Nouvelles

By: Jen Judson WASHINGTON — The U.S. Army is freeing up another $10 billion to apply to its top priorities in its next five-year budget plan, according to the service's undersecretary. “We are about to slap the table on the [program objective memorandum] here by no later than the middle of June,” Ryan McCarthy told a group of reporters during a May 29 media roundtable in his office. As part of a rigorous review of programs and spending, the Army set out to find $10 billion within the budget that could be reallocated toward priorities in its fiscal 2021-2025 program objective memorandum. The money shook out through another round of what the Army informally calls “night court,” a review process that freed up $30 billion in the last budget cycle to get ambitious modernization programs off the ground. The night court process was inspired by similar reviews conducted under Robert Gates when he was defense secretary. Rather than make $182 billion worth of decisions in a few hours, the process is meant to establish a deliberate route to applying funds against priorities, McCarthy said. For example, if a program didn't contribute to a more lethal battlefield or to one of the Army's six modernization priorities, it was canceled or downsized. The Army set up a new four-star command — Army Futures Command — last year to tackle the service's top six modernization priorities: long-range precision fires, the next-generation combat vehicle, future vertical lift, the network, air and missile defense, and soldier lethality. The review was conducted with the Army chief, vice chief, secretary and undersecretary at the head of the table last summer. But this year, to establish a more sustainable model, leadership fell to the major four-star commands and civilian heads in charge of major offices like acquisition and manpower. “Every dollar counts in this environment,” McCarthy said. “And so what we've done is we've realized that it's not a sustainable model to have the entire Army leadership hunkered down every summer, but should delegate to the appropriate echelon of authority.” Only the most difficult decisions will be brought to the top four Army leaders, he added. When it comes to finding another $10 billion across the five-year planning period to apply to priorities, McCarthy said, “we are in very good shape there.” The Army is also working to shift spending so that 50 percent is applied to new programs and 50 percent to legacy systems in the FY24-FY25 time frame. In FY17, the Army was applying 80 percent to legacy programs and 20 percent to bringing on new capabilities. https://www.defensenews.com/land/2019/05/31/army-freeing-up-another-10-billion-for-priorities/

DAVID PUGLIESE, OTTAWA CITIZEN The Tactical Armoured Patrol Vehicle project is close to wrapping up, with full operational capability of the equipment set for the end of this year, according to an update from the Canadian Forces and the Department of National Defence. All 500 vehicles have been accepted by Canada and sent to various bases across the country. CFB Gagetown has 127 TAPVs, CFB Valcartier has 129, CFB Montreal, 25, CFB Borden, 2, CFB Shilo 42, CFB Edmonton, 63, and CFB Petawawa, 112, according to the update. Initial operational capability was achieved in late August, 2017, although some TAPVs were used months before that during the flood relief mission in Quebec, the update pointed out. Since April 2014, there have been 10 incidents when Tactical Armoured Patrol Vehicles have tipped on to their sides, six where they have rolled over completely, and four where they have caught fire. Pat Finn, the assistant deputy minister in charge of procurement at the Department of National Defence, told Postmedia earlier this year there have been no serious injuries as a result of the incidents. The Conservative government announced the TAPV contract in 2012 as part of its re-equipping of the Canadian Army. Canada bought 500 TAPVs from Textron, a U.S.-based defence firm, at a cost of $603 million. The TAPV is a wheeled combat vehicle that will conduct reconnaissance and surveillance, security, command and control, and armoured transport of personnel and equipment. “Upon review of the major TAPV incidents, it has been identified that the most common contributing factors of these incidents tends to be human error due to limited familiarity time operating the vehicles,” the army noted in an emailed statement to Postmedia. The army pointed out that investigations into the incidents did not reveal any design or mechanical faults. The TAPV project will cost taxpayers a total of $1.2 billion, which not only includes the vehicles but also includes the building of infrastructure to house them, as well as the purchase of ammunition and service support for the equipment. There have been a variety of issues related to the fires. See this article here for further details: https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/tactical-armoured-patrol-vehicle-project-expects-to-wrap-up-by-end-of-the-year

Les projets d'approvisionnement liés à la défense favorisent le perfectionnement des compétences des Canadiens Le 29 mai 2019 – Ottawa (Ontario) Tous les ans, les achats de la Défense et les grands achats de la Garde côtière canadienne effectués par le gouvernement du Canada génèrent des milliards de dollars de travaux pour les entreprises canadiennes et appuient des milliers d'emplois au pays. Dans l'avenir, ils favoriseront également le développement d'une main-d'œuvre hautement qualifiée et diversifiée. C'est le point de vue qu'a fait valoir aujourd'hui le ministre de l'Innovation, des Sciences et du Développement économique, l'honorable Navdeep Bains, lors de son passage à CANSEC, le plus important salon commercial des industries de la défense et de la sécurité au Canada. À cette occasion, le ministre Bains a participé au lancement du Prix pour le leadership dans l'industrie canadienne, mis sur pied conjointement par trois entreprises : L3 Technologies, Thales Canada et CAE Inc. Dix étudiantes ayant fait preuve de leadership et d'un bon rendement scolaire obtiendront ainsi un stage de travail ou stage coopératif rémunéré. Ces étudiantes collaboreront à des projets innovateurs qui consolideront leur apprentissage, tout en profitant de mentorat dans les disciplines des sciences, de la technologie, de l'ingénierie et des mathématiques. Les entreprises ont établi ce programme dans le cadre de la Politique des retombées industrielles et technologiques (RIT), selon laquelle les entreprises qui remportent des contrats d'approvisionnement de la défense doivent investir un montant équivalent à la valeur du contrat dans l'économie canadienne. Le ministre Bains a annoncé des changements à la Politique des RIT qui favoriseront l'acquisition de compétences par les travailleurs. En effet, les entrepreneurs principaux obtiendront des points supplémentaires lors de l'évaluation de leur soumission si cette dernière prévoit des investissements dans le développement des compétences et la formation des Autochtones au Canada. Un nouvel élément de cybercertification sera aussi mis en place afin d'offrir aux petites et moyennes entreprises canadiennes un meilleur accès aux possibilités d'affaires associées aux projets d'approvisionnement liés à la défense. Il s'agit là d'une façon pour le gouvernement de concrétiser son engagement à établir et à promouvoir une norme nationale de cyberprotection pour les entreprises canadiennes. Cette nouvelle mesure fait écho à la nouvelle Charte canadienne du numérique, dont l'un des 10 principes énonce que les Canadiens devraient pouvoir se fier à l'intégrité, à l'authenticité et à la sécurité des services qu'ils utilisent, et se sentir en sécurité en ligne. Citations « L'économie mondiale est hautement concurrentielle, et le Canada doit mettre tous ses talents à contribution pour tirer son épingle du jeu. Gr'ce à la Politique des RIT, le gouvernement soutient le développement d'une main-d'œuvre qualifiée et inclusive. Le Prix pour le leadership dans l'industrie canadienne est un excellent exemple de la façon dont nos politiques peuvent favoriser des investissements qui aident les femmes à se tailler une place en sciences, en technologie, en ingénierie ou en mathématiques. Les améliorations à la politique annoncées aujourd'hui faciliteront également de nouveaux investissements dans le perfectionnement des compétences et la formation pour les Autochtones. De leur côté, les petites et moyennes entreprises auront plus facilement accès à un programme de cybercertification qui leur donnera un avantage concurrentiel de plus dans une industrie axée sur l'innovation. » – Le ministre de l'Innovation, des Sciences et du Développement économique, l'honorable Navdeep Bains Faits en bref La Politique des RIT incite les entreprises à établir ou à accroître leur présence au Canada, à renforcer les chaînes d'approvisionnement canadiennes, ainsi qu'à développer des capacités industrielles canadiennes dans des sphères comme l'innovation, la recherche-développement, le développement des sources d'approvisionnement et les exportations. L'un des éléments de la Politique des RIT est la proposition de valeur, en vertu de laquelle les soumissionnaires qui souhaitent obtenir des contrats liés à la défense mettent de l'avant des engagements qui leur permettront de satisfaire aux obligations de RIT. En janvier 2019, l'ensemble du portefeuille des obligations de RIT comptait 161 projets d'une valeur de près de 47 milliards de dollars, dont 36,1 milliards de dollars pour des activités commerciales déjà terminées, 7,1 milliards de dollars pour des activités en cours, et 3,7 milliards de dollars en occasions de travaux futurs non encore déterminés. L'industrie canadienne de la défense compte plus de 660 entreprises, dont les ventes dépassent les 10 milliards de dollars et qui soutiennent près de 60 000 emplois au pays. Cette industrie offre des emplois de calibre supérieur à des travailleurs hautement qualifiés. https://www.canada.ca/fr/innovation-sciences-developpement-economique/nouvelles/2019/05/soutenir-lemploi-et-lacquisition-de-competences-grace-aux-acquisitions-en-matiere-de-defense.html

Bruno Alomar Se profile désormais la création d'un Fonds européen de défense de 13 milliards d'euros en capacité initiale, pour lequel le Parlement européen s'est solennellement prononcé en avril, et qui devrait être confirmé lors de l'adoption des prochaines perspectives financières 2021-2027 Parent pauvre de la construction européenne depuis l'échec de la Communauté européenne de défense (CED) en 1954, le projet d'Europe de la défense a connu, au moins dans les intentions, une accélération spectaculaire au cours des deux dernières années. Se est ainsi succédé la création en décembre 2017 d'une Coopération structurée permanente (CSP) regroupant 25 Etats, puis l'Initiative européenne d'intervention (IEI) en juin 2018. Se profile désormais la création d'un Fonds européen de défense de 13 milliards d'euros en capacité initiale (devant monter in fine à 20 milliards), pour lequel le Parlement européen s'est solennellement prononcé en avril, et qui devrait être confirmé lors de l'adoption des prochaines perspectives financières 2021-2027. La prochaine Commission européenne, pourrait même voir la création d'un poste de Commissaire européen à la défense, avec une Direction générale dédiée. Disons-le tout net : il n'est que temps que les Européens, adeptes du « doux commerce » et du soft power, prennent conscience de la dangerosité du monde et de leur fragilité dans le domaine militaire ! Il n'est que temps de dissiper l'illusion qui a prévalu depuis 1989, celle des « dividendes de la paix », d'un monde irénique structuré autour des seules questions économiques. Pourtant, alors que dans les mots l'idée d'une Europe de la défense progresse, d'autres mots indiquent d'autres réalités. Ainsi, les Sous-secrétaires d'Etat américains à la défense, Ellen Lord, et au département d'Etat, Andrea Thompson, ont adressé une lettre au Haut Représentant de l'Union européenne, Mme Mogherini, en date du 1er mai, qui ne déguise par le mépris dans lequel l'Amérique tient les timides efforts européens en la matière. Dans cette lettre, les autorités américaines rappellent que si la création d'un Fonds européen de défense est de la responsabilité des Européens, il va de soi que ceci ne saurait compromettre les relations qui existent au sein de l'OTAN. Le tropisme américain, Donald Trump n'ayant rien inventé si ce n'est une brutalité inédite sur la forme, demeure : « Européens, si vous voulez être protégés, achetez américain ; sinon gare ! » Sécurité. Rien de nouveau dira-t-on : hormis le Royaume-Uni et la France, puissances nucléaires indépendantes, tous les autres pays européens sont redevables à l'Amérique pour leur sécurité. C'est bien la raison pour laquelle ces Etats se fournissent avec zèle en matériel militaire américain, le dernier exemple en date étant le choix du F 35 par la très europhile Belgique, destinés d'ailleurs à remplacer les F-16 américains. C'est, plus encore, l'une des raisons essentielles pour lesquelles, face à une Russie redevenue menaçante, les pays scandinaves et baltes, avec le soutien silencieux de Berlin, mettent systématiquement en échec toute perspective d'approfondissement de l'Union européenne ou d'inflexion commerciale qui pourrait indisposer Washington. Dans un tel contexte, qu'il soit tout de même permis de formuler quelques orientations pour le futur Fonds européen de défense. Car, au-delà des intentions, c'est dans le détail que son succès au service de la sécurité des européens se jouera. Premièrement, la préférence européenne. N'en déplaise à nos alliés américains, si les européens, auxquels Washington reproche tant – à juste titre – de consacrer insuffisamment de ressources à leur défense, mobilisent des fonds, ceux-ci doivent à l'évidence être entièrement consacrés à la fortification d'une base industrielle et technologique de défense (BITD) européenne, d'autant plus fragile qu'elle est sous pression des industriels américains. Le programme F-35 a d'ailleurs réussi son pari industriel : assécher la R&D des entreprises européennes partenaires comme BAE ou Leonardo. C'est non seulement une question de crédibilité militaire pour les Européens. C'est aussi, si l'on tient compte du rôle essentiel des industries de défense en matière d'innovation au service de toute l'économie, une condition essentielle de restauration de leur base industrielle et de renforcement de leur compétitivité, le tout sur fond de rachat forcené de certains acteurs par leurs concurrents américains (Santa Barbara, Mowag, etc.). Deuxièmement, au moment où les conditions exactes de création et de gestion du Fonds sont débattues, il est essentiel, dans l'intérêt des Européens, de fixer clairement les responsabilités de chacun. Aux instances européennes de centraliser les projets, d'en évaluer l'intérêt, et d'apporter une « plus-value » communautaire. Ensuite, ce sont les Etats, et les Etats seuls, qui doivent gérer les fonds dégagés en coopération avec industriels. Mais rien ne serait pire que les institutions européennes, dont l'ADN est le libre marché et la compétence en matière de défense inexistante, prétendent se substituer au choix et à la décision finale des Etats membres, seuls comptables de leur souveraineté devant leur peuple. Bruno Alomar, auditeur de la 68 em session « politique de défense » de l'iHEDN et de la 25 em promotion de l'Ecole de Guerre. https://www.lopinion.fr/edition/international/fonds-europeen-defense-quelles-perspectives-tribune-libre-bruno-alomar-188032

By: Jen Judson WASHINGTON — The U.S. Army has picked five companies to come up with designs to integrate a new weapon system on the Stryker combat vehicle, according to a May 23 announcement. The service awarded design integration study contracts — no more than $150,000 each — for the Stryker Medium Caliber Weapons System (MCWS) lethality program to General Dynamics Land Systems, Kollsman Inc., Leonardo DRS, Raytheon and Pratt & Miller Engineering and Fabrication Inc. Defense News first reported earlier this month that the Army had decided, after upgunning some of its Stryker vehicles with a 30mm cannon, that it would proceed to outfit at least three of its six brigades of Double V-Hull A1 Stryker Infantry Carrier Vehicles with the more powerful guns and would hold a competition to acquire that weapon system. The companies have to come up with integration designs using a government-furnished XM813 gun on a government furnished Stryker DVH A1 hull. The MCWS program will be carried out in two phases that will culminate in equipping a Stryker DVH A1 brigade in fiscal year 2022, according to the Army. As part of the design study, competitors will build a production-representative vehicle, the statement notes. The second phase will be a full-and-open competition to award a production contract. Draft requests for proposals will be released to industry beginning in the fall of 2019. Entries into the second phase should include a production-representative bid sample, the Army states. The two phases, as well as fielding, are expected to take 39 months total — a short timeline. While the Army plans to initially procure three brigade sets of the Stryker MCWS DVH A1 — a total of 83 vehicles per brigade — the service could procure systems for additional brigades at future decision points, according to the statement. The decision to outfit Strykers with a 30mm cannon was based on lessons learned during the 2nd Cavalry Regiment in Europe's evaluation of the Stryker Infantry Combat Vehicle Dragoon, built rapidly to fill an urgent operational need in that theater. The Army received $300 million to develop and field a Stryker with a 30mm cannon — supplying eight prototypes to the Germany-based regiment. The funding also covered upgrades to 83 production vehicles plus spares. The service spent 18 months to put together its Stryker Dragoon using off-the-shelf solutions such as the remote turret from Kongsberg in Norway and the 30mm cannon from Orbital ATK, now owned by Northrop Grumman. The vehicles were shipped off to Europe for a year-long evaluation. Feedback from the evaluation suggested some improvements are needed, particularly related to situational awareness. The turret for the cannon takes up a lot of roof and hatch space and also affects how equipment is stowed, for instance. https://www.defensenews.com/land/2019/05/23/us-army-picks-5-companies-to-study-stryker-weapon-system-integration/

AIR FORCE Raytheon Co., Tucson, Arizona, has been awarded a $355,493,640 firm-fixed-price, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for AGM-88B High Speed Anti-Radiation Missiles (HARM)/Replacement Exchange In-Kind (REIK) for HARM Control Section Modification (HCSM). This contract provides for the refurbishment of live AGM-88Bs and conversion of AGM-88B into Captive Air Training Missiles (CATM-88B) for approved Foreign Military Sales countries. Work will be performed in Tuscon, Arizona, and is expected to be complete by 2027. This contract involves foreign military sales to Qatar, Taiwan, and Bahrain. Additional countries may be added after contract award. This award is the result of a sole-source acquisition. Fiscal 2019 Foreign Military Sales funds in the amount of $76,074,315 is being obligated on a delivery order at the time of award. The Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, Warner Robins, Georgia, is the contracting activity (FA8520-19-D-0002). Pride Industries, Roseville, California, has been awarded a $19,902,284 firm-fixed-price modification to previously awarded contract FA4484-17-D-0005 for base operations services. This modification provides for the exercise of the second option period out of four. Work will be performed at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey, and is expected to be complete by May 31, 2020. This modification brings the total cumulative face value of the contract to $59,441,361, and fiscal 2019 operations and maintenance funds are being obligated on individual task orders. The 87th Contracting Squadron, Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey, is the contracting activity. Lockheed Martin Corp., Lockheed Martin Aeronautics, Fort Worth, Texas, has been awarded a $16,387,853 cost-plus-fixed-fee modification (P00061) to previously awarded contract FA8615-12-C-6016 for a variety of support to the Taiwan F-16 Peace Phoenix Rising program. This contract modification provides for miscellaneous support work identified during performance of the in-country aircraft modification program, use and maintenance of product support aircraft, and additional support necessary for the successful completion of modification installs. Work will be performed in Fort Worth, Texas; and Taiwan, and is expected to be complete by May 31, 2023. This modification involves 100 percent foreign military sales to Taiwan, and Foreign Military Sales funds in the full amount are being obligated at the time of award. Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, is the contracting activity. Central Coast Water Authority, Buellton, California, has been awarded a $7,929,102 delivery order (FA4610-19-FA038) under previously awarded contract F04684-92-D-0013 for California State Water. This delivery order provides Vandenberg Air Force Base and outlying municipalities with potable water. Work will be performed at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, and is expected to be complete by 2032. This delivery order brings the total cumulate face value of the contract to $157,514,286. Fiscal 2019 operations and maintenance funds in the full amount are being obligated at the time of award. The 30th Contracting Squadron, Vandenberg AFB, California, is the contracting activity. NAVY BAE Systems Technology Solutions and Services Inc., Rockville, Maryland, is awarded an $84,341,597 indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for up to 898,320 man-hours of direct labor engineering services. These services are in support of the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division's Special Communications Mission Solutions Division to perform projects for Special Operations Forces command, control, communications, computers, combat systems, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance systems. Services include requirements definition, solution definition, integration, installation verification and validation, and operation and sustainment. Work will be performed in California, Maryland (70 percent); St. Inigoes, Maryland (13 percent); Fayetteville, North Carolina (6 percent); Little Creek, Virginia (5 percent); Coronado, California (4 percent); and Tampa, Florida (2 percent), and is expected to be completed in May 2024. No funds are being obligated at time of award; funds will be obligated on individual orders as they are issued. This contract was competitively procured via an electronic request for proposals; three offers were received. The Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, Patuxent River, Maryland, is the contracting activity (N00421-19-D-0055). Deloitte Consulting LLP, Arlington, Virginia, is awarded $63,701,527 for a cost-plus-fixed-fee, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract with firm-fixed-price ordering provisions for business and technology management support services required to facilitate the overall Transformation Management Support Services effort in support of the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations (Manpower, Personnel, Training and Education (MPTE), OPNAV N1, and subordinate commands. The contract is a five-year base ordering period with no options. All work will be performed in Arlington, Virginia. The ordering period is expected to be completed by May 2024. Fiscal 2019 operations and maintenance funds (Navy) in the amount of $10,000 will be obligated to fund the contract's minimum amount, and funds will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was competitively procured with the solicitation posted to the Federal Business Opportunities website, with four offers received. Naval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center Norfolk, Contracting Department, Philadelphia Office, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, is the contracting activity (N00189-19-D-Z023). C.E.R. Inc.,* Baltimore, Maryland (N40080-18-D-0016); EGI HSU JV LLC,* Gaithersburg, Maryland (N40080-18-D-0017); G-W Management Services LLC,* Rockville, Maryland (N40080-18-D-0018); Huang-Gaghan JV Inc.,* Alexandria, Virginia (N40080-18-D-0019); Kunj Construction Corp.,* Mechanicsville, Virginia (N40080-18-D-0020); Ocean Construction Services Inc.,* Virginia Beach, Virginia (N40080-18-D-0021), are awarded Option One under a previously awarded, firm-fixed-price, multiple award construction contract for construction projects located primarily within the Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) Washington, District of Columbia, area of operations (AO). The combined total value of all six contractors is $49,500,000. After award of this option, the total cumulative contract value will be $99,000,000. Work will be performed at various administrative facilities within the NAVFAC Washington, District of Columbia AO, including but not limited to, Maryland; Washington, District of Columbia; and Virginia, and is expected to be completed May 29, 2020. No funds will be obligated at time of award; funds will be obligated on individual task orders as they are issued. Task orders will be primarily funded by military construction (Navy); operations and maintenance (Navy and Marine Corps); and Navy working capital funds. NAVFAC Washington, Washington, District of Columbia, is the contracting activity. Thoma-Sea Marine Constructors LLC,* Lockport, Louisiana, is awarded an $11,638,510 firm-fixed-price contract for the purchase and conversion of one existing offshore supply vessel into an Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center range support vessel (ARSV). The ARSV will perform ocean engineering and range support in the launch, recovery and deep ocean mooring installation and maintenance of remote operated vehicles, unmanned underwater vehicles, and autonomous underwater vehicles. The ARSV will be operated for multiple days at sea, which will permit researchers onboard to remain on station at remote locations for multiple days to collect data, deploy scientific equipment, and perform scientific calculations. Work will be performed in Lockport, Louisiana, and is expected to be completed by January 2020. Fiscal 2019 research, development, test and evaluation (Navy) funding in the amount of $11,638,510 will be obligated at time of award and will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was competitively procured via the Federal Business Opportunities website, with one offer received. The Naval Sea Systems Command, Washington, District of Columbia, is the contracting activity (N00024-19-C-2205). Diversified Maintenance Systems Inc.,* Sandy, Utah, is awarded a maximum amount $10,000,000 indefinite-delivery/indefinite quantity contract for other specialty trade contractors construction alterations, renovations, and repair projects at Naval Air Facility El Centro. Projects will be primarily design-bid-build (fully designed) task orders or task order with minimal design effort (e.g. shop drawings). Projects may include, but are not limited to, alterations, repairs, and construction of electrical, mechanical, painting, engineering/design, paving (asphaltic and concrete), flooring (tile work/carpeting), roofing, structural repair, fencing, HVAC, and fire suppression/protection system installation projects. Work will be performed in El Centro, California. The term of the contract is not to exceed 60 months with an expected completion date of May 2024. Fiscal 2019 operations and maintenance (Navy) contract funds in the amount of $5,000 are obligated on this award and will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. Future task orders will be primarily funded by operations and maintenance (Navy). This contract was competitively procured via the Navy Electronic Commerce Online website, with seven proposals received. The Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, San Diego, California, is the contracting activity (N62473-19-D-2623). Detyens Shipyards Inc., North Charleston, South Carolina, is awarded an $8,929,671 firm-fixed-price contract for a 50-calendar day shipyard availability for the mid-term availability of USNS Lenthall (T-AO 189). Work will include general services, diesel fuel marine contaminated tank bottom replacement, vent plenum steel replacement and preservation, main engine intercooler cleaning, switchboard and motor control center cleaning, recondition air conditioning motors, cable bulkhead collar magna rock replacement, diesel fuel marine cargo piping repairs, armory air conditioning replacement, constant tension winch No. 2, No. 3 and No. 4 overhaul, fire and aqueous film forming foam piping replacement, fire damper inspection and repairs, steel replacement and recoating. The contract includes options which, if exercised, would bring the total contract value to $9,004,671. Funds will be obligated on May 23, 2019. Work will be performed in Charleston, South Carolina, and is expected to begin on July 15, 2019, and be completed by Sept. 2, 2019. Fiscal 2019 operations and maintenance (Navy) contract funds in the amount of $8,929,671, are obligated at the time of award. Funds will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was competitively procured with proposals solicited via the Federal Business Opportunities website, with three offers received. The Navy's Military Sealift Command, Norfolk, Virginia, is the contracting activity (N3220519C4014). BAE Systems Land and Armaments L.P., Minneapolis, Minnesota, is awarded an $8,924,330 cost-plus-fixed-fee contract for engineering services and waterfront services in support of the MK 45gun mount providing engineering, technical, logistics services and technical data to support the MK 45 5” Gun system design, development, fabrication, production, operation and integration. This contract includes options which, if exercised, would bring the cumulative value of this contract to $35,058,494. Work will be performed in Navy fleet concentration areas (various locations) (70 percent); Minneapolis, Minnesota (15 percent); and Louisville, Kentucky (15 percent), and is expected to be completed by May 2020. If all options are exercised, work will continue through September 2022. Fiscal 2019 operations and maintenance (Navy); fiscal 2019 weapons procurement (Navy); and fiscal 2013 and 2014 shipbuilding and conversion (Navy) funding in the amount of $3,178,794 will be obligated at time of award and will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was not competitively procured, in accordance with 10 U.S. Code 2304(c)(1), only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements. The Naval Sea Systems Command, Washington, District of Columbia, is the contracting activity (N00024-19-C-5301). ARMY Aura Technologies LLC,* Raleigh, North Carolina, was awarded a $49,997,256 hybrid (cost-plus-fixed-fee and firm-fixed-price) contract for Small Business Innovation Research in support of advanced manufacturing environments. One bid was solicited with one bid received. Work locations and funding will be determined with each order, with an estimated completion date of May 22, 2024. U.S. Army Contracting Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, is the contracting activity (W911NF-19-D-0004). B.L. Harbert International LLC, Birmingham, Alabama, was awarded an $18,481,835 firm-fixed-price contract for to construct Secure Compartmental Information Facility at Camp Humphreys, Republic of Korea. Bids were solicited via the internet with six received. Work will be performed in Pyongtaek, Republic of Korea, with an estimated completion date of July 30, 2021. Fiscal 2018 host nation (Korea) funds in the amount of $18,481,835 were obligated at the time of the award. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Camp Humphreys, Republic of Korea, is the contracting activity (W912UM-19-C-0002). Tribalco LLC, Bethesda, Maryland, was awarded a $14,425,217 firm-fixed-price Foreign Military Sales (Iraq) contract for computer hardware, services and MEMEX software. One bid was solicited with one bid received. Work will be performed in Bethesda, Maryland, with an estimated completion date of May 22, 2020. Fiscal 2019 Foreign Military Sales funds in the amount of $14,425,217 were obligated at the time of the award. U.S. Army Contracting Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, is the contracting activity (W91CRB-19-C-5024). IDSC Holdings LLC, Snap-On Industrial, a division of IDSC Holdings LLC, Kenosha, Wisconsin, was awarded an $11,434,752 firm-fixed-price contract for the General Mechanic's Tool Kit. Bids were solicited via the internet with three received. Work will be performed in Kenosha, Wisconsin, with an estimated completion date of Nov. 30, 2019. Fiscal 2019 Army working capital funds in the amount of $11,434,752 were obligated at the time of the award. U.S. Army Contracting Command, Warren, Michigan, is the contracting activity (W56HZV-18-D-0079). Howard W. Pence Inc.,* Elizabethtown, Kentucky, was awarded an $8,825,159 firm-fixed-price contract for the construction of a Special Operations Forces air-and-ground integration urban live fire range. Bids were solicited via the internet with two received. Work will be performed in Fort Campbell, Kentucky, with an estimated completion date of Nov. 18, 2020. Fiscal 2019 military construction funds in the amount of $8,825,159 were obligated at the time of the award. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Louisville, Kentucky, is the contracting activity (W91Q2R-19-C-0017). DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY General Dynamics, Williston, Vermont, has been awarded a maximum $42,443,476 firm-fixed-price contract for gun barrels. This was a sole-source acquisition using justification 10 U.S. Code 2304 (c)(1), as stated in Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.302-1. This is a three-year contract with no option periods. Locations of performance are Vermont and Maine, with a May 22, 2022, performance completion date. Using military services are Air Force and Army. Type of appropriation is fiscal 2019 through 2022 defense working capital funds. The contracting activity is the Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime, Columbus, Ohio (SPE7LX-19-D-0133). Real-Time Laboratories LLC, Boca Raton, Florida, has been awarded a maximum $10,776,057 firm-fixed-price, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for linear direct valves. This was a sole-source acquisition using justification 10 U.S. Code 2304(c)(1), as stated in Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.302-1. This a five-year contract with no option periods. Location of performance is Florida, with a May 29, 2024, performance completion date. Using military service is Army. Type of appropriation is fiscal 2019 through 2024 Army working capital funds. The contracting activity is the Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime, Warren, Michigan (SPRDL1-19-D-0074). *Small business https://dod.defense.gov/News/Contracts/Contract-View/Article/1856970/source/GovDelivery/

Char, avion de combat du futur: Paris et Berlin travaillent sur d'ambitieux projets industriels communs dans la défense, mais les rapports restent teintés de méfiance et marqués par des divergences de vue autour de la question des exportations d'armement. Face au Brexit, au rel'chement des liens transatlantiques sous l'ère Trump, et malgré une mauvaise passe dans la relation franco-allemande, Emmanuel Macron a fait de l'Europe de la défense l'un de ses grands chevaux de bataille, qui figure en bonne place dans le programme des candidats de son camp aux élections européennes de dimanche. Réunis par un même besoin de renouveler leurs capacités militaires à horizon 2035-2040, Français et Allemands ont convenu à l'été 2017 de développer main dans la main deux programmes d'équipements majeurs: le système de combat aérien du futur (SCAF), sous leadership du français Dassault, pour remplacer les Rafale et les Typhoon, et le char de combat du futur ayant vocation à remplacer les Leclerc et les Lepoard, sous leadership allemand. Concernant le SCAF, dont le premier contrat d'architecture a été notifié à Dassault et Airbus en janvier, Paris et Berlin comptent annoncer "cet été" le lancement des études de recherche et développement destinées à jeter les bases des démonstrateurs, pour un montant de 150 millions d'euros sur deux ans, selon des sources concordantes. - pas d'annonce au Bourget? - Il n'est toutefois pas certain que l'annonce soit faite mi-juin au salon aéronautique du Bourget comme initialement prévu, admet Paris. Objectif: développer un démonstrateur d'ici 2026 -- pour un coût estimé entre 2 et 3 milliards d'euros -- avant une entrée en service en 2040 de ce système associant avion de combat, drones, futurs missiles de croisière et drones évoluant en essaim. Pour le char, "les industriels préparent une offre pour l'étude d'architecture à horizon de l'été", indique-t-on de source gouvernementale française. Pour continuer à avancer, reste à venir à bout des inquiétudes et grincements de dents de part et d'autre du Rhin. Parmi les motifs de friction figure le partage des compétences de pointe censées alimenter ces grands programmes communs d'armement. En France, où le groupe Dassault a conduit seul le programme-phare du Rafale, certains ne cachent pas leur méfiance. "Il ne faudrait pas que les Allemands profitent de cette coopération pour chiper notre savoir-faire stratégique", glisse-t-on de source proche du dossier. En Allemagne, des parlementaires de la coalition au pouvoir reprochent au gouvernement d'Angela Merkel d'avoir mal négocié la répartition industrielle du projet SCAF et critiquent les exigences françaises en matière de propriété intellectuelle, affirme jeudi le quotidien allemand Die Welt. "Au regard des enjeux industriels et économiques du projet, j'attends de Mme Merkel et de Mme von der Leyen (ministre allemande de la Défense) qu'elles prennent en main ce dossier et en fassent une priorité, comme l'a fait le président Macron", déclare au journal le responsable défense du parti social-démocrate allemand (SPD), Thomas Hitschler. - ventes d'armes aux Saoudiens - "Des débats sur le partage des technologies, les questions de propriété intellectuelle peuvent exister mais ils sont en train de se résoudre. C'est normal que ça tiraille, derrière il y a des enjeux financiers et de compétences industrielles", relativise-t-on à Paris, où l'on préfère vanter "la rapidité" avec laquelle un projet de cette ampleur s'est mis en route. Autre obstacle à franchir: la question des conditions d'exportation des armements, objet de frictions ouvertes entre Paris et Berlin. Depuis l'assassinat fin 2018 du journaliste saoudien Jamal Khashoggi à Istanbul, le gouvernement allemand a décidé de geler les exports d?armes à destination de l'Arabie Saoudite, client controversé de l'industrie française de défense. Une décision vertement critiquée par Emmanuel Macron, puis par l'ambassadrice de France en Allemagne, qui a déploré fin mars "la politisation croissante du débat allemand sur les exportations d'armements", susceptible selon elle de "faire peser un risque sur la coopération de défense européenne". "On ne peut pas se mettre d'accord sur des projets d'une telle envergure sans trouver une position commune sur les conditions d'exportation", renchérit un haut responsable français. Or le sujet est politiquement ultra-sensible en Allemagne. "L'opinion publique allemande est vent debout contre les exports d'armement. Quel est l'homme politique allemand qui se risquera à aller contre ça?", souligne Gaëlle Winter, chercheuse associée à la Fondation pour la recherche stratégique (FRS). Paris accuse en outre Berlin de pratiquer un double jeu en feignant d'ignorer la livraison d'armement à Ryad par l'industriel allemand Rheinmetall, via ses filiales à l'étranger. "J'entends dans certaines capitales les protestations de vertus offusquées lorsqu'il s'agit d'exportations françaises, mais j'observe que les mêmes responsables ignorent volontiers ce que font les filiales ou les joint ventures de leurs champions nationaux de l'armement", s'est récemment agacée la ministre française des Armées Florence Parly. Sollicité par l'AFP, le ministère allemand de la Défense n'a pas donné suite. https://www.courrierinternational.com/depeche/europe-de-la-defense-entre-paris-et-berlin-des-ambitions-et-de-la-mefiance.afp.com.20190523.doc.1gt4y7.xml

Par Frédéric Dubois Dans les airs, sur terre ou sur mer, l'industrie européenne de la Défense vit actuellement de profondes transformations. Français, Italiens, Allemands, Britanniques, Espagnols... tous ces acteurs cherchent de nouvelles alliances dans un secteur de plus en plus concurrentiel. Mariages de raison ou de passion, les rapprochements entre grands groupes industriels sont devenus, depuis quinze ans, un passage obligé pour les entreprises qui veulent survivre sur ce marché hyper concurrentiel. Et les cas sont nombreux. Dans les airs, l'exemple le plus connu est certainement l'Eurofighter Typhoon, avion de combat bi-réacteur mis en service en 2004 par l'entreprise européenne Eurofighter GmbH. Aux manettes, quatre pays : la Grande-Bretagne, l'Allemagne, l'Espagne et l'Italie. Ce projet d'avion européen était sur la table depuis les années 70. Finalement, ces quatre pays ont uni leurs savoir-faire, laissant les Français sur la touche, car ces derniers préféraient faire cavalier seul avec le Rafale de Dassault. Entre les deux camps, les résultats commerciaux sont sans appel. En quinze ans, Eurofighter GmbH a vendu 538 exemplaires de son chasseur ; en quelques années de plus, Dassault a écoulé – seulement – 176 avions, en dépit d'une carrière opérationnelle nettement plus prestigieuse. Cette situation a poussé les Européens à revoir leur copie. En 2014, Français et Britanniques se mettent à plancher sur un projet – baptisé FCAS pour Future Combat Air System – afin de produire un avion de 6e génération. Trois ans plus tard, ils sont rejoints par les Allemands. Finalement, en 2018, Dassault annonce officiellement son partenariat avec Airbus Defence and Space dans le cadre du projet FCAS : l'Europe va ainsi se doter d'un nouveau système de défense aérienne avec l'héritier du Rafale, de l'Eurofighter Typhoon européen et de l'Hornet espagnol. Son nom (provisoire) : New Generation Fighter. Dans les airs, les Européens ont enfin compris qu'il valait mieux parler une seule et même langue face au Sukhoi Su-57 russe, et autres F-35 américain ou J-20 chinois. Des concurrents aux dents longues Quel que soit le secteur en Europe, les industries nationales jouent aujourd'hui leur survie face à des concurrents aux moyens nettement plus importants qu'auparavant, gr'ce à des marchés domestiques en forte dynamique et au soutien politique et financier d'états puissants. Après les airs, prenons la direction des océans. Le secteur de l'industrie navale a pris quelques longueurs de retard. En 2017, le quotidien français Le Mondetitrait : « Naval : le serpent de mer de la consolidation européenne ». Dans ce secteur comme dans les autres, le principe de « consolidation » est sur toutes les lèvres, la concurrence étant très sévère entre pays exportateurs. Deux géants se dressent face aux Européens : les Russes et surtout les Chinois, devenus la première puissance mondiale en la matière. En seulement dix ans. « Les groupes européens se sont trop souvent livré une guerre fratricide sur les appels d'offres internationaux, remarque Bertrand Gueynard, directeur du pôle Défense et sécurité du cabinet de conseil en stratégie CEIS dans les colonnes du Monde. Ils sont confrontés à la montée en puissance des arsenaux chinois, russes et même aujourd'hui japonais. Pour rester dans la classe mondiale, les rapprochements sont indispensables. Dans cette industrie, la taille est déterminante car elle permet d'offrir une large gamme de produits et de financer les investissements en recherche et développement nécessaires pour maintenir une avance technologique. Il faut toujours avoir un coup d'avance. » Motivées par le risque de disparition de certaines industries (les exemples sont nombreux hors défense), certaines entreprises européennes de l'industrie navale ont décidé de réagir avant qu'il ne soit trop tard. Des fleurons high-tech en Europe C'est le cas du Français Naval Group et de l'Italien Fincantieri. En 2017, Fincantieri a décidé de se lier à la France à travers deux projets : le rachat des Chantiers de l'Atlantique de Saint-Nazaire (les Sud-Coréens ayant jeté l'éponge) et l'alliance avec son homologue Naval Group. Ces deux entreprises étaient à la fois concurrentes lors d'appels d'offre internationaux et partenaires sur différents projets depuis trente ans, comme avec les frégates Horizon, un projet impulsé en 1991 par Hervé Guillou... devenu PDG de l'entreprise française en 2014. Lors de l'annonce de son alliance avec le PDG de Fincantieri Giuseppe Bono, Guillou a expliqué leur vision commune : « C'est une double ambition – à la fois d'offrir à nos deux pays les meilleures technologies au meilleur prix avec les meilleurs programmes pour garantir la supériorité de nos marines, mais aussi d'être capables d'avoir une présence mondiale suffisante pour assurer notre compétitivité et notre présence sur le marché – qui justifie notre rapprochement. » Cette volonté de la France et de l'Italie part d'un constat sans ambiguïté : l'Europe, et ses divers budgets de défense nationaux, n'a plus les moyens de faire vivre ni de maintenir toutes les compétences de l'ensemble des industriels de la construction navale. Les marchés commencent à opérer une sélection naturelle douloureuse, certains acteurs historiques commençant à connaitre de graves difficultés, notamment en Allemagne, aux Pays-Bas ou encore en Espagne. C'est une course pour la survie qui s'engage désormais. Les Européens ont donc tout intérêt à faire vite, d'autant qu'ils jouissent d'un savoir-faire et de technologies que le reste de la planète leur envie, avec des fleurons high-tech comme Leonardo, Thalès ou Safran. Car si la concurrence est aujourd'hui féroce, les atouts des Européens sont évidents et constituent de réelles opportunités pour les acteurs du Vieux continent. Encore faut-il qu'ils arrêtent de se mettre – trop souvent – des b'tons dans les roues. https://www.econostrum.info/Concentration-industrielle-en-Europe-une-necessite-autant-qu-une-opportunite-pour-la-Defense_a25636.html

NAVY Raytheon Co., Fullerton, California, is awarded a $234,640,402 fixed-price-incentive, firm-target contract for the low-rate initial production of 23 Joint Precision Approach and Landing Systems. In addition, this contract procures three production and installation engineering development model unit upgrade kits, engineering change proposals, and associated data. Work will be performed in Fullerton, California (68 percent); Cedar Rapids, Iowa (22 percent); and Indianapolis, Indiana (10 percent), and is expected to be completed in August 2023. Fiscal 2019 other procurement (Navy); and fiscal 2019 shipbuilding and conversion (Navy) funds in the amount of $49,134,484 will be obligated at time of award, none of which will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was not competitively procured pursuant to Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.302-1. The Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Maryland, is the contracting activity (N00019-19-C-0020). Raytheon Missile Systems, Tucson, Arizona, is awarded a $151,468,431 firm-fixed-price, cost-plus-fixed-fee, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for integrated logistics support and repairs for the sustainment of the AIM-9X Block II and Block II+ missiles. These services are in support of the Navy, Air Force, and the governments of Australia, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Israel, Japan, Korea, Kuwait, Oman, Malaysia, Morocco, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Switzerland, Taiwan, and Turkey under the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) program. Work will be performed in Tucson, Arizona (90.7 percent); Cheshire, Connecticut (7 percent); Andover, Massachusetts (0.7 percent); Burlington, Massachusetts (0.6 percent); Heilbronn, Germany (0.5 percent); and various locations within the continental U.S. (0.5 percent), and is expected to be completed in May 2022. No funds will be obligated at time of award; funds will be obligated on individual task orders as issued. This contract was not competitively procured pursuant to 10 U.S. Code 2304(c)(1). The Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Maryland, is the contracting activity (N00019-19-D-0023). Lockheed Martin Corp., Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co., Fort Worth, Texas, is awarded $11,336,274 for modification P00003 to a previously awarded cost-plus-incentive-fee contract (N00019-19-C-0004). This modification exercises an option for deployment and operation of test aircraft in support of the F-35 Lightning II development, production, and sustainment for the Air Force, Navy, and non-U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) participants. Work will be performed in Lakehurst, New Jersey (70 percent); and Eglin Air Force Base, Florida (30 percent), and is expected to be completed in March 2020. Fiscal 2019 research, development, test and evaluation (Air Force and Navy); and non-U.S. DoD participant funds in the amount of $11,336,274 will be obligated at time of award, none of which will expire at the end of the fiscal year. This option combines purchases for the Air Force ($8,791,728; 78 percent); Navy ($224,464; 2 percent) and non-U.S. DoD participants ($2,320,082; 20 percent). The Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Maryland, is the contracting activity. Raytheon Co., Fullerton, California, is awarded $8,997,334 for modification P00030 to a previously awarded cost-plus-incentive-fee contract (N00019-16-C-0052) to design, prototype, and test a replacement Joint Precision Approach and Landing System Ship Global Positioning System Sensor Unit (SGSU). This resolves obsolescence driven by part shortages in the Digital Integrated Global Positioning System Anti-Jam Receiver, a major subassembly of the SGSU. Work will be performed in Cedar Rapids, Iowa (59.4 percent); Fullerton, California (40.4 percent); and Indianapolis, Indiana (0.2 percent), and is expected to be completed in July 2021. Fiscal 2019 research, development, test and evaluation (Navy) funds in the amount of $8,997,334 will be obligated at time of award, none of which will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. The Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Maryland, is the contracting activity. Computer Systems Center Inc.,* Springfield, Virginia, is awarded a $7,474,901 indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract to perform up to 51,180 hours of concept and requirements development and system engineering services for the F-35 Lightning II Offboard Mission Support Integrated Product Team. Work will be performed in Springfield, Virginia (60 percent); China Lake, California (20 percent); Arlington, Virginia (10 percent); and Fort Worth, Texas (10 percent), and is expected to be completed in May 2024. Fiscal 2019 working capital funds (Navy) in the amount of $205,572 will be obligated at time of award, none of which will expire at the end of the fiscal year. This contract combines purchases for the Navy ($4,858,686; 65 percent); and the Foreign Military Sales customers ($2,616,215; 35 percent). This contract was not competitively procured pursuant to Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.302-1. The Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, China Lake, California, is the contracting activity (N68936-19-D-0035). AIR FORCE Sierra Nevada Corp., Sparks, Nevada, has been awarded a $74,902,132 definitive C-type contract for installation of a Degraded Visual Environment System (DVES), which improves situational awareness to pilots and aircrew operating in DVE conditions by adding new functional capabilities to the HH-60G. This contract provides for the procurement, installation, and integration of the DVES solution on 85 HH-60G helicopter aircraft. Work will be performed in Sparks, Nevada, and is expected to be complete by May 21, 2024. This award is a result of a competitive acquisition resulting in three offers received. Fiscal 2019 other procurement funds in the amount of $19,155,984 are being obligated at the time of award. Air Force Material Command, Robins Air Force Base, Georgia, is the contracting activity (FA8552-19-C-0002). The Boeing Co., St. Louis, Missouri, has been awarded a $40,974,754 firm-fixed-price modification (P00026) to previously awarded contract FA8621-16-C-6397 for F-15C and F-15E Mission Training Center Services contractor-furnished, high-fidelity simulation equipment to provide simulation capability to train pilots and weapons system operators. This modification provides four additional pilot/weapon systems officer crew stations devices and their associated equipment in support of aircrew training requirements. Work will be performed at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, and is expected to be complete by Feb. 15, 2021. This modification brings the total cumulative face value of the contract to $229,428,492. Fiscal 2019 operations and maintenance funds in the full amount are being obligated at the time of award. Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, is the contracting activity. BAE Systems Technology Solutions & Services Inc., Rockville, Maryland, has been awarded a $7,758,301 delivery order (FA2521-19-F0139) against previously awarded contract FA2521-16-D-0010 for serviceable components and subsystems for Instrumentation Tracking Systems (ITS). This delivery order provides for a 5.5 KVDC transmitter power upgrade for AN/FPS-8a5 Phased Array Radar. Work will be performed at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, and is expected to be complete by March 17, 2021. Fiscal 2019 operations and maintenance funds in the full amount are being obligated at the time of award. The 45th Contracting Squadron, Patrick Air Force Base, Florida, is the contracting activity. (Awarded May 16, 2019) ARMY Caelum Research Corp.,* Rockville, Maryland, was awarded a $22,639,066 hybrid (cost-no-fee and firm-fixed-price) contract for data and information management support services. Twenty five bids were solicited with three bids received. Work will be performed in Huntsville, Alabama, with an estimated completion date of Nov. 30, 2024. Fiscal 2019 operations and maintenance, Army funds in the amount of $3,694,966 were obligated at the time of the award. U.S. Army Contracting Command, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, is the contracting activity (W31P4Q-19-F-0324). Sentar Inc.,* Huntsville, Alabama, was awarded a $10,426,896 hybrid (cost-no-fee and firm-fixed-price) contract for cyber security and information management support services. Twenty five bids were solicited with six bids received. Work will be performed in Huntsville, Alabama, with an estimated completion date of Nov. 30, 2024. Fiscal 2019 operations and maintenance, Army and Army working capital funds in the amount of $1,683,982 were obligated at the time of the award. U.S. Army Contracting Command, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, is the contracting activity (W31P4Q-19-F-0323). CAT Island Conservancy LLC,* Baton Rouge, Louisiana, was awarded an $8,121,750 firm-fixed-price contract to purchase Bottomland Hardwood Impacts mitigation bank credits/acres from approved mitigation bank(s) in the Lake Pontchartrain and/or Mississippi River basins. Bids were solicited via the internet with four received. Work will be performed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, with an estimated completion date of June 3, 2019. Fiscal 2019 Army Corps of Engineers civil construction funds in the amount of $8,121,750 were obligated at the time of the award. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New Orleans, Louisiana, is the contracting activity (W912P8-19-C-0037). DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY Galois Inc., Portland, Oregon, was awarded a $16,479,920 cost-plus-fixed-fee contract for a research project under the Safe Documents (SafeDocs) program. The SafeDocs program aims to develop novel verified programming methodologies for building high assurance parsers for extant electronic data formats, and novel methodologies for comprehending, simplifying, and reducing these formats to their safe, unambiguous, verification-friendly subsets (safe sub-setting). SafeDocs will address the ambiguity and complexity obstacles to the application of verified programming posed by extant electronic data formats. Work will be performed in Portland, Oregon, with an expected completion date of May 2023. Fiscal 2019 research, development, test and evaluation funding in the amount of $2,326,000 are being obligated at time of award. This contract was a competitive acquisition under an open broad agency announcement and 23 offers were received. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Arlington, Virginia, is the contracting activity (HR001119C0073). *Small business https://dod.defense.gov/News/Contracts/Contract-View/Article/1855659/source/GovDelivery/