11 février 2019 | International, Aérospatial

French Air Force chief: France and Germany working on export controls for future fighter

WASHINGTON — The French Air Force chief of staff provided top cover for the future Franco-German fighter at a time when the French defense industry is increasingly concerned that cooperation with Germany could curtail its ability to export the system.

“There is a real determination" at the highest levels of government — including French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel — to agree on export controls, said Gen. Philippe Lavigne during a Feb. 7 roundtable with reporters.

"It's a need for our security, but it's also a need for our industry, and we have to develop this,” he said, adding that Spain has already signed on as an observer to the program and that others are expected to follow.

The French government is generally seen as more supportive of arms sales than its partner in the sixth-generation fighter program, called the Future Combat Air System, or FCAS. While enthusiasm for the program remains high, some French defense industry officials are concerned that Germany's involvement could prevent sales to countries that Berlin considers rogue actors.

But settling an export policy is just one of the many questions about the FCAS program that are still yet to be answered.

So far, France and Germany's concept for FCAS involves a network of swarming UAVs, new weapons and a sixth-generation fighter that can exchange information with each other. FCAS would replace France's Rafale and Germany's Eurofighter around 2040.

“We haven't decided what will be the architecture,” Lavigne said. “Will it be this type of aircraft? Will it be this type of [UAV]? Will it be this type of unmanned combat air vehicle? Will it be this type of missiles? But we know that we will share an architecture.

“The gamechanger is the connectivity between different platforms.”

Earlier this week, the French and German governments awarded €65 million (U.S. $74 million) to Dassault and Airbus for the two-year study that will solidify a path forward for FCAS, and the companies plan to announce demonstrator programs at the Paris Air Show this summer.

Lavigne wasn't clear on how the governments would reconcile different requirements, like France's intention to launch FCAS from aircraft carriers, which could drive different design attributes than a fighter that takes off and lands conventionally.

“Of course we will have national interests in France with the nuclear deterrence. Germany will have different national interests,” he said. However, he stopped short of saying how much commonality is expected between the two militaries.

Until the study is complete, it is “too early to say” whether FCAS will be manned or unmanned. However, Lavigne said a human will continue to be in the loop — especially for nuclear deterrence missions — whether a human is in the cockpit or it is remotely piloted.

“We are open to look at the technical solution,” he said. “For me, it's optionally piloted.”

FCAS' system-of-systems approach is similar to the U.S. Air Force's vision for Penetrating Counter Air, its future air superiority concept. The Air Force hasn't shared which defense companies are involved in conceptualizing or prototyping future technologies that could be pulled into a PCA program of record, but it requested $504 million in fiscal 2019 to push the effort forward, with investments projected to hit $3 billion in FY22.

https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2019/02/08/french-air-force-chief-france-and-germany-working-on-export-controls-for-future-fighter

Sur le même sujet

22 juin 2018 | International, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR

Here’s who will lead the DoD group that could decide the future of military shopping
By: Karen Jowers A retired Army major general and former retail executive will lead a Pentagon task force that is examining the case for a possible merger of the military exchange and commissary systems, Defense officials announced Thursday. Keith Thurgood, who was also the chief executive officer of the Army and Air Force Exchange Service from 2007 to 2010, will start work Monday. If the task force business case analysis confirms that consolidation is the right approach, and if Defense Department officials back that finding, Thurgood will serve as the consolidated organization's executive director until the permanent position is advertised and filled, according to a May 29 memo directing the task force's formation. The retired Reserve major general has more than 28 years of military service and has held executive positions at PepsiCo & Frito-Lay Inc., Sam's Club, Overseas Military Sales Corporation, and MedAssets, Inc. He will take a sabbatical from his current position as clinical professor at the University of Texas at Dallas. He could serve up to two years on the task force. The task force will examine “back office” operations of the exchanges and commissaries, such as information technology, human resources and accounting. It will first determine whether the exchange systems ― AAFES, Navy Exchange Service Command, and Marine Corps Exchange ― could be combined with one corporate “backbone.” Then members will determine whether the Defense Commissary Agency could be merged into that system. Consolidation of the stores wouldn't necessarily mean that commissaries and exchanges would be combined into one store. Officials are also looking at keeping the individual branding of the exchange stores on military bases, as they combine behind-the-scenes operations. “With General Thurgood's leadership, understanding of the customer experience, and private sector experience in the retail space, the task force will evaluate our potential to generate efficiencies and scrutinize the above-the-store business aspects of the exchange system, with a goal of validating and defining our execution plan for the way forward,” said John H. Gibson, II, DoD's chief management officer, in the DoD announcement. https://www.militarytimes.com/pay-benefits/2018/06/21/heres-who-will-lead-the-dod-group-that-could-decide-the-future-of-military-shopping/
27 avril 2020 | International, Aérospatial

"L'achat des F18 et Eurofighter par l'Allemagne est plutôt une bonne chose pour la France" (Eric Trappier)
Par Michel Cabirol Pour le PDG de Dassault Aviation la décision de l'Allemagne d'acheter 93 avions de combat Eurofighter et 45 F-18 américains est "paradoxalement plutôt une bonne chose pour la France. Au moins, l'Allemagne écarte le F35". Le patron de Dassault Aviation Eric Trappier a été très clair sur la décision de l'Allemagne d'acheter 93 avions de combat Eurofighter (BAE Systems, Airbus et Leonardo) et 45 F-18 américains (Boeing) pour renouveler sa flotte de Tornado. "C'est paradoxalement plutôt une bonne chose pour la France. Au moins, l'Allemagne écarte le F35", a expliqué jeudi le président du GIFAS lors d'une audition par la commission de la défense de l'Assemblée nationale. Clairement, ce choix, s'il est confirmé par un vote du Bundestag, permettra de poursuivre les travaux sur le futur Système de combat aérien du futur (SCAF), lancés par l'Allemagne et la France, et rejoints par l'Espagne. Ce qui n'aurait pas été le cas si Berlin avait choisi le F-35. "J'insiste sur la nécessité de prise en compte des différences de calendriers et d'organisation politique entre les deux pays. Les industriels doivent s'adapter aux calendriers politiques pour avancer. Un message peut être porté aux parlementaires allemands : il faut trouver un processus type LPM (Loi de programmation militaire, ndlr) pour cadencer avancement des projets communs. La pression des États-Unis Pour autant, pour diminuer l'appétence des pays européens à acheter américain, "il est nécessaire que l'on s'organise entre européens", a-t-il expliqué. Le chemin est très long encore en dépit de l'initiative commune entre trois grands pays européens sur le SCAF. Ainsi, la Bulgarie a signé des contrats pour des F16, la Belgique a signé des amendements pour des F35, a-t-il rappelé. "Il faut se poser la question du poids des européens face aux Etats-Unis dans l'OTAN", a-t-il également fait valoir. Et les États-Unis, qui n'ont qu'un objectif de vassaliser l'Europe en matière d'aviation de combat, ne l'chent vraiment pas les Européens. Ainsi, pour Lockheed Martin, tous les coups sont permis. Le géant américain vient d'embaucher en Finlande, l'ancien chef d'état-major des armées (CEMA) finlandais, celui-là même qui avait lancé la compétition pour l'acquisition de nouveaux appareils, a expliqué Eric Trappier. Ce qui a provoqué une polémique en Finlande. Ce projet d'achat vise à remplacer la flotte actuelle de 64 avions de combat F/A-18C/D Hornet achetés au début des années 90. Le ministre finlandais de la Défense a déclaré que le nombre de nouveaux appareils à acheter pourrait être supérieur ou égal au niveau actuel et espérait qu'il ne serait pas inférieur. Inquiétudes sur le Fonds européen de défense En tant que patron également de l'ASD (AeroSpace and Defence Industries Association of Europe), le président du GIFAS (Groupement des industries françaises aéronautiques et spatiales) a fait part de ses inquiétudes sur l'avenir du Fonds européen de défense (FED). "L'Europe de la Défense ne semble pas la priorité de l'ensemble de nos partenaires. Il faut veiller à le préserver. Elle est notamment utile pour développer de nouvelles technologies et d'abonder les programmes qui sont définis par plusieurs États européens", a-t-il rappelé. Et selon lui, un deuxième danger menace le FED. C'est "la persistance des États-Unis à vouloir faire accéder leurs sociétés à ces financements. Certains pays européens à l'Est du continent sont attentifs et sensibles aux appels américains". On n'est jamais trahi que par les siens... https://www.latribune.fr/entreprises-finance/industrie/aeronautique-defense/l-achat-des-f18-et-eurofighter-par-l-allemagne-est-plutot-une-bonne-chose-pour-la-france-eric-trappier-846130.html
14 mai 2018 | International, Aérospatial, Naval

What do Marines want in their next drone? Everything
By: Mark Pomerleau The Marine Corps has revamped its requirements for a large unmanned aerial system after industry leaders said an early version of the drone could cost as much as $100 million. Now, Marine leaders are following a tiered approach to the requirements as a way to manage costs and work closely with industry. The Marines are charting ahead with the Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) Unmanned Expeditionary, or MUX, group 5 UAS. The Marines have long expressed a desire for an organic drone in the Group 5 category, the largest category of military drones. The initial desired capability set for the MUX was extremely broad, mirroring a Swiss Army knife of mission sets. When first presented to industry, leaders derided the expansive mission set as too costly. “They came back and said you're talking about something that's going to be $100 million, as big as a V-22. Are you sure that's what you want?,” Lt. Gen. Robert Walsh, commanding general of the Marine Corps Combat Development Command and Deputy Commandant for Combat Development and Integration, told a small group of reporters following his appearance at the Modular Open Systems Summit in Washington May 1. “We said ‘No, that's not what we want, not something that big. We want something to fly off a ship, off an expeditionary site. What that allowed us to do through the industry involvement then was to neck down, if you look at the [request for information] we sent out for the industry day, it tiered the requirements.” The initial RFI was released March 8. With the tiered requirements approach, Walsh explained that the Marines listed four capabilities they wanted most, while others could be nice to haves or even be handled by other assets. Tier 1 capabilities include airborne early warning – which Walsh said industry wasn't heavily considering but is a capability the Marines absolutely need coming off a ship – command and control communications, digitally passing information, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance and electronic warfare. Additional capabilities include potential weapons armament if the drone will escort V-22s and logistics. “Amazon, FedEx, somebody else will help us with that and we'll probably buy what they're developing,” Walsh said of the logistics portion. Similarly, Col. James Frey, the director of the Marine Corps' Aviation Expeditionary Enablers branch, told USNI News that the Future Vertical Lift program might fill this void, adding that whatever is not covered by the program could be done with the CH-53K heavy-lift helicopter. Ultimately, Walsh noted that bringing industry in early will help the service refine its requirements before setting them in stone, leading to a better capability. The industry day, slated for June 6 and 7, will “bring everybody together and help us with this and have like a workshop approach to that. Both primes and small subs,” he said. “I find this is a way that will allow us to go fast.” https://www.c4isrnet.com/unmanned/2018/05/02/what-do-marines-want-in-their-next-drone-everything/

Toutes les nouvelles