2 février 2018 | Information, Naval

Approvisionnement en matière de défense - Mer

Services publics et Approvisionnement Canada (SPAC) est responsable de la surveillance des grandes initiatives en matière d'approvisionnement maritime tel que :

SPAC fournit des services d'approvisionnement intégrés principalement aux ministères du gouvernement fédéral. Ce service met l'accent sur la construction de navires pour applications militaires et civiles.

La portée du service comprend :

  • l'élaboration de stratégies d'approvisionnements
  • l'examen et la préparation de spécifications
  • l'appel d'offres
  • la gestion de contrat
  • la gestion de projet

https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/amd-dp/mer-sea/index-fra.html

Sur le même sujet

  • Trousse d’information pour les fournisseurs : Comment obtenir une attestation de sécurité

    12 février 2023 | Information, Autre défense

    Trousse d’information pour les fournisseurs : Comment obtenir une attestation de sécurité

    Cette trousse d’information fournit un accès rapide et facile aux ressources et aux outils conçus pour aider votre organisation à obtenir une attestation de sécurité avec le Programme de sécurité des contrats (PSC) de Services publics et Approvisionnement Canada. La trousse passe en revue les étapes que votre organisation et vos employés doivent suivre avant de soumissionner ou d’exécuter des travaux dans le cadre d’un contrat du gouvernement fédéral comportant des exigences de sécurité. Sous chaque étape, vous trouverez des liens vers des ressources, des guides, des vidéos et du matériel de formation en ligne. Ces ressources et outils donneront à votre organisation et à vos employés des conseils pratiques sur la manière de réaliser les activités d’enquête de sécurité, remplir les formulaires connexes, et se conformer aux exigences du PSC. Sections Étape 1 : Exigences de sécurité et types d’attestation de sécurité Comprenez quelles sont les exigences de sécurité et quel type d’attestation de sécurité votre organisation pourrait avoir besoin pour soumissionner ou exécuter des travaux dans le cadre d’un contrat du gouvernement fédéral. Étape 2 : Parrainage Découvrez comment votre organisation doit être parrainée pour faire l’objet d’une enquête de sécurité auprès du PSC. Étape 3 : Enquête de sécurité sur l’organisation Découvrez les principales étapes que votre organisation devra franchir et les principaux formulaires qu’elle devra remplir pour faire l’objet d’une enquête auprès du PSC. Étape 4 : Enquête de sécurité sur le personnel Une fois que le PSC a effectué l’enquête, apprenez comment votre organisation peut demander le niveau approprié d’enquête de sécurité sur le personnel pour les employés admissibles. Étape 5 : Sous-traitance Découvrez comment demander une enquête de sécurité pour les sous-traitants afin de vous assurer qu’ils satisfont aux exigences de sécurité d’un contrat du gouvernement fédéral. Étape 6 : Maintenir la conformité Comprenez ce que votre organisation et vos employés devront faire pour rester conformes aux exigences de sécurité d’un contrat du gouvernement fédéral. Renseignements supplémentaires Si vous avez des questions ou si vous avez besoin d’une aide personnalisée, n’hésitez pas à communiquer avec le centre de service à la clientèle du Programme de sécurité des contrats. Pour savoir où envoyer vos documents remplis, consultez comment soumettre les demandes, formulaires et autres documents pour la sécurité des contrats.   https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/esc-src/ressources-resources/tif-its-fra.html

  • Raytheon Technologies Corporation: UTC, Raytheon make marriage official

    10 juin 2019 | Information, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR, Sécurité, Autre défense

    Raytheon Technologies Corporation: UTC, Raytheon make marriage official

    By: Aaron Mehta Updated with comments from officials on June 10, 2019, at 9:21 a.m. ET. WASHINGTON — Raytheon and United Technologies Corporation will officially merge into a new entity called Raytheon Technologies Corporation, with the deal taking place in first half of 2020. Following Saturday reports that a merger was imminent, the two firms made the news official Sunday, launching a website about the planned all-stock deal. On Monday, Raytheon CEO Thomas Kennedy and UTC CEO Greg Hayes held a conference call, where the two revealed that discussions about a potential merger started in summer 2018, before taking off in earnest this January. “It's like a mirror,” Kennedy said of UTC, noting both companies invest heavily in new technologies while remaining “platform agnostic.” Hayes added that there is roughly a one percent overlap between the two firms portfolios. The new company will be roughly 50-50 defense and commercial, with plans to spend $8 billion on R&D after combining. Much of that funding will go towards high-end defense programs, including, per a news release, “hypersonics and future missile systems; directed energy weapons; intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) in contested environments; cyber protection for connected aircraft; next generation connected airspace; and advanced analytics and artificial intelligence for commercial aviation.” The new firm has a “tremendous opportunity to invest” in the future, Hayes said. “The resources of the combined company will allow us to do things on a stand alone basis that would have been very difficult” individually. Hayes also expressed his belief the Pentagon would not see major issues, given the limited overlap. However, other trouble may be brewing; during a Monday interview with CNBC, U.S. President Donald Trump expressed concern about the agreement. While being billed as a “merger of equals,” UTC shareowners will own approximately 57 percent and Raytheon shareowners will own approximately 43 percent of the combined company. A spokesperson for Raytheon confirmed to Defense News Sunday that the combined company will be based in the greater Boston area. Raytheon is based in the Boston suburb of Waltham, while UTC is based in Farmington, Conn. Per a news release, the new company will have approximately $74 billion in pro forma 2019 sales. The release also highlights that the merged company will be a major player in both the defense and commercial aerospace markets, giving greater market resiliency. Byron Callan, a defense analyst with Capital Alpha Partners, wrote Sunday in a note to investors that the merger may be a sign of market trends to come. “An RTN-UTX deal may be a signal (a siren?) that 1) this U.S. defense cycle is peaking, and firms need to start repositioning for growth in 2021 and beyond; 2) Maybe the commercial aerospace outlook is looking wobbly too and Western firms need to hedge against fallout from a U.S.-China trade split. A U.S. recession is overdue; 3) Defense firms will need to fund more of their own R&D in the future so joining a larger firm will limit margin pressure which could be evidenced in the 2020s,” Callan wrote. Callan also sees “some overlap in the defense portfolios” for the two companies, primarily through the Mission Systems segment of Collins Aerospace. That could require some small divestitures down the road as the deal is finalized, but there do not appear to be any major issues that would lead to objections from the Pentagon. “Both are active in defense communications, though Collins has a larger share. Both have imaging/IR products, though Raytheon has a larger product offering,” he wrote. “Collins provides large space imaging mirrors used in surveillance satellites but it's not clear to us if there is an overlap with Raytheon's classified space payload work.” The deal should create a mammoth defense contractor second only to Lockheed Martin. Raytheon already ranked number two on the most recent Defense News Top 100 list, with $23.5 billion in defense revenues, 93 percent of its overall revenue total; UTC has $7.83 billion in defense revenues, a mere 13 percent of its overall figures. However, that UTC number came before its acquisition of Rockwell Collins and its $2.28 billion in defense revenues, which will naturally increase United's overall number. The move comes after 18 months of major defense consolidation. In addition to UTC's move on Rockwell, there was the General Dynamics acquisition of CSRA, Northrop Grumman's acquisition of Orbital ATK, and L3 and Harris announcing in Oct. 2018 that they would combine to form what at the time appeared to be the seventh largest global defense firm. https://www.defensenews.com/industry/2019/06/09/raytheon-technologies-corporation-utc-raytheon-make-marriage-official/

  • The Army wants a singular focus, not one-off solutions

    10 juin 2019 | Information, C4ISR

    The Army wants a singular focus, not one-off solutions

    By: Mark Pomerleau The days of one-off solutions for providing situational awareness and command-and-control information in the Army could be numbered. “We are on the verge of putting tactical common operating environment capability into the Army organization in the very near term,” Col. Troy Crosby, project manager for mission command at Program Executive Office for Command, Control and Communications-Tactical, said June 6 at the C4ISRNET Conference in Arlington, Virginia. The Army is getting ready to field the first set of capabilities under a new modernized network architecture in 2021, which will include the first iteration of the Command Post Computing Environment (CP CE). CP CE is a web-enabled system that will consolidate current mission systems and programs into a single user interface. Crosby said CP CE is on the verge of receiving a critical decision from the Army this month as to whether or not it has passed all of its tests and can be used by soldiers in combat. The Army has been trying to incorporate a DevOps process for CP CE using a variety of units to experiment with the capability that can provide direct feedback on the system to the program office. However, one of the key lessons they learned, according to Crosby, was they used too many test units: six in total. “With that many partners trying to do all the exercises that those different level echelon commands and organizations wanted to do, that piece became untenable,” he said. “I think at least for our portfolio, somewhere around three is a much better level.” Similarly, Crosby noted that the difficulty with mission command is each commander has their own way of performing it. As the Army was trying to come up with a common solution for all units with CP CE, they had to make sure they tailored the capability for the Army rather than an individual commander they received feedback from during the developmental process. https://www.c4isrnet.com/show-reporter/c4isrnet-conference/2019/06/07/the-army-wants-a-singular-focus-not-one-off-solutions/

Toutes les nouvelles