Back to news

March 1, 2019 | Local, Naval

DND extends life of submarine escape suits beyond expiry date as fleet shows its age

Murray Brewster · CBC News

Liberals plan to modernize and sail the navy's 4 aging submarines until 2040

The Canadian navy's stock of survival suits, which allow submariners to escape in an emergency from a sunken boat, has been thrown a lifeline after much of the equipment had reached its expiry date, federal documents reveal.

The critical safety suits give stranded crew members the ability to ascend from a depth of 183 metres and protect against hypothermia.

They even inflate into a single-seat life raft once on the surface.

The orange whole-body suits were part of the original equipment aboard the Victoria-class submarines, diesel-electric boats originally built for the Royal Navy and purchased from Britain in the late 1990s.

Documents obtained by CBC News show there was concern among naval engineers, in late 2016, that many of the suits had passed or were about to pass their best-before, safety dates.

A spokeswoman for the Defence Department said a decision was made to extend the life of suits while the federal government procures new ones — a process that is ongoing.

There is no threat to safety, said Jessica Lamirande.

"The service life extension was approved based on successful, rigorous testing at the Naval Engineering Test Establishment on a representative sample of suits that had passed their intended service lives," said Lamirande, in a recent email.

"Testing consisted of detailed visual inspection, leakage tests, and functional testing."

Fleet sailing until 2040

But defence experts say it is a small project that speaks volumes about the Liberal government's plan to modernize and keep operating the four submarines until 2040, a proposal that was articulated in the latest defence policy.

Retired commander Peter Haydon, who also taught defence policy at Dalhousie University in Halifax for years, said keeping submarine replacement parts and equipment in the system has been an ongoing headache for the navy, dating back to the 1980s.

However, the bigger concern is: As the boats age, the strength of their pressure hulls declines.

The government plans to modernize the boats, but Haydon said that's fine for the electronic and other components.

"You can modernize most things, but you can't modernize the hull, unless you build a new hull," he said.

Pressure to buy new

The Senate and House of Commons defence committees have recommended the government begin exploring options now for the replacement of the submarines, which took years to formally bring into service after they were purchased.

The government, in its response to a committee report last fall, argued it is already fully engaged building Arctic patrol ships and replacements for frigates and supply ships.

Buying new submarines is a topic that has been debated behind the scenes for a long time at National Defence with one former top commander, retired general Walt Natynczyk ordering — in 2012 — a study that looked at the possible replacements.

They're running a risk with the lives of sailors, the older these vessels get in an extremely dangerous environment, especially when they're submerged.— Michael Byers, University of British Columbia

University of British Columbia defence expert Michael Byers has been quoted as saying he's worried Canada "will lose its submarine capability through negligence rather than design," noting that it is politically more palatable to refurbish the underwater fleet rather than endure a painful procurement process.

"They're running a risk with the lives of sailors, the older these vessels get in an extremely dangerous environment, especially when they're submerged," said Byers, who pointed to the loss of the Argentine submarine San Juan and its crew of 44 in 2017.

"I would be more comfortable with a decision to buy a new fleet submarines than the current path that we're on. I have been skeptical as to whether we need submarines, but better a new fleet than send our sailors to sea in these old vessels."

Since Canada does not have the technology, nor has it ever constructed its own submarines, the federal government would be required to go overseas to countries such as Germany or Sweden to get them built.

Restricted diving

In the meantime, Haydon said he's confident ongoing maintenance and the stringent safety standards among Western allies will keep the Victoria-class submarines in the water and operating safely.

He cautions, however, like Canada's previous submarines retired in the 1990s, the Oberon class, the older the current fleet gets, the more their diving depth will eventually have to be restricted.

As the hull and its valves weaken, the less pressure they can sustain.

Lamirande said the navy has enough escape submarine suits whenever it deploys, and she emphasized it never goes to sea with "expired" equipment.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/dnd-extends-life-of-submarine-escape-suits-beyond-expiry-date-as-fleet-shows-its-age-1.5036007

On the same subject

  • Irving misreads the National Shipbuilding Strategy: analysis

    August 15, 2018 | Local, Naval

    Irving misreads the National Shipbuilding Strategy: analysis

    DAVID PUGLIESE, OTTAWA CITIZEN Irving seems to be upset about Davie's ongoing efforts to win work under the National Shipbuilding Strategy. In a new deal with the federal government, Davie will refit existing icebreakers that are to be owned by the federal government. This is part of federal efforts to shore up Canada's icebreaking capability. At an event last week to announce the contract, Steven MacKinnon, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Service and Procurement Canada and Member of Parliament (Gatineau, Quebec) also stated that Davie Shipyard in Levis, Quebec will have opportunities to bid and win work under the National Shipbuilding Strategy. That has sparked concern from Irving which issued on Monday a statement that it is worried MacKinnon's remarks “signal the possible redirection of shipbuilding work out of Atlantic Canada.” During the new conference MacKinnon said Davie could be in line for work under the shipbuilding strategy. “Davie had, has had, and will continue to have opportunities under the national shipbuilding strategy to bid, to win work, and the quality of the work that's done in this shipyard speaks for itself,” he said. Full Article: https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/irving-misreads-the-national-shipbuilding-strategy-analysis

  • Airbus veut croître en Amérique du Nord en visant la défense

    February 4, 2019 | Local, Aerospace

    Airbus veut croître en Amérique du Nord en visant la défense

    DJALLAL MALTI Agence France-Presse Airbus veut profiter de son implantation industrielle croissante en Amérique du Nord pour accélérer dans la défense aux États-Unis et au Canada, avec comme argument clé d'être un acteur local qui investit et crée des emplois sur place. « Pour n'importe quel acteur du secteur aéronautique et défense, jouer aux États-Unis, c'est aujourd'hui pratiquement incontournable », relève Philippe Plouvier, directeur associé au cabinet de conseil Boston Consulting Group. « Parce que dans la défense, les États-Unis, c'est 50 % des budgets mondiaux. » Mais « jouer en Amérique du Nord, c'est avoir une base industrielle sur place. Il n'y a pas de grand acteur là-bas qui n'ait pas une base importante », souligne ce spécialiste de l'aéronautique et de la défense. Airbus a renforcé son empreinte industrielle outre-Atlantique ces dernières années. Déjà présent aux États-Unis depuis 2004 avec une usine d'hélicoptères à Columbus, il a inauguré en 2015 une ligne d'assemblage finale (FAL) destinée à l'A320 à Mobile. Mais avec la prise de contrôle du programme CSeries de Bombardier, il a encore accru cette présence. Au Canada, il a « hérité » de la ligne d'assemblage de l'A220 à Mirabel et aux États-Unis, il a décidé d'en implanter une seconde, à Mobile, ce qui fait du géant européen un acteur local. Airbus se targue d'avoir dépensé 48 milliards de dollars aux États-Unis ces trois dernières années, ce qui se traduit par 275 000 emplois américains soutenus par l'avionneur. « Lorsqu'un industriel de la défense veut vendre ses produits dans un autre pays que le sien, il y a généralement trois étapes à franchir », relève Stéphane Albernhe, du cabinet Archery Consulting. Les deux premières sont les compensations au transfert de technologies. « La troisième, qui est particulièrement importante aux États-Unis, c'est la capacité à être perçu comme un actual good US citizen, qui consiste à mettre les conditions pour que l'industriel soit considéré par les Américains comme pleinement américain. » « Pour réussir cela, beaucoup de leviers peuvent être activés », mais « ce qui compte pour remporter un contrat au-delà du respect des spécifications techniques et du prix, c'est véritablement de s'intégrer pleinement dans le paysage américain. » « Le meilleur avion pour l'armée la plus puissante » Huit ans après avoir perdu celui des avions ravitailleurs face à Boeing, Airbus s'est allié à Lockheed Martin pour répondre aux besoins de l'armée de l'air américaine en termes de ravitaillement en vol. Le géant européen propose son A330 MRTT, qu'il a déjà vendu à une douzaine de pays. « Je ne comprends toujours pas pourquoi l'armée de l'air la plus puissante du monde ne volerait pas avec le meilleur avion ravitailleur sur le marché ? Parce que c'est clairement ce qu'est le MRTT », a lancé le président exécutif d'Airbus, Tom Enders, récemment à Mobile. « Nous avons remporté toutes les compétitions à part les États-Unis », a-t-il poursuivi. « Alors tout ce que nous voulons faire est d'amener l'avion ravitailleur le plus performant à la plus grande armée de l'air du monde. Cela fait sens, non ? » Airbus vise également un appel d'offres de la marine américaine pour 130 hélicoptères, alors qu'il fournit déjà l'armée américaine avec des UH-72A Lakota. Au Canada, il est en lice avec l'Eurofighter Typhoon pour l'appel d'offres qu'Ottawa doit lancer en mai pour remplacer sa flotte d'avions de combats : 88 appareils à livrer en 2025, un contrat estimé à 19 milliards de dollars. Tom Enders a laissé entendre qu'une partie de l'assemblage pourrait se faire sur place. « Quatre-vingt huit appareils, c'est important pour le Canada, ce serait important pour nous aussi », a-t-il l'ché. À plus long terme, Airbus vise le remplacement des ravitailleurs de l'armée de l'air canadienne, à l'horizon 2021-2022. Restent les enquêtes qui le visent : Airbus, qui coopère avec les autorités judiciaires en France, au Royaume-Uni et aux États-Unis, espère vite tourner cette page qui ternit son image. « C'est généralement très long et dure plusieurs années », souligne Stéphane Albernhe. « Une fois que l'instruction a démarré, il y a deux objectifs pour l'industriel : faire en sorte de converger le plus rapidement possible pour réduire les impacts "réputationnels", et négocier afin que la sanction financière soit raisonnable. » https://www.lapresse.ca/affaires/economie/transports/201902/01/01-5213165-airbus-veut-croitre-en-amerique-du-nord-en-visant-la-defense.php

  • DND denies misjudging supply ship cost even though price tag jumped to $4.1 billion

    July 6, 2020 | Local, Naval

    DND denies misjudging supply ship cost even though price tag jumped to $4.1 billion

    DAVID PUGLIESE, OTTAWA CITIZEN Updated: July 2, 2020 The defence department denies it ever misjudged the cost of a project to buy new naval ships even though the price tag jumped from $2.3 billion to $4.1 billion in less than two years. And DND admits the cost to taxpayers for the vessels could rise even more in the coming years. The Liberal government acknowledged on June 15 that the cost of the project to buy two Joint Support Ships has increased to $4.1 billion. The vessels are needed by the Royal Canadian Navy as they would provide fuel, ammunition and other supplies to warships at sea. But the $4.1 billion price tag is just the latest in a series of steadily increasing cost figures. In June 2018, the government acknowledged the cost of the ship project had, at that time, jumped from $2.3 billion to $3.4 billion. But Seaspan, the Vancouver shipyard that is to build the vessels, provided a new set of numbers in October 2019 and by February 2020 government approval was received for a new budget of $4.1 billion, DND confirmed in an email to this newspaper. “As with any large-scale procurement project, all project values are best estimates that are based on the data and figures available at the time,” the email added. There has been no misjudging of costs on the JSS project, the department noted. In 2013, the Parliamentary Budget Officer questioned DND's JSS cost estimates and warned that the project would require $4.13 billion. DND stated in its email to this newspaper that taxpayers can be assured they are getting value for money on JSS and that those working on the shipbuilding project in both the department and Public Services and Procurement Canada are top notch. “The Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces, along with our counterparts at PSPC, have a first-rate cadre of experienced, professional procurement officers, subject matter experts and financial administrators who take great pride in their work and in their accomplishments,” DND said in an email. “Our team has – and will continue to – ensure that Canadians get value from their investments in the Armed Forces.” But DND also acknowledged costs could continue to rise. “While the total project budget includes contingency funding for these types of reasons, some events may happen unexpectedly and thus excel what the contingency funding allowed for,” the DND email noted. “As a result, it's possible that cost estimates may change for a variety of reasons that can't be controlled or predicted.” Conservative MP Kelly McCauley said DND's claim that project costs weren't misjudged is “BS.” “I don't even have faith in their latest cost of $4.1 billion,” added McCauley, who is behind the effort to get the Parliamentary Budget Officer to do a new report looking at JSS. “It's going to go up.” McCauley said the JSS design is based on the Berlin-class, an existing and proven German Navy ship. But he noted that DND and PSPC keep making changes to the ship, driving up costs and adding delays. DND noted that, “it's not uncommon for the cost estimate to change throughout the duration of a project, especially for a first-of-class ship.” DND also pointed out the construction contract with Seaspan may be changed throughout the duration of the project but added that does not necessarily mean the project budget will increase. The Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates recently passed McCauley's motion to request the Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer undertake a costing analysis of building the JSS in Canada as well as the leasing of Asterix, a commercial ship converted into a supply vessel for the Royal Canadian Navy to use. The PBO report will be presented to the committee by Oct. 15. The Asterix, converted by Davie shipyards in Quebec, was at the centre of the two-year legal battle Vice Adm. Mark Norman found himself in when the RCMP charged him with breach of trust. The police force alleged Norman had tipped off Davie that the Liberal government was planning to delay its Asterix deal. The legal case against Norman collapsed in 2019, forcing the federal government to pay the naval officer an undisclosed financial settlement as well as prompting questions about whether the charge had been politically motivated. The Asterix turned out to be a procurement success and since 2018 has been used to refuel and resupply Royal Canadian Navy and allied warships. The Liberal government tried to derail the Asterix project shortly after being elected in the fall of 2015. The move came after cabinet ministers, including Scott Brison and defence minister Harjit Sajjan, received a letter from the Irving family with a complaint that the Irving proposal for a similar supply ship was not examined properly. Irving has denied any suggestion it was involved in political meddling. But after receiving the letter from the Irvings, the Liberals decided to put Asterix on hold. The government, however, had to back off that plan after news of its decision leaked out to the news media. Shortly after, the RCMP began investigating Norman. https://o.canada.com/news/national/defence-watch/dnd-denies-misjudging-supply-ship-cost-even-though-price-tag-jumped-to-4-1-billion/wcm/6743dc85-efb0-457c-90b9-be1b2d204868

All news