7 décembre 2018 | Local, Aérospatial

Senate committee outlines recommendations for Canadian SAR

by Ken Pole

As the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) gears up for the late 2019 arrival of the first of 16 new Airbus CC-295 fixed-wing search and rescue (FWSAR) aircraft, a Senate committee said the government should consider the deployment of even more search and rescue (SAR) aircraft.

“This would be a multi-year, mega-government dollar capital procurement project,” the Standing Senate Committee on Fisheries and Oceans acknowledged in an exhaustive new report, When Every Minute Counts: Maritime Search and Rescue. “Repositioning current aeronautical SAR assets is not feasible . . . at this time because the fleet is fully utilized.”

The November 2018 report is based on more than two years of study and hearings, which wrapped up in October. While most witnesses were heard in Ottawa — including senior RCAF, Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) and Transport Canada officials, as well as representatives of several industries — the committee also travelled to bases across the country as well as visiting officials and SAR facilities in England, Ireland, Norway and Denmark.

RCAF fixed- and rotary-wing assets are a key element in covering nearly 18 million square kilometres of land and sea. In 2017, the Joint Rescue Coordination Centres in Victoria, Trenton and Halifax responded to 10,003 SAR calls, 62 per cent of them maritime.

The committee predicts that the number of calls in the Arctic will increase as global warming results in a longer ice-free navigation period. Accordingly, the report recommends that the CCG establish additional primary search and rescue stations in the Canadian Arctic, where no SAR aircraft are currently based.

It also calls on the Department of National Defence (DND) to authorize a pilot project which would see private civilian helicopters provide coverage in the North as well as in Newfoundland and Labrador, where the committee says “a disproportionately high number” of SAR incidents occur.

In addition to the possible privatization of some missions (CHC Helicopter and Cougar Helicopters Inc. appeared before the committee), the committee also said the CCG should be an independent agency. “The Canadian Coast Guard . . . is hampered by its position within Fisheries and Oceans Canada, which leaves it at the mercy of the department for funding and prevents it from receiving long-term sustainable capital funding.”

SAR reaction times were also an issue for the committee. It was told that the CCG’s official time is 30 minutes from when a helicopter or ship is tasked until it departs, but that it usually takes less than 15 minutes in the case of a surface vessel, because they are probably on the water already.

In comparison, the RCAF has a reaction time of 30 minutes during a typical eight-hour working day five days a week, and two hours at all other times. “Like the CCG vessels, the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) crews are often airborne sooner than the targeted reaction time, around 20 minutes during working hours and one hour outside of working hours,” the committee notes.

“However, there was considerable discussion regarding what witnesses called the CAF’s ‘two-tier reaction time.’ It was stressed that the two-hour reaction time guaranteed outside of working hours had . . . resulted in missions becoming recovery-oriented instead of rescue-oriented. In their view, the CAF should have a reaction time of 30 minutes, 24/7/365, like the CCG.”

DND witnesses told the committee the concern had been addressed “to the extent possible” and it was the responsibility of SAR commanders in the three regions to align the 30-minute reaction time to coincide with the observed periods of greatest maritime SAR activity. “Overall, the committee was told that shifting the regular weekly schedules without increasing the total number of hours worked has improved readiness.”

It also was told it was impossible for the RCAF to maintain 30-minute readiness at all times because “pilots and SAR aircrew members have a limit on how long they can engage in flying operations.” Sustaining a 30-minute target would require crews to remain poised on flight lines. “The two-hour reaction time allows the pilots and aircrews to be ‘fresh’ and able to deliver a SAR response for up to 14, 16, 18 hours, which allows them to then go longer, further distances. Moreover, the increased level of readiness would require more aircraft, add more maintenance and necessitate infrastructure upgrades.”

The committee says that despite improvements, Canada’s SAR reaction time is “not at par” with other countries.

“Aeronautical SAR assets operated in the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Denmark respond within 15 minutes during the day and between 30 and 45 minutes at night.”

The committee says that given current shortfalls in the RCAF’s pilot, flight engineer and SAR Technician cadres, it isn’t possible to impose similar reaction times on RCAF crews. But it says it hopes the RCAF will reconsider its reaction time targets once personnel shortages are addressed.

https://www.skiesmag.com/news/senate-committee-outlines-recommendations-for-canadian-sar

Sur le même sujet

  • Le gouvernement inaugure un nouveau manège militaire pour la Réserve de l’Armée de terre d’Halifax

    23 janvier 2019 | Local, Terrestre

    Le gouvernement inaugure un nouveau manège militaire pour la Réserve de l’Armée de terre d’Halifax

    Le 23 janvier 2019 – Halifax (Nouvelle‑Écosse) – Défense nationale/Forces armées canadiennes Comme le prévoit la politique de défense du Canada Protection, Sécurité, Engagement, le gouvernement investit dans des projets d’infrastructure de la Défense modernes, fonctionnels et écologiques afin de répondre aux besoins changeants de nos forces armées. Aujourd’hui, Mme Bernadette Jordan, ministre du Développement économique rural et M. Andy Fillmore, secrétaire parlementaire du ministre du Patrimoine canadien et du Multiculturalisme, au nom du ministre de la Défense nationale Harjit S. Sajjan, ont participé à la cérémonie d’inauguration du nouveau manège militaire de Willow Park à Halifax. Ce projet évalué à 55,2 millions de dollars a été achevé selon l’échéancier et en deçà du budget établi et a procuré des avantages économiques importants à la communauté locale d’Halifax, créant quelque 250 emplois pendant la phase des travaux. Ce nouveau manège militaire d’une superficie de 8 574 m2 abritera trois unités de la Réserve de l’Armée de terre à Halifax : le 36e Bataillon des services, le 36e Régiment des transmissions et la 33e Ambulance de campagne. Il leur fournira des locaux administratifs et de formation modernes, des aires d’entreposage et d’entretien de l’équipement, des aires de mess communes, une vaste salle d’exercices et un bâtiment d’entreposage extérieur pour les véhicules militaires. Grâce à ce nouveau bâtiment, ces unités disposeront de l’espace et des installations nécessaires à l’exécution d’exercices opérationnels et d’entraînement essentiels tout en ayant l’espace nécessaire en vue de leur croissance future. Citations « Dans le cadre de la politique Protection, Sécurité, Engagement, notre gouvernement investit afin de soutenir une Force de réserve solide, moderne et compétente. Ce nouveau manège militaire fournira aux membres des unités de la Réserve de l’Armée de terre d’Halifax l’infrastructure fonctionnelle et écologique dont ils ont besoin pour effectuer leur important travail au pays et à l’étranger, tout en soutenant leur croissance continue. »  Harjit S. Sajjan, ministre de la Défense nationale « Des hommes et des femmes sont au cœur de la réussite opérationnelle de nos forces armées. En investissant dans une nouvelle installation pour ces trois unités de la Réserve, nous faisons notre part pour soutenir leur bien‑être, tout en veillant à ce qu’ils aient les moyens nécessaires pour appuyer les opérations et l’instruction qui leur sont essentielles. » Mme Bernadette Jordan, ministre du Développement économique rural  « L’ouverture de ce nouveau manège militaire représente une étape importante pour la communauté locale d’Halifax. En plus de soutenir directement l’important travail de nos Forces armées canadiennes, cette nouvelle installation a été construite avec comme objectif d’optimiser l’efficacité environnementale, contribuant ainsi à réduire notre empreinte carbone afin de rendre le Canada plus propre et écologique. »  M. Andy Fillmore, secrétaire parlementaire du ministre du Patrimoine canadien et du Multiculturalisme Faits en bref Cette nouvelle installation sera utilisée par trois unités de la Réserve de l’Armée de terre, soit le 36e Bataillon des services, le 36e Régiment des transmissions et la 33e Ambulance de campagne. Des contrats ont été attribués à deux entreprises à Bedford, en N.‑É., pour ce projet. Bird Design-Build Construction Inc. a obtenu le contrat pour la conception et la construction du nouveau manège militaire ainsi que pour la démolition de deux bâtiments désuets. Dexter Construction Company Ltd. s’est vu accorder un contrat pour la démolition d’un troisième bâtiment désuet. Le nouveau manège militaire, dont les travaux de construction se sont achevés en août 2018, a été conçu en respectant les critères de la certification LEED® (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) de niveau « Argent », et intègre des concepts de bâtiments écologiques afin de minimiser son empreinte. L’infrastructure écologique permettra à la Défense de réduire les émissions de gaz à effet de serre provenant de ses bâtiments et de ses véhicules non militaires de 40 p. 100 (par rapport aux niveaux établis en 2005) d’ici 2030, et appuie le nouvel objectif fédéral de réduction des émissions de 80 p. 100 d’ici 2050. https://www.canada.ca/fr/ministere-defense-nationale/nouvelles/2019/01/le-gouvernement-inaugure-un-nouveau-manege-militaire-pour-la-reserve-de-larmee-de-terre-dhalifax.html

  • RCAF may not need seven of the 25 used Australian F-18s, says defence procurement chief

    15 mars 2019 | Local, Aérospatial

    RCAF may not need seven of the 25 used Australian F-18s, says defence procurement chief

    DAVID PUGLIESE, OTTAWA CITIZEN The Defence department’s procurement chief says the Royal Canadian Air Force might not need the seven used Australian F-18 aircraft being purchased for parts afterall. Canada is buying 25 used F-18s from Australia, with 18 of those to be flown and seven to be either stripped down for parts or used for testing. The aircraft to be flown will augment the existing RCAF CF-18 fleet until a new generation fighter jet can be purchased. But Pat Finn, the Department of National Defence’s Assistant Deputy Minister for Materiel, said there may be no need for the seven F-18s. “The seven, whether or not we actually take them at this point, we’re still looking at that,” Finn recently told the Commons defence committee. “What we’re actually finding is the number of spares that they’ve been able to provide to us is more than adequate. Rather than take aircraft apart and go through that cost, we’re taking the spares. We may not, in fact, at this point look at any of the seven.” It is unclear whether there will be a reduction in the cost of the purchase or the overall project cost if the seven airframes are not acquired. The DND also clarified what is happening with the engines on the Australian F-18s. Rumours have been circulating in the retired military community that the engines are being stripped out of the planes and given back to Australia. “Only the engines from the first two Australian F-18s (four engines total) are being returned to Australia, at their request,” explained DND spokesman Dan Le Bouthillier. “Australia needs those engines to meet their own operational requirements.” In order to take advantage of an advanced delivery date for the first two Australian aircraft, Canada agreed to return those aircraft’s engines to Australia, but the plan is to get an equivalent number of engines back at a later date, he added. “Canada has sufficient engines in reserve to support this plan and this will have no impact on operations,” Le Bouthillier stated. “We therefore found this to be a reasonable request, and agreed to it.” https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/rcaf-may-not-need-7-of-the-25-used-australian-f-18s-says-defence-procurement-chief

  • Feds look to ease requirements for fighter-jet makers after U.S. complaints

    10 mai 2019 | Local, Aérospatial

    Feds look to ease requirements for fighter-jet makers after U.S. complaints

    By Lee Berthiaume, The Canadian Press OTTAWA — The federal government is planning to loosen its industrial requirements for fighter-jet makers in the $19-billion competition to replace Canada's aging CF-18s. The planned modification follows recent U.S. complaints that the previous criteria violated Canada's obligations as one of nine partner countries in the development of the F-35, one of the small handful of planes expected in the competition. Yet the proposed change has sparked complaints from some of the companies whose planes will be competing against the F-35, who say the new approach goes too far in the other direction. Canada has long required companies bidding on major defence contracts to commit to re-investing back into the country, with those unable to make such a contractual commitment seeing their bids tossed out. But in a presentation to companies on Thursday, the government said it plans to allow bids missing such a commitment in the fighter-jet competition — they will be just docked points in the assessment. The plan is intended to maximize the number of bids in the competition to buy 88 new jets while still aiming for the largest-possible economic spinoffs, a senior government official told The Canadian Press. The U.S. had threatened not to enter the F-35 into the competition if the requirement wasn't changed, noting that under the partnership agreement signed in 2006, companies in each member country instead compete for work. The threat was contained in a letter sent to the government from the head of the Pentagon's F-35 office in December and published in a report from the Macdonald-Laurier Institute think tank on Monday. Canada has contributed roughly $500 million over the past 20 years toward developing the F-35, while Canadian companies have won nearly $1.5 billion in contracts associated with the stealth fighter. Canada will also be able to buy the plane for less than non-members. The proposed new process will see the government evaluate bids on a scale, with 60 per cent of the points based on the plane's capability, 20 per cent on its full lifetime costs and the remaining 20 per cent on industrial benefits to Canada. Bidders can still guarantee that they will re-invest back into Canada if their jet wins the competition and get all 20 points - which is the likely approach for Boeing's Super Hornet, Eurofighter's Typhoon and Saab's Gripen. But those that can't make such a commitment will be asked to establish "industrial targets," lay out a plan for achieving those targets and sign a non-binding agreement promising to make all efforts to achieve them. The government will study those plans and assign points based on risk. This is the likely approach for Lockheed Martin and the F-35, which the U.S. has said could provide Canadian companies with billions in work over the next 50 years. The planned new approach has already stirred complaints from some of Lockheed Martin's competitors, who question why the F-35 should get points if the company can't guarantee re-investment back into Canada. There are also concerns about how the government will decide how risky plans to achieve "industrial targets" actually are, with one industry source saying that question is entirely subjective. Bidders were also told Thursday that the actual launch of the competition has been delayed until mid-July. Government officials had previously said they hoped the starting gun would be fired by the end of the month. Lee Berthiaume, The Canadian Press https://www.nationalnewswatch.com/2019/05/09/feds-ease-industrial-requirements-for-fighter-jet-makers-after-u-s-complaints/

Toutes les nouvelles