2 décembre 2024 | International, Aérospatial
https://www.reuters.com/science/global-push-cooperation-space-traffic-crowds-earth-orbit-2024-12-02/
5 janvier 2023 | International, C4ISR
This system was developed using model-based systems engineering significantly increasing the speed of development, while reducing cost
28 septembre 2018 | International, Aérospatial
Les récentes déclarations de François Hollande au journal Mediapart sur le choix du partenaire local du projet Rafale (l'entreprise Reliance), et qui a également financé le film de sa compagne Julie Gayet, ont relancé la polémique en Inde sur les conditions d'attributions et d'achat de ces avions de combat. Pour autant, au-delà du potentiel conflit d'intérêts, cette histoire cache une réalité beaucoup plus complexe qu'il n'y peut paraître vu de France. Cet énorme contrat mêle, de façon concomitante, des enjeux de politique interne, de relations internationales mais aussi des enjeux industriels et économiques. La phrase ambiguë de François Hollande Afin de bien comprendre pourquoi les propos de François Hollande ont eu autant de retentissement en Inde, il est bon de recontextualiser l'histoire. Vendredi dernier, François Hollande interrogé sur le financement d'un film de Julie Gayet par le groupe indien Reliance, chargée également de fabriquer des pièces de l'avion de chasse Rafale dans le cadre d'une joint-venture avec Dassault Aviation, a déclaré à Mediapartque le gouvernement français n'avait pas eu de mot à dire sur le choix du partenaire indien : « C'est le gouvernement indien qui a proposé ce type de services, et Dassault qui a négocié avec Anil Ambani (le PDG de Reliance) [...] Nous n'avons pas eu le choix, nous avons pris l'interlocuteur qui nous a été donné. » Cette phrase ambiguë a permis à l'opposition, et notamment au Parti du Congrès, de prendre à partie le gouvernement de Narendra Modi et de l'accuser une nouvelle fois d'avoir favorisé Ambani et Reliance pour l'obtention de ce contrat. Une polémique ancienne Pourtant, cette polémique est bien plus ancienne et complexe. Celle-ci commence en avril 2015 lorsque le premier ministre Narendra Modi, en visite officielle à Paris, annonce que l'Inde achètera 36 Rafales pour un montant d'environ 8 milliards d'euros. Cette annonce remet en cause l'accord négocié par le précédent gouvernement UPA (une coalition entre le parti du Congrès et d'autres partis) en 2008 et qui proposait l'achat de 126 avions Rafale pour 20 milliards de dollars. Le gouvernement Modi avait jugé cet accord trop cher, d'une durée trop longue (plus de 10 ans) et limitant ainsi les plans de modernisation de l'armée indienne. L'acquisition à court terme de ces avions était aussi liée à la nécessité de rapidement remplacer une flotte de combat vieillissante et en sous-effectif. Les débats ont alors porté sur trois éléments que l'on retrouve encore aujourd'hui dans la controverse : le coût d'acquisition de ces avions Rafale ; le choix de la compagnie en charge de construire certains éléments aéronautiques ; et enfin le fait qu'il n'y ait pas de réel transfert de technologie compris dans l'accord. L'opposition maintient que ces Rafales sont plus chers sous ce nouveau contrat que sous l'accord passé en 2008. Le gouvernement indien prétend que ce nouvel accord permet, au contraire, une baisse de coût de 9 % de moins par avion par rapport à l'ancien accord. Mais, dans le même temps, il refuse de s'exprimer devant le Parlement sur le prix total, mettant en avant l'accord de confidentialité signé en janvier 2016 avec la France et Dassault et des considérations de secret défense et de sécurité nationale. Une préférence du privé au public qui pose question L'opposition questionne aussi vivement le fait que le gouvernement ait autorisé que le partenaire de Dassault soit une compagnie de défense privée (Reliance Aerospace Limited) dans le cadre de l'accord de 2016 et n'ayant qu'une expérience très limitée dans le domaine de l'aéronautique de défense. Par ailleurs, celle-ci, au moment de l'accord, connaissait de fortes pertes financières. L'ancien accord prévoyait que le partenaire principal soit l'entreprise publique Hindustan Aeronotics Limited (HAL) qui possède une importante expertise dans l'industrie des avions de combat depuis l'Indépendance. Cette préférence du privé au public, couplée à la question de la compétence, ont suffi pour jeter la suspicion sur l'aval donné à ce choix. D'autant plus que les frères Mukesh et Anil Ambani, originaires du Gujarat (État à l'ouest du pays), tout comme le premier ministre, sont considérés comme très proches de ce dernier. Ainsi que l'a dit François Hollande, le gouvernement indien a toujours maintenu le fait que la compagnie privée retenue a été du choix du vendeur français et que les gouvernements ne sont pas intervenus dans ce choix. Ils sont rejoints par les déclarations de Dassault qui revendique cette liberté de décision. Comment Reliance Aeronotics s'est imposé Ce qui est plus intéressant dans cette polémique, c'est de comprendre pourquoi Reliance Aeronotics Limited, entreprise ayant peu d'expérience et très endettée, s'est imposé par rapport à Hindustan Aeronotics. Reliance Aeronotics avait déjà discuté avec Dassault dans le cadre du premier accord de 2008. À cette époque, l'entreprise était sous l'égide de l'aîné des Ambani, Mukesh, et ce dernier n'avait pas souhaité participer au projet jugeant les procédures administratives et légales trop contraignantes. Ce n'est qu'après 2012, quand Anil Ambani a pris la direction de Reliance Aeronotics à la place de son frère, que les discussions ont repris. Les plans d'une joint-venture auraient été discutés lors d'Aero India (le salon aéronautique indien) deux mois avant l'annonce par Modi du nouvel accord. Or, une vidéo d'Éric Trappier (le PDG de Dassault Aviation) prise 15 jours avant l'annonce du nouveau contrat de 2015 le montre se réjouissant d'un partenariat avec Hindustan Aeronotics Limited. Dassault se défend en expliquant que cette vidéo a été prise avant que le nouvel accord ait été proposé et que cette phase était logique dans le cadre de l'ancien accord ou Hindustan Aeronotics apparaissait. L'enjeu central des transferts de technologie Ce qui est plus probable, c'est que ce changement d'accord opportun ait permis à Dassaut d'avoir plus de coudées franches par rapport au projet, l'évitant ainsi d'avoir à faire un transfert de technologie trop important. Les discussions préliminaires avec Hindustan Aeronotics portaient a priori sur le fait de construire sur place une partie des structures du Rafale alors que l'accord avec Reliance Aeronotics prévoit la participation de Reliance sur la construction de certains composants d'avions d'affaire (comme le Falcon 2000), et de façon anecdotique ceux du Rafale (dont l'assemblage sera fait en France). Et c'est sans doute bien sur ce point que les commentaires des opposants au nouveau deal sont les plus pertinents. En effet, à son arrivée au pouvoir, Modi a souhaité faire en sorte que tout nouvel accord avec des entreprises étrangères réponde au cahier des charges de sa politique du « Make in India » : la production ou l'assemblage doit être en partie localisée en Inde. Ici, ce cahier des charges n'est pas réellement complet, même si, par le nouveau contrat, Dassault s'est engagé à réinvestir la moitié de la somme du contrat (qui est de presque 8 milliards d'euros) à travers le système des offset (investissements compensatoires). Le partenariat avec Reliance Aeronotics et la joint-venture ne porte, pour l'instant, que sur 100 millions d'euros pour l'usine commune qui est construite à Nagpur. Dans son communiqué de presse du 21 septembre, Dassault indique néanmoins d'autres partenariats vont être signés avec d'autres entreprises comme BTSL, DEFSYS, Kinetic, Mahindra, Maini, et SAMTEL. La bataille politique de l'armement en Inde Les controverses autour du Rafale et la véhémence du Parti du Congrès contre le BJP s'inscrivent en fait dans la longue continuation de la bataille politique entre le Congrès et ses opposants depuis les années 1980 vis-à-vis de la question de l'armement. Chaque contrat avec des puissances étrangères a fait l'objet des mêmes attaques pour un gouvernement comme pour l'autre, et un nombre substantiel de contrats n'ont pu voir le jour. La conséquence de ce jeu politique n'est pas neutre pour l'Inde. Le pays a été contraint de faire ses achats d'armements sans réelle cohérence dans la construction de sa politique de défense, plus souvent basée sur le contrat créant le moins de polémiques que sur l'efficacité technique ou la cohérence des commandes. Par contre, Narendra Modi, en refusant d'apporter un peu plus de transparence sur le prix et les conditions d'achat du Rafale, fait sans doute une erreur tactique. Et il semble retomber dans le même travers que Rajiv Gandhi (le père de Rahul Gandhi, le plus véhément principal opposant de Modi sur cette affaire et leader du parti du Congrès) lors du scandale Bofors dans les années 1980. Ce dernier y perdit ses soutiens politiques dans son propre parti, le soutien de l'armée et cette affaire provoqua la chute du gouvernement (et l'arrêt du contrat par la même occasion). En fin tacticien, c'est certainement avec le souvenir de cette histoire en tête que Rahul Gandhi cherche à préparer le terrain des élections générales de l'année prochaine. L'art délicat de la diplomatie des ventes d'armes Par ces propos ambigus, François Hollande a certainement cherché à se prémunir contre toute attaque vis-à-vis d'un conflit d'intérêts entre les choix stratégiques de la France et sa vie privée. Cette priorisation de l'intérêt personnel par rapport aux intérêts français est une option risquée et qui a d'ailleurs conduit l'ancien Président à faire machine arrière sur ses propos suite à une contredéclaration du Quai d'Orsay. Cet incident pourrait néanmoins porter à long terme préjudice à la France. N'oublions pas que l'Inde est le premier importateur d'armes au monde et le premier client export de Dassault Aviation ainsi que de la France en termes d'armement sur la période 2007-2016. L'achat de matériel militaire ne se joue pas uniquement sur la performance de celui-ci mais est un art délicat de diplomatie et d'équilibre des rapports de pouvoir entre les États et les entreprises. Et l'ancien Président est pourtant bien placé pour le savoir. https://theconversation.com/histoire-dun-faux-pas-ce-qui-se-joue-vraiment-derriere-laffaire-du-rafale-en-inde-104014
19 juillet 2019 | International, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR, Sécurité, Autre défense
NAVY HII Fleet Support Group LLC, Virginia Beach, Virginia (N00039-19-D-0020); General Dynamics Information Technology Inc., Fairfax, Virginia (N00039-19-D-0021); M.C. Dean Inc., Tysons, Virginia (N00039-19-D-0022); Prism Maritime LLC,* Chesapeake, Virginia (N00039-19-D-0023); Serco Inc., Herndon, Virginia (N00039-19-D-0024); and VT Milcom Inc., Virginia Beach, Virginia (N00039-19-D-0025), are awarded a combined $2,450,000,000 indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity, cost-plus-incentive fee, fixed-price-incentive-firm-target, cost-plus-fixed-fee, firm-fixed-price multiple award contract to provide worldwide installation services for all afloat command, control, communications, computer, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (C4ISR) and supporting systems, current and future, under the cognizance of the Naval Information Warfare Systems Command (NAVWAR). C4ISR installation services include decommissioning and modernization of existing platforms, as well as installation design and installation of integrated C4ISR systems, program and project management, engineering design, industrial work, troubleshooting, operational verification, end-user training and other installation services and material necessary to accomplish NAVWAR C4ISR maintenance, modernization and new system installation. Work will be performed in various worldwide locations based on the requirement for each task order placed, and work is expected to be completed July 2024. If the option is exercised, ordering could continue until July 2029. No contract funds will be obligated at the time of award. Contract funds in the amount of $5,000 will be obligated on the first task order under each contract utilizing fiscal 2019 operations and maintenance (Navy). All awardees will have the opportunity to compete for task orders during the ordering period. The types of funding to be obligated include fiscal 2019 operations and maintenance (Navy); fiscal 2019 other procurement (Navy); fiscal 2019 shipbuilding and conversion (Navy); and fiscal 2019 research, development, test and evaluation (Navy). Contract funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This requirement was solicited using full and open competition via the NAVWAR e-Commerce Central website and the Federal Business Opportunities website, with seven offers received. The Naval Information Warfare Systems Command, San Diego, California, is the contracting activity. Data Link Solutions LLC, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, is awarded a $235,566,335 modification to its current indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract (N00039-15-D-0007) to increase the ceiling of the existing production contract line item number (CLIN), spares CLIN, and systems engineering and integration CLIN of the referenced contract. This ceiling increase will implement the capabilities identified in the Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) Memorandum dated Aug. 20, 2018, wherein the JROC endorsed the advanced capabilities of Concurrent Multi-Netting-4 (CMN-4), Concurrent Contention Receive, and Enhanced Throughput as the Department of Defense baseline for all future upgrades to any platform requiring Link-16. In response to the JROC memorandum, current Link-16 platform users identified the need for the procurement and/or retrofit of 3,370 additional Multifunctional Information Distribution System Joint Tactical Radio System (MIDS JTRS) CMN-4, F-22 Falcon, Tactical Targeting Network Technology (TTNT) terminals. This increase in scope will be in addition to the current scope in the original Class Justification and Approval (CJ&A) No. 17,226 approved April 25, 2014, for the MIDS JTRS; the amended CJ&A No. 18,012 approved Jan. 18, 2017, for the addition of the MIDS JTRS TTNT development effort; and CJ&A No. 18,415 approved Sept. 11, 2018, for the addition of MIDS Modernization Increment 2, retrofits and additional MIDS JTRS terminals, not including F-22s. The modification will increase the contract value to $1,224,529,670. This contract combines purchases for the Navy, Air Force and MIDS Program Office, as well as to the governments of Austria, Chile, Finland, Israel, Jordan, Japan, Kuwait, Malaysia, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, United Arab Emirates, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. This contract also includes purchases to NATO and all NATO nations under the Foreign Military Sales program. Work will be performed in Cedar Rapids, Iowa (50%); and Wayne, New Jersey (50%), and is expected to be completed June 2020. No additional funding will be placed on contract or obligated at the time of modification award. Existing contract funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. Future contract actions will be issued and funds obligated as individual delivery orders. This contract modification was not competitively procured because it is a follow-on sole-source, multiple-award procurement pursuant to the authority of Title 10 U.S. Code 2304(c)(1): only one or a limited number of responsible sources (Federal Acquisition Regulation subpart 6.302-1(a)(2)). Non-competitive procedures were approved for this modification under CJ&A 19,415. Naval Information Warfare System Command, San Diego, California, is the contracting activity. ViaSat Inc., Carlsbad, California, is awarded a $90,768,631 modification to its current indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract (N00039-15-D-0008) to increase the ceiling of the existing production contract line item number (CLIN) of the referenced contract. This ceiling increase will implement the capabilities identified in the Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) Memorandum dated Aug. 20, 2018, wherein the JROC endorsed the advanced capabilities of Concurrent Multi-Netting-4 (CMN-4), Concurrent Contention Receive, and Enhanced Throughput as the Department of Defense baseline for all future upgrades to any platform requiring Link-16. In response to the JROC memorandum, current Link-16 platform users identified the need for the procurement and/or retrofit of 3,370 additional Multifunctional Information Distribution System Joint Tactical Radio System (MIDS JTRS) CMN-4, F-22 Raptor, Tactical Targeting Network Technology (TTNT) terminals. This increase in scope will be in addition to the current scope in the original Class Justification and Approval (CJ&A) No. 17,226 approved April 25, 2014 for the MIDS JTRS; the amended CJ&A No. 18,012 approved Jan. 18, 2017, for the addition of the MIDS JTRS TTNT development effort; and CJ&A No. 18,415 approved on Sept. 11, 2018, for the addition of MIDS Modernization Increment 2, retrofits, and additional MIDS JTRS terminals, not including F-22s. The modification will increase the contract value to $789,000,000. This contract combines purchases for the Navy, Air Force and MIDS Program Office, as well as to the governments of Austria, Chile, Finland, Israel, Jordan, Japan, Kuwait, Malaysia, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, United Arab Emirates, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. This contract also includes purchases to NATO and all NATO nations under the Foreign Military Sales program. Work will be performed in Carlsbad, California, and work is expected to be completed May 2020. No additional funding will be placed on contract or obligated at the time of modification award. Existing contract funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. Future contract actions will be issued and funds obligated as individual delivery orders. This contract modification was not competitively procured because it is a follow-on sole-source, multiple-award procurement pursuant to the authority of Title 10 U.S. Code 2304(c)(1): only one or a limited number of responsible sources (Federal Acquisition Regulation subpart 6.302-1(a)(2)). Non-competitive procedures were approved for this modification under CJ&A 19,415. Naval Information Warfare System Command, San Diego, California, is the contracting activity. Raytheon Co., Marlborough, Massachusetts, is awarded an $87,793,895 cost-plus-fixed-fee, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract with cost-plus-fixed-fee and firm-fixed-price ordering provisions for engineering and program support services in support of the relocatable over-the-horizon radar at the Forces Surveillance Support Center in Chesapeake, Virginia. The contract will include a 60-month base period with no option periods. Work will be performed in Chesapeake, Virginia (60%); Marlborough, Massachusetts (20%); New Kent, Virginia (6%); Corpus Christi, Texas (3%); San Juan, Puerto Rico (3%); England (2%); Adelaide, Australia (1%); Dayton, Ohio (1%); Colorado Springs, Colorado (1%); Washington, District of Columbia (1%); Arlington, Virginia (1%); and Key West, Florida (1%). Work is expected to be completed by August 2024. Fiscal year 2019 operations and maintenance (Navy) funds in the amount of $2,000,000 will be obligated to fund the contract's minimum amount and funds will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was a sole-sourced requirement pursuant to the authority set forth in 10 U.S. Code 2304(C)(1) and Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.302-1, with one offer received. Naval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center, Norfolk, Contracting Department, Philadelphia Office, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, is the contracting activity (N00189-19-D-Z030). Paradigm Mechanical Corp.,* Lemon Grove, California, is awarded a maximum amount $49,000,000 indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for commercial and institutional building construction alterations, renovations, and repair projects at Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, Marine Corps Logistics Base, Barstow, and Mountain Warfare Training Center, Bridgeport. Projects will be primarily design-bid-build (fully designed) task orders or task order with minimal design effort (e.g. shop drawings). Projects may include, but are not limited to, alterations, repairs, and construction of administration buildings, maintenance/repair facilities, aircraft control towers, hangars, fire stations, office buildings, laboratories, dining facilities and related structures. Work will be performed in Twentynine Palms, California (36%); Barstow, California (36%); and Bridgeport, California (28%). The term of the contract is not to exceed 60 months with an expected completion date of July 2024. Fiscal 2019 operations and maintenance (Navy) contract funds in the amount of $5,000 are obligated on this award and will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. Future task orders will be primarily funded by operations and maintenance (Navy). This contract was competitively procured via the Navy Electronic Commerce Online website, with seven proposals received. The Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, San Diego, California, is the contracting activity (N62473-19-D-2624). Sapper West – Spectrum Service Group JV,* Sacramento, California, is awarded a maximum amount $49,000,000 indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for other specialty trade contractors construction alterations, renovations and repair projects at Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach; and Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton. Projects will be primarily design-bid-build (fully designed) task orders or task order with minimal design effort (e.g. shop drawings). Projects may include, but are not limited to, alterations, repairs, and construction of electrical, mechanical, painting, engineering/design, paving (asphaltic and concrete), flooring (tile work/carpeting), roofing, structural repair, fencing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning, and fire suppression/protection system installation projects. Work will be performed in Seal Beach, California (50%); and Oceanside, California (50%), and the term of the contract is not to exceed 60 months with an expected completion date of July 2024. Fiscal 2019 operations and maintenance (Navy) contract funds in the amount of $5,000 are obligated on this award and will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. Future task orders will be primarily funded by operations and maintenance (Navy). This contract was competitively procured via the Navy Electronic Commerce Online website, with six proposals received. The Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest, San Diego, California, is the contracting activity (N62473-19-D-2622). Sapper West – Spectrum Service Group JV,* Sacramento, California, is awarded a maximum amount $49,000,000 indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for other specialty trade contractors construction alterations, renovations, and repair projects at Naval Base, Ventura County. Projects will be primarily design-bid-build (fully designed) task orders or task order with minimal design effort (e.g. shop drawings). Projects may include, but are not limited to, alterations, repairs, and construction of electrical, mechanical, painting, engineering/design, paving (asphaltic and concrete), flooring (tile work/carpeting), roofing, structural repair, fencing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning, and fire suppression/protection system installation projects. Work will be performed in Port Hueneme, California (50%); and Point Mugu, California (50%), and the term of the contract is not to exceed 60 months with an expected completion date of July 2024. Fiscal 2019 operations and maintenance (Navy) contract funds in the amount of $5,000 are obligated on this award and will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. Future task orders will be primarily funded by operations and maintenance (Navy). This contract was competitively procured via the Navy Electronic Commerce Online website, with six proposals received. The Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest, San Diego, California, is the contracting activity (N62473-19-D-2618). Management and Technology Solutions Inc., doing business as MTS Group, Dumfries, Virginia, is awarded a $39,300,000 firm-fixed-priced contract for general warehousing services at Navy Expeditionary Medical Support Command, Cheatham Annex, Williamsburg, Virginia, and is expected to be completed by Sept. 30, 2024. Fiscal 2020 Defense Health Program operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $4,830,490 will be obligated on an initial task order at the time of award and will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. The contract was competitively procured via the Federal Business Opportunities website, with three offers received. The Naval Medical Logistics Command, Fort Detrick, Maryland, is the contracting activity (N62645-19-D-5008). Bristol General Contractors LLC, Anchorage, Alaska, is awarded $24,496,240 for firm-fixed-price task order N69450-19-F-0857 under a previously awarded multiple award construction contract (N69450-13-D-1771) for P-5000 consolidated communications facility at Barksdale Air Force Base. The work to be performed provides for design-build construction of a new three-story consolidated communications facility. The facility will include all required demolition, utilities construction and site improvements. Work will be performed in Barksdale, Louisiana, and is expected to be completed by January 2022. Fiscal 2017 and 2018 military construction (Air Force) contract funds in the amount of $21,000,000 and $3,496,240 are obligated on this award and will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. Two proposals were received for this task order. The Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southeast, Jacksonville, Florida, is the contracting activity. Naval Systems Inc., Lexington Park, Maryland, is awarded a $23,043,905 cost-plus-fixed-fee, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract. This contract provides cost estimating and analysis support. Specifically, to provide analyses including acquisition and logistics estimating, independent evaluations, case studies and recommendations, along with associated data in support of cost estimating and analysis that spans all phases of the life cycle (i.e., material solution analysis, technology demonstration, engineering and manufacturing development, production and deployment, and operations and support). Work will be performed in Lexington Park, Maryland (56%); Patuxent River, Maryland (30%); Lakehurst, New Jersey (7%); and Orlando, Florida (7%), and is expected to be completed in August 2024. No funds will be obligated at the time of award. Funds will be obligated on individual orders as they are issued. This contract was competitively procured via an electronic request for proposal, with two offers received. The Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, Patuxent River, Maryland, is the contracting activity (N00421-19-D-0075). Sig Sauer Inc., Newington, New Hampshire, is awarded a $9,338,800 firm-fixed-price modification under previously-awarded contract N00164-18-D-JQ30 for an in-scope change to the internal reticle of the SU-293/PVS Second Focal Plane (SFP) Squad-Variable Powered Scope (S-VPS) to add a glass etched reticle. This modification is to a highly competitive procurement for the SFP S-VPS system. The S-VPSs to be procured are in support of the U.S. Special Operations Command Visual Augmentation Systems Weapons Accessories S-VPS Program. Work will be performed in Newington, New Hampshire, and is expected to be completed by July 2029. No funding will be obligated at time of award. In accordance with 10 U.S. Code 2304(c)(1), this modification was not competitively procured (only one source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements). The Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane, Indiana, is the contracting activity. Lockheed Martin Corp., Rotary and Mission Systems, Riviera Beach, Florida, is awarded a $9,620,135 cost-plus-fixed-fee modification to previously awarded contract (N00024-17-C-6308) for engineering support services in support of Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (UUV) subsystem development. Engineering services will be used to develop and study UUV subsystems and concepts initially developed under the Extra Large Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (XLUUV) program, including navigational capabilities, autonomy, and payload deployment. Work will be performed in Riviera Beach, Florida, and is expected to be completed by June 2020. Fiscal 2019 research, development, test and evaluation (Navy) funds in the amount of $3,025,163 will be obligated at time of award and will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. The Naval Sea Systems Command, Washington, District of Columbia, is the contracting activity. General Dynamics Missions Systems Inc., McLeansville, North Carolina, is awarded a $9,207,817 cost-plus-fixed-fee modification to previously awarded contract N61331-11-C-0017 for engineering services in support of ongoing development, test, and production of the Surface Mine Countermeasure Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (UUV) program, also known as Knifefish. The Knifefish program is an ongoing effort to provide a UUV that will provide persistent mine hunting ability in a contested environment. Engineering services hours are used for a number of efforts, including test and evaluation, engineering change proposal development, and pre-planned product improvement initiatives. Work will be performed in Quincy, Massachusetts (52%); McLeansville, North Carolina (27%); Braintree, Massachusetts (10%); Hanover, Maryland (5%); Reston, Virginia (5%); and Ann Arbor, Michigan (1%), and is expected to be completed by July 2020. Fiscal 2019 research, development, test and evaluation (Navy) funding in the amount of $150,000 will be obligated at time of award and will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. The Naval Sea Systems Command, Washington, District of Columbia, is the contracting activity. AIR FORCE Group W Inc., Vienna, Virginia, has been awarded a $24,553,592 indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity, firm-fixed-price and cost-plus-fixed-fee contract for professional technical support of the Air Force's synthetic theater operations research module. This contract provides for system maintenance, system help-desk support, and development of additional capabilities for the Air Force's campaign modeling software suite. Work will be performed at Air Force's Studies and Analyses Directorate and the Air Force Warfighting Integration Capability office, Arlington, Virginia, and, if all options are exercised, is expected to be completed by Nov. 28, 2023. This award is the result of a competitive source acquisition and one offer was received. Fiscal 2019 operations and maintenance funding in the amount of $747,060 was obligated on the task order coinciding with contract award. Air Force District Washington Contracting Directorate, Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, is the contracting activity (FA7014-19-D-A001). (Awarded Nov. 28, 2018) Lockheed Martin Corp., Orlando, Florida, has been awarded a $23,637,880 cost-plus-incentive-fee modification (P00004) to previously awarded contract FA8682-18-C-0009 for providing a replacement joint air to surface standoff missile (JASSM) anti-jam GPS receiver with a new JASSM Anti-Jam GPS Receiver (JAGR) due to obsolescence. This contract provides replacement for the current JAGR due to obsolescence. Work will be performed at Orlando, Florida, and is expected to be completed by March 31, 2023. Fiscal 2019 procurement funds in the amount of $23,637,880 are being obligated at the time of award. The Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, is the contracting activity. AX Enterprize LLC., Yorkville, New York,* has been awarded a $7,753,015 modification to previously awarded contract FA8750-16-C-0293 for collaborative low-altitude Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) integration effort. The objective of this effort is to research the needs and challenges of the integration of unmanned aircraft operations in the UAS Traffic Management (UTM) as well as the relevance and impact of UTM on manned and unmanned aircraft operations. Work will be performed at Yorkville, New York, and is expected to be completed by Sept. 30, 2020. Fiscal 2019 research, development, test and evaluation funds in the amount of $7,753,015 are being obligated at the time of award. The Air Force Research Laboratory – Information Directorate's Information Grid and Systems Contracting Branch, Rome Research Site, Rome, New York, is the contracting activity. ARMY NIC4 Inc.,* Tampa, Florida, was awarded a $13,418,364 firm-fixed-price contract for Very Small Aperture Terminals services and equipment. One bid was solicited via the internet with one bid received. Work locations and functions will be determined with each order, with an estimated completion date of July 31, 2024. U.S. Army Contracting Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, is the contracting activity (W91CRB-19-D-5001). *Small Business https://dod.defense.gov/News/Contracts/Contract-View/Article/1908210/source/GovDelivery/