Air Force moves to improve electronic warfare effectiveness

Sur le même sujet

• 

  9 août 2022 | International, Aérospatial, C4ISR

  QinetiQ's American unit agrees to buy software specialist Avantus

  This acquisition is an important step in the execution of QinetiQ's five-year ambitions to expand our presence in the US according to the company's CEO.

• 

  10 décembre 2019 | International, Aérospatial

  L'achat d'un nouvel avion de combat, un choix militaire et diplomatique

  Le Rafale, l'Eurofighter, le F-35A ou le F/A-18 Super Hornet: quel nouvel avion de combat la Suisse choisira-t-elle? La décision sera politique. Mais ce choix n'est pas qu'une question de technologie. L'enjeu est aussi diplomatique. Les 26 vieux Tiger et les 30 F/A-18 de l'armée suisse arriveront à la fin de leur durée d'utilisation au plus tard vers 2030. Après le retrait du suédois Saab, constructeur du Gripen, il ne reste plus que quatre constructeurs en lice pour les remplacer: le français Dassault (Rafale), l'européen Airbus (Eurofighter) et les américains Boeing (F/A-18 Super Hornet) et Lockheed-Martin (F-35A). Les quatre jets ont été évalués entre avril et juin sur la base aérienne de Payerne (VD). Objectif: tester leurs capacités en conditions réelles. Au terme de l'appel d'offres, le Département fédéral de la défense effectuera une recommandation fondée sur l'efficacité opérationnelle, mais aussi sur d'autres critères comme les coûts d'achat et d'exploitation. La décision finale reviendra au Conseil fédéral. Quel avion pour quel partenaire? La compétition entre les quatre candidats se jouera sur les capacités de l'appareil mais aussi sur les contreparties industrielles - les affaires compensatoires - exigées par la Suisse. Moins visible, il existe aussi un autre enjeu, plus diplomatique. Pour le comprendre, la RTS s'est rendue dans la capitale française. Le ministère français des Armées, qui chapeaute l'offre pour le Rafale, lui a exceptionnellement ouvert ses portes. La France, cinquième puissance militaire mondiale, n'exporte pas ses armes comme elle exporte ses voitures, explique Thierry Carlier, chargé du dossier côté français. "Qu'un pays ami acquiert un système qui est le même que celui de la France permet de développer des partenariats très importants. C'est pour ça que notre offre dépasse largement la question du Rafale", affirme-t-il. Pour le directeur du développement international de la Direction générale de l'armement (DGA), cette notion de partenariat est importante. Acheter un avion français permettrait de créer des opportunités au niveau technologique, avec des échanges, mais également sur un plan plus opérationnel: réalisation d'exercices communs, utilisation par la Suisse de terrains d'entraînement français, développement des missions de police du ciel existantes, partage d'expériences, etc. "Europe de la défense" La France n'est pas la seule à vouloir séduire la Suisse avec un partenariat. C'est aussi le cas de l'Allemagne, qui vend l'Eurofighter, fabriqué par Airbus. Acheter cet avion, c'est s'allier davantage à l'Allemagne, comme le relevait ce printemps le lieutenant-colonel de l'armée de l'air allemande Ingo Stüer lors de la présentation de l'Eurofighter à Payerne. "Je pense que les défis pour les armées de l'air en Europe sont tous les mêmes, affirmait-il. Pour l'armée de l'air allemande, c'est important d'être interopérable avec nos alliés, afin d'être capable d'agir ensemble s'il le faut. C'est pourquoi nous cherchons une coopération très étroite avec l'armée de l'air suisse." La France et l'Allemagne, avec leurs offres, proposent aussi à la Suisse "l'Europe de la défense", une certaine vision d'une Europe géographique souveraine défendue par Emmanuel Macron. "Je pense qu'il y a une cohérence des Européens à s'équiper en européen. Je défends beaucoup cette idée", expliquait en juin dernier le président français à la RTS. L'argument économique Si cette "Europe de la défense" n'intéresse pas la Suisse, il reste les deux chasseurs américains. Lors des essais du F/A-18 Super Hornet et du F-35A à Payerne, l'ambassadeur des Etats-Unis en Suisse Edward McMullen adoptait d'ailleurs des arguments différents de ses concurrents européens. Un style diplomatique davantage porté sur les enjeux économiques. "Lorsqu'on parle de développement économique et d'opportunités de marchés, il s'agit d'un partenariat. Nous sommes conscients que la Suisse est neutre et il n'y a aucune alliance avec elle", explique-t-il. Un vote sur le principe, pas sur l'avion L'Europe ou les Etats-Unis? Pour quel partenariat? Le Conseil fédéral se réserve ce choix. Sur ce point, le peuple n'aura pas son mot à dire. Il ne votera que sur l'enveloppe de six milliards de francs destinée à l'acquisition des nouveaux avions de combat sans connaître le nom de son futur partenaire. La votation devrait intervenir à l'automne 2020. https://www.rts.ch/info/suisse/10922471-l-achat-d-un-nouvel-avion-de-combat-un-choix-militaire-et-diplomatique.html

• 

  8 avril 2020 | International, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR, Sécurité

  COVID-19: Help Fleets Of Innovators Make 3D Printed Face Masks

  By JOHN QUIGG Next month we'll celebrate the 80th anniversary of Operation Dynamo, better known as “the Miracle of Dunkirk.” In the course of three days, hundreds of British civilian boats crossed the Channel to save their Army from starvation and the advancing Germans. Why? The Royal Navy did not have enough ships to transport the troops nor the right type of boats to operate in the shallows of the French coast. The key to the operation's success was governmental agility, masterful logistics, and realizing that the only solution to saving the entire force was a never-seen-before public/private partnership and lightning fast decision making (along with favorable weather and air cover). Our first responders and medical heroes are trapped on a figurative beach as the crest of the COVID-19 epidemic looms with too few supplies, thus facing illness and possible death. Supply chains ravaged by years of creating just-in-time global networks are not up to this challenge. The “Little Ships” in our modern story to the rescue will be 3-D printers. The air cover will be shielding from tort lawyers, and the civilian volunteers the remarkable talents comprising the nation's maker community. I confess that this is personal — my youngest brother is an EMT in suburban Atlanta. He tells me that his coworkers and emergency room staff are already down to handmade masks and are begging for supplies. The need is clear – top priority must be placed on vetting and publishing designs, finding out where the nation's supply chain can't satisfy projected demand, and the command and control required to match makers with the needs of the nation's first responders. For example, the Seattle Children's hospital was running critically low on masks several weeks ago and was desperate for help. Enter Rory Larson, a talented CAD designer who spent two caffeine fueled days and nights designing and testing a printable version of an N-95 mask with replaceable filters which were enthusiastically embraced by the hospital staff. His father, Garr, connected him with Jonathan Roberts, a veteran of Microsoft and Innovation Partners. Roberts helped scale the availability of the design, enlisted production partners and reached out to people who could help them leap over the many administrative hurdles — and set up a website. Now anyone with a printer can download the design and print their own masks. The military is already headed down this path. US Forces Korea tasked their science advisors from the Office of Naval Research and Army Futures Command to start an internal effort given the shortages of masks and other supplies in Asia. They designed, produced and disseminated a face shield for gate guards and are exploring the techniques for other medical shortfalls however the design and approval process is still problematic. One of their largest challenges is procedural – sharing military-manufactured equipment falls foul of all sorts of regulations and they will need process changes at a pace no earthly acquisition official could normally achieve. This problem is replicated across the defense enterprise as installations around the world wrestle with the red tape surrounding helping their neighbors and host countries. To help, the Department of Defense Manufacturing Innovation Institute for additive manufacturing (www.AmericaMakes.us) initiated a fast track certification process to breach the monolith of government approvals. ONR Global's Mark Buffum tells me that they are working with ONR/USFK legal to check that the validation coordination between the FDA and AmericaMakes will allow designs that have passed Clinical Review to be moved to production at DOD installations globally. The end state for now is a tested design placed on the NIH's 3D design exchange that is approved for manufacture. The government is working on the dispensations needed to take a mask printed on a Navy ship in Korea, an Army logistics train in Iraq, or an Air Force base in Colorado. Similarly, 3D makers near Active Duty/Reserve/National Guard installations should be integrated into their supply chain. If worst case scenarios come to pass and civilian logistics fail then we have an exercised plan to connect military supply and transport capabilities to the manufacturers and vice versa. Much as the Royal Navy executed the plan to flag and man the Little Ships during Dunkirk, we must figure out how the military can leverage local, regional, and national maker capabilities to get those printers humming. A case in point is the Belgian chemical company Solvay, partnering with Boeing, to leverage its extensive expertise in thermoplastic materials—and especially medical-grade plastics—to support various efforts aimed at fighting the pandemic. Their support centers located around the world are ready to support material selection, manufacturing support, relevant testing and regulatory certifications. They are offering to put makers in touch with their extensive network of distributors, molders and machine shops.Additionally, Boeing is working with Solvay to design/produce more durable face shields for healthcare workers. Boeing announced last week it would be shifting some of its manufacturing capacity, including its in-house 3D printing, to produce thousands of face shields per week for medical workers. At the local level, community leaders like Todd Spain are talking to their local hospital to determine shortfalls, and are working with a regional maker group, Colorado Makers Unite (MakerUnite.co) to produce their own masks and ventilator adapters to protect the staff and enable equipment sharing. They are prepared to make anything their first responders need. One of the biggest roadblocks is the administrative state: the only readily available plastic is not approved for medical use, the approved plastic is on a 3-week wait list and costs 10X more, shipping of vital feed-stock and machines is not on the prioritized list, and the usual hurdles of liability, etc.... One can only imagine the potential legal hurdles to using something that hasn't been tested in countless lawsuits unless a company gets regulatory relief. A partnership with the local National Guard unit or military installation could bring their concerns to light and allow the Defense Department to take on the job of connecting the capability to the population and while providing emergency protection from the trial bar. We must move heaven and earth to give the brave people trying to build an ad hoc network of 3-D mask makers our best and ensure that the “small ships” of the 3-D printing world and its makers are allowed to give it their best shot. I can only hope that history looks back at this time with wonder that we were able to pull it off. John Quigg, a retired Army officer, was one of America's first cyber warriors. He is a senior advisor to Spurrier Capital Partners, a New York investment bank, and a senior staffer at Johns Hopkins' Applied Physics Lab. https://breakingdefense.com/2020/04/covid-19-help-fleets-of-innovators-make-3d-printed-face-masks