Trudeau told NATO that Canada will never meet spending goal, Discord leak shows

On the same subject

• 

  November 21, 2018 | Local, Aerospace

  Le Canada manque d'avions de chasse et de pilotes, constate le vérificateur général

  Le Canada dispose d'un nombre insuffisant d'avions de chasse pour répondre au niveau d'alerte le plus élevé et honorer ses engagements à l'endroit de l'OTAN. C'est la conclusion inquiétante du vérificateur général du Canada, Michael Ferguson, qui déplore du même coup l'absence de plan pour mettre fin notamment à l'importante pénurie de pilotes et de techniciens. Un texte de Marc Godbout Des appareils qui ne sont pas à jour et un sérieux manque de pilotes et de techniciens : les conclusions du vérificateur général sont loin d'être rassurantes. En fait, même si la Défense nationale disposait d'un nombre suffisant d'appareils, les problèmes ne seraient pas réglés pour autant, confirme Michael Ferguson. Elle n'a aucun plan pour surmonter les plus grands obstacles au respect de la nouvelle exigence opérationnelle, à savoir la pénurie de pilotes et le déclin de la capacité de combat de ses aéronefs. Extrait du rapport Il faudra donc plus que les 3 milliards de dollars déjà prévus pour prolonger la durée de vie de la flotte actuelle et pour acheter, exploiter et entretenir des avions de chasse d'occasion de l'Australie. « Les investissements décidés ne suffiront pas pour lui permettre d'avoir chaque jour un nombre suffisant d'appareils disponibles afin de répondre au niveau d'alerte le plus élevé du NORAD (Commandement de la défense aérospatiale de l'Amérique du Nord) et honorer dans le même temps l'engagement du Canada envers l'OTAN (Organisation du traité de l'Atlantique Nord) », précise Michael Ferguson. Y a-t-il un pilote dans l'avion? Le rapport confirme que la Défense nationale disposait de seulement 64 % des pilotes de CF-18 qualifiés pour satisfaire aux exigences opérationnelles. Entre avril 2016 et mars 2018, l'Aviation royale canadienne a perdu 40 pilotes de chasse qualifiés et en a formé seulement 30 nouveaux. Extrait du rapport Michael Ferguson va même plus loin : « Si les pilotes continuent de quitter à ce rythme, il n'y aura pas assez de pilotes expérimentés pour former la prochaine génération de pilotes de chasse. » Le problème est confirmé par le ministre des Transports fédéral, Marc Garneau. « C'est un défi qu'on a au Canada de recruter plus de pilotes, non seulement du côté militaire, mais aussi du côté commercial. C'est un dossier sur lequel je me penche en ce moment pour essayer de trouver des solutions pour recruter plus de gens », a indiqué le ministre aux journalistes mardi. M. Garneau souligne que le coût d'une formation de pilote est très élevé, et que c'est la raison principale pour laquelle pas assez de gens sont attirés vers le domaine. « Pour devenir un pilote commercial, ça coûte 80 000 $ », dit-il. Par ailleurs, Marc Garneau ne voit pas de contradiction entre le fait d'acheter des avions usagés australiens et l'absence de pilotes pour les conduire. « Nos forces armées sont en train de travailler très fort pour recruter des pilotes, et quand les pilotes vont être là, il faut que les avions soient là. Alors il faut s'occuper des deux en parallèle », pense-t-il. Manque de techniciens pour préparer les avions De plus, les techniciens avaient été en mesure de préparer à peine 83 % des aéronefs nécessaires pour satisfaire aux engagements en matière de défense auprès du NORAD et de l'OTAN. Or, si le nombre de techniciens expérimentés n'augmente pas, prévient Michael Ferguson, les vols que pourra effectuer chaque pilote de CF-18 diminueront. Le rapport précise que, l'an dernier, les pilotes avaient enregistré moins d'heures de vol que le nombre minimal requis de 140 heures. La Défense nationale n'a pas pu faire le nécessaire, constate le vérificateur général, « vu l'incertitude entourant la date de remplacement de la flotte d'avions de chasse ». Sécurité des ambassades, graves lacunes Près de 8000 employés travaillent dans les missions canadiennes à l'étranger, dont la moitié se trouvent dans des endroits où leur sécurité était menacée en raison de l'imprévisibilité politique ou de troubles civils. Or, le vérificateur général en arrive à un autre constat inquiétant : « Affaires mondiales n'avait pas pris toutes les mesures de sécurité dans ses missions à l'étranger en fonction de l'évolution des menaces. » Le ministère avait pourtant relevé des lacunes qui devaient immédiatement être corrigées, dont de nombreuses failles majeures dans plusieurs de ses 175 missions diplomatiques et consulaires. Les délais pour remédier aux lacunes entraînent « des retards pour assurer efficacement la protection du personnel et des biens à l'étranger », conclut Michael Ferguson. Vidéosurveillance inadéquate, absence de barrière pour restreindre l'accès des véhicules aux entrées des missions et mécanismes d'alarme défaillants sont cités en exemple par le vérificateur général. Une mission située dans un endroit où la menace était élevée ne disposait pas d'appareil de radiographie pour contrôler les visiteurs, alors que l'on en trouvait dans des endroits où la menace était plus faible. Extrait du rapport De plus, de nombreux employés qui travaillaient dans des endroits dangereux n'avaient toujours pas suivi la formation obligatoire. Michael Ferguson souligne que les retards sont attribuables « à une mauvaise gestion et à une surveillance inadéquate des projets » par Affaires mondiales. https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/1136935/avions-chasse-canadiens-verificateur-general

• 

  October 6, 2020 | Local, Naval

  Shipbuilding industry pushes back as federal government shops for used icebreaker

  Murray Brewster The federal government is in the market for another used icebreaker that could be converted for use by the Canadian Coast Guard on the Great Lakes — much to the dismay of shipbuilders across the country. A request for proposals to acquire an existing light icebreaker was posted on the government's procurement website in mid-September. The timing is interesting. Federal decision-makers have known for five years that the coast guard needs such a vessel for the region. The request for proposals — which closes at the end of October — was posted as U.S. lawmakers began to push bipartisan legislation through Congress to strengthen the U.S. Coast Guard's capacity to break ice and keep commerce flowing on the Great Lakes. The plan for Canada to buy a used icebreaker follows a separate decision by Transport Canada to purchase a used ferry from Spain on an emergency basis. Build them here, says industry The Canadian Marine Industry and Shipbuilding Association (CMISA), which represents most of the marine suppliers and shipyards across the country, said both decisions represent a loss of domestic jobs and at least $250 million in federal spending that could have gone into a Canadian economy hard hit by the coronavirus. "We're of the strong belief that vessels such as light icebreakers can and should be built in Canada," said Colin Cooke, president and chief executive officer of the shipbuilding association. "We have the capacity. We have the skilled trades. We have the expertise, the technical expertise. We have the shipyards. And that was what the point of the National Shipbuilding Strategy was all about." That shipbuilding strategy is supposed to direct government work to Canadian shipyards. Cooke said the plan to purchase an existing icebreaker and the deal to acquire a former Spanish ferry would both be unacceptable in normal times — but they're even less acceptable now. "We are in a COVID time when we're looking for all sorts of ways to make sure that people are employed, that businesses are able to survive — I won't say thrive, I will say survive — through the lockdowns caused by this pandemic," he said. Public Services and Procurement Canada was asked for comment last Thursday but did not respond. The tender for the light icebreaker, posted online Sept. 18, describes the purchase as a necessary interim step for the coast guard to "bridge the gap while awaiting the delivery of dedicated new vessels." Significantly, the request for proposals noted that the need for such a ship was identified five years ago — around the same time a comprehensive analysis warned that the coast guard icebreaking fleet was in dire straits and in need of immediate replacement. "In 2015-16 the CCG identified a requirement for interim icebreaking capabilities to fill gaps in capacity resulting from ships being temporarily withdrawn from service" for refit and life extension, said the tender. Two years ago, the Liberal government concluded a deal worth $827 million with Chantier Davie of Levis, Que., which operates the Davie shipyard, to refit three medium-sized commercial icebreakers for the coast guard. Used icebreakers could be scarce Tim Choi, a University of Calgary shipbuilding expert, said this recent tender suggests the federal government is operating on the flawed assumption that there is an abundance of used icebreakers on the market. The deal with the Davie shipyard was an anomaly and federal officials "got lucky" last time because there happened to be three vessels available, he said. Choi said he believes the federal government isn't likely to be so fortunate this time: his research suggests there may be only one light icebreaker out there that would fit in the bill — in Finland — and it's not clear the Finns are ready to part with it. "There are very few requirements for a vessel like that outside of Canada and the United States in the Great Lakes, St. Lawrence region," said Choi. "It's not like there's a used car lot where you can just go out and buy these things." The shipbuilding association said it can make a strong case for a fast-track build in Canada. Choi said he believes procurement services may be forced in that direction anyway because of market conditions. In mid-September, three U.S. senators — Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Todd Young (R-IN) and Gary Peters (D-MI) — introduced the Great Lakes Winter Commerce Act. The bipartisan legislation is expected to codify the U.S. Coast Guard's icebreaking operations on the Great Lakes and, more importantly, increase the size of its fleet. "Inadequate icebreaking capacity in the Great Lakes is costing us thousands of American jobs and millions in business revenue," said Baldwin in a statement. "We must boost our icebreaking capacity in the Great Lakes to keep our maritime commerce moving." https://www-cbc-ca.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/www.cbc.ca/amp/1.5751143

• 

  March 29, 2019 | Local, Naval

  SNC-Lavalin's legal woes are putting a $500M federal defence contract at risk

  Murray Brewster · CBC News A SNC-Lavalin contract with the Department of National Defence (DND) worth half a billion dollars comes up for renewal next year — when the Montreal-based engineering giant is expected to be on trial over corruption charges. The pending expiry of the $507 million contract to support the servicing of minor warships and auxiliary vessels, signed in 2011, sharpens the debate over what a guilty verdict would mean for the Quebec-based engineering giant and whether a conviction actually would mean subjecting the company to a 10-year ban on bidding for federal contracts. The stakes are high for DND. In addition to holding an important defence contract, SNC-Lavalin has access to a range of secret military drawings, equipment and intellectual property. Although its agreements are periodically reopened to new bids, the embattled corporation has been a reliable contractor for National Defence. A survey of active federal government contracts shows DND and Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) were the two biggest users of SNC-Lavalin services and construction during the current fiscal year. Across the whole of the federal government, SNC-Lavalin holds 53 'active' federal government contracts — 25 of them with DND — with a combined value of $670 million. A company with a big federal footprint The firm signed roughly $68 million in new or renewed agreements with the federal government ($23.7 million with DND and PSPC alone) in the current budget year up to the end of December. That figure excludes what could be a large number of smaller contracts worth less than $25,000 — contracts the federal government can award without competition. An inventory of those agreements is extremely difficult to track down, but PSPC acknowledged it awarded $146,522 in minor work to SNC-Lavalin in the current fiscal year. The RCMP laid corruption charges against SNC-Lavalin and some of its units in February 2015. All the charges relate to the company's operations in Libya. The charges allege that the company offered officials in that country $47 million in bribes and accuse SNC-Lavalin and two of its subsidiaries of defrauding various Libyan public agencies of approximately $129.8 million over 10 years, starting in 2001. The company has been at the centre of a political firestorm since early February, when The Globe and Mail reported that former justice minister Jody Wilson-Raybould felt pressured by the Prime Minister's Office to grant the company a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) — a legal tool which would have allowed the company to avoid a criminal trial by acknowledging fault and paying a fine, among other conditions. In defending their interest in a DPA for SNC-Lavalin, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and others in his government have pointed to the scale of the engineering firm's business, the possibility it could be banned from federal government work and the number of people it employs. Scott Newark, a former Crown prosecutor who teaches at Simon Fraser University, said it's been clear from the outset that avoiding the federal contract ban has been SNC-Lavalin's main objective. The question of what would happen to those federal contracts should the company be convicted is a subject of debate, however. There are policy provisions that allow federal officials to cancel existing contracts and ban future bids from a company convicted of serious crimes, such as bribery. PSPC would only say the federal government would "assess the situation" if "a supplier becomes ineligible during the life of a contract" due to a conviction. The power to terminate or suspend a contract rests with federal bureaucrats, according to PSPC's Ineligibility and Suspension Policy. A company convicted of serious crimes can avoid being fired by the feds by signing an undertaking stating "that it will conduct business with Canada in an ethical and responsible manner." But there's never a guarantee that such an undertaking will be offered to a convicted company. Just three companies are currently banned from carrying on business with the federal government — all relatively small firms in Ontario, Quebec and Newfoundland. No ban on bidding during trial A spokesman for DND said there's nothing stopping SNC-Lavalin from continuing to bid on federal contracts as they appear, even during its trial. "These contracts were issued pursuant to Government of Canada contracting regulations, particularly as it concerns open, fair and transparent competitions," said Dan Le Bouthillier in an email. "Those regulations also stipulate that any company eligible to bid on Government of Canada contracts may continue to do so, so long as they meet the necessary requirements for the work." In an analysis piece for the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, Newark said PSPC is working on a revision of its 'integrity regime' policy to give federal officials more discretion to waive bans of individual companies contracting with the federal government. Public Services Minister Carla Qualtrough has said her department is looking at eliminating fixed bidding disqualification periods and replacing them with a wholly discretionary determination — which would include the option of imposing no contracting ban at all. Even under the current system, Newark said, an order cancelling a company's federal contracts and banning it from future contracts following a conviction is far from a slam-dunk. "I checked on the Criminal Code and the Corruption of Public Foreign Officials Act and, of course, it's not in those statutes. It's not a mandatory consequence." he said. The integrity regime review has been underway in Qualtrough's department since 2017. Newark said he's amazed that nobody with the company or the federal government seems to have realized that a conviction for SNC-Lavalin could lead to something other than a 10-year contracting ban. "Why didn't anybody say, 'Hey wait a minute. We know what about this. We're changing our policy,'" he said. The head of procurement at DND attempted to reassure members of the all-party House of Commons defence committee during a hearing last month that SNC-Lavalin's "secret" work for the federal government does not pose an unacceptable risk. "We hold the intellectual property, the drawings and everything," Pat Finn testified on Feb. 28. "Irrespective of the circumstances in which the contract is terminated, we hold the material." https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/snc-lavalin-s-legal-woes-are-putting-a-500m-federal-defence-contract-at-risk-1.5073996