Back to news

July 9, 2022 | International, C4ISR

Guerre électronique : un marché avion en préparation par le ministère des Armées

DÉFENSE

Guerre électronique : un marché avion en préparation par le ministère des Armées

La guerre en Ukraine et le retrait de service accéléré du Gabriel, ou le Transall C160G, qui assure la reconnaissance électronique, l'espionnage et le recueil de renseignements, ont décidé le ministère des Armées à disposer d'une capacité intérimaire avant l'arrivée des 3 Dassault Falcon Archange, dont la livraison semble désormais calée pour 2026, puis prévue sur 3 ans. A ce stade, le gabarit de l'appareil choisi n'est pas connu, mais il devrait s'agir d'un biturbine pour atteindre des altitudes raisonnables et durer un minimum en l'air, surtout si l'aéronef doit aussi servir à maintenir un format minimal à l'escadron électronique 1/54 Dunkerque. Depuis plus de 10 ans, le ministère des Armées loue des capacités ISR au secteur privé (quasiment exclusivement au Luxembourgeois CAE Aviation), principalement pour la DGSE et la DRM. Plusieurs formules ont été testées, comme la fourniture d'avions et d'équipage de conduite, ou seulement d'avions (l'équipage étant fourni par l'armée de l'Air et de l'Espace). Malgré le retrait de ses 2 Gabriel, l'armée de l'Air et de l'Espace conserve des disponibilités minimales avec un segment terrestre, des capacités ESM de ses E-3F Awacs, et des capacités d'interception électromagnétique de ses 2 Vador, qui ont été utilisés en opérations pour la 1ère fois depuis la Roumanie.

Air & Cosmos du 8 juillet


On the same subject

  • Barrett announces new US partnership and US Government contract

    March 25, 2020 | International, C4ISR

    Barrett announces new US partnership and US Government contract

    Perth, Western Australia – Monday March 23, 2020 – Barrett Communications is pleased to announce its partnership with US company Royal Communications International, Inc. and the award of a follow-on FMS contract with the US Mission in Central Asia. Royal Communications have provided sales and support for HF radio communications solutions for over 30 years and is ideally positioned within the US to team with Barrett in delivering sales, training, installation, technical and warranty support for the full range of Barrett HF solutions. Barrett Communications USA Corp. General Manager, John Eschenfelder said, “Our US investment strategy is two-fold, our partnership with Royal Communications and our US manufacturing facility provides us a truly ‘Made in USA' product, bringing us closer to our US customer base and enhancing our ability to deliver the next level in product and customer service in the USA.” The latest phase of the US-funded Counter Narcotics Global Threats program has been delivered by Barrett Communications. The delivered PRC-2090 HF manpack and vehicle systems will enhance and expand the strategic communications and force tracking capabilities to the mission, strengthening border security and preventing illegal trafficking. Mr. Andrew Burt, Barrett Communications CEO, commented “We live in unprecedented times and conditions are changing rapidly. Barrett Communications are committed to ensuring the supply of our products and solutions, and as a global company we are investing in our manufacturing and support capability globally to ensure our customers continue to receive the personalized service they are accustomed to.” View source version on Barrett Communications: https://www.barrettcommunications.com.au/news/barrett-announces-new-us-partnership-and-us-government-contract/

  • Too many cooks in the DoD: New policy may suppress rapid acquisition

    January 2, 2020 | International, Aerospace, Naval, Land, C4ISR, Security

    Too many cooks in the DoD: New policy may suppress rapid acquisition

    By: Eric Lofgren In 2015, Congress passed middle tier acquisition, or MTA, authorities for rapid prototyping and rapid fielding. Lawmakers expected detailed guidance to follow shortly after. By June 2019, the Government Accountability Office found little clarity on documentation and authority. Congress reacted by threatening to withhold 75 percent of MTA funding in 2020 until the Pentagon released guidance. Dangle the purse strings and compliance follows. The undersecretary for acquisition and sustainment, or USD(A&S), released Department of Defense Instruction 5000.80 on Dec. 30, 2019. The MTA guidance, however, is more likely to pump the brakes on rapid acquisition than propel it forward. Programs designated “middle tier” do not have to follow regulatory processes for requirements and milestone reviews. That can shave years off a program schedule. In return, the prototype must be completed — or system fully fielded — within five years. As of March 2019, there were 35 middle tier programs. The term “middle tier” is perhaps misleading considering nearly half of them exceed the cost thresholds for major weapon systems — roughly $200 million for prototyping or $1 billion for fielding. Many questions remained unanswered until the new policy. How big was a middle tier? What documentation does it require? What is the role of oversight and USD(A&S)? Authority For several years, acquisition authority had been delegated down to the services. While the services only managed 48 percent of major programs in 2014, the figure grew to 90 percent in 2019. DoDI 5000.80 reverses the trend. While the services can approve MTA for non-major programs, only USD(A&S) may approve major programs. Moreover, major programs have far more entrance documentation than non-majors, including approved requirements, an acquisition strategy and a cost estimate. The services may avoid some documentation by disaggregating major systems into multiple MTA programs. For example, two of the Navy's non-major programs are components to Standard Missile-6 Block 1B. The same is true of the Air Force's Airborne Warning and Control System. USD(A&S), however, can still disapprove any MTA program, whether major or non-major. With advisers from all around the Office of the Secretary of Defense, there will be will numerous potential veto points. Each official may extract concessions from MTA programs managed by the services. Even though 31 out of 35 MTA programs are rapid prototyping efforts, the undersecretary for research and engineering, or USD(R&E), has been relegated to a secondary position. All MTA authority rests with USD(A&S). Almost as an affront to USD(R&E), he was given control over a rapid prototyping fund that Congress stopped funding. The outcome reflects a broader weakening of USD(R&E). Congress has reacted negatively to the undersecretary's effort to move fast and reallocate funds to higher value uses. USD(R&E) may lose control of the Missile Defense Agency to USD(A&S). Documentation While MTA exempts programs from traditional requirements and milestone processes, documentation abounds. Each service must create its own requirements process with approval in six months. Joint service requirements are discouraged from using MTA pathways. MTA requirements, however, must still meet the needs determined by four-star generals in the Joint Chiefs of Staff and combatant commands. This may in effect bring the same approvals from the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System process back into MTA. Many of the DoDI 5000.02 processes also apply. Still required are system analyses, sustainment plans, test strategies, cybersecurity, risk assessments, cost estimates and more. Contractors performing on MTA programs must still report cost data. No exemption was made for earned value management systems. Sidestepping many contract regulations — for example, with other transactions authorities — remains a separate process. Most importantly, Congress requires detailed justification in the budget for every MTA program. That means the services must start justifying MTAs at least two years in advance of funding receipt. Many of today's MTA programs spun off existing, budgeted line items. New programs may find a hard time finding funds. The present situation is reminiscent of the time David Packard attempted rapid acquisition between 1969 and 1971. A couple years later, new layers of bureaucracy descended. Similarly, MTA has built within it the seeds of another slow-paced bureaucratic order. Adm. Hyman Rickover's skepticism to the reforms nearly 50 years ago rings true today. As Rickover wrote to Packard in a memo: “My experience has been that when a directive such as the one you propose is issued, most of the effort goes into the creation of additional management systems and reports and the preparation of large numbers of documents within the Service to ‘prove' that the requirements of the directive are being met in order to justify funds for the Service. “So long as the bureaucracy consists of a large number of people who consider that they are properly performing their function of approval and evaluation by requiring detailed information to be submitted through the bureaucracy, program managers will never be found who can in fact effectively manage their jobs.” https://www.defensenews.com/opinion/commentary/2020/01/02/too-many-cooks-in-the-dod-new-policy-may-suppress-rapid-acquisition/

  • Australia makes another order for Boeing’s Loyal Wingman drones after a successful first flight

    March 3, 2021 | International, Aerospace

    Australia makes another order for Boeing’s Loyal Wingman drones after a successful first flight

    The design will also be the basis of one of the U.S. Air Force's Skyborg entrants.

All news