December 11, 2020 | International, Aerospace
La STAT (section technique de l'armée de terre) a révélé que le SMDR (système de mini-drones de reconnaissance) sera déployé dans les prochains jours sur le thé'tre sahélien.
La section technique de l'armée de Terre a reçu l'AJD (association des journalistes professionnels de défense) le mercredi 9 décembre sur le plateau de Satory. A cette occasion, le Général Vidaud, commandant de la STAT, a annoncé que le SMDR, système de mini-drones de reconnaissance, sera déployé en opération dans les prochains jours, avant la fin du mois de décembre. Le SMDR et l'équipe de marque qui l'accompagnera seront ainsi projetés sur le thé'tre de l'opération Barkhane. La durée de projection des équipes de la STAT est estimée à un mois, mais pourrait évoluer en fonction des besoins sur place.
Le déploiement du SMDR par une équipe de la STAT permettra de « vérifier que l'équipement peut être employé de manière opérationnelle », nous explique ainsi le Général Vidaud. L'ambition est ainsi de pouvoir transférer le matériel vers les forces tout en les accompagnant dans cette prise en main, via un appui des équipes de la STAT. Cela représentera donc la dernière étape de l'opérationnalisation du SMDR avant son transfert complet vers l'armée de Terre. Evalué par le groupement renseignement de la STAT, le SMDR est très attendu par les forces. Les systèmes de mini-drones de reconnaissance « seront mis en œuvre par les sections mini-drones des batteries d'acquisition et de surveillance des régiments d'artillerie et par le 61e régiment d'artillerie », détaillait en juin dernier la DGA.
Alors que le programme avait pris du retard puisque les premiers systèmes étaient attendus pour 2019, la DGA annonçait le 16 juin dernier, lors de la livraison à l'armée de Terre des trois premiers systèmes (un système correspondant à trois drones et une station sol), un déploiement opérationnel avant fin 2020. Un engagement respecté de justesse.
Le SMDR viendra ainsi remplacer le DRAC (drone de reconnaissance au contact) dont l'entrée en service remonte à 2008. Ce renouvellement des moyens permettra de doter l'armée de Terre de moyens plus performants. Alors que le DRAC disposait d'une heure d'autonomie pour 10 km de portée, le SMDR peut mener des missions de trois heures, pour 30 km de portée. Au total ce sont 35 systèmes qui ont été commandés par le Ministère des Armées. « Déployer des drones tels que le Patroller ou le SMDR sur Barkhane, c'est sauver des vies. Les moyens de surveillance manquent en BSS », déclarait ainsi dans nos colonnes le colonel Marc Bonnet, chef de corps du 61e RA, en juin dernier.
October 17, 2023 | International, Naval
Huntsville, Ala., October 16, 2023 /PRNewswire/ -- Lockheed Martin's (NYSE: LMT) Next Generation Interceptor (NGI) program executed its digital All Up Round (AUR) Preliminary Design Review (PDR), in partnership with...
October 25, 2019 | International, Aerospace
OPINION. Le porte-avions offre une capacité militaire majeure à une marine. Son déploiement, lors d'une crise, représente un signal politique fort. L'apparition d'un porte-avions aux couleurs de l'Europe serait certes « hautement symbolique », mais le symbole ne suffit pas dans les questions de défense. Par un groupe de travail au sein de l'association EuroDéfense-France(*). « Le Charles-de-Gaulle aura besoin d'un successeur », souligna Florence Parly, la ministre des Armées, au salon Euronaval en octobre 2018, en lançant une phase d'études pour la construction d'un nouveau porte-avions, qui pourrait entrer en service vers 2030-2035. Ce successeur sera-t-il isolé ? Ou en couple, comme le furent naguère le Clemenceau et le Foch ? Cette solution serait militairement préférable, permettant à la France de toujours disposer d'un b'timent opérationnel, tandis que l'autre serait en période d'entretien ou en refonte. Elle aurait toutefois un coût élevé, celui d'un seul navire étant estimé à 4,5 milliards d'euros. Le porte-avions offre une capacité militaire majeure à une marine. Son déploiement, lors d'une crise, représente un signal politique fort. Dans sa mission Clemenceau, entre mars et juillet derniers, le groupe aéronaval, constitué par le Charles de Gaulle avec ses b'timents d'accompagnement, a participé à l'opération Chammal contre Daech au Moyen-Orient, puis a rejoint la région indo-pacifique pour une série d'exercices avec les marines de l'Inde, des États-Unis, de l'Australie, de la Malaisie et du Japon, et celle de l'Egypte au retour. Combat contre le terrorisme et coopération avec nos alliés ont ainsi conjugué guerre et diplomatie. Dans sa réponse aux propositions d'Emmanuel Macron en vue d'une réforme de l'Union européenne, Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, alors successeure d'Angela Merkel à la présidence de l'Union chrétienne-démocrate d'Allemagne et désormais ministre fédérale de la Défense, a écrit en mars de cette année : close volume_off « Dès à présent, l'Allemagne et la France travaillent ensemble au projet d'un futur avion de combat européen... La prochaine étape pourrait consister en un projet hautement symbolique, la construction d'un porte-avions européen commun, pour souligner le rôle de l'Union européenne dans le monde en tant que puissance garante de sécurité et de paix. » Macron et Merkel ont plusieurs fois exprimé l'ambition d'une « armée européenne. » Si l'Europe veut tenir sa place dans le concert mondial, tel qu'il se dessine avec des puissances-continent comme les États-Unis, la Chine, la Russie ou l'Inde, elle doit se doter d'une capacité militaire d'action. Des progrès indéniables sont intervenus depuis 2017, notamment gr'ce à la coopération structurée permanente, le fonds européen de défense, l'initiative européenne d'intervention, mais l'Union européenne reste loin de disposer d'une véritable armée. Un porte-avions aux couleurs de l'Europe ? L'apparition d'un porte-avions aux couleurs de l'Europe serait certes « hautement symbolique », comme l'écrit la responsable allemande, et ce navire pourrait montrer le drapeau de l'Union sur les mers du globe et aux approches des continents. Cependant, le symbole ne suffit pas dans les questions de défense. Un porte-avions est un navire de guerre et, s'il peut remplir des missions diplomatiques de présence, il faut, pour que celles-ci soient crédibles, qu'il soit aussi capable d'intervenir militairement, qu'il sache effectivement combattre. À cet égard, la réalisation d'un porte-avions peut paraître prématurée à ce stade de l'intégration européenne. Florence Parly a, en effet répondu, sur les ondes de RMC en mai dernier qu'on « n'en est pas encore tout à fait là », en évoquant les conditions d'emploi d'un tel navire. Il ne suffit pas de construire un porte-avions, encore faut-il être capable de l'employer, certes pour des missions de présence, mais également, si besoin, pour un engagement armé dans une crise ou un conflit. Or, l'on n'en est pas encore là. La brigade franco-allemande est déployée au Sahel, mais seules ses composantes françaises se battent contre les djihadistes, la partie allemande intervenant dans le cadre d'un mandat de l'Union européenne pour la formation de l'armée malienne ou dans celui de la force onusienne Minusma. Conjuguer les besoins de la France et ceux de l'Europe ? Faut-il alors abandonner l'idée d'un porte-avions européen ? Ne pourrait-on conjuguer les besoins de la France et ceux de l'Europe ? Un second porte-avions serait utile à la marine française. Un porte-avions européen signifierait une étape considérable dans l'affirmation militaire de l'Union, qui est en chemin. Pourquoi la France ne partagerait-elle pas un porte-avions ? Pourquoi ne pas engager la construction de deux porte-avions, le premier français, le second franco-européen. Celui-ci naviguerait sous le pavillon national, celui-là naviguerait généralement sous le pavillon européen et arborerait le pavillon français, quand l'autre serait indisponible. Le premier serait financé uniquement par la France, le second le serait à parité par la France et l'Union européenne. Budgétairement, l'opération serait rentable : la France disposerait toujours d'un porte-avions opérationnel pour un coût probablement inférieur à celui d'un b'timent et demi, une série de deux s'avérant à l'unité moins couteuse que la construction d'un seul ; l'Union européenne acquérait, de même, un porte-avions pour un budget inférieur sans doute à la moitié du coût d'un navire isolé. Mettre en œuvre un groupe aérien de qualité Des questions sensibles seraient à résoudre, l'une des premières concernant le groupe aérien. En effet, la puissance d'un porte-avions réside dans sa capacité mettre en œuvre un groupe aérien de qualité. La France est le seul pays européen à utiliser, comme les Etats-Unis, des catapultes. La Grande-Bretagne, l'Espagne et l'Italie déploient des porte-aéronefs avec des avions à décollage court ou vertical, aux capacités moindres. Le groupe aérien, qui réunirait des appareils capables d'apponter sur les nouveaux porte-avions, serait logiquement composé du futur avion de combat européen, dont le projet a été lancé par la France et l'Allemagne, rejointes par l'Espagne. Des évolutions devraient intervenir chez nos amis, soit, comme en Allemagne, pour reconstituer une aviation embarquée, soit, comme en Italie, pour choisir un avion européen. Des décisions significatives seraient nécessaires, mais ces pays, voire d'autres, pourraient vouloir développer une composante aéronavale moderne, dès lors que le coût budgétaire, né de la coopération européenne, serait raisonnable. Rien, techniquement, n'interdirait de créer des flottilles européennes d'avions pouvant apponter sur ces porte-avions. Un autre sujet délicat est celui de l'équipage. Celui-ci rend opérationnel le porte-avions, qui accueille des flottilles d'avions et l'état-major du groupe aéronaval. Il doit être en phase avec son navire. Quand le b'timent franco-européen naviguerait sous pavillon français, son équipage devrait, au besoin, pouvoir être engagé au combat, y compris avec ses membres non français. Développer la participation, étendre le périmètre de discussion S'agissant du groupe aéronaval, d'ores et déjà l'habitude est prise que des navires européens intègrent celui du Charles-de-Gaulle, y compris dans des missions d'engagement armé. Ainsi, chaque fois que ce b'timent a été déployé pour frapper Daech, il a été accompagné par de tels navires (allemand, belge, britannique et italien). L'existence d'un porte-avions européen développerait la participation des marines européennes, en contribuant à leur excellence. L'accord devrait intervenir également sur le système de propulsion, nucléaire ou non, et sur le partage des t'ches entre les industries navales, la France étant la seule, à ce jour, à disposer des compétences pour construire des porte-avions dotés de catapultes. D'autres sujets seraient à traiter, comme le port d'attache, la formation et l'entrainement, la chaîne de commandement... La résolution de certaines questions serait indéniablement délicate, mais possible en présence d'une vraie volonté politique. Cette volonté témoignerait d'un pas nouveau et significatif de l'Europe pour sa défense et de son rayonnement dans le monde. https://www.latribune.fr/opinions/tribunes/pourquoi-pas-un-porte-avions-franco-europeen-831590.html
January 31, 2020 | International, Aerospace, Naval, Land, C4ISR, Security
ARMY General Dynamics Mission Systems, Orlando, Florida, was awarded an $883,000,000 order-dependent contract for the enhancement and maintenance of the Live Training Transformation (LT2) product line, including software architecture, LT2 framework, and individual products associated with the LT2 product line. Bids were solicited via the internet with one received. Work locations and funding will be determined with each order, with an estimated completion date of Jan. 31, 2028. U.S. Army Contracting Command, Orlando, Florida, is the contracting activity (W900KK-20-D-0007). PAE Professional Services, LLC, Falls Church, Virginia, was awarded a $90,000,000 firm-fixed-price contract to provide temporary construction security infrastructure, equipment, services and security surveillance services to support secure construction projects to support the Yongsan Relocation Program in the Far East District, South Korea. Bids were solicited via the internet with four received. Work locations and funding will be determined with each order, with an estimated completion date of Jan. 29, 2025. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Far East District, South Korea, is the contracting activity (W912UM-20-D-0002). Lockheed Martin Corp., Missiles and Fire Control, Dallas, Texas, was awarded a $77,064,274 Foreign Military Sales (Bahrain, Republic of Korea, Germany, Japan, Kuwait, Netherlands, Poland, Qatar, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Sweden, United Arab Emirates) contract for Phased Array Tracking Radar to Intercept on Target, Advanced Capability-3. Bids were solicited via the internet with one received. Work will be performed in Dallas, Texas, with an estimated completion date of Jan. 31, 2023. Fiscal 2019 and 2020 aircraft procurement, Army funds in the amount of $77,064,274 were obligated at the time of the award. U.S. Army Contracting Command, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, is the contracting activity (W31P4Q-19-F-0003). Aerojet Rocketdyne, Camden, Arkansas, was awarded a $76,874,368 modification (P00005) to contract W31P4Q-18-D-0027 for procurement of Stinger flight motors. Bids were solicited via the internet with one received. Work locations and funding will be determined with each order, with an estimated completion date of Sept. 30, 2021. U.S. Army Contracting Command, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, is the contracting activity. Trade West Construction,** Mesquite, Nevada, was awarded a $52,672,800 firm-fixed-price contract to deepen the upstream approach to the locks in the north canal at the Soo Locks complex in Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan. Bids were solicited via the internet with three received. Work will be performed in Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, with an estimated completion date of Sept. 30, 2021. Fiscal 2019 civil construction and State of Michigan contributed funds in the amount of $52,672,800 were obligated at the time of the award. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Detroit, Michigan, is the contracting activity (W911XK-20-C-0002). Schutt Industries Inc.,** Clintonville, Wisconsin, was awarded a $51,492,774 firm-fixed-price contract for procurement of four models of a 2.5-ton single-axle chassis trailer. Bids were solicited via the internet with four received. Work locations and funding will be determined with each order, with an estimated completion date of Jan. 28, 2027. U.S. Army Contracting Command, Detroit Arsenal, Michigan, is the contracting activity (W56HZV-20-D-0023). Hensel Phelps Construction Co, Tysons Corner, Virginia, was awarded a $34,227,105 firm-fixed-price contract for the design and construction of a new warehouse facility of approximately 44,000 gross square foot with associated office space. Bids were solicited via the internet with 10 received. Work will be performed at Fort Meade, Maryland, with an estimated completion date of July 8, 2022. Fiscal 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 military construction, Army funds in the amount of $34,227,105 were obligated at the time of the award. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore, Maryland, is the contracting activity (W912DR-20-C-0004). Applied Visual Technology Inc.,** Orlando, Florida, was awarded a $31,000,000 firm-fixed-price contract to design, develop, integrate, manage, deliver, install, test, document and support construction equipment virtual trainers. Bids were solicited via the internet with five received. Work locations and funding will be determined with each order, with an estimated completion date of Jan. 29, 2025. U.S. Army Contracting Command, Orlando, Florida, is the contracting activity (W900KK-20-D-0008). General Dynamics Land Systems, Sterling Heights, Michigan, was awarded a $29,886,655 modification (P00096) to contract W56HZV-17-C-0067 for Abrams Systems technical support. Work will be performed in Sterling Heights, Michigan, with an estimated completion date of Jan. 29, 2021. Fiscal 2019 and 2020 procurement of weapons and tracked combat vehicles, Army; operations and maintenance, Army; and Kuwait Foreign Military Sales funds in the amount of $29,886,655 were obligated at the time of the award. U.S. Army Contracting Command, Detroit Arsenal, Michigan, is the contracting activity. Vectrus Systems Corp., Colorado Springs, Colorado, was awarded a $26,321,249 firm-fixed-price contract for information technology services to support the mission of the 2nd Theater Signal Brigade/U.S. Army Europe. Bids were solicited via the internet with two received. Work will be performed in APO AE, Germany, and APO AE, Italy, with an estimated completion date of Jan. 31, 2021. Fiscal 2020 operations and maintenance, Army funds in the amount of $26,321,249 were obligated at the time of the award. U.S. Army Contracting Command, Fort Huachuca, Arizona, is the contracting activity (W91RUS-17-C-0010). Marton Technologies Inc.,** Newport News, Virginia, was awarded a $9,090,390 modification (000191) to contract W52P1J-14-G-0021 for continued performance of logistics support services at Fort Riley, Kansas. Work will be performed in Fort Riley with an estimated completion date of Jan. 31, 2121. Fiscal 2020 operations and maintenance, Army funds in the amount of $9,090,390 were obligated at the time of the award. U.S. Army Contracting Command, Rock Island Arsenal, Illinois, is the contracting activity. SGS LLC, Yukon, Oklahoma, was awarded an $8,996,222 contract to design and construct a single story, 13,838 square foot blood donor center at Fort Bliss, Texas. Bids were solicited via the internet with five received. Work will be performed at Fort Bliss, Texas, with an estimated completion date of Nov. 2, 2021. Fiscal 2016 military construction, Army funds in the amount of $8,996,222 were obligated at the time of the award. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth, Texas, is the contracting activity (W9126G-20-C-0009). AIR FORCE Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd., Lod, Israel, has been awarded a $240,000,000 estimated ceiling indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for the acquisition of T-38 Wings. Work will be performed in Lod, Israel, and is expected to be complete by Jan. 2033. This award is the result of a competitive acquisition and four offers were received. Fiscal 2020 consolidated sustainment activity group working capital funds in the amount of $34,426,532 are being obligated at the time of award. The Air Force Sustainment Center, Hill Air Force Base, Utah, is the contracting activity (FA8208-20-D-0001). Gulfstream Aerospace Corp., Savannah, Georgia, has been awarded a delivery order in the amount of $127,430,000 firm-fixed‐price contract for the acquisition of two C-37B aircraft. Work will be performed in Savannah, Georgia, and is expected to deliver by September 2021. This award is the result of a sole-source acquisition. Fiscal 2020 procurement funds in the amount of $127,430,000 are being obligated at the time of award. The cumulative face value of the contract order is $127,430,000. The Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma, is the contracting activity (FA8134‐20-F‐3100). The Boeing Co., St. Louis, Missouri, has been awarded an $84,108,947 contract modification (P00007) to the previously awarded contract FA8634-18-C-2698 for the F-15 Advanced Display Core Processor (ADCP) II Low-Rate Initial Production 4. This contract modification exercises an option that provides the production and integration of the ADCP II boxes and related equipment into the F-15 platform. Work will be performed in St. Louis, Missouri, and is expected to be completed by July 22, 2022. This award is the result of a sole-source acquisition. Fiscal 2018, 2019 and 2020 procurement and working capital funds in the full amount are being obligated at the time of award. Total cumulative face value of the contract is $260,932,155. Fiscal 2018, 2019 and 2020 procurement funds in the amount of $74,346,630; and fiscal 2020 working capital funds in the amount of $9,762,318 are being obligated at the time of award. The Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, Fighter/Bomber Directorate, F-15 Division, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, is the contracting activity. Global Connections to Employment Inc., Pensacola, Florida, has been awarded a $28,683,615 firm-fixed-price contract for custodial services. The contractor will provide non-personal services for continued operational support. Work will be performed at MacDill Air Force Base, Florida, and is expected to complete by Jan. 31, 2027. This award is to a mandatory source under the AbilityOne program (41 U.S. Code 85 and 41 Code of Federal Regulations 51). Fiscal 2020 operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $5,657,808 will be obligated under multiple task orders at the time of award. The 6th Contracting Squadron, MacDill Air Force Base, Florida, is the contracting activity (FA4814-20-D-0003). Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., McLean, Virginia, has been awarded a $19,999,836 modification to previously awarded contract FA8750-18-C-0116 for Operational Resilient Cyber Advancements. The contract modification allows the performer to design and develop Microservice Architectures for defensive cyber operations technology in addition to utilizing a cloud-based orchestration engine to automate processes and develop Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning technology thrusts. Work will be performed in McLean, Virginia, and is expected to be completed by Aug. 5, 2023. Fiscal 2020 research, development, test and evaluation funds in the amount of $1,528,884 are being obligated at the time of award. The total cumulative face value of the contract is $67,435,795. The Air Force Research Laboratory, Rome, New York, is the contracting activity. NAVY Lockheed Martin Corp., Rotary and Mission Systems, Manassas, Virginia, is awarded an $81,645,285 cost-plus-incentive-fee contract modification to a previously awarded contract (N00024-17-C-6259) to exercise and fund options for naval production, engineering services and required materials for the government of Canada under the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) program. Work will be performed in Manassas, Virginia (65%); Clearwater, Florida (32%); Syracuse, New York (2%); and Marion, Florida (1%), and is expected to be completed by June 2026. FMS (Canada) funding for $79,584,238 will be obligated at time of award and will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. The Naval Sea Systems Command, Washington, District of Columbia, is the contracting activity. Northrop Grumman Mission Systems, Linthicum, Maryland, is awarded a $45,479,156 modification for the firm-fixed-price portion of a previously awarded contract (M67854-19-C-0043). This modification is for the purchase of two Gallium Nitride full rate production systems and spares in support of Program Executive Officer Land Systems, Quantico, Virginia. Work will be performed in Linthicum, Maryland, and is expected to be complete by April 4, 2023. Fiscal 2020 procurement (Marine Corps) funds in the amount of $45,479,156 will be obligated at the time of award and will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. The contract modification was not competitively procured. The base contract was prepared in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.302-1 and 10 U.S. Code § 2304(c)(1). The Marine Corps Systems Command, Quantico, Virginia, is the contracting activity. Jacobs Ewingcole JV, Pasadena, California, is awarded a firm-fixed-price task order N62473-20-F-4247 at $21,627,696 under an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for design-bid-build construction packages at Naval Air Weapons Station, China Lake, California. The work to be performed provides for preparation of design-bid-build construction packages consisting of full plans, specifications, cost estimates and other services. Work will be performed in Ridgecrest, California, and is expected to be completed by March 2021. Fiscal 2020 military construction (Navy) contract funds for $21,000,000 are obligated on this award and will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. One proposal was received for this task order. The Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest, San Diego, California, is the contracting activity (N62473-18-D-5801). URS Group Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, is awarded a $7,000,000 modification on a firm-fixed-price task order under a multiple award construction contract for phase one of Hurricane Michael repairs for stabilization and repairs to multiple buildings at Naval Support Activity, Panama City, Florida. After award of this modification, the total task order value will be $69,246,764. The work to be performed provides for construction, alteration and repair of real property and utilities because of Hurricane Michael. Work also includes any and all ancillary and incidental mechanical and electrical support services needed to accomplish required work including, but not limited to, disconnects, temporary reconnects, removals, extensions, modifications, alterations, reinstalls, new components and permanent reconnects necessary for functional operation. Work will be performed in Panama City, Florida, and is expected to be completed by October 2020. Fiscal 2019 operation and maintenance (Navy) contract funds for $7,000,000 are obligated on this award and will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. The Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southeast, Jacksonville, Florida, is the contracting activity (N62470-13-D-6022). DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY Pinnacle Petroleum Inc.,* Huntington Beach, California, (SPE605-20-D-4516, $63,570,797); Falcon Fuels Inc.,** Paramount, California, (SPE605-20-D-4509, $57,497,366); Brad Hall and Associates Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, (SPE605-20-D-4505, $55,451,197); Petroleum Traders Corp.,** Fort Wayne, Indiana, (SPE605-20-D-4515, $18,411,287); Merrimac Petroleum Inc.,* Long Beach, California, (SPE605-20-D-4514, $16,596,199); Mansfield Oil Company of Gainesville Inc., Gainesville, Georgia, (SPE605-20-D-4513, $9,251,400) and Foster Fuels Inc.,** Brookneal, Virginia, (SPE605-20-D-4510, $7,238,675) have each been awarded a fixed-price with economic-price-adjustment contract under solicitation SPE605-20-R-0200 for various types of fuel. These were competitive acquisitions with 39 offers received. These are 54-month contracts with a six-month option period. Locations of performance are Arizona, California, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Nevada, Utah and Virginia, with a Sept. 30, 2024, performance completion date. Using customers are Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps and federal civilian agencies. Type of appropriation is fiscal 2020 through 2024 defense working capital funds. The contracting activity is the Defense Logistics Agency Energy, Fort Belvoir, Virginia. Federal Resources Supply Co., Stevensville, Maryland, has been awarded a maximum $30,000,000 fixed-price with economic-price-adjustment, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for hospital equipment and accessories for the Defense Logistics Agency electronic catalog. This was a competitive acquisition with 102 responses received. This is a five-year contract with no option periods. Location of performance is Maryland, with a Jan. 29, 2025, performance completion date. Using military services are Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps. Type of appropriation is fiscal 2020 through 2025 defense working capital funds. The contracting activity is the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (SPE2DH-20-D-0028). Minburn Technology Group LLC,** Great Falls, Virginia, has been awarded an $18,191,117 firm-fixed-price delivery order (SP4701-20-F-0029) against a 10-year Department of Defense Enterprise Services Initiative blanket purchase agreement (N66001-19-A-0006) and General Services Administration Federal Supply Schedule (GS-35F-309AA) for a Microsoft enterprise licensing agreement. This was a competitive acquisition with five responses received. This is a one-year delivery order with two one-year option periods. Location of performance is Virginia, with a Jan. 31, 2021, performance completion date. Using customer is Defense Logistics Agency. Type of appropriation is fiscal 2020 through 2021 defense working capital funds. The contracting activity is the Defense Logistics Agency Contracting Services Office, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Robertson Fuel Systems LLC, Tempe, Arizona, has been awarded an $8,899,105 firm-fixed-price, indefinite-delivery requirements contract for fuel tank assemblies. This was a sole-source acquisition using justification 10 U.S. Code 2304 (c)(1), as stated in Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.302-1. This is a four-year contract with no option periods. Location of performance is Arizona, with a Jan. 31, 2024, performance completion date. Using military service is Army. Type of appropriation is fiscal 2020 through 2024 Army working capital funds. The contracting activity is the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama (SPRRA1-19-D-0012). DEFENSE COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY AGENCY ASRC Federal Professional Services LLC, Beltsville, Maryland, was awarded an estimated $54,757,914 firm-fixed-price contract (HS0021-20-C-0002) for the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA). The contract provides for case processing and overall operation center support services in support of the background investigation process. Work will be performed at Boyers, Pennsylvania, and St. Louis, Missouri. This contract is funded with fiscal 2020 DCSA working capital funds with $13,577,188 obligated at time of award. The anticipated period of performance includes one 12-month base period and four 12-month option periods. The estimated lifecycle award value is $276,794,547. This requirement was synopsized on the Federal Business Opportunities website as a single-award, small business set-aside on Nov. 20, 2018. As a result, all small businesses were solicited and six offers were received. The Contracting Office, Quantico, Virginia, is the contracting activity. *Woman-owned small business **Small business https://www.defense.gov/Newsroom/Contracts/Contract/Article/2070367/source/GovDelivery/