3 juillet 2018 | International, Aérospatial, C4ISR
By: Joe Gould
WASHINGTON ― America's aging C-135 reconnaissance planes keep breaking down, and alarmed lawmakers want the U.S. Air Force to tell them why.
Based at Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, the 55th Wing's Boeing-made reconnaissance and intelligence-gathering aircraft, all more than 50 years old, are meant to carry out critical missions from operating bases in England, Greece, Japan and Qatar.
But an Omaha World-Herald investigative series has found that mechanical problems plague the jets, cutting short 500 of their flights since 2016 and one of every 12 missions since 2015. That's prompted Nebraska lawmakers to write to Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson, urging her to probe and report on the health of the 55th Wing's worn-out fleet.
Meanwhile, the Nebraska delegation is trying to fend off an effort within Congress to strip funding to recapitalize the OC-135, which conducts overflights of Russia under the 34-nation Open Skies Treaty. Some lawmakers and Pentagon officials have grown skeptical of the treaty, which allows reciprocal surveillance flights, amid alleged Russian violations, but the administration has requested funds for two new airliners to take over the mission.
“It has one of the worst maintenance rates in the United States Air Force,” Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., said of the OC-135 on the House floor last week. “It frequently breaks down in Russia, putting us in very hostile, awkward situations with Russians at their bases.”
The chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee's Strategic Forces Subcommittee, Deb Fischer, led the letter with Sen. Ben Sasse, a SASC member; Bacon (a retired brigadier general and former 55th Wing commander who sits on the House Armed Services Committee), as well as Reps. Jeff Fortenberry and Adrian Smith.
The letter asked Wilson to report on the 55th Wing's safety, security and continued mission effectiveness as well as the Air Force's long-term plans to sustain and recapitalize the wing's capabilities.
It referenced the RC-135V/W Rivet Joint, RC-135S Cobra Ball, RC-135U Combat Sent, WC-135 Constant Phoenix, TC-135 Rivet Joint Trainer and the OC-135 Open Skies aircraft.
In the current budget season, House and Senate lawmakers have taken divergent approaches to the Trump administration's $222 million request for the two new aircraft.
House appropriators and authorizers stripped the funding from their 2019 bills. The authorization bill withholds the funding until Russia adheres to the treaty and agrees to extradite Russians indicted for meddling in U.S. elections in 2016.
Fischer helped ensure the Senate-passed 2019 authorization bill did include funding for OC-135 recapitalization, and the bill will have to be reconciled with its House counterpart.
Defense Secretary Jim Mattis directed the Air Force to recapitalize the aircraft. He wrote to Fischer in May to acknowledge that unplanned maintenance issues meant the U.S. completed only 64 percent of its scheduled overflights in 2017, while Russia typically completes all of its scheduled overflights.
The White House Office of Management and Budget has also issued letters objecting to the absence of OC-135 recapitalization funding in the House bills.
2 mai 2022 | International, C4ISR, Sécurité
The multi-day event is typically conducted under intense conditions, simulating a spreading crisis that ropes in the military and civilian worlds and the public and private sectors.
24 février 2020 | International, Aérospatial
Une nouvelle campagne d'essais en vol du démonstrateur technologique de drone de combat furtif nEUROn vient de s'achever à DGA Essais en vol (Istres). Le drone furtif de Dassault Aviation s'est essayé au combat collaboratif. A Paris ce 20 février, la ministre Florence Parly recevait les délégations allemandes et espagnoles pour la signature du contrats de développement des démonstrateurs du SCAF. Ci-dessus: une vue d'artiste datant de plusieurs années montrant un drone de combat aux côtés du Rafale - Dassaut Aviation La DGA (Direction générale de l'armement) a annoncé la fin de la cinquième campagne d'essais en vol du démonstrateur nEUROn. Mandatée par elle-même au profit de l'Etat, elle "a été menée en coopération avec Dassault Aviation pour la mise en œuvre du vecteur aérien et avec la participation des forces. Un de ses objectifs était d'étudier l'utilisation d'un drone de combat furtif dans un contexte opérationnel, impliquant également une réflexion sur les tactiques de défense face à un tel vecteur." L'information principale concernant cette nouvelle campagne est la réalisation d'un vol d'essai en ambiance de combat collaboratif réalisé avec 5 Rafale et 1 Awacs, "dans des configurations tactiques multiples". Les résultats sont en cours d'analyse approfondie. Ils apporteront selon la DGA des éléments majeurs pour aiguiller les choix d'architecture et de technologie du SCAF. Programme à - seulement - 450 millions d'euros entamé il y a une douzaine d'années, le Neuron prouve une nouvelle fois toute la pertinence d'une politique active dans le domaine des démonstrateurs. Et si l'on parle aujourd'hui surtout des "remote carriers" dans le cadre du SCAF (système de combat aérien futur), il ne fait pas de doute qu'un drone de combat furtif aura toute sa place dans cette architecture, aux côtés du Rafale, du futur chasseur européen, et autres effecteurs déportés... Signature du contrat de démonstrateur du SCAF Et ce 20 février à Paris, près d'une semaine après l'aval du Bundestag (voir lien ci-dessous), la ministre des Armées Florence Parly recevait les autres parties au programme SCAF, à savoir les Allemands et les Espagnols, pour la signature du contrat de démonstrateurs. Lire aussi: Lancement de la phase de démonstrateur du SCAF Comme convenu, Dassault Aviation (qui pour l'occasion exhibait des maquettes du "NGF") hérite de la maîtrise d'ouvrage pour le futur chasseur, avec Airbus DS comme "main partners". Airbus est maître d'oeuvre pour les remote carriers, avec la collaboration de MBDA, collaboration qui était déjà affichée au Bourget en juin 2019, et est également en charge avec Thalès du "Air combat cloud" (ACC), à savoir l'architecture numérique du SCAF. Safran et MTU s'occuperont de la motorisation, mais le démonstrateur du chasseur utilisera lui vraisemblablement les moteurs M88 du Rafale. Le tout est chapeauté par la DGA, manager du programme. Si les démonstrateurs, dont l'avion, doivent voler en 2026, et qu'environ 150 millions d'euros ont été apportés au programme pour ces études préliminaires, il s'agira de trouver 4 milliards d'euros d'ici 2025, et 8 au total d'ici 2030. S'agissant de la participation espagnole, qui doit se clarifier durant les prochains mois, trois entreprises s'ajoutent à la participation de Madrid, principalement sur les drones. Il s'agit de GMV, SENER Aeroespacial et Tecnobit Grupo Oesia, qui ont annoncé ce 17 février un accord dans le cadre du plan industriel coordonné par le ministère espagnol de la Défense. La problématique Indra, que l'Espagne insiste pour intégrer au développement de l'ACC en dépit des réticences d'Airbus, reste à régler cependant. http://www.paxaquitania.fr/2020/02/fin-dune-5eme-campagne-dessais-pour-le.html
3 juillet 2019 | International, Aérospatial
By Anthony Capaccio United Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney unit is chronically late delivering engines for the Pentagon's costliest program, the F-35, raising questions about whether the company is ready for a surge to full-rate production scheduled for next year. Pratt remains under a previously unreported “Corrective Action Request” from the Defense Contract Management Agency that cites “poor delivery performance” on its current batch of engines for the fighter jet, including for the most complicated version used by the Marine Corps and the U.K. for vertical takeoffs and landings. The agency's action is likely to be watched not only by the Pentagon and international buyers of the F-35 but also by shareholders and investors assessing United Technologies' planned merger with Raytheon Co., which would fortify the combined company's standing as one of the top U.S. defense contractors. The F-35 engines would be one of the new company's top revenue producers. United Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney unit is chronically late delivering engines for the Pentagon's costliest program, the F-35, raising questions about whether the company is ready for a surge to full-rate production scheduled for next year. Pratt remains under a previously unreported “Corrective Action Request” from the Defense Contract Management Agency that cites “poor delivery performance” on its current batch of engines for the fighter jet, including for the most complicated version used by the Marine Corps and the U.K. for vertical takeoffs and landings. The agency's action is likely to be watched not only by the Pentagon and international buyers of the F-35 but also by shareholders and investors assessing United Technologies' planned merger with Raytheon Co., which would fortify the combined company's standing as one of the top U.S. defense contractors. The F-35 engines would be one of the new company's top revenue producers. The company, which is the sole supplier of engines for the fighter built by Lockheed Martin Corp., must demonstrate by year-end that it has delivered on promised improvements to solve the problems that led to the agency's formal request in December, spokesman Mark Woodbury said in a statement outlining the issues. Full Production The $428 billion F-35 program is scheduled for approval next year to enter full-rate production, the most lucrative phase of a weapons program for contractors. The decision is contingent on an assessment during the aircraft's current round of intensive combat testing that it's effective and can be maintained. Of the $428 billion, as much as $66 billion is to be spent on at least 2,470 engines -- designated the F135 -- for U.S. jets, including $53.4 billion in procurement, according to the Defense Department's latest Selected Acquisition Report on the F-35. Pentagon budget documents indicate the engine program is valued at about $2 billion annually for Pratt, according to Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Douglas Rothacker. John Thomas, a spokesman for Pratt, said in an emailed statement that “we take seriously our responsibility to meet F135 production commitments. The corrective action plan submitted earlier this year lays out how we are doing that. Over the past year, we have invested more than $200 million for additional capacity, and currently have over 100 Pratt & Whitney employees deployed to our supplier facilities in support of production obligations.” Revenue Potential Pratt & Whitney President Bob Leduc underscored the engine's revenue potential to analysts June 17 at the Paris Air Show. United Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney unit is chronically late delivering engines for the Pentagon's costliest program, the F-35, raising questions about whether the company is ready for a surge to full-rate production scheduled for next year. Pratt remains under a previously unreported “Corrective Action Request” from the Defense Contract Management Agency that cites “poor delivery performance” on its current batch of engines for the fighter jet, including for the most complicated version used by the Marine Corps and the U.K. for vertical takeoffs and landings. The agency's action is likely to be watched not only by the Pentagon and international buyers of the F-35 but also by shareholders and investors assessing United Technologies' planned merger with Raytheon Co., which would fortify the combined company's standing as one of the top U.S. defense contractors. The F-35 engines would be one of the new company's top revenue producers. The company, which is the sole supplier of engines for the fighter built by Lockheed Martin Corp., must demonstrate by year-end that it has delivered on promised improvements to solve the problems that led to the agency's formal request in December, spokesman Mark Woodbury said in a statement outlining the issues. Full Production The $428 billion F-35 program is scheduled for approval next year to enter full-rate production, the most lucrative phase of a weapons program for contractors. The decision is contingent on an assessment during the aircraft's current round of intensive combat testing that it's effective and can be maintained. Of the $428 billion, as much as $66 billion is to be spent on at least 2,470 engines -- designated the F135 -- for U.S. jets, including $53.4 billion in procurement, according to the Defense Department's latest Selected Acquisition Report on the F-35. Pentagon budget documents indicate the engine program is valued at about $2 billion annually for Pratt, according to Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Douglas Rothacker. John Thomas, a spokesman for Pratt, said in an emailed statement that “we take seriously our responsibility to meet F135 production commitments. The corrective action plan submitted earlier this year lays out how we are doing that. Over the past year, we have invested more than $200 million for additional capacity, and currently have over 100 Pratt & Whitney employees deployed to our supplier facilities in support of production obligations.” Revenue Potential Pratt & Whitney President Bob Leduc underscored the engine's revenue potential to analysts June 17 at the Paris Air Show. “So another way to think about the F135 is a year ago we made about eight engines a month,” he said. “Right now we are between 13 and 14 engines a month. But when you think about the F135, it's 16 engines a month for the next 30 years. There will be over 4,000 of these airplanes when it's all said and done,” including foreign sales. The primary issues resulting in late engine deliveries “have been related to supply-chain capacity, material shortages” and production issues, according to the contract management agency. “Engine test failures due to high vibrations and foreign object debris continues to plague” production, the agency said in an internal quarterly assessment for January through March. Deliveries of the Marine Corps model engines “have been consistently late,” it said. As of early June, Pratt & Whitney was contractually required to deliver 108 engines in the latest production contract, the program's 11th. Of the 90 delivered, 88 were “late by an average of 40 days,” Woodbury said in his statement. The Pentagon is close to finalizing the award of the 12th and largest F-35 contract to date with Lockheed and Pratt. Spotty Record The current delays add to Pratt & Whitney's spotty track record. Even as deliveries increased to 81 in 2018 from 48 in 2012, 86% of those were delivered late, up from 48% in late 2017, according to an April report from the Government Accountability Office. Asked whether the contract management agency has confidence Pratt will be ready for a full-production decision, Woodbury said the agency is monitoring milestones in Pratt's corrective action plan and needs to see progress before making that judgment. The agency's assessment said that in light of Pratt & Whitney's track record it believes the company “will encounter issues keeping up with demand for any future low-rate and full-rate production contract” that increases quantities. — With assistance by Rick Clough https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-07-02/united-technologies-pratt-slow-on-f-35-engines-pentagon-says