Remplacement des avions CF-18 | Ottawa devrait faire son choix en 2022

Sur le même sujet

• 

  26 janvier 2018 | Local, Naval

  Contrat de maintien des systèmes d’armes pour aider à protéger les matelots et les navires canadiens

  Communiqué de presse De Défense nationale Le 26 janvier 2018 – Esquimalt (C.-B.) – Défense nationale/Forces armées canadiennes Le gouvernement du Canada s'est engagé de par sa politique de défense, Protection, Sécurité, Engagement (PSE), à fournir aux femmes et hommes des Forces armées canadiennes l'équipement dont ils ont besoin. Aujourd'hui, l'honorable Harjit S. Sajjan, ministre de la Défense nationale, a annoncé l'attribution d'un contrat de soutien des systèmes d'armes qui protègeront les matelots et les navires canadiens pour les deux prochaines décennies. D'une valeur de 704 millions de dollars, ce contrat profitera aussi à l'industrie canadienne puisqu'on s'attend à ce qu'il crée et maintienne plus de 450 emplois qualifiés et bien rémunérés à travers le pays. Dans le cadre de ce contrat, l'entreprise Raytheon Canada Limited mettra à niveau et soutiendra 21 systèmes d'armes de combat rapproché pour la Marine royale canadienne. Ces systèmes de canons à tir rapide et à guidage radar fournissent le système d'autodéfense naval le plus efficace disponible contre les menaces rapprochées comme les missiles, les petits navires et les aéronefs. Ces systèmes sont actuellement utilisés sur les frégates de la Marine de la classe Halifax, et seront installés sur les navires de soutien interarmées de la classe Protecteur après leur construction. Citations « L'annonce d'aujourd'hui s'aligne avec les objectifs que nous nous sommes fixés dans Protection, Sécurité, Engagement. Nous réalisons des investissements stratégiques dans la Marine royale canadienne qui aideront à protéger nos hommes et femmes matelots alors qu'ils mènent toute la gamme des opérations dans le contexte de sécurité actuel. » – Ministre de la Défense nationale, Harjit S. Sajjan « Gr'ce à la politique sur les retombées industrielles et technologiques du gouvernement, Raytheon Canada Limited réalisera d'importants investissements au Canada pour maintenir des emplois de la classe moyenne bien rémunérés, favoriser la croissance économique et aider à stimuler l'innovation partout au Canada chez les petites et moyennes entreprises. Voilà comment nous nous assurons que l'innovation bénéficie à toute la population canadienne. » – Ministre de l'Innovation, de la Science et du Développement économique Navdeep Bains Faits en bref Le contrat de soutien en service des systèmes de défense rapprochée (CIWS) continuera jusqu'à la fin de 2037, et comprend une période de service de dix ans avec trois options pour cinq, trois ou deux années supplémentaires, respectivement. Le CIWS est le système de défense rapprochée le plus largement déployé au monde et est utilisé actuellement par 24 nations. Ce niveau d'interopérabilité permettra à la Marine de tirer profit des améliorations qui seront réalisées par nos alliés à l'avenir. La politique sur les retombées industrielles et technologiques (RIT), y compris la proposition de valeur, s'applique à ce contrat et encouragera la croissance d'une défense canadienne et d'une industrie de la marine durables. De plus, Raytheon Canada Limited s'est engagé à investir dans des petites et moyennes entreprises canadiennes et en activités de recherche et développement. Personnes-ressources Byrne Furlong Attachée de presse Cabinet du ministre de la Défense nationale Téléphone : 613-996-3100 Relations avec les médias Ministère de la Défense nationale Téléphone : 613-996-2353 Sans-frais : 1-866-377-0811 Courriel : mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca https://www.canada.ca/fr/ministere-defense-nationale/nouvelles/2018/01/contrat_de_maintiendessystemesdarmespouraideraprotegerlesmatelot.html

• 

  13 mai 2019 | Local, Aérospatial

  Like it or not, the U.S. needs to be a key part of Canada’s next-gen jet procurement process

  ELINOR SLOAN, CONTRIBUTED TO THE GLOBE AND MAIL RICK BOWMER/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Elinor Sloan, professor of international relations in the department of political science at Carleton University, is a fellow at the Canadian Global Affairs Institute. For a bid to buy a plane designed to cut quickly through the skies, Ottawa's pursuit of a future-generation fighter jet has been a long and torturous slog. In 1997, Jean Chrétien's Liberal government joined the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program, a U.S.-led initiative conceived as a new way for allies to work together to design, develop and produce a fifth-generation fighter aircraft. In 2006, Ottawa signed a formal memorandum of understanding that gave Canada and the other eight partner nations the exclusive right to compete for contracts to produce such aircraft and, since 2007, Canadian companies have won more than US$1.3-billion in defence contracts related to the Joint Strike Fighter. With a production line that will be operating at full capacity starting this year, and is expected to produce about 10 times as many aircraft as exist today over the next few decades, this number promises to grow substantially. Meanwhile, Canada's nearly 40-year-old fleet of fighter jets – the CF-18s – continues to age. In 2010, the Harper government shelved its plan to sole-source buy the Joint Strike Fighter to replace them after a public outcry and a damning auditor-general's report that found significant weaknesses in the process used by the Department of National Defence. Then, when the Liberals took office in 2015 and promised an open and fair competition to replace the CF-18s, it also banned the F-35 from bidding – two contradictory positions. The Trudeau government quietly dropped that ban last year, and pre-qualified four companies to bid on a contract worth at least $15-billion: Sweden's Saab Gripen, Britain's Airbus Eurofighter, the U.S.'s Boeing F/A-18 Super Hornet and, yes, Lockheed Martin's F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. According to letters released last week, though, the U.S. government threatened to pull the Lockheed Martin F-35 from consideration last year over Ottawa's insistence that Canada receive industrial benefits from the winning bid. In response, Ottawa relaxed its requirement on Thursday: Where bidders once had to commit to spend 100 per cent of the value of the aircraft's acquisition and sustainment in Canada, bids will now only lose points in a three-category scoring system in the review process, instead. With such exhausting twists and incompatible statements, it's little surprise that it took three and a half years of the government's four-year mandate just to get to the formal request-for-proposal stage. But there is a way out of this morass: pursuing a back-to-basics focus on why we need this aircraft and what we need it to do. To do so, we must focus on the proposed jets' promised technical capabilities, which are paramount, and rightly weighted the highest of that three-category scoring system. The second category is cost, which of course is important to any government. The third is creating and sustaining a highly skilled work force within our own borders, a goal enshrined in Canada's industrial trade benefits (ITB) policy, which requires a winning bid to guarantee it will make investments in Canada equal to the value of the contract. Each bid is scored by these three categories, weighed 60-20-20, respectively. However, the Joint Strike Fighter program, which Canada has spent millions to join, does not fit neatly into the ITB policy. In those letters last year, the Pentagon and Lockheed Martin pointed out that Canada's ITB terms are inconsistent with – and indeed prohibited by – the memorandum of understanding Canada signed in 2006, which says partners cannot impose industrial compensation measures. The solution reached on Thursday allows that memorandum to be obeyed, but since Canada will still give higher grades to bids that follow its ITB policy, questions remain as to whether the playing field has really been levelled. All of this is important because of the growing competition between the major powers. Russian bombers and fighters, for example, are increasingly testing the boundaries of Canadian and U.S. airspace. More than ever, the focus needs to be interoperability with the United States, working together on NORAD and helping NATO allies in Europe. As a flying command-and-control platform, rather than a mere fighter, Canada's next-generation jet must work with the United States' most sophisticated systems, and include a seamless and secure communications capability – that is a critical and non-negotiable criterion. Indeed, as DND has said,the United States will need to certify the winning jet meets Washington's security standards. Some may question the federal government's decision to relax the ITB rules, and to grant this certification sign-off. But whatever Canada buys must be able to address threats to us and to our allies until well into the 2060s. Our relationship with the United States, both in terms of geopolitics and military technology, is crucial. Despite our trade tiff, the United States remains our most important strategic partner. Canada can either take an active part in our own security, or leave it to the United States. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-the-us-needs-to-be-a-key-part-of-canadas-next-gen-jet-procurement/

• 

  10 juillet 2023 | Local, Autre défense

  Trudeau says Canada will more than double military presence in Latvia

  Trudeau held a joint press conference with Latvian Prime Minister Krišjānis Kariņš at the Ādaži military base outside Riga on Monday, where he also greeted some of the 800 Canadian Armed Forces members deployed to the mission.