22 août 2024 | International, C4ISR, Sécurité
Google Fixes High-Severity Chrome Flaw Actively Exploited in the Wild
Google patches high-severity Chrome bug CVE-2024-7971, actively exploited in the wild. Users urged to update immediately.
7 mai 2020 | International, Naval
Navy Wants Robot Boats But Will Still Need Sailors To Fix Them
"We need to find a balance of vehicle designs that enables the cost to be cheap enough that we can afford them, but it's not so highly optimized towards the purely unmanned spectrum that it's cost prohibitive to maintain them."
By PAUL MCLEARYon May 06, 2020 at 3:27 PM
WASHINGTON: The Navy needs to comb through a host of thorny issues before deploying a new fleet of unmanned ships to confront China, Russia, and Iran.
“You don't hear me talking about artificial intelligence and machine learning and things like that just yet,” said Capt. Pete Small, the Navy's program manager for Unmanned Maritime Systems at a C4ISRnet conference this morning. “Those aren't my first concerns. My first concerns are about the field stability and sustainability of these systems right now.”
The Navy just isn't equipped to deploy or sustain a new fleet of unmanned vessels yet. “Our infrastructure right now is optimized around manned warships,” Small said. “We're gonna have to shift that infrastructure for how we prepare, deploy, and transit” over large bodies of water before large numbers of unmanned vessels can be effective, he said.
It's not clear where that planning stands, but the service has already invested tens of millions in the early work of developing a family of large and medium unmanned vessels, and is looking to vastly ramp that up in the 2021 budget, asking for $580 million for research and development.
In 2019 an unmanned Sea Hunter prototype autonomous vessel sailed from San Diego to Hawaii, but it needed to repair several broken systems along the way, forcing sailors to board the ship. It was the first experiment of its kind, one the Navy has not repeated. Those mechanical problems point to work the Navy must do to reconfigure its logistics tail to meet the needs of a new class of ship.
“We're going to have to transition from a [system] more optimized around our manned fleet infrastructure to a more distributed mix of these large manned platforms to smaller platforms,” Small said, “we're gonna need to talk about things like, tenders for heavy lift ships, or forward operating bases, things like that.”
The early thinking is the service will use the ships as sensors deployed well forward of manned ships and carrier strike groups, which could be at risk if they maneuvered too close to contested waters. But the Navy isn't going to pin everything on a nascent fleet of robot boats — a new class of manned frigates is also being built to operate inside the range of enemy precision weapons. The frigates are going to be smaller and faster than current destroyers, with the ability to generate much more power so they can use lasers and other weapons for both offensive and defensive missions.
The Navy is considering several sizes of USVs, including a large variant between 200 and 300 feet in length and having full load displacements of 1,000 tons to 2,000 tons. The ships should be low-cost, and reconfigurable with lots of room capacity for carrying various payloads, including mine hunting and anti-surface warfare.
The 2021 budget submission proposes using research and development funding to acquire two more prototypes and another in 2022. Plans then call for buying deployable LUSVs at a rate of two per year.
Medium unmanned ships will likely come in at between 45 to 190 feet long, with displacements of roughly 500 tons. The medium ships are thought to skew more toward mission modules revolving around intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance payloads and electronic warfare systems. The first MUSV prototype was funded in 2019, and the Navy wants to fund a second prototype in 2023.
Fundamental issues need to be sorted out before the Navy buys one of these ships.
“We need to find a balance of vehicle designs that enables the cost to be cheap enough that we can afford them, but it's not so highly optimized towards the purely unmanned spectrum that it's cost prohibitive to maintain them,” Small said. If the maintenance is too complicated and time consuming, and “we have to take the whole vehicle out of the water and take it apart in some explicit manner to replace the parts, it's not gonna really support what we need in the field. So really, the sustainability of the technology is as important — if not more important — in the near-term than the technology itself.”
https://breakingdefense.com/2020/05/navy-wants-robot-boats-but-will-still-need-sailors-to-fix-them/
Sur le même sujet
-
-
24 mars 2020 | International, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR, Sécurité
Post-Brexit Defense Review Challenged By Costs And Coronavirus
Tony Osborne Post-Brexit Britain is taking its first steps toward understanding its place in the world and the military capabilities it may need to ensure it can hold onto that status. A review, described by Prime Minister Boris Johnson as the most extensive of its kind since the end of the Cold War, is examining the UK's foreign, defense, security and development policies. And it is proceeding despite the challenges and costs surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. Although it will examine the work of several government departments—notably the Foreign Office, the Defense Ministry and the Department for International Development—considerable focus is likely to be on defense. It has the largest budget of those under the microscope and an oft-criticized procurement process that some in government are eager to overhaul. The process will run in parallel with the government's comprehensive spending review. That assessment decides UK government spending for the next three years and will deliver its findings potentially as early as this summer. Some critics argue that is simply too soon for a thorough analysis of Britain's future defense needs. “If you are to have a strategy that is worth the name, you must address ends, ways and means together. . . . If you do not do the whole package, including the money, together, then you do not have a strategic review,” Jock Stirrup, a former chief of the Royal Air Force (RAF) and UK Defense Staff, told parliamentary defense committee hearings on March 17. The 2020 review represents a break from the traditional defense-led Strategic Defense and Security Review (SDSR) usually held every five years. Some analysts contend the 2020 edition could shape defense capabilities for decades to come. Jack Watling, Land Warfare research fellow at the London-based Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) says the review would have to make “hard choices” but that these would “determine the trajectory of the UK's defense capabilities for a generation.” He notes that for a post-Brexit Britain looking to expand its trading and security partners, future conflicts may be difficult to avoid. “Security and trade partnerships are closely intertwined. . . . If ‘Global Britain' means diversifying our economic partnerships, it will be necessary to build meaningful security ties as well,” Watling says. The UK must look at its role in the Euro-Atlantic alliance and in the Great Power competition, in addition to other global issues and homeland security, Defense Minister Ben Wallace told Parliament. The review will also “place prosperity and manufacturing at its heart,” he added. The assessment comes at a challenging time for Britain's defense and its equipment-procurement plans. The National Audit Office recently warned that for a third consecutive year there will be shortfalls in the budget. The ministry's plans call for the spending of £183.6 billion ($214 billion) over the next 10 years, equivalent to 42% of the ministry budget during that period. Auditors say the Defense Ministry has a shortfall of at least £2.9 billion over that period, but this could be as high as £13 billion. Although the UK is expanding its intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities with the upcoming arrival of the General Atomics Protector unmanned aircraft system and deliveries of the Boeing P-8 Poseidon maritime patroller—two of which have already arrived—capability gaps in the ISR mission are imminent. The planned retirement of the RAF's long-suffering Boeing E-3D Sentry fleet has been pushed to December 2022. But the Boeing E-7 Wedgetail, the 737-based platform planned as its replacement, is not due to enter service until the end of 2023, potentially leaving a yearlong capability gap. The RAF also plans to retire its Raytheon Sentinel radar-reconnaissance platform in March 2021. It got several reprieves after its Afghanistan duties ended, but its departure would leave the UK without a standoff ground-moving-target-indicator and synthetic aperture radar platform. Several commitments made in the 2015 SDSR, such as the UK's decision to commit all 138 Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighters across the lifetime of the program, have also not been budgeted, auditors note. Current plans forecast only the costs of the first 48 aircraft. The government says that “decisions on future numbers and aircraft variants will be taken at the relevant time,” but it is unclear whether this will be considered in the review. The British government is aiming to maintain the target of 2% of GDP set by NATO for all allies. Defense ministers have said they will fight to meet that share, and more if needed, although the UK has a history of not fully funding post-review defense portfolios. “It is not a review designed to cut costs,” says Jeremy Quin, minister for defense procurement. “It is a review designed to ensure we know what we are doing in the world and that [this is achieved] through really effective equipment.” Along with defining capabilities required for land, sea and air, the review is also likely to conclude that the UK should make additional investment in both the cyber and space domains. https://aviationweek.com/defense-space/post-brexit-defense-review-challenged-costs-coronavirus
-
9 février 2018 | International, Aérospatial, C4ISR
Safran contributeur majeur du projet « OCEAN2020 » retenu par la Commission Européenne pour l’Action Préparatoire de Recherche de Défense
Boulogne-Billancourt, le 7 février 2018 Safran est l'un des principaux membres du consortium OCEAN2020 qui a remporté l'appel d'offres majeur associé à l'Action Préparatoire de Recherche de Défense (PADR) de la Commission Européenne pour 2017. Doté d'un montant de 35 millions d'euros, le projet de la Commission Européenne porte sur un démonstrateur technologique attestant de la valeur opérationnelle de systèmes de drones de tous milieux (drones aériens, de surface et sous-marins) dans un environnement maritime. Le consortium OCEAN2020, mené par Leonardo, a remporté cet appel d'offres en fédérant des industriels de toutes tailles, des partenaires académiques et des représentants étatiques de 15 pays de l'Union Européenne. L'équipe gagnante réalisera deux démonstrations de mise en oeuvre de nouveaux moyens de surveillance et de systèmes intégrés de traitement de l'information dans le cadre d'exercices navals européens, en Méditerranée en 2019 puis en mer Baltique en 2020. Au cours de ces opérations navales, Safran déploiera son drone Patroller dans une configuration de surveillance maritime. Seul drone à voilure fixe de longue endurance engagé dans ces démonstrations, le Patroller sera équipé d'une nouvelle chaîne de mission comprenant un radar de surveillance maritime, un système d'identification automatique des navires (AIS) et la boule optronique EuroflirTM 410 de Safran déjà présente sur sa version terrestre. Les informations recueillies par cet ensemble multi capteurs seront transmises aux systèmes de combat de plusieurs navires et aux centres d'opérations. Safran contribuera aux innovations du projet OCEAN2020 en développant une fonction d'autonomie de mission pour drones navals. Des traitements embarqués permettront au Patroller de détecter et de suivre automatiquement un navire suspect dans sa zone de recherche et de réunir de l'information (vitesse, trajectoire, taille, immatriculation, images-preuves...) afin de faciliter le travail des opérateurs de mission. Ces nouvelles capacités fonctionnelles sont déterminantes pour mener à bien les opérations de surveillance des Marines et agences européennes réalisées avec des drones. Thierry Dupoux, directeur de l'innovation chez Safran Electronics & Defense, a déclaré : « Nous sommes fiers de poursuivre notre feuille de route sur les chaînes de mission drone pour les applications de surveillance maritime. C'est une chance de déployer nos compétences pour contribuer à construire un projet européen d'envergure dans la R&D de défense. » L'Action Préparatoire de Recherche de Défense est un programme de recherche de 3 ans de la Commission Européenne visant à tester, à travers plusieurs projets, les mécanismes de financement de la R&T de Défense par le budget de l'Union Européenne. Elle préfigure le lancement d'un programme-cadre de soutien de la recherche de défense à partir de 2021. https://www.safran-electronics-defense.com/fr/media/safran-contributeur-majeur-du-projet-ocean2020-retenu-par-la-commission-europeenne-pour-laction-preparatoire-de-recherche-de-defense-20180207