Naval Group trumpets its Australian industry focus in submarine deal

Sur le même sujet

• 

  1 avril 2020 | International, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR, Sécurité

  Coronavirus : retour au travail pour les industriels de la défense

  L'arrêt de certaines usines a surpris nombre de militaires. Après un travail de concertation, tous les industriels ont rouvert afin d'assurer le soutien des armées. Par Anne Bauer Publié le 31 mars 2020 à 15h50Mis à jour le 31 mars 2020 à 16h06 C'est une des découvertes de la crise du coronavirus : la défense n'a pas d'obligations de production particulières par rapport à d'autres secteurs . De quoi surprendre les commandants militaires. Aussitôt le confinement déclaré, une entreprise comme Arquus (ex-Renault Trucks Defense), filiale de Volvo, annonçait la fermeture de ses sites industriels sans concertation avec ses partenaires, alors que l'entreprise fabrique avec Thales et Nexter les blindés de l'armée de terre. Après un certain flottement, les choses sont rentrées dans l'ordre et les sites industriels se remettent en marche depuis lundi. Cartographier les besoins prioritaires « Un dialogue s'est ouvert entre les industriels de la défense, la Direction générale de l'armement et le ministère des Armées pour faire une cartographie des activités les plus critiques pour la défense, donner des prévisions d'activité et bien mesurer tous les impacts sur les systèmes de soutien au profit des forces armées », explique-t-on au ministère des Armées. Dès le 20 mars, la ministre Florence Parly envoyait un courrier aux industriels pour leur rappeler que « sans transiger sur les mesures barrières dont le respect strict est indispensable pour endiguer la propagation du virus, l'activité des entreprises de défense devait continuer ». Pas question de ne pas assurer l'entretien des hélicoptères au moment où ils sont plus que jamais engagés dans le transport des malades , de baisser la garde sur la dissuasion nucléaire, ou encore de ne pas pouvoir changer les pièces défaillantes des blindés utilisés au Sahel. Renégociation prochaine des objectifs Après une grosse semaine de fermeture, histoire de bien analyser les conditions de production et de nettoyer les sites de fond en comble, les industriels de la défense ont rouvert. Chez Nexter, les sites de production sont de nouveau actifs, même si la totalité des effectifs n'est évidemment pas appelée. Arquus, de son côté, explique avoir terminé la semaine dernière son inventaire, ce qui lui a permis de livrer à la Direction générale de l'armement nombre de blindés stockés et de rappeler ses salariés pour assurer les livraisons des pièces de rechange, notamment à l'heure où les camions de l'armée sont extrêmement sollicités dans l'opération « Résilience » de soutien à la lutte contre la pandémie. Globalement, le soutien aux armées sur terre, mer et air est assuré, sachant qu'il y aura plus tard, au printemps, des négociations pour réviser les objectifs de livraison de matériel neuf, qui étaient inscrits dans la loi de programmation militaire. Il faudra tenir compte de la baisse de la mobilisation du personnel pour des raisons sanitaires - et sans doute, in fine, d'un recadrage des ressources budgétaires. https://www.lesechos.fr/industrie-services/air-defense/coronavirus-retour-au-travail-pour-les-industriels-de-la-defense-1190687

• 

  17 août 2020 | International, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR, Sécurité

  The list is here: Find out how global defense companies performed in FY19

  By: Mike Gruss The adage is that it is difficult for an aircraft carrier to turn on a dime. The same could be said for the defense industry or Pentagon budgets and as such, the Defense News Top 100 list. Changes are slow and can take time to appear on our list. For example, for the first time, this year's list reflects the result of the L3-Harris merger. L3, ranked 18th on last year's list, and Harris, ranked 26th a year ago, merged to form what everyone expected: one of the world's largest defense corporations in L3Harris Technologies, ranked 9th on our list. Next year, observers will see the results of the merger between Raytheon, ranked 5th on this year's list, and United Technologies Corp., ranked 10th on this year's list. Thematically, the shifts that defense and military leaders have spent years discussing are becoming fully reflected in industry. China's heavy investments in defense are becoming evident by the inclusion of Aviation Industry Corporation of China (6th), China North Industries Group Corporation Limited (8th), and China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation (11th) on this year's list. The role of integration and communication tools is becoming more important, as is evidenced by Leidos, Peraton and Perspecta's inclusion. Medium-sized businesses are becoming increasingly critical players. And, for years, U.S. military leaders have heard from Silicon Valley startups that it remains too difficult to break into the defense market in a meaningful way. Advocates will likely point by how few are in the list. Other companies have complained that the big primes have too much of a lock on Pentagon contracts, perhaps seen in how the top five bring in more than twice the revenue of the next five. Each year, the Defense News Top 100 is part art, part science. Every year, the Defense News team tries to push it a bit closer to science. This year's list, like years past, is a snapshot of what's happening in defense markets and maybe, just maybe, a hint of what's to come. https://www.defensenews.com/top-100/2020/08/17/the-list-is-here-find-out-how-global-defense-companies-performed-in-fy19/

• 

  25 septembre 2020 | International, C4ISR, Sécurité, Autre défense

  Two steps President Trump could take now to secure missile defense improvements

  Trey Obering and Rebeccah Heinrichs In his acceptance speech for the Republican presidential nomination, President Donald Trump said that in a second term, “We will win the race to 5G, and build the world's best cyber and missile defense.” On the last issue — missile defense — there are actions President Trump can and should take now, with only a few weeks left until election day, to make necessary improvements. First, reverse the Pentagon's decision to give more authority over the Missile Defense Agency to the office of cost assessment and program evaluation (CAPE) while creating more bureaucratic oversight. These moves will create more obstacles to thwart the President's agenda and will drastically slow MDA's ability to develop and field missile defense capabilities to meet rapidly emerging threats. We understand fully the intent to reduce risk in acquisitions, but the purpose of the MDA is to conduct research and development and deliver new and ever-evolving effective defensive systems for the protection of the American people. We must prioritize speed over risk-aversion. Secondly, the President can announce that the United States is moving forward with site preparation for at least one additional homeland interceptor site. The Trump Administration's 2019 Missile Defense Review stated that such a site would protect against future Iranian threats; since the Pentagon released this policy document Iran has only improved its missile program. Especially concerning was the successful satellite launch conducted by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) in April of this year. Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. John Hyten said the launch vehicle had traveled, “a very long way, which means it has the ability once again to threaten their neighbors, their allies, and we want to make sure they can never threaten the United States.” These developments put more pressure on the United States to make moves in the near term to bolster full coverage of the U.S. homeland. Environmental Impact Studies have already been concluded and military installations in New York, Ohio, and Michigan have been chosen as potential hosts for a third homeland missile defense site. Any of those sites would offer a “shoot-look-shoot” capability when considering the geometry of a potential missile attack from Iran. It might also make sense to pick two sites, perhaps putting a few interceptors in Ohio and in Michigan. If President Trump does decide to move forward with site preparation for an additional homeland interceptor site or sites, he would not need to decide immediately about the kind of interceptor to emplace, whether Next Generation Interceptors (NGIs) or Ground-Based Interceptors. Site preparation can take several years to complete and should not take away investments from development of the NGI, which promises to add significant capability to homeland defense. Either interceptor could be emplaced at the new site. If NGI matures and is ready for deployment by the Pentagon's stated goal of 2027, then the additional location could be home to a few of the interceptors. The threat from Iranian missiles are not the only ones putting pressure on the homeland defense systems. The Trump administration has used a combination of economic pressure, military threats, and talks to pressure North Korea into ending its missile program, but North Korea has not made the decision to forgo its nuclear missile program. Although Kim Jong-un has responded by holding off on further long-range missile tests, he has resumed shorter-range tests, and there is reason to believe Kim has not slowed down his efforts to improve his longer-range missile program. Moreover, North Korea remains a serious missile and illicit arms proliferator and a senior U.S. official recently expressed concern about cooperation between North Korea and Iran on long-range missile development. It would be a mistake to slow down homeland missile defense because the North Korean leader has promised to disarm while showing no real signs of doing so. The Pentagon is wrapping up its budget submission for the next fiscal year, and whoever wins in November will determine the budget's final form. Regardless, the United States must carefully ensure that even as we push ahead to evolve the system, we cannot neglect the defense of the American people against the threats that are here today. If the United States is going to have an effective, cutting edge missile defense architecture to balance near and evolving threats and to adapt as the threats dictate, the MDA must remain agile, and it must have the funding to improve and sustain current programs while investing in advanced technologies to stay ahead of the evolving threat. https://www.defensenews.com/opinion/commentary/2020/09/24/two-steps-president-trump-could-take-now-to-secure-missile-defense-improvements/