16 février 2018 | International, Aérospatial, C4ISR

Le Canada réintègre le programme du système aéroporté d’alerte et de contrôle de l’OTAN

Communiqué de presse

De Défense nationale

Le 14 février 2018, Bruxelles (Belgique) — Défense nationale/Forces armées canadiennes

Le gouvernement est déterminé à assurer la sécurité et la sûreté de la population canadienne et à en protéger les droits et libertés. Le Canada joue un rôle important et constructif dans le monde en contribuant concrètement à la paix et à la sécurité internationales, y compris au sein de l'Organisation du Traité de l'Atlantique Nord (OTAN).

L'OTAN est une pierre angulaire de la politique de sécurité internationale du Canada et, aujourd'hui, le gouvernement a annoncé son intention de réintégrer le programme du système aéroporté d'alerte et de contrôle (AWACS) de l'OTAN.

Les programmes comme AWACS, qui effectuent des activités de renseignement, de surveillance et de reconnaissance, sont de plus en plus pertinents dans le contexte actuel de sécurité. En réponse aux défis posés par cet environnement, l'OTAN a considérablement augmenté le recours à AWACS, y compris dans des régions comme l'Europe centrale et l'Europe de l'Est où le Canada dirige un groupement tactique multinational de l'OTAN en Lettonie.

Le Canada avait décidé de se retirer du programme AWACS en 2011 à la suite de l'examen stratégique de 2010 du ministère de la Défense nationale.

Citations

« L'OTAN est une pierre angulaire de la politique canadienne en matière de sécurité internationale et l'une de nos relations multilatérales les plus importantes. Dans cet esprit, le Canada a décidé de réintégrer le programme du système aéroporté d'alerte et de contrôle qui est une capacité clé de l'OTAN. Nous appuierons ce programme en contribuant à son budget d'opérations et de soutien. Nous sommes résolus à maintenir l'engagement du Canada dans le monde et nous continuerons de soutenir l'OTAN et ses missions : il s'agit d'étapes importantes vers la réalisation de cet objectif. »

Harjit S. Sajjan, ministre de la Défense

Faits en bref

  • Le système aéroporté d'alerte et de contrôle (AWACS) a été créé en 1978 et comprend une flotte d'aéronefs appartenant à l'OTAN, ce qui donne à l'Alliance les moyens d'effectuer une surveillance aérienne à long rayon et de commander ainsi que de contrôler les forces aériennes.

  • Une partie de l'engagement du Canada envers l'OTAN, comme il est énoncé dans la politique Protection, Sécurité, Engagement, comprend ce qui suit :

    • mener et/ou contribuer des forces aux efforts de l'OTAN et de la coalition pour dissuader et vaincre des adversaires potentiels, y compris des terroristes, afin de soutenir la stabilité mondiale;
    • diriger et/ou contribuer aux opérations internationales de paix et aux missions de stabilisation avec les Nations Unies, l'OTAN et d'autres partenaires multilatéraux.
  • Le système aéroporté d'alerte et de contrôle (AWACS) de l'OTAN compte seize aéronefs E-3A. Ces Boeing 707 modifiés sont facilement identifiables à partir du dôme radar distinctif monté sur le fuselage. L'appareil E-3A fonctionne généralement à une altitude d'environ 10 km. À partir de cette altitude, un seul appareil E-3A peut surveiller en permanence l'espace aérien dans un rayon de plus de 400 km et peut échanger des informations, au moyen de liaisons de données numériques, avec les commandants sur terre, en mer et dans les airs. En utilisant le radar à impulsions Doppler, un appareil E-3A volant dans l'espace aérien de l'OTAN peut faire la distinction entre les cibles et les réflexions au sol et est donc en mesure de donner l'alerte rapide en cas de vol à basse ou haute altitude au-dessus du territoire d'un agresseur potentiel.

Personnes-ressources

Byrne Furlong
Attachée de presse
Cabinet du ministre de la Défense nationale
Téléphone : 613-996-3100
Courriel : byrne.furlong@forces.gc.ca

Relations avec les médias
Ministère de la Défense nationale
Téléphone : 613-996-2353
Courriel : mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca

https://www.canada.ca/fr/ministere-defense-nationale/nouvelles/2018/02/le_canada_reintegreleprogrammedusystemeaeroportedalerteetdecontr.html

Sur le même sujet

  • Don’t Use COVID As Excuse to Slash Defense Spending

    20 mai 2020 | International, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR, Sécurité

    Don’t Use COVID As Excuse to Slash Defense Spending

    Opponents of defense spending may cite the economic consequences of COVID-19 — huge deficits and ballooning national debt— in an effort to slash the Department of Defense's budget. If they succeed, American military supremacy will erode further, inviting aggression from adversaries and decisively undermining American security. By BRADLEY BOWMANon May 20, 2020 at 4:01 AM Even as many Americans huddle in their homes to avoid the coronavirus, our adversaries have continued to use military power to test and undermine the United States. Since the crisis began, Moscow has sent bombers to probe American air defenses near Alaska. China escalated its belligerent activity in the South China Sea. Iran has harassed U.S. naval vessels in international waters. North Korea launched a barrage of missiles. Hackers have pummeled defense networks and suppliers with cyberattacks. All the while, terrorists have continued attacking U.S. and partner forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. Authoritarians and terrorists apparently did not get the memo that they were supposed to play nice during the pandemic. They clearly still believe they can advance their interests and undermine ours with the employment of cyber and kinetic military power. Despite this, opponents of defense spending may cite the economic consequences of COVID-19 — huge deficits and ballooning national debt— in an effort to slash the Department of Defense's budget. If they succeed, American military supremacy will erode further, inviting aggression from adversaries and decisively undermining American security. To be clear, the United States did not find itself in this tenuous position overnight. America's military edge has been eroding for years. For many years after 9/11, Washington repeatedly failed to provide the Pentagon with the timely, predictable and sufficient funding necessary to maintain current readiness and modernize its forces. When confronted with this difficult choice, defense leaders were often forced to postpone vital weapon modernization research and development programs to resource and support the next units to deploy. Meanwhile, Beijing and Moscow studied how the United States fights wars and undertook comprehensive efforts to modernize their weapons and revamp their operational concepts. So, by 2018, the military balance of power had shifted so significantly that the National Defense Strategy (NDS) Commission — a group of bipartisan national security experts not prone to hyperbole — sounded the alarm. “The security and wellbeing of the United States are at greater risk than at any time in decades,” they warned. “America's military superiority—the hard-power backbone of its global influence and national security—has eroded to a dangerous degree.” Thankfully, the U.S. has now emerged from what the 2018 National Defense Strategy called a “period of strategic atrophy” and taken concerted action. With increased defense funding in the last few years and a focus on great power competition, the Department of Defense is undertaking the most significant U.S. military modernization effort in decades. In order to win the intense military technology competition with Beijing and others, the Pentagon is focusing its research and development on artificial intelligence, biotechnology, autonomy, cyber, directed energy, hypersonics, space and 5G. Simultaneously, the Pentagon and combatant commands are working to develop a new joint concept to employ these new weapons. Despite these positive efforts, U.S. military supremacy has continued to erode. Consider Indo-Pacific Command's report submitted in March warning that the military balance of power with China continues to become “more unfavorable.” The United States, it said, is accumulating “additional risk that may embolden our adversaries to attempt to unilaterally change the status quo before the U.S. could muster an effective response.” This is because America has not yet deployed most of the weapons and capabilities it has been developing and is still crafting its new joint warfighting concept. To be sure, each of the U.S. military services are sprinting to field key systems, weapons, and capabilities in the next few years. But the Chinese Communist Party and its People's Liberation Army are sprinting too, and there is no time to waste. The bipartisan experts on the NDS Commission recommended that “Congress increase the base defense budget at an average rate of three to five percent above inflation” in the coming years. If Congress ignores its own commission and slashes defense spending, U.S. military supremacy will continue to erode and could eventually disappear. The far left and libertarians often respond to such arguments by emphasizing the size of the U.S. defense budget. What they fail to mention is that U.S. defense spending, measured either as a percentage of gross domestic product or a percentage of federal outlays, is near post-World War II lows. That doesn't mean assertive congressional oversight is not needed; there is certainly room for improvement at the Pentagon. Indeed, defense leaders must continue to ruthlessly establish priorities, eliminate waste, and implement efficiencies—while credibly demonstrating tangible stewardship to Congress and taxpayers. One should not dismiss the severe economic impacts of the coronavirus. The Congressional Budget Office has highlighted the potentially dire consequences for the federal deficit and debt. But Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security's mandatory spending — not discretionary defense spending — is the primary driver, by far, of fiscal unsustainability. If the American people and their representatives in Congress provide the Department of Defense sufficient resources over the next few years, the U.S. military will be able to complete and field vital modernization programs. This will ensure U.S. troops have what they need and will enable the United States to re-assert the military superiority that has been so beneficial to peace, prosperity, and security. The coronavirus has certainly demonstrated the need for better domestic health security programs and has delivered a body blow to the U.S. economy. But if political leaders respond by slashing the Department of Defense's budget, Washington risks making American military superiority yet another casualty of the coronavirus. Bradley Bowman, former advisor to Sens. Todd Young and Kelly Ayotte, is senior director of the Center on Military and Political Power at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. https://breakingdefense.com/2020/05/dont-let-the-covid-deficit-hurt-defense-spending

  • BAE Systems to develop next-generation airborne decoy countermeasure

    16 mai 2024 | International, Terrestre

    BAE Systems to develop next-generation airborne decoy countermeasure

    Expanding the capabilities of BAE Systems’ combat-proven AN/ALE-55 Fiber-Optic Towed Decoy, DBD consists of a towed unit connected by fiber-optic cable to electronic warfare equipment onboard the aircraft

  • Inflection point: Army wrestles to strike balance between current and future capability

    11 octobre 2018 | International, Terrestre

    Inflection point: Army wrestles to strike balance between current and future capability

    WASHINGTON — The Army is at an inflection point. It's a statement its top leaders have acknowledged countless times in recent months as they have made the case to begin major investment in future capability. But to bring online state-of-the-art technology and weapons and equipment that will maintain overmatch against peer adversaries like Russia and China, the Army will need money. Lots of money. And that means, at some point soon, the Army will have to make difficult decisions on how long legacy weapon systems and planned upgrades for those capabilities can — or should — carry the service into the future. It is Army Secretary Mark Esper and Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley's goal and mandate to have a fully modernized Army that aligns with the service's multidomain operations doctrine by 2028. It logically follows that to get there, much has to happen in the 10 years between now and then. The Army wants longer-range fires, new combat vehicles and tanks, two new helicopters, highly capable autonomous vehicles and aircraft, a robust and resilient network tying together everything on the battlefield, a layered and more advanced air-and-missile defense capability and more lethal systems for warfighters. These capabilities all fall under the Army's top six modernization priorities, which the service laid out a year ago in an overarching modernization strategy. The Army then stood up Army Futures Command — a new four-star command — that will focus on rapidly bringing online modernized equipment and weapons that fit under the top six priorities. And it put a general officer in charge of a cross-functional team for each priority to advance prototypes and technology development. Full article: https://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/ausa/2018/10/10/inflection-point-army-wrestles-to-strike-balance-between-current-and-future-capability/

Toutes les nouvelles