25 septembre 2018 | Local, Naval

Feds closing in on winning bidder for $60-billion warship project

By BEATRICE PAEZ 

Some industry observers say there are rumblings that the multibillion-dollar announcement on the Canadian Surface Combatant could happen in a few weeks' time, but Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan says he hopes a decision will be announced on the design by 'the end of the year.'

Ottawa could be close to settling on the winning bid for the $60-billion procurement of multi-purpose vessels that will form the backbone of the Canadian Navy, with rumours swirling that a decision could come in a few weeks’ time, although Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan says the government will announce it by the end of the year.

Some industry observers have heard rumblings that the multibillion-dollar announcement on the Canadian Surface Combatant (CSC) project, the biggest procurement in the federal government’s history, could happen as early as the upcoming defence and aerospace convention in Halifax, otherwise known as DefSec, slated for Oct. 2-4. 

Asked if the government plans to announce the winner in Halifax, Byrne Furlong, press secretary to Mr. Sajjan (Vancouver South, B.C.) said, the minister would be attending the convention as he does every year. Mr. Sajjan, in an interview with The Hill Times earlier this month said, the preferred bidder will be named by the end of the year. 

“We wanted to make sure that we gave industry enough time so that the right bid process is done correctly and we’re hoping that by the end of this year, we will be able to make the announcement and a selection will be made on the design,” Mr. Sajjan said in a phone interview on Aug. 29.

Three companies are competing to help deliver 15 warships over the next 25 years. Those ships will eventually replace Canada’s aging fleet, namely, the 12 Halifax-class frigates and the four Iroquois-class destroyers, which have been decommissioned. In its entirety, the CSC project is estimated to cost between $56-billion and $60-billion.

The cure process—a chance for the contenders to adjust their bids to fit the government’s criteria—wrapped up in July.

“I don’t expect there to be another cure process. I think they’ve got a decision ready to go,” said Brian Botting, principal at Earnscliffe Strategy Group. He added there are rumours suggesting the “evaluation has been completed, and it’s a matter of getting the right announcement put together,” while noting that the chance of there being an announcement is 50-50. Mr. Botting is a defence-industry consultant, whose client, Naval Group, submitted a bid outside the competitive process. The bid was rejected.

DefSec is a major attraction in defence circles, and unveiling the winner in that venue would be a good play, from a communications perspective, Mr. Botting said.

Still, one observer said that Mr. Sajjan’s noncommittal response on the precise timing of the announcement leaves the department some wiggle room.

Dave Perry, vice-president and senior analyst at the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, said he’d be surprised if the government had chosen a winner by then.

The preferred bidder will work with Irving Shipbuilding, which won a separate competition to build the 15 ships in the company’s Halifax shipyard.

Three vessels in the running

Three bidders are competing to supply the ships’ design: a coalition that includes shipbuilder BAE Systems, Lockheed Martin, and L3 Technologies; Alion Science and Technology; and Navantia, a state-owned corporation in Spain.

Mr. Botting said that BAE Systems’ Type 26 frigate appears to have an edge over the other two companies, thanks to the support it enjoys in the navy ranks, “There’s a lot of supporters of Type 26 in the navy. It’s not that much different than what the royal navy operates on. … We tend to have a strong focus on submarine warfare, which this ship operates as.”

Type 26 is under construction in the U.K. for its navy and would be the first of its class. Construction under the CSC program is expected to start in the mid-2020s. That the navies of Canada and the U.K. face similar environments and needs makes for a compelling case in Type 26’s favour, even in the face of criticism that BAE and Lockheed Martin’s offer is still a design on paper, according to Mr. Botting. In addition to landing a contract with the U.K., BAE was also selected by Australia to build a new generation of warships.

Multiple requests for an interview with Lockheed Martin’s executive were declined. A company spokesperson touched base with The Hill Times briefly on background. 

In contrast, one of Alion’s biggest selling points, as characterized by the company’s chief operating officer, Bruce Samuelson, is that the company’s offer is a “proven, off-the-shelf design” and does not carry the risks of going with a new design.

Unlike its competitors, Alion is not in the business of making products, but rather it takes a “vendor-agnostic” approach as an integrator. That means that, as the designer and engineering firm, Alion works to select the different components, from the sensors to the combat-management system, which make up the ship through what’s available in the marketplace.

“The reason you’d buy straight off the shelf is like going to a car lot and buying a car. You know exactly what you’re getting,” said Mr. Samuelsen. “Why do you change it a little bit? Because you have slightly different needs, but you really want to take advantage of what everyone else has done for that car.”

The anchor to its overall design is the De Zeven Provinciën-class frigate, which has been in service in the Dutch navy for more than a decade. Damen Schelde Naval Shipbuilding, the Netherlands-based company, has had experience tucking under another shipyard to produce its design, said Mr. Samuelsen. The winning subcontractor will have to work with Irving.

When the warship is eventually built it will resemble a mini-city. The ship has to have the trappings of a town: there has to be a functional sewage system, provide food, shelter, medical care, and at the same time, it has to be built to respond to the hostile environment that is the ocean, said Mr. Samuelsen.

Navantia’s proposal, which is a partnership with Saab Australia and CEA Technologies, is also based on an existing model, the F-105 frigate. Seven are in service with the Spanish and Australian navy, and there are five “smaller variants” in the Norwegian navy, according to the company.

In an email response to The Hill Times, Emiliano Matesanz Sanz, the company’s business development manager, said Navantia is in the “best position to face the challenging task of working with the local industry,” given that it has operated in a similar scenario as the one set up under the CSC project. Its ship was built in a new shipyard in Australia, by ASC. Two frigates have, so far, been delivered, Mr. Matesanz Sanz said.

(Navantia initially agreed to a phone interview, but said due to the sensitivity of the file, an email Q&A was the only possible option.)

The government had initially stated a preference for a mature design—one that was already in operation in a NATO country, for example—to mitigate the risks of cost overruns that could, for example, tie up production. But the government appeared to have been convinced by the team behind Type 26 to consider its bid because it changed the parameters for considering bids, said Mr. Botting.

Due to inflation, for every year of delay, the program is projected to cost $3-billion or more, according to the Parliamentary Budget Officer.

If going with an untested design carries more risks, why would Canada potentially sweep those concerns aside?

Part of the answer lies in the argument that while there isn’t a “physical ship in the water” yet, Type 26 stands to have “some of the most modern technology,” said Mr. Perry. The chance to hold the intellectual property rights to the design is also cited as a possible point in its favour.

“People would make the argument that if you have a ship that hasn’t sailed and been tested yet, you can offer up the IP, because you don’t have an understanding of what its full value is. Whereas if you have something that’s more of a known quantity, you can put whatever premium you want on it,” he added.

Conflict-of-interest concerns flared up in late 2016 when it was announced that Irving Shipbuilding planned to work with BAE Systems to bid on a $5-billion contract to provide maintenance and support for Arctic patrol vessels and resupply ships, according to a CBC report, while BAE was pursuing the CSC project that Irving is involved in overseeing. Both Irving and Ottawa said at the time that they have taken steps to ensure the process is fair.

Mr. Perry dismissed conjectures that suggest changes to the bidding process have been made with the “explicit goal” of giving Type 26 the upper hand. “I don’t think that’s accurate. Because that’s not the way the procurement system is set up. What the government has done is to try and make this environment as competitive as possible,” he said. “But you can never totally level the playing field. … Some bids are always gonna be better than others in different respects.”

Billed as the most-complex, most-expensive procurement on record in Canadian history, CSC, and more broadly, Canada’s shipbuilding strategy, has raised questions about whether the country has chosen the right approach in preserving its shipbuilding culture over working to develop the high-tech side of the business.

“We protected the lower-tech end of the business and not the higher-tech [end]. All the missile systems, sensors, all that stuff is being imported and assembled at the Irving yard,” Mr Botting said. “It’s a different way of approaching it. The U.K. is slowly getting out of that business, but it’s painful when you close down a yard.”

https://www.hilltimes.com/2018/09/24/feds-closing-winning-bidder-60-billion-warship-project/169844

Sur le même sujet

  • Mobilisation des idées nouvelles en maitère de défense et de sécurité

    22 mai 2019 | Local, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR, Sécurité, Autre défense

    Mobilisation des idées nouvelles en maitère de défense et de sécurité

    Orientation de la politique Protection, Sécurité, Engagement La politique de défense Protection, Sécurité, Engagement, tient compte du fait que la collaboration avec des représentants du milieu universitaire et d’autres experts renforce les fondements du processus décisionnel fondé sur des preuves. A cette fin, cette politique fournit une directive en vue d’augmenter l’investissement annuel pour financer un programme de coopération de la Défense remanié et élargi. Le programme Mobilisation des idées nouvelles en matière de défense et de sécurité (MINDS) répond à cet appel.   S’inspirer de la réussite Le programme MINDS s’inspire de la réussite du Programme de coopération de la Défense (PCD), tout en élargissant judicieusement le programme de manière à obtenir non seulement des résultats plus importants, mais de meilleurs résultats. Les consultations sont au centre de ces efforts de renouvellement. Elles ont débuté dans le cadre de l’examen de la politique de défense et se poursuivent grâce à un dialogue continu avec des experts à l’échelle du pays. Le PCD a aidé de façon efficace l’Équipe de la Défense à obtenir des conseils externes par l’entremise de sa série de conférences d’experts et de son programme de subventions de coopération ciblées. Ces éléments du programme qui se sont avérés être un succès se poursuivront. Nouvelle méthode en matière de mobilisation externe Étant une version élargie du PCD, MINDS offre un programme qui : répond aux besoins en matière de conseils pertinents et opportuns de la part des experts de la défense et de la sécurité; favorise le développement de la prochaine génération d’experts et de savants; aide la population canadienne à mieux comprendre les enjeux en matière défense et de sécurité. Le programme MINDS offre toutefois de plus grandes possibilités de collaboration entre l’Équipe de la Défense et la communauté de spécialistes de la sécurité et de la défense. Ce programme comprend les cinq principales catégories suivantes : Série de conférence d’experts, Subventions de coopération ciblées, Réseaux de collaboration, Bourses d’études et Mécanisme d’intervention rapide. Chacune de ces catégories propose différentes façons pour le ministère de la Défense nationale et les Forces armées canadiennes d’accéder rapidement à de l’expertise pertinente qui intègre divers points de vue et fournit des conseils éclairés. Ce programme vise à refléter les principales priorités du gouvernement du Canada dans le travail qu’il accomplit, veillant à ce que l’analyse comparative entre les sexes plus (ACS+) soit intégrée et appuyant la réconciliation avec les Autochtones et les activités de mobilisation des jeunes. Collaboration de l’Équipe de la Défense Le programme MINDS est différent du programme Innovation pour la défense, l’excellence et la sécurité (IDEeS), mais complémentaire à celui ci, utilisant diverses approches pour relever les défis en matière de défense et de sécurité. Le programme IDEeS propose des solutions cruciales aux défis relatifs à la technologie et aux capacités appliquées, tandis que MINDS est axé sur une réflexion stratégique et sur la production de connaissances dans le domaine des politiques publiques. Ensemble, MINDS et IDEeS stimulent l’innovation et contribuent à relever les défis en matière de défense. La politique de défense Protection, Sécurité, Engagement, propose des mesures concrètes pour améliorer la capacité de l’Équipe de la Défense d’anticiper et de comprendre les menaces, les défis et les possibilités. Pour atteindre cet objectif, il est essentiel de faire appel à l’expertise de la communauté canadienne d’experts en matière de défense et de sécurité par l’intermédiaire du programme MINDS. https://www.canada.ca/fr/ministere-defense-nationale/programmes/minds.html

  • L’appel d’offres pour le remplacement des CF-18 lancé bientôt

    6 juin 2019 | Local, Aérospatial

    L’appel d’offres pour le remplacement des CF-18 lancé bientôt

    NORMAND BOIVIN Au cours des prochaines semaines, un mois au maximum, le Canada devrait lancer le processus d’appel d’offres pour le remplacement de sa flotte de CF-18. Le major-général Alain Pelletier est en train de mettre la touche finale aux travaux qui l’ont tenu occupé au cours des deux dernières années pour le choix du prochain chasseur, tout en s’assurant de maintenir la capacité opérationnelle de la flotte actuelle. « Nous sommes toujours en discussions avec les quatre fournisseurs en lice », a expliqué au Quotidien, lors de son passage dans la région mardi, celui qui est devenu, en mai, le nouveau commandant de la 1re Division aérienne du Canada. Même si le F-35 est le seul avion furtif de cinquième génération, le major-général affirme que les offres seront analysées en fonction de la capacité du futur chasseur à répondre à la mission que va se donner le Canada et du nombre d’années de service qu’il sera en mesure de fournir – 35 à 40 ans –, plutôt que de génération. Dassault a retiré son Rafale de la course. Furtif, oui ou non ? Les F-18, comme les F-16 ou les F-15, sont des avions de quatrième génération et sont facilement détectables par les radars. Le F-35 et le F-22 sont les seuls avions de chasse de cinquième génération, c’est-à-dire qu’ils ont une faible signature radar, ce qui les rend pratiquement indétectables. Entre les deux, le Typhoon, fabriqué par Eurofighter, est un appareil qu’on dit de 4,5e génération. Il n’est pas complètement furtif, mais a des caractéristiques qui diminuent sa signature radar. On peut le détecter, mais son écho est plus petit et peut être confondu avec autre chose. Il y a aussi des changements sur le Super Hornet. Boeing fait des tests pour diminuer sa signature radar par des contre-mesures électroniques et certaines peintures qui, semble-t-il, absorbent les ondes radar au lieu de les réfléchir. « Avec l’évolution des technologies, ce genre de dénomination tient moins la route, car on parle maintenant de 4,6 et même 4,7e génération. Nous avons nos exigences et nous discutons avec nos quatre fournisseurs », affirme le major-général Pelletier. Le F-18 Super Hornet de Boeing, le Gripen du Suédois SAAB et le Typhoon européen sont donc encore dans la course avec le F-35 Lightning de Lockheed Martin. Une fois que le Canada aura déposé la version finale de ses exigences, le major-général Pelletier estime que les quatre avionneurs devraient soumettre leurs offres à la fin de 2021. S’ensuivra une période de négociations devant aboutir à la livraison des premiers appareils quelque part en 2025, pour la mise en service au début de 2026. Lorsque les 88 nouveaux chasseurs auront été livrés et que les CF-18 prendront leur retraite, ils auront presque 50 ans. D’ici là, ajoute Alain Pelletier, le Canada va tout mettre en œuvre pour s’assurer que nos vieux CF-18 continueront d’être en mesure de remplir leurs missions de protéger l’espace nord-américain et d’assurer la paix ailleurs dans le monde. Ainsi, les avions, qui avaient été achetés au début des années 80 pour servir jusqu’en 2010, ont déjà subi des modifications pour les mettre à niveau avec de nouveaux systèmes d’armement et pour augmenter leur vie utile d’abord jusqu’en 2017, puis en 2025. À cause de la décision du gouvernement fédéral d’annuler la commande initiale des F-35 pour retourner en appel d’offres, ils devraient donc bénéficier de nouveaux investissements pour prolonger leur vie jusqu’en 2032. https://www.lesoleil.com/actualite/le-fil-groupe-capitales-medias/lappel-doffres-pour-le-remplacement-des-cf-18-lance-bientot-15e1736dc05d467a2f07b9381c5dd023

  • Boeing Secures Services Contract for Canada's Chinooks

    5 avril 2018 | Local, Aérospatial

    Boeing Secures Services Contract for Canada's Chinooks

    Five-year performance-based logistics contract to provide lifecycle support for Royal Canadian Air Force's fleet of CH-147F Chinooks The follow-on contract covers full system logistics, engineering support, supply chain, data analytics and training services OTTAWA, Ontario, April 3, 2018 /PRNewswire/ -- Boeing (NYSE: BA) and the Canadian government have agreed to an amendment to an existing performance-based logistics (PBL) contract. Under the $313 million fixed-price amendment, Boeing will continue to provide full system logistics, engineering support, supply chain, data analytics and training services to the Royal Canadian Air Force's (RCAF) fleet of 15 CH-147F Chinooks through 2023. Operating under a 20-year performance-based sustainment and training contract since 2013, the RCAF reviews its Chinook fleet support requirements every five years.       "We look forward to continuing our support of the Royal Canadian Air Force and its effort to reduce maintenance costs through this long-term agreement," said Turbo Sjogren, vice president of International Government Services, Boeing Global Services. "PBLs have a proven track record of increasing system availability, decreasing maintenance cycles through the use of predictive maintenance tools, and reducing overall ownership costs." Unlike traditional contracts based on payment for specific parts and services, under a PBL agreement, the customer pays for a support package with an agreed-to level of readiness, which can lower costs while increasing mission-capability rates. Boeing supports PBL contracts with customers around the world and across multiple platforms, including the Chinook. Through this contract, Boeing will also continue to work with companies across Canada in support of the country's Industrial and Regional Benefits Policy, which supports long-term opportunities for the Canadian aerospace industry and workforce. Currently, Boeing works with nearly 560 Canadian suppliers, and the company employs approximately 2,000 highly skilled workers throughout the country. Boeing Global Services, headquartered in the Dallas area, was formed by integrating the services capabilities of the government, space and commercial sectors into a single, customer-focused business. Operating as a third business unit of Boeing, Global Services provides agile, cost-competitive services to commercial and government customers worldwide. Contact   Ken Mercer Boeing Global Services Office: +1 312-544-2229 Mobile: +1 312-218-9377  Kenneth.b.mercer@boeing.com  http://boeing.mediaroom.com/2018-04-03-Boeing-Secures-Services-Contract-for-Canadas-Chinooks

Toutes les nouvelles