9 juillet 2020 | Local, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR, Sécurité

Canadian Armed Forces equipment delivered late half the time, auditor general finds

By . Published on Jul 8, 2020 10:32am

Half of all late requests for military materials and equipment arrived in Canadian soldiers' hands more than two weeks behind schedule because of a problem-ridden supply chain that often forced the military to incur extra shipment costs, a new report from the Auditor General has found.

“We concluded that National Defence often did not deliver on time the materiel the Canadian Armed Forces requested, and that it did not have the right controls in place to determine whether it avoided needless transportation costs,” said the report authored by Auditor General of Canada Karen Hogan, which was released on Wednesday.

During the period of the audit, there were approximately 1 million requests for materiel — military materials and equipment — submitted and fulfilled by National Defence. The audit oversaw all materiel covered by the National Defence Act, with the exclusion of ammunition, bombs, missiles and large equipment like aircraft, vessels and vehicles.

The Auditor General found that 50 per cent of all late materiel requests were delayed by at least 15 days and 25 per cent were at least 40 days late.

Of the highest priority requests — of which there were about 86,000 observed — 60 per cent were late. Fifty per cent of all were at least six days late, and 25 per cent were at least 20 days late.

The Auditor General found that 162,000 requests, about 16 per cent of all it tracked during its audit, were more than one year late, having been stalled at some point in the supply chain.

The goal of National Defence's supply chain is to “fulfill materiel requirements in the most economical and timely manner possible,” the Auditor General's report says. It attempts to achieve this by keeping equipment nearby where it thinks it will eventually be used.

However, most equipment bought by the military is initial delivered to Canadian Armed Forces supply depots in Edmonton and Montreal. They then supply regional warehouses, which supply smaller localized military units. Materiel is transferred at units' requests, which are made in a number of ways, but are defined as being of one of three levels of priority — high priority, essential and routine.

“We found that National Defence's systems and processes often did not ensure the timely and efficient delivery of military supplies to the Canadians Armed Forces,” Hogan's report says.

Stock shortages caused delays, National Defence poorly managed priorities and costs for transportation were bungled.

Per it's report, the Auditor General made three recommendations.

It suggested that National Defence review its materiel forecasting to ensure it sufficiently stocks items at the correct locations, that it improve its oversight of high-priority requests so that the categorization is only used when necessary, and that it provide clear guidance on how to select the proper mode of transportation for items to ensure that decisions about shipments are based on fully understanding how much it'll cost.

In a statement released shortly after the Auditor General's report, Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan said he “welcome(s)” its findings and accepts all recommendations.

Similar concerns were raised a few years ago by the Auditor General's office about National Defence's equipment supply. In the fall of 2016, it raised issues with the military's ability to properly account for its inventory. The same fiscal year, National Defence announced a 10-year inventory management plan to address the Auditor General's concerns. The Trudeau government also released its multi-decade defence policy in the spring of 2017.

One of the focal points of Strong, Secure, Engaged was to ensure the military was properly equipped.

“Providing (the women and men of the Canadian Armed Forces) the training, equipment and care they deserve is the most important objective of this policy,” reads a line from the opening paragraph of Sajjan's opening message in more than 100-page policy.

Upon being re-elected, Sajjan was again reminded of his responsibility to “ensure the Canadian Armed Forces have the capabilities and equipment required to uphold their responsibilities,” in the mandate letter assigned to him by Trudeau.

In an emailed statement to iPolitics, Conservative Defence Critic James Bezan said “effective and efficient supply chains are crucial to the operating capability of the Canadian Armed Forces.”

“Our military heroes rely on these supply chains to defend Canadians at home and abroad. It is clear that more work needs to be done in order to make these supply chains better for our men and women and uniform,” Bezan said.

“The delivery of supplies must be timely so that materiel reaches military members when they need it,” Hogan's recently released report said.

Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan said in a statement Wednesday that the Canadian Armed Forces will enhance its data analytics capabilities and “rely on real data to ensure” the military has the right supply chain approach for its ever-evolving requirements and to help better anticipate future needs.

“These steps will make sure that we have the right equipment, in the right quantities, at the right places to meet the challenges we ask our members to face now and in the future,” he said.

https://ipolitics.ca/2020/07/08/canadian-armed-forces-equipment-delivered-late-half-the-time-auditor-general-finds/

Sur le même sujet

  • DND says budget for Surface Combatants remains unchanged; PBO report expected in late February

    26 novembre 2020 | Local, Naval

    DND says budget for Surface Combatants remains unchanged; PBO report expected in late February

    In 2019, the PBO projected the cost of 15 CSC frigates to be nearly $70-billion. The defence department says the ships are still projected to cost between $56- and $60-billion. By Neil Moss; The Hill Times November 25, 2020 The Department of National Defence says there hasn't been an increase in cost to the largest defence procurement project in Canadian history, which will serve as the backbone of the Canadian Navy for years to come, as questions loom over delays, which could add billions to the price tag. Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) Yves Giroux is expecting to release an updated cost projection for the purchase of 15 Canadian Surface Combatants (CSC) in late February 2021. The 15 warships are replacing Canada's current fleet of Halifax-class frigates. The project is still pegged by DND to cost between $56- and $60-billion. “There have been no budget changes,” a DND spokesperson told The Hill Times. The ships were originally budgeted to cost $26-billion before their price was doubled by DND following a 2017 PBO report that estimated the costs to be $61.82-billion. The most recent projection of the cost of the CSC was done by the PBO in February 2019, which forecast the project could cost nearly $70-billion. The DND calculation does not include taxes that will be paid for construction, which the PBO projection does. The PBO was initially tasked to examine the CSC procurement by the House Committee on Government Operations and Estimates during the last parliamentary session and report back by the end of October, but that timeline was cut short by the prorogation of Parliament on Aug. 18. Now, the committee has passed a motion to have the PBO to report back by Feb. 5, 2021. Mr. Giroux told The Hill Times the PBO's report won't be finished until late February. “Given the complexity in the project themselves—the big procurement projects at DND—its not every day or even every year that the government purchases combat ships, so the comparisons are not very easy to do and there are not that many [countries] in the world where information is readily available [for comparison],” he said, noting the PBO hasn't been having difficulties with DND. The office recently criticized the department of finance for a lack of transparency. “Even if we get perfect information and totally complete and transparent information from DND, that is only one part of the ledger. It doesn't tell us whether the predicted cost compared favourably or not with other procurement projects by other navies in the world,” he said, adding difficulty arises when trying to compare different ships, with different capabilities, being built by different shipyards, and under different timelines. In response to the PBO's recent cost projection of Canada's Joint Support Ship procurement, DND said the comparisons that were being used didn't have the same capabilities. “It's not always easy to compare capabilities that vary greatly from one country to the other and that's one criticism we sometimes get when we're trying to cost defence projects, [that] we did not take into account sufficiently the fact that the Canadian capabilities are so much better than the competitors,” he said. Another issue when performing a cost analysis, Mr. Giroux said, is that navies procure varying numbers of ships and the cost per individual ship decreases with the more ships that are built. Mr. Giroux said the cost analysis is in the “early stages” and wouldn't comment on its early findings. He said the extended timeline is a result of the amount of work and the competing work that the PBO has been tasked with, such as costing COVID-19 supports. The DND spokesperson said costs for “personnel, operations, and maintenance” that will be needed throughout the life of the ships will be “greatly influenced” by the ship design and “only available later in the process.” In 2019, the Canadian government selected the BAE Type 26 as the frigate design for the CSC. Lockheed Martin is partnering with BAE Systems. The ships will be constructed at Irving Shipbuilding's Halifax shipyard. Irving and Lockheed Martin are currently “focused on integrating” the necessary elements from the Type 26 with the Canadian Navy's systems requirements for the CSCs, according to DND. The PBO will be comparing the cost of the Type 26 to the Type 31e, the FREMM, and other “competing” ships. Canadian Global Affairs Institute vice-president David Perry, an expert on defence procurement, recently wrote in The Hill Times that there are “rumblings” of delays to the CSC procurement and changes to the ship that could drive up the cost of the project. The CSC procurement has been going through a requirements reconciliation phase of the design process, which the spokesperson says has been “substantially completed,” adding that the preliminary design work has begun. “Significant progress has been made over the last 18 months to advance the selected design to meet the RCN's unique operational requirements. This progress has provided us with greater clarity about the complexity of the ship design and its associated combat systems, as well as better insight into the required time to complete the necessary design work before the start of construction,” the spokesperson said, but did not address if there are any delays. The PBO's 2019 reported indicated that a delay of one year would add $2.2-billion to the cost of the ships and a two-year delay would mean an added $4.5-billion. “There is no evidence suggesting that the pace of the project has improved as the work became more difficult—and that is without trying to account for any COVID-related impacts,” Mr. Perry wrote. During the first wave of the pandemic, Irving Shipbuilding reduced staff at their shipyard to about half. After the design phase of the ships is completed, Irving Shipbuilding will be awarded an implementation contract to build the ships. “The schedule to build and commission the ships will be better understood as design work progresses,” the DND spokesperson said. Mr. Giroux said he was surprised by how precise the information being provided to the PBO is. “I would expect some of the information to be secret for defence reasons [and] national security reasons, and very often they are,” he said. “We're provided with a level of information that is surprisingly detailed in my opinion.” “In terms of transparency from DND, it's a pleasant surprise so far,” he said, adding he also has been surprised with how Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan (Vancouver South, B.C.) and his officials have been transparent with the PBO. nmoss@hilltimes.com The Hill Times Other major defence procurement projects Arctic Offshore Patrol Ship (AOPS) Purpose: The AOPS will provide armed surveillance of Canadian waters, which includes the North, and help enforce Canada's sovereignty with its defence partners. First announced: in 2015 by the Harper government. Cost: $4.3-billion Timeline: First ship was delivered in July 2020 with the sixth and final ship planned for a 2024 delivery. Victoria-class modernization Purpose: To extend the life of Canada's four Victoria-class submarines so they have the capability to operate until the mid- to late-2030s. First announced: in 2017 by the Trudeau government. Cost: Unknown Timeline: Currently in the options-analysis phase. More information on the timeline and costs are expected when the current procurement phase is complete. Joint Support Ships Purpose: The two Joint Support Ships are replacing auxiliary oiler replenishment vessels that were decommissioned in 2016. First announced: in 2004 by the Martin government. Cost: $4.1-billion Timeline: First ship is expected to be delivered by 2024 and the second one is planned to be completed in 2025. Fighter Jet Replacement Purpose: Eighty-eight fighter jets to replace Canada's fleet of CF-18s that serve as the pillar of the Canadian Air Force. First announced: in 2010 by the Harper government. Cost: $15- to $19-billion Timeline: Proposals from three aerospace companies are currently being assessed—Saab's Gripen, Lockheed Martin's F-35, and Boeing's Super Hornet. A contract award is anticipated for 2022 with the first aircraft being delivered “as early as” 2025. The new fleet is planned to operate beyond 2060. Canadian Multi-Mission Aircraft Purpose: To replace the CP-140 Aurora fleet to have a “enhanced long-ranged, long-endurance, multi-mission capability.” First announced: in 2018 by the Trudeau government. Cost: Unknown Timeline: Has yet to begin the option analysis phase.

  • Attribution d’un contrat d’efficacité énergétique relatif à la 14e Escadre Greenwood

    7 décembre 2018 | Local, Aérospatial

    Attribution d’un contrat d’efficacité énergétique relatif à la 14e Escadre Greenwood

    Le 7 décembre 2018 – Greenwood (Nouvelle-Écosse) – Défense nationale/Forces armées canadiennes En vertu de la politique de défense du Canada, Protection, Sécurité, Engagement, le gouvernement du Canada écologise les infrastructures de défense et lutte contre les changements climatiques. Le ministère de la Défense nationale (MDN) élargit le recours aux contrats de rendement énergétique afin d'améliorer l'efficacité énergétique de nos infrastructures militaires et de fournir à notre personnel des installations modernes et écologiques dans lesquelles travailler et s'entraîner. Au nom de Harjit S. Sajjan, ministre de la Défense, Colin Fraser, député de Nova-Ouest, a attribué aujourd'hui un contrat de rendement énergétique relatif à la 14e Escadre Greenwood. Dans le cadre du projet de 20,5 millions de dollars, 102 b'timents seront mis à niveau avec des mesures d'efficacité énergétique allant de nouvel éclairage à DEL à des systèmes de ventilation efficaces. L'installation de chauffage central de l'escadre sera également mise à niveau vers une source de carburant plus propre au gaz naturel. On s'attend à ce que ces mises à niveau réduisent les coûts énergétiques annuels de l'escadre d'environ 900 000 $, soit 13 %, et réduisent les émissions de gaz à effet de serre de près de 7 500 tonnes par année. Le MDN a un certain nombre de contrats de rendement énergétique qui se trouvent à diverses étapes d'élaboration et de mise en œuvre dans des bases partout au Canada. Dans le cadre de ces contrats, une entreprise est engagée pour payer et exécuter un projet de rénovation énergétique dans une base ou une escadre. L'argent économisé en coûts énergétiques est ensuite utilisé pour rembourser l'entreprise sur une période de cinq à quinze ans, ce qui réduit au minimum les coûts initiaux pour le contribuable, et garantit que les mises à niveau produisent des économies. Citations « Ces contrats de rendement énergétique représentent les formidables travaux en cours à l'échelle du Canada afin de rendre notre infrastructure de défense plus durable et éconergétique. Ces travaux profitent à notre personnel en modernisant les endroits où ils travaillent et s'entraînent, tout en diminuant considérablement nos émissions de carbone afin de nous aider à atteindre un avenir plus vert pour tous les Canadiens. » Harjit S. Sajjan, ministre de la Défense « Je suis ravi de voir ce projet d'énergie verte aller de l'avant pour la base Greenwood. Cet investissement de 20,5 millions de dollars créera des possibilités économiques pour la communauté du comté de Kings, tout en démontrant que des opérations gouvernementales plus écologiques et plus durables sont aussi bénéfiques pour l'économie que pour l'environnement. » Colin Fraser, député de Nova-Ouest Faits en bref Le contrat relatif aux mises à niveau et aux rénovations énergétiques à la 14e Escadre Greenwood a été attribué à MCW Custom Energy Solutions Ltd. Des contrats semblables sont en cours d'élaboration pour Bagotville, Shilo, Alert, Comox, Borden, Trenton, Kingston, Gagetown, Halifax, Montréal, Saint-Jean et Goose Bay. En plus de Greenwood, des projets sont en cours à Valcartier, à Esquimalt et à Petawawa. On s'attend à ce que le projet réduise les émissions annuelles de GES de la 14e Escadre de 7 500 tonnes, ce qui équivaut à éliminer 1 600 véhicules de la circulation. Comme il est énoncé dans la politique de défense du Canada, Protection, Sécurité, Engagement, le MDN améliore son infrastructure pour obtenir une réduction de 40 % des émissions de gaz à effet de serre (par rapport aux niveaux de 2005) d'ici 2030. La mise en œuvre de nouveaux contrats de rendement énergétique dans les bases et les escadres dans l'ensemble du Canada appuie l'objectif de faibles émissions de carbone du gouvernement et le nouvel objectif de réduction des émissions de 80 % d'ici 2050. La stratégie générale en matière d'énergie et d'environnement de la Défense renforce la capacité du MDN à écologiser ses opérations et à s'adapter aux répercussions des changements climatiques en intégrant des mesures d'adaptation, y compris des contrats de rendement énergétique, à ses politiques et à ses pratiques. Construction de Défense Canada et Services publics et Approvisionnement Canada sont les partenaires du MDN pour l'acquisition des services auprès de sociétés de services énergétiques afin de moderniser et d'écologiser les infrastructures de défense. https://www.canada.ca/fr/ministere-defense-nationale/nouvelles/2018/12/attribution-dun-contrat-defficacite-energetique-relatif-a-la-14e-escadre-greenwood.html

  • Appel au secteur manufacturier pour contribuer à la production d’équipements médicaux

    27 mars 2020 | Local, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR, Sécurité

    Appel au secteur manufacturier pour contribuer à la production d’équipements médicaux

    Si vous êtes un manufacturier canadien ou une entreprise canadienne qui peut aider le Canada à répondre aux besoins en fournitures médicales, votre aide est nécessaire Si vous pouvez répondre oui aux affirmations suivantes, contactez-nous. Vos activités manufacturières sont basées au Canada ou vous avez facilement accès aux intrants nécessaires par le biais de votre chaîne d'approvisionnement. Vous disposez d'équipements pouvant être modifiés ou d'installations qui pourraient être réorganisées rapidement pour répondre aux besoins médicaux, notamment pour fabriquer de l'équipement de protection individuelle comme des gants, des masques et des blouses chirurgicales; des désinfectants; des lingettes; des ventilateurs; et d'autres équipements et fournitures médicaux. Vous avez des travailleurs qualifiés capables de réagir et qui seraient disponibles pour travailler dans les circonstances actuelles. Le Plan canadien de mobilisation du secteur industriel pour lutter contre la COVID-19 soutient directement les entreprises afin d'augmenter rapidement leur capacité de production et en leur donnant les outils nécessaires aux chaînes de production pour concevoir des produits faits au Canada qui aideront à lutter contre la COVID-19. Pour plus d'informations, cliquez ici. Ressources pour les entreprises canadiennes Les petites et moyennes entreprises sont la pierre angulaire de l'économie canadienne. C'est la raison pour laquelle le gouvernement du Canada adopte des mesures strictes pour aider les entreprises canadiennes à faire face à la pandémie de COVID-19, qui les touche ainsi que leurs employés et les membres de leur famille. Le gouvernement du Canada et les responsables de la santé publique invitent tous les Canadiens à prendre les mesures suivantes : demeurer à domicile sauf s'il est essentiel de sortir faire preuve de distanciation sociale et d'hygiène adéquate Pour les entreprises, cela peut vouloir dire : de permettre autant que possible des modalités de télétravail souples de préparer votre milieu de travail pour éviter la COVID-19 (en anglais seulement) d'assurer la sécurité de vos employés (en anglais seulement) Pour plus d'informations, cliquez ici. Ontario ensemble : aidez à combattre le coronavirus Si votre entreprise ou organisation peut fournir des produits médicaux tels que des ventilateurs, des tampons, des masques et des lunettes de protection. Remplissez ce sondage : ici. Le gouvernement du Canada a également besoin de produits et de services : découvrez ce dont ils ont besoin Si votre entreprise ou organisation peut aider les communautés à résister à la pandémie et que vous avez une solution pour: des services de santé mentale virtuels pour les personnes vulnérables ou vivant dans des communautés éloignées surveillance de la résilience de la chaîne d'approvisionnement planification financière et conseils aux petites entreprises qui peuvent être fournis en ligne à faible coût, y compris des conseils sur les programmes de secours et la façon de postuler Remplissez le formulaire : ici. Si votre entreprise ou organisation a des idées, d'autres produits ou services qui pourraient aider les Ontariens : communiquez votre idée. Pour plus d'informations, cliquez ici.

Toutes les nouvelles