22 mai 2020 | International, Sécurité, Autre défense

Announcement of an SBIR/STTR Opportunity

Announcement of an SBIR/STTR Opportunity

Announcement of an SBIR/STTR Opportunity

Under Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) HR001120S0019

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR)

May 13, 2020

The DARPA Small Business Programs Office (SBPO) has pre-released the following SBIR/STTR Opportunities (SBOs):

These SBOs will open for proposals on May 28, 2020 and close on June 29, 2020 at 2:00pm ET

Sur le même sujet

  • Academia a Crucial Partner for Pentagon’s AI Push

    13 février 2019 | International, C4ISR

    Academia a Crucial Partner for Pentagon’s AI Push

    By Tomás Díaz de la Rubia The dust lay thick upon the ruins of bombed-out buildings. Small groups of soldiers, leaden with their cargo of weaponry, bent low and scurried like beetles between the wrecked pillars and remains of shops and houses. Intelligence had indicated that enemy troops were planning a counterattack, but so far, all was quiet across the heat-shimmered landscape. The allied soldiers gazed intently out at the far hills and closed their weary, dust-caked eyes against the glare coming off the sand. Suddenly, the men were aware of a low humming sound, like thousands of angry bees, coming from the northeast. Growing louder, this sound was felt, more than heard, and the buzzing was intensifying with each passing second. The men looked up as a dark, undulating cloud approached, and found a swarm of hundreds of drones, dropped from a distant unmanned aircraft, heading to their precise location in a well-coordinated group, each turn and dip a nuanced dance in close collaboration with their nearest neighbors. Although it seems like a scene from a science fiction movie, the technology already exists to create weapons that can attack targets without human intervention. The prevalence of this technology is pervasive and artificial intelligence as a transformational technology shows virtually unlimited potential across a broad spectrum of industries. In health care, for instance, robot-assisted surgery allows doctors to perform complex procedures with fewer complications than surgeons operating alone, and AI-driven technologies show great promise in aiding clinical diagnosis and automating workflow and administrative tasks, with the benefit of potentially saving billions in health care dollars. In a different area, we are all aware of the emergence of autonomous vehicles and the steady march toward driverless cars being a ubiquitous sight on U.S. roadways. We trust that all this technology will be safe and ultimately in the best interest of the public. Warfare, however, is a different animal. In his new book, Army of None, Paul Scharre asks, “Should machines be allowed to make life-and-death decisions in war? Should it be legal? Is it right?” It is with these questions and others in mind, and in light of the advancing AI arms race with Russia and China that the Pentagon has announced the creation of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center, which will have oversight of most of the AI efforts of U.S. service and defense agencies. The timeliness of this venture cannot be underestimated; automated warfare has become a “not if, but when” scenario. In the fictional account above, it is the enemy combatant that, in a “strategic surprise,” uses advanced AI-enabled autonomous robots to attack U.S. troops and their allies. Only a few years ago, we may have dismissed such a scenario — an enemy of the U.S. having more and better advanced technology for use in the battlefield — as utterly unrealistic. Today, however, few would question such a possibility. Technology development is global and accelerating worldwide. China, for example, has announced that it will overtake the United States within a few years and will dominate the global AI market by 2030. Given the pace and scale of investment the Chinese government is making in this and other advanced technology spaces such as quantum information systems, such a scenario is patently feasible. Here, the Defense Department has focused much of its effort courting Silicon Valley to accelerate the transition of cutting-edge AI into the warfighting domain. While it is important for the Pentagon to cultivate this exchange and encourage nontraditional businesses to help the military solve its most vexing problems, there is a role uniquely suited for universities in this evolving landscape of arming decision makers with new levels of AI. Universities like Purdue attribute much of their success in scientific advancement to the open, collaborative environment that enables research and discovery. As the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center experiments with and implements new AI solutions, it must have a trusted partner. It needs a collaborator with the mission of verifying and validating trustable and explainable AI algorithms, and with an interest in cultivating a future workforce capable of employing and maintaining these new technologies, in the absence of a profit motive. "The bench in academia is already strong for mission-inspired AI research." That's not to diminish the private sector's interest in supporting the defense mission. However, the department's often “custom” needs and systems are a small priority compared to the vast commercial appetite for trusted AI, and Silicon Valley is sure to put a premium on customizing its AI solutions for the military's unique specifications. Research universities, by contrast, make their reputations on producing trustable, reliable, verifiable and proven results — both in terms of scientific outcomes and in terms of the scientists and engineers they graduate into the workforce. A collaborative relationship between the Defense Department and academia will offer the military something it can't get anywhere else — a trusted capability to produce open, verifiable solutions, and a captive audience of future personnel familiar with the defense community's problems. If the center is to scale across the department and have any longevity, it needs talent and innovation from universities and explainable trusted AI solutions to meet national mission imperatives. As the department implements direction from the National Defense Authorization Act to focus resources on leveraging AI to create efficiency and maintain dominance against strategic technological competitors, it should focus investment in a new initiative that engages academic research centers as trusted agents and AI talent developers. The future depends on it. But one may ask, why all this fuss about AI competition in a fully globalized and interdependent world? The fact is, in my opinion and that of others, that following what we perceived as a relatively quiet period after the Cold War, we live today again in a world of great power competition. Those groups and nations that innovate most effectively and dominate the AI technology landscape will not only control commercial markets but will also hold a very significant advantage in future warfare and defense. In many respects, the threat of AI-based weapons to national security is perhaps as existential a threat to the future national security of the United States and its allies as nuclear weapons were at the end of World War II. Fortunately, the U.S. government is rising to the challenge. Anticipating these trends and challenges, the Office of Management and Budget and the Office of Science and Technology Policy announced, in a recent memo, that the nation's top research-and-development priorities would encompass defense, AI, autonomy, quantum information systems and strategic computing. This directly feeds into the job of the aforementioned Joint Artificial Intelligence Center, which is to establish a repository of standards, tools, data, technology, processes and expertise for the department, as well as coordinate with other government agencies, industry, U.S. allies and academia. The bench in academia is already strong for mission-inspired AI research. Purdue University's Discovery Park has positioned itself as a paragon of collaborative, interdisciplinary research in AI and its applications to national security. Its Institute for Global Security and Defense Innovation is already answering needs for advanced AI research by delving into areas such as biomorphic robots, automatic target recognition for unmanned aerial vehicles, and autonomous exploration and localization of targets for aerial drones. Complementary to the mission of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center, the Purdue Policy Research Institute is actively investigating the ethical, legal and social impacts of connected and autonomous vehicles. Some of the topics being researched include privacy and security; workforce disruption; insurance and liability; and economic impact. It is also starting to investigate the question of ethics, technology and the future of war and security. Purdue University is a key player in the Center for Brain-Inspired Computing project, forging ahead on “AI+” mentality by combining neuromorphic computing architectures with autonomous systems applications. The Integrative Data Science Initiative at Purdue aims to ensure that every student, no matter what their major is, graduates from the university with a significant degree of literacy in data science and AI-related technologies. Data science is used by all of the nation's security agencies and no doubt will be integral to the functioning of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center and its mission. The opportunities for Purdue and Discovery Park to enter into a partnership with the center are vast and span a wide range of disciplines and research areas. In short, the university is primed to play a vital role in the future of the nation's service and defense agencies and must be relentless in pursuing opportunities. It has become apparent that the United States is no longer guaranteed top dog status on the dance card that is the future of war. To maintain military superiority, the focus must shift from traditional weapons of war to advanced systems that rely on AI-based weaponry. The stakes are just too high and the prize too great to for the nation to be left behind. Therefore, we must call upon the government to weave together academia, government and industry for the greater good. We're stepping up to secure our place in the future of the nation. Tomás Díaz de la Rubia is Purdue University's vice president of Discovery Park. http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2019/2/11/viewpoint-academia-a-crucial-partner-for-pentagons-ai-push

  • RAF, l’Eurofighter en successeur du Tornado !

    1 octobre 2018 | International, Aérospatial

    RAF, l’Eurofighter en successeur du Tornado !

    La Royal Air Force prépare activement la mise à jour de sa flotte d'avions de combat Eurofighter « Typhoon II » en vue du remplacement du Panavia Tornado GR4. En effet, les dernières unités de « Tornado » devraient être retirées au début de l'année 2019. Project Centurion : Le programme « Poject Centurion » doit permettre à l'avion européen d'égaler la capacité d'attaque au sol du « Tornado » et de la dépasser à terme. Pour remplacer complètement le « Tornado » au sein de la RAF, les « Typhoon II » devront porter les mêmes armes, avec la phase 2 et phase 3 d'amélioration (P2EA et P3EA) qui, à leur tour, constituent la première phase et la deuxième phase du programme « Centurion ». Ils ont été précédés d'un Phase Zero (P1EB ou Phase 1 Enhancement Further Work). La phase zéro a été livrée en décembre 2017, officiellement entrée en service en janvier 2018 et est désormais opérationnelle dans le cadre de l'opération «Shader». La configuration du projet « Centurion » est destinée à combiner la bombe guidée de précision Raytheon Paveway IV déjà livrée avec les missiles « Storm Shadow », « Meteor » et « Brimstone » sur le Typhoon FGR4. L'avion devra prochainement venir remplacer le Panavia Tornado GR4 au début de l'année 2019. Les avions de première phase qui sont livrés ont été équipés de la mise à niveau « Typhoon » Phase 2 Enhancement (P2E) qui comprend le « Meteor » et le « Storm Shadow ». La phase 2 du projet Centurion couvre la mise à niveau de la phase 3 du Typhoon Enhancement (P3E) avec l'arrivée du « Brimstone ». Les essais sont maintenant en cours, la configuration finale du projet « Centurion » devrait être prête pour la fin de 2018. Les appareils concernés font partie de la Tranche 1 (51), la Tranche 2 (67) et environ 10 appareils de la Tranche 3. A noter que 24 Eurofighter de la tranche 1 qui doivent être retenus serviront uniquement à la défense aérienne et ne recevront pas la mise à niveau du projet Centurion. Environ 65 à 75 sorties devraient être enregistrées avant qu'une phase d'évaluation opérationnelle ne commence à au sein de la base aérienne de la RAF de Coningsby dans le Lincolnshire le 10 août prochain. Cela comprendra également des essais de tir complets avec l'arme de précision. D'autres améliorations incluent des mises à jour de l'interface homme / machine du "Typhoon", avec notamment le système de visée monté sur un casque Striker fourni par BAE. Le Storm Shadow : Le SCALP (acronyme de « Système de croisière conventionnel autonome à longue portée »), anciennement « Arme de précision tirée à grande distance », est un missile développé fin 1994 MBDA. La version britannique est baptisée «Storm Shadow». Cette arme est conçue pour frapper l'ennemi dans son territoire profond, quelle que soit la défense aérienne gr'ce à sa furtivité qui le rend indétectable, y compris par les avions radars. Le MBDA Brimstone : Le missile Brimstone air-sol britannique fabriqué par MBDA sur commande de la Royal Air Force. Il est équipé d'un guidage laser et d'un radar millimétrique, ceci afin de le rendre plus efficace contre des cibles mobiles. Le missile Meteor : Le Meteor est prioritairement réservé aux missions d'interception à grande distance, au-delà de la portée optique (BVR) de tout type d'aéronefs. Son utilisation est privilégiée pour les cibles de haute valeur telles que l'attaque à plus de 100 km d'avions radar ou de ravitailleurs. Ce missile va permettre d'assurer une efficacité de destruction à des distances aujourd'hui encore importantes, de l'ordre de 50 Nm (entre la cible et l'avion tireur au moment de l'impact). A cette fin, le système d'arme comporte : Un radar de bord qui fournit des informations précises sur la cible avant le départ du missile, et une liaison de données de type Link16 assurant les mêmes fonctions en retransmettant vers l'avion tireur les informations d'un capteur porté par un autre aéronef. Des systèmes d'identification des cibles à des distances compatibles avec la portée du missile. Une manœuvrabilité suffisante du missile dans toutes les phases de vol, pour toutes les distances de tir, qui doit lui assurer une grande probabilité de destruction des cibles. La propulsion de ce missile est également un défi technologique du fait du concept retenu : celui d'un statoréacteur. Ce statoréacteur à propergol solide et à poussée régulée (Throttleable Ducted Rocket ou TDR) dans sa phase de croisière comporte un accélérateur à poudre intégré dans la chambre de combustion, ce qui permet de donner une impulsion initiale suffisante pour atteindre une vitesse compatible avec le fonctionnement du statoréacteur. http://psk.blog.24heures.ch/archive/2018/09/30/raf-l-eurofighter-en-successeur-du-tornado-866306.html

  • US and China Dominated Arms Market in 2019: SIPRI Report

    8 décembre 2020 | International, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR, Sécurité

    US and China Dominated Arms Market in 2019: SIPRI Report

    China's heavy investments in the defense industry appears to be paying off with Beijing dominating the global arms market in 2019 while Russia is losing ground. Total sales by the top 25 rose by 8.5% to $361 billion, or 50 times the annual budget of the U.N.'s peacekeeping operations. The United States is still number 1, accounting for 61% of sales by the world's top 25 manufacturers last year, way ahead of China's 16%, a Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) report published Monday reveals. In 2019, the top five arms companies were all based in the U.S. - Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and General Dynamics. These five together registered $166 billion in annual arms sales. In total, 12 U.S. companies appear in the top 25 for 2019, accounting for 61% of the combined arms sales of the top 25. The largest absolute increase in arms revenue was registered by Lockheed Martin: $5.1 billion, equivalent to 11% in real terms. Chinese companies that made its way to the global top 25 are Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC; ranked 6th), China Electronics Technology Group Corporation (CETC; ranked 8th), China North Industries Group Corporation (NORINCO; ranked 9th), and China South Industries Group Corporation (CSGC; ranked 24th). Their combined revenue grew by 4.8% between 2018 and 2019. “Chinese arms companies are benefiting from military modernization programmes for the People's Liberation Army,” SIPRI Senior Researcher Nan Tian said. The only two Russian companies in the list - S-400 missile system manufacturer Almaz-Antey in 15th spot and United Shipbuilding in 25th - accounted for 3.9% of 2019 arms sales. The revenues of the two firms both decreased between 2018 and 2019, by a combined total of $634 million. A third Russian company, United Aircraft, lost $1.3 billion in sales and dropped out of the top 25 in 2019. Alexandra Kuimova, Researcher at SIPRI, said: “Domestic competition and reduced government spending on fleet modernization were two of the main challenges for United Shipbuilding in 2019.” For the first time, a Middle Eastern firm appears in the top 25 ranking. EDGE, based in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), was created in 2019 from the merger of more than 25 smaller companies. It ranks at number 22 and accounted for 1.3% of total arms sales of the top 25. https://www.defenseworld.net/news/28477#.X8_0tdhKiUk

Toutes les nouvelles