Back to news

June 2, 2020 | International, Aerospace, Naval

US Navy upgrades more ships for the F-35 as the future of carriers remains in flux

By: David B. Larter

WASHINGTON — Former acting Navy Secretary Thomas Modly hadn't been out of the job more than a month before the Navy canceled an ongoing study he'd launched into the future of aircraft carriers — a review he optimistically termed “Future Carrier 2030.”

Modly and his predecessor, Richard Spencer, had been excited by the prospect of fielding smaller, more risk-worthy carriers that could reduce the chance of China or Russia landing a major punch in a conflict simply by sinking or disabling a single ship, such as a Nimitz- or Ford-class aircraft carrier with thousands of sailors and tens of billions of dollars of hardware aboard.

But very soon after Modly's spectacular departure, former acting Secretary James McPherson canceled the study until further notice. Still, as the effort to move to a smaller carrier seems frozen — as it has been for decades every time someone suggested it — the Navy is forging ahead with preparing its big-deck boats — the amphibious assault ships — for operating with the Marine Corp's F-35B. The Corps' F-35 fighter jet is a short-takeoff-and-vertical-landing variant.

The Navy recently inked a $200 million contract with BAE Systems to upgrade the amphibious assault ship Boxer to be able to operate with the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the fifth landing helicopter assault ship to be so amended.

“The USS Boxer [dry-dock availability] will complete a combination of maintenance, modernization, and repair of the following systems: Hull structure, propulsion, electrical plant, auxiliary systems, and communications and combat systems, as well as alterations to prepare the ship for operations with the F-35B Joint Strike Fighter (JSF),” according to a statement from Naval Sea Systems command.

But the idea of smaller carriers is one the Navy has been flirting with more recently. Last fall, the Navy packed 13 F-35Bs on the amphibious assault ship America. Then-Navy Secretary Spencer later said the ship could hold up to 20.

“I will tell you, we are augmenting the aircraft carrier with our ideas, such as this lightning carrier,” Spencer said at the Brookings Institution think tank. “Twenty F-35 Bravos on a large-deck amphib. My cost performance there is tremendous. Does it have the same punch? No, it doesn't, but it does have a very interesting sting to it.”

The Boxer, which is an older class of big-deck amphib, could likely pack about 15 F-35Bs if it were dedicated for the purpose, according to Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute.<

The idea of a lighter carrier is also one that has intrigued Defense Secretary Mark Esper. In an interview with Defense News that coincided with the fiscal 21 budget rollout, Esper raised the possibility that lighter carriers were still on the agenda.

“There are various ways to do carriers,” Esper said. “So we can talk numbers or we can talk the sizes of carriers, right? There's been discussion in the past about: Do you keep building big carriers, or do you go to smaller carriers, lightning carriers? Acting Secretary Modly and I have talked about that.

“I think this gets into the future fleet designs we look at. That will be one element that we look at.”

‘What's the objective?'

The Navy has shied away from lighter carriers for decades because, as expensive as the carriers are, they generate more sorties for less money than it would cost a comparable number of smaller carriers to generate.

But the utility of a smaller carrier that still has a mean bite was recently demonstrated when a COVID-19 outbreak on the carrier Theodore Roosevelt sidelined the flat top in Guam in the middle of its deployment. The Navy directed the America to the South China Sea to provide presence there to dissuade China from taking advantage of the Roosevelt's misfortune.

That was a win for the idea of a smaller carrier, said Seth Cropsey, director of the Center for American Seapower at the Hudson Institute.

“The ability of the America to be on scene when the Roosevelt was not was a good thing,” he said. “Look I don't think anyone is going to argue that it replaces a Ford-class carrier, but the idea of a more distributed force is a sensible one.

“I'm not saying that the Navy should stop building Ford-class carriers; I'm saying they should be including smaller carriers."

The reason is pretty simple, Cropsey said: China's missiles.

“I think there is definitely a strategic reason to do it: It's called the DF-21 and DF-24, and China'a ability to fill the sky with missiles over the South China Sea. The Navy gets it, but implementing the idea and turning into tangible programs is the problem.”

The first step for the Navy is to figure out what it wants to achieve when it comes to countering China, he said.

“My strong opinion [is] that the issue is compounded by the lack of a strategic concept,” Cropsey said. “What's the plan? What's the objective? Once the Navy is able to articulate that, questions such as the ones being asked about [smaller carriers] will resolve themselves much more easily.”

https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2020/06/01/us-navy-upgrades-more-ships-for-the-f-35-as-the-future-of-carriers-remains-in-flux/

On the same subject

  • Air Force Expands AI-Based Predictive Maintenance

    July 10, 2020 | International, Aerospace, C4ISR

    Air Force Expands AI-Based Predictive Maintenance

    By THERESA HITCHENSon July 09, 2020 at 4:23 PM WASHINGTON: The Air Force plans to expand its &ldquo;predictive maintenance&rdquo; using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to another 12 weapon systems, says Lt. Gen. Warren Berry, deputy chief of staff for logistics, engineering and force protection. &ldquo;I continue to believe that predictive maintenance is a real game changer for us as an Air Force,&rdquo; he told the Mitchell Institute today. &ldquo;There's a lot of power in moving unscheduled maintenance into scheduled maintenance, and we're firmly convinced that it will improve our readiness and improve our combat capabilities by doing so.&rdquo; &ldquo;We have long been a fly-to-fail force,&rdquo; he explained, simply waiting for aircraft to quit working and then trying to fix them by moving parts to wherever the planes were grounded. But today's unpredictable and relatively slow approach to getting fighters and bombers back in the air simply won't be possible in future conflicts, as Russian and China seek to degrade US communications including via cyber attacks and attacks on US bases. The service has made &ldquo;logistics under attack&rdquo; one of its key priorities as it shifts focus to deal with globalized peer conflict, asking for $3 billion in 2021 to fund various efforts. Berry noted that the Air Force is &ldquo;talking to&rdquo; the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (JAIC) about best practices and lessons learned as it pushes ahead with its two key predictive maintenance initiatives: &ldquo;condition-based maintenance plus (CBM+) and &ldquo;enhanced reliability centered maintenance (ERCM). The service has been using CBM+, which involves monitoring platforms on three aircraft: the C-5, the KC-135 and the B-1. &ldquo;They've been doing it for about 18 to 24 months now, and we're starting to get some real return on what it is that the CBM+ is offering us,&rdquo; he said. ERCM, he explained, &ldquo;is really laying that artificial intelligence and machine learning on top of the information systems that we have, the maintenance information system data, that we have today, and understanding failure rates and understanding mission characteristics of the aircraft and how they fail,&rdquo; he said. While he said he didn't have the list at his fingertips, Berry said the dozen weapon systems being integrated would come under the ERCM effort by the end of the year. Berry said that there are a number of other changes to how the Air Force does logistics that will require future focus, especially the question of how best to preposition supplies in the European and Pacific theaters. He noted that the Pacific region presents particular problems because of the wide geographic dispersement of allies there. &ldquo;I think we need to fundamentally change how we think about prepositioning our assets,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;And that really does require partners and allies, in not just prepositioning the material and equipment, but prepositioning capacity and capability &mdash; whether that's through operational contracting support or whether that's through things that are actually on the installation that we can take advantage of.&rdquo; &ldquo;We're not going to be able to bring what we could bring in the past,&rdquo; he added, &ldquo;and so much of what we are going to use is probably going to have to be there.&rdquo; This is going to require new ways to partner with allies and friendly nations in those regions, he said, noting that the European Deterrence Initiative and the Pacific Deterrence Initiative might help. &ldquo;But, we're gonna have to make those a little bit more foundational moving forward,&rdquo; he said. Finally, Berry stressed that improved command and control is going to be the base of all of the Air Force's efforts to establish &ldquo;adaptive operations and agile combat employment&rdquo; &mdash; concepts for operating in a distributed manner from a large number of small operating locations in a peer conflicts. As a 2019 study on &ldquo;distributed operations&rdquo; by RAND explains, &ldquo;this type of distributed air operations in a contested environment represents a significant shift in the way the Air Force has operated since the end of the Cold War.&rdquo; Berry said that &ldquo;Log C2&rdquo; is related to Joint All Domain Command and Control (JADC2), another top Air Force priority as Breaking D readers are well aware. &ldquo;JADC2 is about having the decision advantage in multi- domain operations, and so in the log enterprise sustainment we want to have that same decision advantage in order to support multi-domain operations because sustainment and logistics follows operators,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;And so we've got to be able to have the sense orient and respond posture ... to be able to support multi-domain operations in the way that the operators plan to employ.&rdquo; This involves moving to replace old IT systems with modern capabilities, including cloud storage and data fusion from multiple sensors &mdash; whether those be onboard an aircraft such as the F-35 or from a machine doing specific maintenance. &ldquo;That data really is the key to our awareness of what's happening in the environment, and what's happening in the broader enterprise, to include at home and the depots and the broader supply system,&rdquo; he said. https://breakingdefense.com/2020/07/air-force-expands-ai-based-predictive-maintenance/

  • UK boosts ISR capabilities with £40m Juno satellite deal

    November 5, 2024 | International, Aerospace

    UK boosts ISR capabilities with £40m Juno satellite deal

    The UK MoD has signed a contract with Surrey Satellite Technology Limited (SSTL) for the development of a new satellite, named Juno.

  • The Pentagon wants to ‘reconsider’ its JEDI award decision

    March 16, 2020 | International, C4ISR

    The Pentagon wants to ‘reconsider’ its JEDI award decision

    By Andrew Eversden The Department of Defense requested 120 days to &ldquo;reconsider certain aspects&rdquo; of its decision to award its controversial enterprise contract to Microsoft. The request from the DoD in a March 12 court filing comes after Court of Federal Claims Judge Patricia Campbell-Smith issued a temporary restraining order directing the Pentagon to stop all work on its Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure cloud contract, after AWS alleged that the DoD made mistakes in its source selection process. The court granted Amazon's request for an injunction Feb. 13. While Amazon challenged both the technical evaluation and political interference, the court's decision to impose the injunction rested on AWS' technical challenges to the DoD selection, which included issues with how the Pentagon considered data storage capabilities. &ldquo;DoD wishes to reconsider its evaluation of the technical aspects of Price Scenario 6, and intends to issue a solicitation amendment and to accept limited proposal revisions addressing the offerors' technical approach to that price scenario,&rdquo; Defense Department lawyers wrote in the document. In the court filing, the DoD also said it wants to reconsider its evaluation of Microsoft and AWS' online marketplace offerings and &ldquo;may conduct&rdquo; clarifications with the two tech giants. The DoD will reconsider other technical challenges presented by AWS, but &ldquo;does not intend to conduct discussions with offerors or to accept proposal revisions with respect to any aspect of the solicitation,&rdquo; other than price scenario six of the RFP, which deals with storage capabilities. In a statement, Microsoft spokesperson Frank Shaw said the DoD made the &ldquo;correct decision.&rdquo; &ldquo;However, we support their decision to reconsider a small number of factors as it is likely the fastest way to resolve all issues and quickly provide the needed modern technology to people across our armed forces. Throughout this process, we've focused on listening to the needs of the DoD, delivering the best product, and making sure nothing we did delayed the procurement process. We are not going to change this approach now,&quot; Shaw said. &ldquo;Over two years the DoD reviewed dozens of factors and sub factors and found Microsoft equal or superior to AWS on every factor. We remain confident that Microsoft's proposal was technologically superior, continues to offer the best value, and is the right choice for the DoD.&rdquo; The JEDI cloud contract is potentially worth $10 billion over 10 years. This court filing is another significant setback for the DoD, even after the continuous challenges the contract has faced for about two years. Earlier in the court battle, Amazon sought to depose President Donald Trump, Secretary of Defense Mark Esper, former Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, DoD CIO Dana Deasy and several other DoD officials involved in the in the final decision. An Amazon spokesperson said the company was &ldquo;pleased&rdquo; with the decision. &quot;We are pleased that the DoD has acknowledged &lsquo;substantial and legitimate' issues that affected the JEDI award decision, and that corrective action is necessary,&rdquo; a spokesperson said. &quot;We look forward to complete, fair, and effective corrective action that fully insulates the re-evaluation from political influence and corrects the many issues affecting the initial flawed award.&rdquo; https://www.federaltimes.com/it-networks/cloud/2020/03/13/the-pentagon-was-to-reconsider-its-jedi-award/

All news