Back to news

June 10, 2020 | International, Aerospace

Marché mondial des dispositifs d’interface pour avions de chasse à réaction 2020 – Impact du COVID-19, analyse de la croissance future et défis | Astronics Corporation, Rockwell Collins, Navaero Inc, Esterline Technologies Corporation, United Technologies

Le Rapport de recherche sur le marché Dispositif d'interface pour avion de chasse mondial propose une analyse approfondie des derniers développements, de la taille du marché, du statut, des technologies à venir, des moteurs de l'industrie, des défis, des politiques réglementaires, avec les profils des entreprises principales et les stratégies des acteurs. Le Rapport de recherche inclus les nouveaux acteurs du marché mondial de Dispositif d'interface pour avion de chasse, il donne une idée du scénario actuel du marché ainsi que des opportunités ou défis du marché à venir.

En outre, la récente pandémie de COVID-19 au début de 2020 a un impact sur le marché mondial de Dispositif d'interface pour avion de chasse. En raison de la propagation sans précédent du coronavirus à travers le monde, le marché mondial de Dispositif d'interface pour avion de chasse est entravé dans divers secteurs tels que l'Amérique du Nord, l'Amérique du Sud, l'Europe, l'Asie-Pacifique, le Moyen-Orient et l'Afrique, etc. De nombreux fabricants sont confrontés à ce problème en raison de la pandémie du coronavirus. De nombreuses industries connaissent aussi des fluctuations de la demande, qui peuvent principalement changer les tendances chez les consommateurs.

Les principaux acteurs présentés dans ce Rapport comprennent:

Astronics Corporation
Rockwell Collins
Navaero Inc
Esterline Technologies Corporation
United Technologies Corporation
Teledyne Control
Arconics

Obtenez un exemplaire PDF gratuit (comprenant la table des matières complète, les tableaux et les graphiques) de: Le Marché Dispositif d'interface pour avion de chasse @ https://www.apexmarketreports.com/Heavy-Industry/global-fighter-jet-aircraft-interface-device-market-by-596056#sample

En outre, l'étude du Rapport mondial de recherche sur le marché Dispositif d'interface pour avion de chasse se concentre sur des aspects importants tels que la classification des produits, les concepts importants et d'autres paramètres spécifiques à l'industrie. Ce Rapport comprend également les facteurs clés en fonction des stratégies et événements commerciaux actuels tels que les alliances, les fusions et acquisitions et les lancements de nouveaux produits.

Segmentation globale du marché Dispositif d'interface pour avion de chasse par régions:

  • Amérique du Nord (États-Unis, Canada, Mexique)
  • Amérique du Sud (Cuba, Brésil, Argentine et bien d'autres.)
  • Europe (Allemagne, Royaume-Uni, France, Italie, Russie, Espagne, etc.)
  • Asie (Chine, Inde, Russie et de nombreux autres pays asiatiques.)
  • Région Pacifique (Indonésie, Japon et de nombreux autres pays du Pacifique.)
  • Moyen-Orient et Afrique (Arabie saoudite, Afrique du Sud et bien d'autres.)

Segmentation globale du marché Dispositif d'interface pour avion de chasse par type:

Wired
Wireless

Segmentation globale du marché Dispositif d'interface pour avion de chasse par applications:

Civil
Military

Le Rapport de recherche sur le marché Dispositif d'interface pour avion de chasse comprend des informations détaillées sur l'analyse des données en utilisant les chiffres, des graphiques, des camemberts, des tableaux et des graphiques à barres. Avec l'aide de ceux-ci, les utilisateurs comprennent facilement les données analysées, d'une façon meilleure et facile. Le Rapport présente aussi les différents défis commerciaux qui affectent la croissance du marché de façon positive ou négative.

Renseignez-vous ici pour demander un Rapport, une remise et une personnalisation du Rapport : https://www.apexmarketreports.com/Heavy-Industry/global-fighter-jet-aircraft-interface-device-market-by-596056#inquiry

Points importants couverts par le Rapport:

  • Aperçu commercial et stratégies commerciales des principaux acteurs
  • Analyse globale des tendances de l'industrie
  • Informations détaillées sur les moteurs, les opportunités et les contraintes du marché Dispositif d'interface pour avion de chasse
  • Dernières informations et mises à jour liées aux progrès technologiques
  • Carte de croissance sur l'amélioration de la technologie avec un impact sur l'analyse du marché
  • Le Rapport fournit une analyse concurrentielle du marché Dispositif d'interface pour avion de chasse et des segments de produits clés d'un marché
  • Analyse point à point de la dynamique de la concurrence sur le marché

Il y a 13 chapitres pour présenter le marché mondial de Dispositif d'interface pour avion de chasse:

Chapitre 1: Présentation du Marché, Facteurs, Contraintes et Opportunités, présentation de la Segmentation vue globale
Chapitre 2: Concurrence sur le marché par fabricants
Chapitre 3: Production par régions
Chapitre 4: Consommation par régions
Chapitre 5: Production, par types, revenus et parts de marché par types
Chapitre 6: Consommation, par applications, part de marché (%) et taux de croissance par Applications
Chapitre 7: Profilage complet et analyse des fabricants
Chapitre 8: Analyse des coûts de fabrication, analyse des matières premières, dépenses de fabrication par région Frais généraux de fabrication
Chapitre 9: Chaîne industrielle, stratégie d'approvisionnement et acheteurs en aval
Chapitre 10: Analyse de la stratégie marketing, distributeurs / commerçants
Chapitre 11: Analyse des facteurs d'effet de marché
Chapitre 12: Prévisions du marché
Chapitre 13: Résultats et conclusion de l'étude en Dispositif d'interface pour avion de chasse, annexe, méthodologie et source de données

https://journallactionregionale.com/2020/06/09/marche-mondial-des-dispositifs-dinterface-pour-avions-de-chasse-a-reaction-2020-impact-du-covid-19-analyse-de-la-croissance-future-et-defis-astronics-corporation-rockwell-collins-navaero-inc/

On the same subject

  • New military drone roadmap ambivalent on killer robots

    September 4, 2018 | International, Land, C4ISR

    New military drone roadmap ambivalent on killer robots

    By: Kelsey Atherton Drones are everywhere in the Pentagon today. While unpeopled vehicles are most closely associated with the Air Force and targeted killing campaigns, remotely controlled robots are in every branch of the military and used across all combatant commands. The fiscal year 2018 defense authorization contained the largest budget for drones and robots across the services ever, a sign of just how much of modern warfare involves these machines. Which is perhaps why, when the Department of Defense released its latest roadmap for unmanned systems, the map came in at a punchy 60 pages, far shy of the 160-page tome released in 2013. This is a document less about a military imagining a future of flying robots and more about managing a present that includes them. The normalization of battlefield robots Promised since at least spring 2017, the new roadmap focuses on interoperability, autonomy, network security and human-machine collaboration. The future of drones, and of unpeopled ground vehicles or water vehicles, is as tools that anyone can use, that can do most of what is asked of them on their own, that communicate without giving away the information they are sharing, and that will work to make the humans using the machines function as more-than-human. This is about a normalization of battlefield robots, the same way that mechanized warfare moved from a theoretical approach to the standard style of fighting by nations a few generations ago. Network security isn't as flashy a highlight as “unprecedented battlefield surveillance by flying robot,” but it's part of making sure that those flying cameras don't, say, transmit easily intercepted data over an open channel. “Future warfare will hinge on critical and efficient interactions between war-fighting systems,” states the roadmap. “This interoperable foundation will transmit timely information between information gatherers, decision makers, planners and war fighters.” A network is nothing without its nodes, and the nodes that need to be interoperable here are a vast web of sensors and weapons, distributed among people and machines, that will have to work in concert in order to be worth the networking at all. The very nature of war trends toward pulling apart networks, toward isolation. Those nodes each become a point at which a network can be broken, unless they are redundant or autonomous. Where will the lethal decision lie? Nestled in the section on autonomy, the other signpost feature of the Pentagon's roadmap, is a small chart about the way forward. In that chart is a little box labeled “weaponization,” and in that box it says the near-term goals are DoD strategy assessment and lethal autonomous weapon systems assessment. Lethal autonomous weapon systems are of such international concern that there is a meeting of state dignitaries and humanitarian officials in Geneva happening at the exact moment this roadmap was released. That intergovernmental body is hoping to decide whether or not militaries will develop robots that can kill of their own volition, according to however they've been programmed. The Pentagon, at least in the roadmap, seems content to wait for its own assessment and the verdict of the international community before developing thinking weapons. Hedging on this, the same chart lists “Armed Wingman/Teammate (Human decision to engage)” as the goal for somewhere between 2029 and 2042. “Unmanned systems with integrated AI, acting as a wingman or teammate with lethal armament could perform the vast majority of the actions associated with target identification,tracking, threat prioritization, and post-attack assessment," reads the report. "This level of automation will alleviate the human operator of task-level activities associated with the engagement of a target, allowing the operator to focus on the identified threat and the decision to engage.” The roadmap sketches out a vision of future war that hands off many decisions to autonomous machines, everything from detection to targeting, then loops the lethal decision back to a human responsible for making the call on whether or not the robot should use its weapons on the targets it selected. Humans as battlefield bot-shepards, guiding autonomous machines into combat and signing off on the exact attacks, is a possible future for robots in war, one that likely skirts within the boundaries of still-unsettled international law. Like its predecessor, this drone roadmap is plotting a rough path through newly charted territory. While it leans heavily on the lessons of the present, the roadmap doesn't attempt to answer on its own the biggest questions of what robots will be doing on the battlefields of tomorrow. That is, fundamentally, a political question, and one that much of the American public itself doesn't yet have strong feelings about. https://www.c4isrnet.com/unmanned/2018/08/31/new-military-drone-roadmap-ambivalent-on-killer-robots

  • Parsons gets first new CEO in 13 years

    April 21, 2021 | International, Land

    Parsons gets first new CEO in 13 years

    Carey Smith will replace Chuck Harrington as CEO come July 1.

  • British Defence Ministry reveals why a drone program now costs $427M extra

    January 27, 2020 | International, Aerospace

    British Defence Ministry reveals why a drone program now costs $427M extra

    By: Sebastian Sprenger Correction: A previous version of this story misidentified the cost increase to Britain's Protector acquisition program. The program is said to now cost an extra £325 million, with £187 million of that attributed to a delivery delay. LONDON — The British Defence Ministry's top civilian has identified in a letter to lawmakers the reasons why a drone acquisition program has experienced a near 40 percent hike in costs. The Ministry of Defence decided to delay by two years the delivery of 16 General Atomic Protector RG Mk1 drones to replace the Royal Air Force's MQ-9 Reaper fleet, the letter to Parliament's Public Accounts Committee said. Stephen Lovegrove, the ministry's permanent secretary, cited that decision as the main reason for the £325 million (U.S. $427 million) cost increase to the program, as £187 million of that could be attributed to the delay. “The cost growth and time delay to the program imposed in July 2017 were outside of program tolerances but were the result of the need to ensure the affordability of the overall defence program,” Lovegrove wrote in his letter. The MoD is currently in negotiations with the U.S. over a deal to build the first three of the 16 Protectors scheduled to be purchased for the RAF. The final number of vehicles on order could eventually expand beyond 16 — subject to the MoD's fragile finances in the coming years unless defense gets a sizable increase in the Conservative government's next budget round due later this year. The letter was sent Nov. 5 but has only recently been made public. Lovegrove detailed further causes of the cost increase rise in the drone program, which was expected to cost £816 million when it was approved by the MoD in 2016. Aside from the increased costs caused by the delay, the letter said that the fall in the value of the pound against the dollar accounted for £50.8 million of the price rise, and a new primary sensor cost another £64 million. Other unspecified program costs accounted for a further £23 million. The pound has firmed up against the dollar a little since the Conservative Party won the general election in December, which may lessen the impact of increased costs for the moment. The new primary sensor investment involves provision of an improved electro-optical and infrared sensor. The letter said the investment was to avoid future obsolescence issues. Consideration is still being given to the purchase of what is known as a “due regard air-to-air radar” designed for vital detect-and-avoid duties on the platform. Protector, which is the British name for its version of the new General Atomics MQ-9B SkyGuardian, is scheduled to achieve initial operating capability in November 2023, the letter read. The vehicle will replace the current fleet of MQ-9 Reapers, which the RAF has operated almost constantly during the last few years over Afghanistan and the greater Middle East. Lovegrove said the MoD had compared Protector with other options to meet the requirement but the General Atomics platform remained the best value for money. “A comparison was made between: developing a new remotely piloted aircraft system capability (either collaboratively or nationally); procuring the current Reaper Blk 5 (as used by the US Air Force and others); and procuring Protector,” he said. “This concluded that procuring Protector represented best value for money, as its higher performance meant that the operational task could be delivered by procuring fewer air vehicles. The 2-year delay and resultant cost increase have not undermined this value for money case ... it remains affordable despite the cost growth,” the permanent secretary added. Lovegrove said the biggest problem for the Protector program was not the platform itself but the availability of trained crew in the run-up to initial operating capability. “The most significant risk to the Protector program is the RAF's ability to generate and sustain the volume of trained personnel necessary to assure IOC in Nov 2023. The Protector work force builds on the current Reaper force; training and retaining sufficient remotely piloted aircraft system crews has historically proved challenging and is being closely monitored,” the letter said. The Protector is expected to fly longer and hit harder than the Reaper. The UAV will also fly in nonsegregated airspace in places like the U.K . in September, the MoD and General Atomics signed a significant deal to complete the test and evaluation activities required to fly the system in civil airspace. The first test and evaluation aircraft is due to be delivered next year subject to the successful completion of the production contract. An initial production deal is currently in negotiation, with aiming of inking a deal in the next few months. In a first for the system, the SkyGuardian version of the medium-altitude, long-endurance drone flew across the Atlantic Ocean in July from Grand Forks, North Dakota, to RAF Fairford in England. The flight covered 3,760 nautical miles in 24 hours and 2 minutes. https://www.defensenews.com/unmanned/2020/01/24/british-defence-ministry-reveals-why-a-drone-program-now-costs-245m-extra/

All news