Back to news

December 19, 2022 | International, Aerospace

L3Harris moves to acquire Aerojet Rocketdyne

L3Harris, the country’s sixth largest defense contractor, plans to acquire propulsion expert Aerojet Rocketdyne in a deal valued at $4.7 billion.

https://www.c4isrnet.com/industry/2022/12/19/l3harris-moves-to-acquire-aerojet-rocketdyne/

On the same subject

  • French Air Force chief: France and Germany working on export controls for future fighter

    February 11, 2019 | International, Aerospace

    French Air Force chief: France and Germany working on export controls for future fighter

    By: Valerie Insinna WASHINGTON — The French Air Force chief of staff provided top cover for the future Franco-German fighter at a time when the French defense industry is increasingly concerned that cooperation with Germany could curtail its ability to export the system. “There is a real determination" at the highest levels of government — including French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel — to agree on export controls, said Gen. Philippe Lavigne during a Feb. 7 roundtable with reporters. "It's a need for our security, but it's also a need for our industry, and we have to develop this,” he said, adding that Spain has already signed on as an observer to the program and that others are expected to follow. The French government is generally seen as more supportive of arms sales than its partner in the sixth-generation fighter program, called the Future Combat Air System, or FCAS. While enthusiasm for the program remains high, some French defense industry officials are concerned that Germany's involvement could prevent sales to countries that Berlin considers rogue actors. But settling an export policy is just one of the many questions about the FCAS program that are still yet to be answered. So far, France and Germany's concept for FCAS involves a network of swarming UAVs, new weapons and a sixth-generation fighter that can exchange information with each other. FCAS would replace France's Rafale and Germany's Eurofighter around 2040. “We haven't decided what will be the architecture,” Lavigne said. “Will it be this type of aircraft? Will it be this type of [UAV]? Will it be this type of unmanned combat air vehicle? Will it be this type of missiles? But we know that we will share an architecture. “The gamechanger is the connectivity between different platforms.” Earlier this week, the French and German governments awarded €65 million (U.S. $74 million) to Dassault and Airbus for the two-year study that will solidify a path forward for FCAS, and the companies plan to announce demonstrator programs at the Paris Air Show this summer. Lavigne wasn't clear on how the governments would reconcile different requirements, like France's intention to launch FCAS from aircraft carriers, which could drive different design attributes than a fighter that takes off and lands conventionally. “Of course we will have national interests in France with the nuclear deterrence. Germany will have different national interests,” he said. However, he stopped short of saying how much commonality is expected between the two militaries. Until the study is complete, it is “too early to say” whether FCAS will be manned or unmanned. However, Lavigne said a human will continue to be in the loop — especially for nuclear deterrence missions — whether a human is in the cockpit or it is remotely piloted. “We are open to look at the technical solution,” he said. “For me, it's optionally piloted.” FCAS' system-of-systems approach is similar to the U.S. Air Force's vision for Penetrating Counter Air, its future air superiority concept. The Air Force hasn't shared which defense companies are involved in conceptualizing or prototyping future technologies that could be pulled into a PCA program of record, but it requested $504 million in fiscal 2019 to push the effort forward, with investments projected to hit $3 billion in FY22. https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2019/02/08/french-air-force-chief-france-and-germany-working-on-export-controls-for-future-fighter

  • Le projet de futur avion de combat européen prend forme

    February 20, 2020 | International, Aerospace

    Le projet de futur avion de combat européen prend forme

    Les études du futur avion de combat européen sont enfin lancées. L'Allemagne et la France ont signé un contrat de 150 millions d'euros ce jeudi 20 février. Une étape de franchie. Après des mois de rivalités politico-industrielles franco-allemandes, les ministres de la Défense des deux pays ont signé jeudi 20 février à Paris un contrat de 150 millions d'euros devant conduire en 2026 à un premier prototype du futur avion de combat européen. "C'est le contrat qui nous amène sur la route d'un démonstrateur en vol en 2026" du Scaf, le Système de combat aérien futur, résume-t-on au cabinet de Florence Parly, la ministre française des Armées. Un démonstrateur est une sorte de pré-prototype destiné à valider la faisabilité d'un concept. La ministre française et son homologue Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer ont signé l'accord gouvernemental entérinant le lancement de cette phase du projet, dite "phase 1A", prévue pour durer 18 mois. Elles ont également signé avec le secrétaire espagnol à la Défense Ángel Ramírez une lettre d'intention prévoyant l'intégration dans les mois à venir de Madrid, qui a rejoint plus tardivement le projet Scaf, dans les études de recherches et technologies. Le contrat de notification aux industriels proprement dit a été signé par le maître d'œuvre du programme, le délégué général à l'armement (DGA) Jöel Barre. Le SCAF, qui doit remplacer d'ici une vingtaine d'années les Rafale et Eurofighter, "permettra à nos nations de faire face aux menaces et aux défis de la deuxième moitié du XXIe siècle", s'est félicité Florence Parly, saluant un projet "très ambitieux, qui "illustre notre volonté et notre ambition pour l'Europe de la Défense". A l'origine prévue lors du salon du Bourget en juin 2019, la signature de ce contrat, financé "strictement à moitié-moitié" entre les deux pays, a buté sur des tensions entre industriels des deux pays et surtout des craintes côté allemand que l'Allemagne soit perdante dans ce partenariat dont la France a été désignée cheffe de file. Des réticences Le déblocage a été permis la semaine passée par le vote des crédits par le Bundestag, qui ne voulait "pas détériorer les relations franco-allemandes", selon un député. Mais les parlementaires ont exprimé des réticences et exigé de l'exécutif allemand qu'il s'assure dans la longueur que les intérêts du pays ne sont pas bradés, notamment que le projet de futur char franco-allemand (MGCS), dont Berlin est leader, suive un développement parallèle à celui du SCAF. "Il y a des différences de processus entre la France et l'Allemagne, ça ne veut pas dire que les députés allemands sont moins convaincus par le SCAF", a observé devant la presse Dirk Hoke, président exécutif d'Airbus Defense and Space, l'un des principaux industriels impliqués dans le programme. "De temps en temps, il y a des nuages mais on passe au-dessus des nuages et on retrouve le ciel bleu", a pour sa part confié le PDG de Dassault Aviation Eric Trappier, selon qui "c'est vraiment un départ, on ne peut pas revenir en arrière". L'avion de combat de nouvelle génération (dit NGF ou "New Generation Fighter"), dont Dassault est maître d'œuvre avec Airbus comme partenaire principal, est doté d'une enveloppe de 91 millions d'euros. Les études sur le moteur, développé par Safran avec l'allemand MTU, bénéficient de 18 millions d'euros, les "effecteurs déportés", de 19,5 millions. Ces drones, sur lesquels vont plancher Airbus et le missilier MBDA, accompagneront l'avion et leur rôle sera de leurrer ou saturer les défenses adverses. Un quatrième pilier (Airbus et Thales) devra mettre au point un système de "combat collaboratif" permettant de connecter avions, drones, satellites et centres de commandement. Quelque 14,5 millions d'euros y sont consacrés. Enfin, un cinquième pilier doté de 6,5 millions d'euros concerne la cohérence globale du projet et des laboratoires de simulation. L'Espagne, avec Airbus Espagne et l'électronicien de défense Indra, est d'ores et déjà impliquée à hauteur de deux millions d'euros dans le projet de recherche et technologie. C'est une "préfiguration" d'une participation "beaucoup plus massive" d'environ 45 millions d'euros venant s'ajouter "courant 2020" aux 150 millions mis par Paris et Berlin, selon le cabinet de Florence Parly. Les montants en jeu sont certes limités par rapport à l'enveloppe globale d'un programme qui sera opérationnel à l'horizon 2040. "Mais ils vont figer l'organisation de tout le reste du contrat" , plaide-t-on de même source. Un total de 4 milliards d'euros doit être investi d'ici à 2025, 8 milliards d'ici à 2030. https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/le-projet-de-futur-avion-de-combat-europeen-prend-forme-1362786

  • Brexit turns up the heat on access rules to EU defense coffers

    February 5, 2020 | International, Aerospace, Naval, Land, C4ISR, Security

    Brexit turns up the heat on access rules to EU defense coffers

    By: Sebastian Sprenger COLOGNE, Germany — European leaders should modify rules to include Britain and the United States in their defense-cooperation efforts, ending a simmering dispute that could turn toxic over time, according to the director general of the European Union Military Staff. “We will find a way [on] how to engage the United States and other third-party states,” Lt. Gen. Esa Pulkkinen told Defense News in an interview in Washington last week. But he cautioned that the unresolved issue could become a “permanent” thorn in the side of relations with the United States, in particular. At issue are the conditions for access to the multibillion-dollar European Defence Fund and its associated collaboration scheme, the Permanent Structured Cooperation, or PESCO. The funds are meant to nurse the nascent defense capabilities of the continent's member states, with the idea that NATO would be strengthened in the process. Officials have left the door open for the U.K., which recently left the EU, as well as its defense companies to partake in individual projects, given the country's importance as a key European provider of military capabilities. But the exact terms have yet to be spelled out, requiring a balancing act between framing member states as primary PESCO beneficiaries while providing a way in for key allies. Defense officials in Washington previously criticized the EU initiative, complaining that it would needlessly shut out American contractors. European leaders countered that the program is first and foremost meant to streamline the bloc's disparate military capabilities, stressing that avenues for trans-Atlantic cooperation exist elsewhere. “EDF and PESCO isn't everything in the world,” Pulkkinen said in Washington. “We are not going to violate any U.S. defense industrial interests. “The defense industry is already so globalized, they will find a way [on] how to work together.” While European governments have circulated draft rules for third-party access to the EU's defense-cooperation mechanism, a final ruling is not expected until discussions about the bloc's budget for 2021-2027 are further along, according to issue experts. Officials at the European Defence Agency, which manages PESCO, are taking something of a strategic pause to determine whether the dozens of projects begun over the past few years are delivering results. Sophia Besch, a senior research fellow with the Centre for European Reform, said the jury is still out over that assessment. “The big question is whether the European Union can prove that the initiatives improve the operational capabilities,” she said. Aside from the bureaucratic workings of the PESCO scheme, the German-French alliance — seen as an engine of European defense cooperation — has begun to sputter, according to Besch. In particular, Berlin and Paris cannot seem to come together on operational terms — whether in the Sahel or the Strait of Hormuz — at a time when Europe's newfound defense prowess runs the risk of becoming a mostly theoretical exercise, Besch said. The EU members' ambitions remain uneven when it comes to defense, a situation that is unlikely to change anytime soon, according to a recent report by the German Marshall Fund of the United States. “The dispute around the concept of strategic autonomy has not led to any constructive consensus, and it will likely affect debates in the future,” the document stated. “Member states and the EU institutions will continue to promote different concepts that encapsulate their own vision of defense cooperation.” https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2020/02/04/brexit-turns-up-the-heat-on-access-rules-to-eu-defense-coffers

All news