Back to news

July 23, 2019 | International, Naval

Future U.S. Navy Frigates Strengthened By Lockheed Martin Integration And Test Experience

MOORESTOWN, N.J., July 19, 2019 – The U.S. Navy selected Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) as the Combat System Ship Integration & Test agent for the Navy's future Guided Missile Frigate (FFG(X)) ship program.

The Combat System Ship Integration & Test contract will ensure the overall integration of the combat system elements into the Frigate ship design and validate the installation through the completion of waterfront testing. The 10-year contract will consist of one base year and nine option years' worth up to $125 million.

“The U.S. Navy will experience substantial efficiency by utilizing the existing processes, tools, and experience of the Lockheed Martin ship integration and test team,” said Chris Minster, Program Director, Lockheed Martin Surface Navy Integration Systems. “While minimizing ship impact and cost, our Ship Integration & Test team will enable the successful integration of the combat system elements into the future frigate ship design.”

As the warfighter's needs change, Lockheed Martin has continuously evolved to quickly provide innovative and affordable capabilities to the fleet. Lockheed Martin has over 40 years of ship integration and test experience including Aegis Ticonderoga class guided missile cruisers and Arleigh Burke class guided missile destroyers.

As the Navy's trusted Combat System Engineering Agent (CSEA), Lockheed Martin has successfully delivered and integrated Aegis and Aegis-based products on 126 platforms in eight nations, with an additional 23 under construction or planned. Aegis and Aegis-derived systems are in service in U.S. Navy cruisers, destroyers, Littoral Combat Ships, Coast Guard National Security Cutters and Aegis Ashore sites. The navies of Japan, Spain, Norway, the Republic of Korea, and Australia have also chosen Aegis to protect their nations.

About Lockheed Martin

Headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, Lockheed Martin is a global security and aerospace company that employs approximately 105,000 people worldwide and is principally engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture, integration and sustainment of advanced technology systems, products and services.

View source version on Lockheed Martin: https://news.lockheedmartin.com/future-us-navy-frigates-strengthened-by-lockheed-martin-integration-and-test-experience

https://www.epicos.com/article/449175/future-us-navy-frigates-strengthened-lockheed-martin-integration-and-test-experience

On the same subject

  • The Pentagon is handling cyber vulnerabilities inconsistently

    March 18, 2020 | International, C4ISR, Security

    The Pentagon is handling cyber vulnerabilities inconsistently

    Mark Pomerleau The Department of Defense has not consistently mitigated cyber vulnerabilities identified in a 2012 report, according to the department's inspector general. The DoD IG issued a follow-on report to its 2012 report, issued March 13 and made public March 17, that determined cyber red teams didn't report the results of assessments to organizations and components didn't effectively correct or mitigate the identified vulnerabilities. The new report discovered that components didn't consistently mitigate or include unmitigated vulnerabilities identified in the prior audit and during this audit by red teams during combatant command exercises, operational testing assessments and agency-specific assessments in plans of action and milestones. “Ensuring DoD Components mitigate vulnerabilities is essential to achieve a better return on investment,” the report stated. “In addition, we determined that the DoD did not establish a unified approach to support and prioritize DoD Cyber Red Team missions. Instead, the DoD Components implemented Component-specific approaches to staff, train and develop tools for DoD Cyber Red Teams, and prioritize DoD Cyber Red Team missions.” The report found that DoD didn't establish a unified approach because it didn't assign an organization with responsibility to oversee and synchronize red team activity based on priorities, it didn't assess the resources needed for each red team and identify requirements to train them to meet priorities and it didn't develop baseline tools to perform assessments. “Without an enterprisewide solution to staff, train and develop tools for DoD Cyber Red Teams and prioritize their missions, DoD Cyber Red Teams have not met current mission requests and will not meet future requests because of the increased demands for DoD Cyber Red Team services,” the report said. “Until the DoD assigns an organization to assess DoD Cyber Red Team resources, it will be unable to determine the number of DoD Cyber Red Teams and staffing of each team to support mission needs, which will impact the Do D's ability to identify vulnerabilities and take corrective actions that limit malicious actors from compromising DoD operations.” The DoD IG issued seven recommendations the secretary of defense assign an organization responsibility for. They include: Review and assess red team reports for systemic vulnerabilities and coordinate the development and implementation of enterprise solutions to mitigate them; Ensure components develop and implement a risk-based process to assess the impact of identified vulnerabilities and prioritize funding for corrective actions for high-risk vulnerabilities; Ensure components develop and implement processes for providing reports with red team findings and recommendations to organizations with responsibility for corrective actions; Develop processes and procedures to oversee red team activities, including synchronizing and prioritizing red team missions, to ensure activities align with priorities; Perform a joint DoD-wide mission-impact analysis to determine the number of red teams, minimum staffing levels of each team, the composition of the staffing levels needed to meet current and future mission requests; Assess and identify a baseline of core and specialized training standards, based on the three red team roles that team staff must meet for the team to be certified and accredited; and Identify and develop baseline tools needed by red teams to perform missions. https://www.fifthdomain.com/dod/2020/03/17/the-pentagon-is-handling-cyber-vulnerabilities-inconsistently/

  • Un nouveau drone pour l'US Air Force

    June 23, 2020 | International, Aerospace

    Un nouveau drone pour l'US Air Force

    L'US Air Force (USAF) a publié une RFI, ou demande d'information, afin de trouver le successeur du drone MALE MQ-9 Reaper. Observation et armement. L'US Air Force a rendu public une demande d'information dont l'objectif est d'identifier différents systèmes pouvant venir remplacer le MQ-9 Reaper à l'horizon 2030. Le drone MALE actuellement recherché devra être capable de mener des missions ISR (renseignement, surveillance, reconnaissance), l'essence même du drone, ainsi que des frappes armées. L'emport et la mise en œuvre d'armement par les drones MALE américain sont désormais fréquents et a démontré à plusieurs reprises son intérêt, malgré la dénonciation de certaines opérations par l'opinion publique. Quelle drone de nouvelle génération ? Si l'US Air Force s'intéresse ainsi aux nouveaux drones MALE pouvant être disponibles sur le marché d'ici à 2030 afin de remplacer son MQ-9 Reaper, l'USAF fait part également de son intérêt pour des solutions lui permettant de moderniser et d'améliorer les plateformes actuellement en service. Il n'est donc pas garanti que l'USAF fasse le choix d'acquérir des nouveaux drones MALE, certains MQ-9 Reaper pourraient également être modifiés afin de répondre aux nouvelles exigences opérationnelles. Le critère budgétaire semble en effet peser lourd dans la balance, notamment sur le plan du soutien et de la maintenance. Malgré tout l'US Air Force souhaite doter ses forces de systèmes modernes et performants, et l'emport de technologies intelligentes bénéficiera d'une attention particulière. Marché. Si la compétition est ouverte aux petites entreprises, se pose la question de potentielles importations. En effet, dans le domaine des drones MALE, l'armée américaine est entièrement dotée de systèmes développés nationalement et laisse peu de place à la concurrence étrangère. Par ailleurs General Atomics, constructeur du MQ-9 Reaper, continue sa quête de débouchés et un nouveau contrat avec l'Air Force permettrait d'asseoir sa crédibilité une fois de plus. Dans le domaine des drones MALE, aujourd'hui deux pays tirent véritablement leur épingle du jeu : les Etats-Unis et Israël. https://air-cosmos.com/article/un-nouveau-drone-pour-lus-air-force-23271

  • Pentagon, Lockheed reach handshake deal for next F-35s

    November 25, 2024 | International, Aerospace

    Pentagon, Lockheed reach handshake deal for next F-35s

    Lockheed Martin has felt financial strain as early funding for the upcoming F-35 jets dried up, but kept working on them to avoid supply chain disruptions.

All news