9 juillet 2019 | International, Naval

The US Navy’s Riverines are up-gunned, high tech and ready to lean into great power competition

By:

JOINT EXPEDITIONARY BASE LITTLE CREEK, Va. — The Mark VI patrol boat bristles with heavy automatic weapons, and that's the way its crews like it.

“I tell the crews that you want to look like a porcupine,” said U.S. Navy Senior Chief Derrick Cox, who trains the sailors that man the Mark VI as part of Coastal Riverine Squadron 2's training evaluation unit. “You don't want to kick a porcupine because you know there will be consequences.”

The Mark VI is a replacement for the Riverine Command Boat, which gained notoriety three years ago when two of them, along with their crews, were captured by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard when they strayed into Iranian waters near Farsi Island in the Arabian Gulf.

“This has double, maybe even triple the firepower of the RCB,” Cox said.

The RCBs had four mounts that could support a number of heavy weapons to defend the boat. The Mark VI is in another league all together. The boat shown to Defense News this month packed two stabilized, remote-operated, optically guided MK 50, .50-caliber Gun Weapon Systems; two MK 38 Mod 2 (25mm) Gun Weapon Systems (also remotely operated with an advanced optics system); and two crew-served .50-caliber machine guns.

“We've demonstrated that we can sustain a firefight for 45 minutes in the Mark VI,” Cox said.

The Mark VI was just coming online in January 2016 when the incident at Farsi Island went down — the last of the 12 were delivered by the end of 2018. And though ultimately none of the 10 captured sailors were hurt — they were released along with their RCBs after the personal intervention of then-Secretary of State John Kerry — the incident was deeply embarrassing for the Navy and infuriating for senior leadership. It prompted the service to refocus the Riverines' mission and change the mindset.

Navy Expeditionary Combat Command, the parent command of the Riverines, dispensed training for offensive operations and refocused the Coastal Riverine Force toward port and infrastructure security, high-value unit escort missions, and other such anti-terrorism, force protection missions. It also forced the Riverine crews to get serious about their jobs, Cox said.

“Our missions were in more permissive environments, and a lot of our training was tailored toward that,” he said. “Now we are geared toward non-permissive environments.”

The head of NECC, Rear Adm. Brian Brakke, is taking that new focus and his new Mark VI platform and turning toward the challenge at hand: great power competition.

“Where I would like to go is where do we have the opportunity inside the littorals to be able to conduct missions for the Navy that may free up capital assets to go do other missions,” Brakke said.

The new Mark VI has a communications suite that well exceeds that of the RCB. The new boat can connect with the fleet via Link 16; it also has high- and ultrahigh-frequency and satellite comms so shore side controllers won't lose track of the boat, as happened during the Farsi Island incident. The 85-foot boat has a top speed of more than 40 knots and a range of up to 500 miles.

It has a 10-person crew and can accommodate up to 20 personnel — the RCB maxed out at 15 personnel.

Among the possibilities Brakke is looking at: using the Mark VI as a mothership for swarm attacks in conjunction with new 40-foot patrol boats being introduced to the force; operating unmanned aircraft for over-the-horizon surveillance; operating autonomous wave runners for various missions.

The boat already comes with a ramp and rails to launch sleds for autonomous vehicles, which means the boats can be employed for mine countermeasures operations in the littorals. The launch capability is an area that needs improvement but is full of potential, Brakke said.

“From a force-development and innovation perspective, that's where we are taking a look at how to grow this force and what it can do for us,” Brakke said. “We understood when they developed the craft that if it's going to have that interaction with the fleet, we have to be able to communicate. So having SATCOMs, Link 16, being able to come up on blue-force tracker so that we know where they are, and they know where we are, that was a big piece of this.”

Fixing what's broken

The 2016 incident with Iran also forced significant organizational changes into the Coastal Riverine Forces.

Since the Farsi Island debacle, NECC has worked to close the gaps that contributed to the incident. Up and down the chain of command, the Navy has boosted and improved training and communication, said Cmdr. Mike Ray, the head of Coastal Riverine Group 1, during a June 26 interview.

Watch standers in the operations centers that lost track of the RCBs as they got lost and bumbled their way into Iranian waters receive more training and are more fully appraised on the individual boat crews — their strengths and weaknesses, and what exactly they've been trained to do.

The turnover process in theater has also been greatly improved and is overseen by both the operational command in theater and by the administrative command, which is responsible for providing a manned, trained and equipped force to the operators.

“One of the specific deficiencies that was brought up in the Farsi investigation was that the [turnover] process allowed the incoming squadron and those forces to be ill-prepared to understand some of the theater-specific requirements or changes since the last time they deployed," Ray said. "So every time a squadron turns over now, you've got representatives of my staff or my counterpart in Little Creek from Group 2 who go over there to essentially shepherd that process hand in hand with the [operational control] task force commander to ensure that once the handover is complete, that new squadron ... is fully prepared to execute in that theater.”

The improved turnover process gets after what was one of the more controversial questions in the aftermath of the Farsi Island incident: Was that unit ill-prepared when it entered theater, or did it degrade while it was in theater?

Vice Adm. Kevin Donegan, then commander of 5th Fleet, determined that the Riverine crews were insufficiently trained prior to departing for deployment. But others argued that Commander Task Force 56 tasked the Riverine crews with a mission for which they weren't properly trained — a long, open-ocean transit from Kuwait to Bahrain — and that the sailors had been in theater for months by the time disaster struck, well removed from their training.

The improved turnover then, ideally, cuts out the finger-pointing and ensures that both the relevant task force knows the unit it's getting and are fully briefed on the training and capabilities.

Communication between the task force and the trainers back in the states during the deployment has also increased, Ray said. Even though the Riverines are turned over to the operational chain of command in theater, his group is still available to offer expertise and guidance on employment of their units on a mission-by-mission basis.

“We backstop them by providing Coastal Riverine Force-specific expertise in those planning briefs. Although they are [in operational control], they reach back to us a lot to provide oversight and review of those to ensure nothing is missed,” Ray said.

‘Ready to fight'

One of the more troubling aspects of the Farsi Island incident for the U.S. Navy was the behavior of the crew members, both in allowing themselves to be captured and in the leader of the voyage apologizing to Iran on camera.

Leaders in the Riverine force seem to chalk that behavior up to complacency and a lack of the proper mindset in a contested environment.

“We spend a significant amount of time talking about a combat mindset — understanding that contact with the enemy is a plausible scenario that they need to be ready for mentally, physically and tactically," Ray said.

“I just had the privilege of sending some sailors off to Bahrain to go do security, and it suffices to say that the 5th Fleet theater is contested," he added. "And I'll tell you that every one of those sailors understood that they were headed into an environment where they potentially could be called up to employ those weapons skills, mental toughness, in a contested environment.

“So, not to say that there was any goodness that came out of the Farsi Island incident, but it served to reinforce the reality to our sailors that any given sailor, on any given day, perhaps is going to be called upon to demonstrate that toughness, to demonstrate that seriousness of purpose and demonstrate that tactical training: It was a good reminder for all of our sailors of the environment in which they serve.”

Brakke, the NECC commander, put it even more directly.

“And a lot of times when we talk to the units and the squadrons before they deploy we tell them that you have to be ready to expect that not all of you might come home,” he said. “And that focuses them that this isn't just something where we're going over to just ride around: We're ready to fight and win our nation's wars if we have to.

“That's the culture that we've tried to put into place.”

https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2019/07/08/the-us-navys-riverines-are-up-gunned-high-tech-and-ready-to-lean-into-great-power-competition/

Sur le même sujet

  • Lockheed Martin Successfully Transitions Long Range Discrimination Radar To The Missile Defense Agency

    23 avril 2024 | International, Terrestre

    Lockheed Martin Successfully Transitions Long Range Discrimination Radar To The Missile Defense Agency

    The highly adaptable LRDR operates in S-band frequencies and features a scalable, open systems architecture designed to be scaled and extended to counter evolving threats without changing the hardware design

  • Top Aces wins contract to train USAF with F-16 Advanced Aggressor Fighter fleet - Skies Mag

    13 septembre 2022 | International, Aérospatial

    Top Aces wins contract to train USAF with F-16 Advanced Aggressor Fighter fleet - Skies Mag

    The five-year contract is valued at up to US$175 million, and is expected to “significantly enhance” the training of fifth-generation combat pilots.

  • SCAF : Paris et Berlin ont trouvé un accord sur les moteurs du futur avion de combat européen

    29 novembre 2019 | International, Aérospatial

    SCAF : Paris et Berlin ont trouvé un accord sur les moteurs du futur avion de combat européen

    Par Michel Cabirol La France et l'Allemagne ont trouvé un accord sur l'organisation industrielle des moteurs. Dans un premier temps, Safran sera bien le maître d'oeuvre et MTU sous-traitant. Par la suite, les industriels vont créer une société commune à parité pour porter les contrats puis la certification du moteur. Rencontré la semaine dernière au salon aéronautique de Dubaï, le patron d'Airbus Defence & Space, Dirk Hoke, avait assuré à La Tribune que les difficultés du Système de combat aérien du Futur (SCAF) allaient être surmontées, y compris sur le difficile volet concernant les motoristes (Safran, MTU). Et de préciser que l'Allemagne et la France allaient "trouver une solution" sur l'organisation industrielle des moteurs du futur avion de combat européen, le programme NGF (Next Generation Fighter). C'est désormais chose faite, selon plusieurs sources concordantes. Le SCAF est donc enfin sur la piste de décollage. Si aucun aléa ne vient perturber la "phase de roulage"', le programme européen (Allemagne, France et Espagne) devrait décoller fin janvier avec la notification des contrats de Recherche et Technologie (R&T) sur les cinq piliers du projet, dont le fameux démonstrateur technologique sous la maîtrise d'oeuvre de Dassault Aviation qui est très attendu. Mais le temps presse. Et chaque minute compte, y compris celles des week-ends, pour être à l'heure du calendrier politique, comprendre, celui d'Emmanuel Macron et d'Angela Merkel. Une organisation industrielle enfin figée Paris et Berlin ont trouvé un accord oral, qui doit être désormais décliné par écrit. Dans la phase 1A (Recherche et Technologie), la France a obtenu que Safran soit clairement le maître d'oeuvre tandis que MTU se cantonne à un rôle de sous-traitant principal (main partner). Cette organisation était jusqu'ici contestée par MTU, lui même soutenu par le parlement allemand. Mais la France n'a pas cédé. C'était d'ailleurs une volonté très ferme de la France que d'équilibrer les rapports entre les industriels français et allemands sur le SCAF (Airbus Allemagne est maître d'oeuvre de trois piliers tandis que Dassault Aviation et Safran le sont pour un pilier chacun). "Ce schéma-là a fini par être agréé", explique-t-on à La Tribune. La direction générale de l'armement (DGA) voulait que "les responsabilités soient clairement affichées, contrairement à ce qui avait été fait pour le moteur de l'Airbus A400M", avait confirmé début octobre le Délégué général pour l'armement, Joël Barre, au Sénat. "Nous tenons donc à avoir un responsable par poste et nous sommes en discussion avec Safran et MTU de façon à ce que Safran joue ce rôle en matière de moteur, pour des raisons d'équilibre de partage industriel entre les postes", avait-il précisé. Ce qui avait provoqué un coup d'arrêt du programme SCAF en raison de l'hostilité de MTU, soutenu par le parlement allemand. Une société commune créée entre Safran et MTU Après la phase de R&T, Safran et MTU se sont engagés à créer une société commune à parité (50/50), dont la date de création et les contours doivent encore être négociés. Cette société portera les contrats et s'appuiera sur les compétences des deux sociétés mères. Mais la répartition des t'ches entre les deux industriels devra être cohérente en fonction de leur compétence (intégration pour Safran, services pour MTU). In fine, cette société portera la certification du moteur du futur avion de combat européen. Tous les acteurs concernés par ce dossier sont "alignés" sur ce schéma industriel, assure-t-on à La Tribune. La DGA n'attend plus désormais sur son bureau que les propositions techniques et financières des industriels, qui devraient arriver de façon imminente. Date butoir, le 6 décembre. Par ailleurs, la place d'Indra, le groupe espagnol que Madrid a désigné pour être son champion au sein du SCAF au grand dam d'Airbus, a également été réglée. Le groupe espagnol, qui sera un sous-traitant majeur de Dassault Aviation, ne sera pas seulement sur la photo, il sera bien dans le programme et obtiendra des contrats de R&T, affirme-t-on à La tribune. Par la suite, Indra aura une part définie selon le montant de l'investissement, que Madrid consentira dans le programme SCAF. Le dossier Propriété intellectuelle traité A Dubaï, le patron des activités défense d'Airbus s'était également montré résolument optimiste pour trouver une solution en vue de régler le dossier sensible de la propriété intellectuelle. D'autant que l'Allemagne a surpris en faisant la démonstration de son savoir-faire dans le domaine des systèmes de systèmes à travers un programme jusqu'ici secret. En effet, Airbus Allemagne a récemment dévoilé l'existence d'un démonstrateur de drone de combat furtif, baptisé LOUT (Low Observable UAV Testbed). Là aussi, la France et l'Allemagne ont trouvé un accord cadre où chaque industriel pourra protéger la propriété intellectuelle de ses compétences. Ce qui veut dire que Safran par exemple n'est pas obligé de transférer à MTU ses compétences sur les parties chaudes du moteur. En revanche, toutes les compétences nécessaires à l'établissement des études en commun sont partagées dans un cadre de droit d'usage. Clairement, tout ce qui est créé par les industriels dans le cadre de la coopération (Airbus/Dassault Aviation ou Safran et MTU par exemple), appartient de manière conjointe aux entreprises. En outre, les Etats peuvent s'en servir pour leurs besoins de défense. En revanche, pas question pour les industriels de transférer vers le civil des savoir-faire s'ils n'en ont pas la propriété intellectuelle. https://www.latribune.fr/entreprises-finance/industrie/aeronautique-defense/scaf-berlin-et-paris-ont-trouve-un-accord-sur-les-moteurs-du-futur-avion-de-combat-europeen-834088.html

Toutes les nouvelles