4 février 2021 | International, Aérospatial
Pascal Samama
Le 03/02/2021 à 14:40
La veille de l'ouverture du salon aéronautique Aero India, Boeing a obtenu la licence lui permettant de vendre à l'Inde son avion de combat F-15EX
Coup de thé'tre pour l'ouverture d'Aero India 2021, un évènement aéronautique civil et militaire qui se tient à Bangalore cette semaine. Quelques jours avant l'ouverture du salon, les autorités américaines ont donné à Boeing l'agrément pour vendre des avions de chasse à l'Inde.
Le F-15EX n'est pas en concurrence avec les contrats de Dassault Aviation. La France a d'ailleurs déjà signé un contrat portant sur 36 Rafale avec New Dehli. En plus de transporter une vingtaine de missiles air-air, cet avion est un concentré de technologies créé pour participer à des opérations cyber.
Le 2 février, l'US Air Force a annoncé que le premier exemplaire d'une commande de huit appareils passée en juillet dernier venait de réaliser son tout premier vol à Saint Louis (Missouri). L'armée américaine souhaiterait en acheter 144. L'Inde pourrait être le premier client étranger pour cet appareil.
Le pays veut créer 42 escadrons de chasse et acheter quelque 450 avions de combat, signale le site Opex360. L'armée de l'air indienne devrait accueillir à terme en plus des Rafale, 200 avions de chasse indiens de 4ᵉ génération LCA Tejas, de 114 chasseurs-bombardiers issus du programme Multi-role fighter aircraft (MRFA) et de 100 exemplaires du futur Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA), un projet d'appareil de 5e génération confié à Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL).
Par ailleurs, la marine indienne compte aussi équiper ses porte-avions de 57 appareils. Des discussions sont en cours avec le russe RSK MiG sur le MiG-29K, Dassault Aviation, avec la version marine du Rafale Marine et Boeing avec le F/A-18 Super Hornet.
19 décembre 2023 | International, Terrestre, C4ISR
With the completion of a successful launcher demonstration, the Indirect Fire Protection Capability system can move into Army-led developmental testing.
10 septembre 2020 | International, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR, Sécurité
By: Joe Gould WASHINGTON — A bipartisan compromise and vote on the 2021 defense policy bill isn't likely before the Nov. 3 elections, but it should come “quickly” thereafter, the House Armed Services Committee's top Republican said Wednesday. The vote would delay a decision from Congress about whether the Defense Department to rename military bases honoring Confederate leaders. It's defining issue for the $740.5 billion defense authorization bill, which includes must-pass provisions like military pay hikes, defense equipment purchase plans and strategic posturing of forces in coming years. “There are more negotiations that have to occur, and part of that negotiation is talking with the White House about the shape of that provision,” Rep. Mac Thornberry, of Texas, said at the Defense News Conference. “Is there a way to get everybody to ‘good?' Of course there is. Is it likely to happen before the election? No, it's not.” Republicans and Democrats in the House and Senate voted overwhelmingly to back language requiring the changes, though the House requires the names changed within one year and the Senate bill requires them within three years. President Donald Trump has threatened to veto the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act over the Confederate name changes among other issues. Trump has said Senate Armed Services Chairman Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., personally assured him that Congress will not force the Pentagon to change the names. That's fueled speculation that bipartisan negotiations to reconcile the bills could drag on. The summer's sustained protests over racial injustice have buoyed the provision, while Trump has argued that changing the names would dishonor troops who have served at the sites and that Confederate symbols aren't racist. “We can't cancel our whole history,” he told Fox News last month. Thornberry, who had offered a softer alternative as a House amendment, said Wednesday that both sides have political incentives not to compromise on the base renaming provision, among other issues. “I don't know how that will come out in conference, but I do think we are in a time when neither party is rewarded for compromise, and coming together and getting things done,” he said. “On the other hand, I think we should be able to get a conference report pretty quickly after the election.” https://www.defensenews.com/congress/2020/09/09/no-defense-authorization-bill-before-election-says-thornberry/
8 septembre 2022 | International, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR
Brown spoke with C4ISRNET about the future of DIU, the importance of commercial capability integration and the need for resources and support from DoD.