14 septembre 2020 | International, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR, Sécurité
By: Jen Judson
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Army is in the midst of conducting what Army Futures Command Commander Gen. Mike Murray is calling “this generation's digital Louisiana Maneuvers” in the Arizona desert, as the service aims to bring key technologies together designed to fight across air, land, sea, space and cyber.
The famed Louisiana Maneuvers, a series of mock battles during World War II, were designed to figure out how the United States could use its existing technology to fight in a fundamentally different way against the German military's airplanes, radios and tanks.
“It was a combination of those three technologies and how the Germans put it together to execute what we call Blitzkrieg" that was “fundamentally different” than any of the capabilities the Allied forces, to include the U.S., brought to the battlefield, Murray told Defense News in an exclusive interview.
In 2020, there are three key technologies that when paired together in novel ways can provide a strong advantage against possible conflict with near-peer adversaries, according to Murray: artificial intelligence, autonomy and robotics in the air and on the ground.
“To make those three work in a digital environment, you have to have an underlying robust and resilient network,” Murray said, “and you have to have a data architecture and the data and the talent to put all that together.”
Enter Project Convergence, the Army's weekslong “campaign of learning” to bring together the weapons and capabilities it envisions fighting with in the 2030s and beyond in a seamlessly networked environment.
The capstone event began in the middle of August and will wrap up September 18 amid the global coronavirus pandemic. Murray reported there has been only one isolated case of COVID-19 at Yuma and that person was quickly isolated without the disease spreading.
The effort aims to bring in as many capabilities across the Army's six modernization priorities as possible and put them through maneuvers that service's new Multidomain Operations (MDO) warfighting concept lays out.
The service is particularly focused on three key phases of MDO at Project Convergence:
“Convergence is one of the tenets,” Murray said. “The ability to converge effects across all five warfighting domains (air, land, sea, cyber and space) and we're really taking that tenant and putting it together in the dirt live and bringing multiple things together... and the key thing is here is being able to act faster than any opponent in the future.”
Murray also discussed Convergence as part of the 2020 Defense News Conference.
Getting the upper hand
To act faster, the Army has moved a system called Firestorm out of a science and technology effort from Picatinny Arsenal's armaments center and into the exercise. Firestorm is being developed as the brain that connects the sensors on the battlefield to the right shooter through the appropriate command and control node, Murray explained.
“I firmly believe on a future battlefield, the commander that can see first, understand first, decide first and the act first will have a distinct advantage and will ultimately win any future battle,” Murray said, “so that's this learning experience year to year.”
While Project Convergence will have surrogate capability this year representing its Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft, the Future Long-Range Assault Aircraft, as well as the Extended Range Cannon Artillery system, more and more technologies across the Army's modernization priorities will be brought in in subsequent years.
The Army, this year, is also using available Air-Launched Effects (ALE) as well as a surrogate system called Titan — at Joint Base Lewis McChord in Washington State — that will process targeting information from ground and air autonomous vehicles using artificial intelligence.
Titan is managed by the Army's Multidomain Task Force's Intelligence, Information, Cyber, Electronic Warfare and Space (I2CEWS) battalion. The system will pass targeting information to a fire control element sitting at Yuma.
The service is also experimenting with space sensing capabilities this year and bringing it all together using new network architecture. “The network is a huge piece of this and so we are building out mesh networks, communications between the air in terms of Gray Eagle [unmanned aircraft system] and ALE and [Future Vertical Lift] surrogates to the ground.”
The hope from the first year is to walk away with conclusions about whether technology currently being developed works, Murray said. “Can we actually link multiple sensors and shooters right? In this case, it's not a huge number. It's less than a handful,” he said, “but the ability for Firestorm to figure out the right shooter against the right target is one of the key things we're driving and then can we do this in near-real time.”
During National Training Center rotations, “it takes a while to clear fires,” Murray said. “So what is that order of magnitude we can do this faster, to see faster and really put rounds on target faster.”
Early intel out of Project Convergence is that Firestorm has already shown “great success” and “the ability to put lethal effects on a target much, much, much faster than we do right now in an order of magnitude that is at least 10 times faster,” Murray said, “but we still have a ways to go.”
Spiraling in capability
Project Convergence this year came together quickly, Murray said. The inspiration came from an AI-focused effort through the Army's Next-Generation Combat Vehicle (NGCV) modernization outfit dubbed Project Quarterback, which paired automated target recognition with future combat vehicles.
Brig. Gen. Ross Coffman, who is in charge of the NGCV cross-functional team, discussed what he was doing with Murray over the winter, with the latter saying “It just occurred to me, it should have occurred to me a long time ago. It is so much bigger than that.”
The Army is already wrapping up its plans for Project Convergence in 2021 and setting its sites on what is possible in 2022, according to Murray.
While the Integrated Battle Command System (IBCS), the command and control system for the Army's future air-and-missile defense system, was tied up in Limited User Test this year, the service is looking for a way to integrate that into the effort next year. IBCS will be going through its Initial Operational Test and Evaluation at that time, but Murray said he is hopeful there is a way to bring the integral capability of the system to the event.
Another test of the Precision Strike Munition (PrSM) will also be executed during the event next year. The missile had three successful test shots this calendar year.
And while the exercise this year had roughly 500 people at Yuma this year, most of those are data collectors, Murray said. The exercise represents a platoon-sized operation, but in 2021, Murray said he intends to bring in an operational headquarters element to drive the learning in terms of how “we organize and how we fight the capability in the future.”
Ideally, the Army would involve one of the MDTF units, but due to conflicts in schedule this year it wasn't possible to bring them into the event, so the service is working with U.S. Army Forces Command to incorporate MDTF participation.
Next year will also bring in joint participation. While the Air Force will be present at Project Convergence this year, the Army plans to use the F-35 fighter into the architecture.
Joint participation is critical to developing Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2), which is the joint warfighting doctrine now in development of which MDO as a concept is a part.
“Convergence is our contribution to an all-domain command-and-control,” Murray emphasized, “and it is not in conflict with what the Air Force is doing with JADC2 and the [Air-Battle Management System].”
In 2022, Murray said the plan is to bring coalition partners and so far the United Kingdom has committed to participation and Australia will also likely sign on to attend.
“We've been very open-kimono in terms of the technology that we're bringing and there's been a lot of crosstalk between the three nations,” he added.
3 juillet 2023 | International, Naval, C4ISR
Le groupe décroche le contrat pour équiper les futures frégates néerlandaises et belges des équipements nécessaires à la lutte de surface. Un contrat supérieur à 500 millions d'euros.
26 avril 2019 | International, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR, Sécurité, Autre défense
AIR FORCE The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, Massachusetts, has been awarded a $2,038,147,146 modification (P00020) to previously awarded contract FA8702-15-D-0001 for the operation of the Lincoln Laboratory Federally Funded Research and Development Center. This modification provides for advanced technology research and development activities that focus on long-term technology development as well as rapid system prototyping and demonstration. Work will be performed in Lexington, Massachusetts, and is expected to be complete by March 31, 2020. This modification brings the total cumulative face value of the contract to $9,600,000,000, and no funds are being obligated at the time of award. Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, Hanscom Air Force Base, Massachusetts, is the contracting activity. General Dynamics Missions Systems, Scottsdale, Arizona, has been awarded a $20,241,853 requirements contract for Identification Friend or Foe KIV-78 Mode 4/5 Cryptographic Applique production. The contract provides for KIV-78 units, Delorean Circuit Card Assemblies, data and technical support for United States and foreign military sales requirements. Work will be performed in Scottsdale, Arizona, and is expected to be complete by April 24, 2023. No funds are being obligated at the time of award. Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, Cryptologic and Cyber Systems Division, Joint-Base San Antonio, Texas, is the contracting activity (FA8307-19-D-0004). ARMY Lockheed Martin, Orlando, Florida, was awarded a $723,550,174 modification (P00011) to domestic and Foreign Military Sales (Lebanon, Netherlands and France) contract W31P4Q-18-C-0130 to procure a variety of HELLFIRE II missile variants. Work will be performed in Orlando, Florida, with an estimated completion date of Sept. 30, 2022. Fiscal 2017, 2018 and 2019 other procurement, Army funds in the amount of $723,550,174 were obligated at the time of the award. U.S. Army Contracting Command, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, is the contracting activity. Korte Construction Co., St. Louis, Missouri, was awarded a $31,295,038 firm-fixed-price contract to design and build an Integrated Training Center Academics Building at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. Bids were solicited via the internet with six received. Work will be performed in Okaloosa, Florida, with an estimated completion date of April 30, 2021. Fiscal 2016 and 2019 military construction funds in the amount of $31,295,038 were obligated at the time of the award. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile, Alabama, is the contracting activity (W91278-19-C-0013). Gentex Corp., Simpson, Pennsylvania, was awarded a $27,860,817 firm-fixed-price contract for the Head Gear Unit 56/P Rotary Wing Helmet. Bids were solicited via the internet with one received. Work locations and funding will be determined with each order, with an estimated completion date of April 25, 2024. U.S. Army Contracting Command, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, is the contracting activity (W58RGZ-19-D-0070). Yorktown Systems Group Inc.,* Huntsville, Alabama, was awarded a $23,650,768 modification (P00025) to contract W911S0-17-C-0007 for Asymmetric Warfare Group operations support services. Work will be performed in Fort Meade, Maryland, with an estimated completion date of May 14, 2021. Fiscal 2019 operations and maintenance Army funds in the amount of $18,800,000 were obligated at the time of the award. U.S. Army Mission and Installation Contracting Command, Fort Eustis, Virginia, is the contracting activity. NAVY British Aerospace Engineering Systems Technology Solutions and Services, Inc., Rockville, Maryland (N00421-19-D-0045); Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc., McLean, Virginia (N00421-19-D-0048); Coherent Technical Services, Inc., Lexington Park, Maryland (N00421-19-D-0049); Engility Corp., Andover, Maine (N00421-19-D-0050); Gryphon Technologies, LC., Washington, District of Columbia (N00421-19-D-0051); J.F. Taylor, Inc., Lexington Park, Maryland (N00421-19-D-0052) and Valkyrie Enterprises, Inc., Virginia Beach, Virginia (N00421-19-D-0053) are each awarded cost-plus-fixed-fee, multi-award indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contracts to provide engineering support services for Air Traffic Control and Landing Systems as well as developmental programs such as the Joint Precision Approach and Landing Systems (JPALS) and unmanned programs for the U.S. Navy, U.S. Marine Corps, U.S. Air Force and other Department of Defense activities. The estimated aggregate ceiling for all contracts is $98,625,565 with the companies having an opportunity to compete for individual orders. Work will be performed in St. Inigoes, Maryland, and various awardee and customer sites to be determined on individual orders and is expected to be completed in April 2024. Funds will be obligated on individual orders as they are issued. These contracts were competitively procured via an electronic request for proposals, seven offers were received. The Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, Patuxent River, Maryland, is the contracting activity. Lockheed Martin Corp., Fort Worth, Texas, is awarded $90,773,387 for fixed-price-incentive-fee modification P00014 to a previously awarded contract (N0001918C1048). This modification will stand up organic depot repair capabilities for the F-35 integrated core processor. Work will be performed in McKinney, Texas (39.1 percent); Owego, New York (32.7 percent); Fort Worth, Texas (14.5 percent); Camden, New Jersey (5.9 percent); Clearwater, Florida (5 percent) and Melbourne, Florida (2.8 percent), and is expected to be completed in October 2022. Fiscal 2019 aircraft procurement (Air Force, Marine Corps and Navy) funds in the amount of $90,773,387 will be obligated at time of award, none of which will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This modification combines purchases for the U.S. Air Force ($45,386,693; 50 percent), U.S. Marine Corps ($22,693,347; 25 percent) and the U.S. Navy ($22,693,347; 25 percent). The Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Maryland, is the contracting activity. The Boeing Co., St. Louis, Missouri, is awarded an $89,011,500 indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity task order contract for the technical and engineering services to integrate various external stores and alternative mission equipment onto the F/A-18E/F and EA-18G aircraft. Work will be performed in St. Louis, Missouri (40 percent), Patuxent River, Maryland (40 percent); Tullahoma, Tennessee (8 percent); Mountain View, California (8 percent); Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (2 percent); and Buffalo, New York (2 percent), and is expected to be completed in December 2022. Fiscal 2019 research, development, test and evaluation (Navy) funds in the amount of $482,841 will be obligated at time of award; none of which will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was not competitively procured pursuant to Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.302-1. The Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Maryland, is the contracting activity (N0001919D0021). Amethyst Builders, LLC*, Ewa Beach, Hawaii (N62478-19-D-4029); Concept 2 Completion, LLC*, Kailua, Hawaii (N62478-19-D-4030); D&D Construction, Inc.*, Waipahu, Hawaii (N62478-19-D-4031); and MEI Corp.*, Hauula, Hawaii (N62478-19-D-4032), are each awarded indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity multiple award design-bid-build construction contracts for construction projects located primarily within the Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) Hawaii area of responsibility (AOR). The maximum dollar value including the base period and four option years for all four contracts combined is $48,000,000. The work to be performed provides for, but is not limited to, new construction, addition, alteration, maintenance, and repair work by design-bid-build for the Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force and various Federal Agencies located in the State of Hawaii. These four contractors may compete for task orders under the terms and conditions of the awarded contract. No task orders are being issued at this time. All work on the contract will be performed within the NAVFAC Hawaii AOR. The term of the contract is not to exceed 60 months, with an expected completion date of April 2024. Fiscal 2019 Navy working capital funds in the amount of $20,000 are obligated on this award and will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. Future task orders will be primarily funded by operation and maintenance (Navy). This contract was competitively procured via the Navy Electronic Commerce Online website, with 20 proposals received. The Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, is the contracting activity. DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY Harris Corp., Roanoke, Virginia, has been awarded a maximum $50,000,000 firm-fixed-price, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for the production of Image Intensifying tubes in support of the AN/AVS-6 and AN/AVS-9 Aviator's Night Vision Imaging System (ANVIS). This was a sole-source acquisition using justification 10 U.S. Code 2304 (c)(1), as stated in Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.302-1. This is a five-year base contract with one five-year option period. Location of performance is Virginia, with an April 24, 2024, performance completion date. Using military service is Army. Type of appropriation is fiscal 2019 through 2024 Army working capital funds. The contracting activity is the Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland (SPRBL1-19-D-0029). Seiler Instrument & Manufacturing Co., Inc.,* St. Louis, Missouri, has been awarded a maximum $11,902,218 firm-fixed-price, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for telescope and quadrant mounts. This was a competitive acquisition with one response received. This is a five-year contract with no option periods. Location of performance is Missouri, with a March 25, 2024, performance completion date. Using military service is Army. Type of appropriation is fiscal 2019 through 2024 Army working capital funds. The contracting activity is the Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime, Warren, Michigan (SPRDL1-19-D-0083). *Small business https://dod.defense.gov/News/Contracts/Contract-View/Article/1824510/source/GovDelivery/
24 mars 2020 | International, Naval
Le successeur d'Hervé Guillou à la tête de Naval Group est désormais connu. L'Etat a désigné Pierre Eric Pommellet, actuel directeur général du groupe Thales, a-t-on appris le 24 janvier de sources gouvernementales. Le nouveau PDG de Naval Group a été désigné. Atteint par la limite d''ge, Hervé Guillou doit quitter le groupe français en mars. C'est Pierre Eric Pommellet, "directeur général opérations et performance" de Thales, qui a été choisi par l'Etat pour prendre la tête du constructeur naval, a-t-on appris vendredi 24 janvier de sources gouvernementales. “PEP”, favori pour la succession d'Hervé Guillou “Nous confirmons que le choix de l'Etat est Pierre Eric Pommellet, a déclaré une source du ministère des Armées. Il prendra la tête de Naval Group au départ d'Hervé Guillou, c'est-à-dire à la fin du mois de mars.” Vendredi 24 janvier, le comité des nominations de Naval Group s'est réuni pour valider ce choix. La candidature de Pierre Eric Pommellet doit encore passer devant le conseil d'administration de Naval Group en février. Si les administrateurs approuvent ce choix, une assemblée générale devrait avoir lieu en mars. Le nouveau patron devra ensuite être nommé officiellement par un décret du président de la République. Depuis plusieurs jours, des informations de presse présentaient “PEP” comme le favori pour la succession d'Hervé Guillou. Le nom de Benoît Ribadeau-Dumas, directeur de cabinet du Premier ministre Édouard Philippe, circulait également avec ceux de plusieurs profils internes. "Une vraie histoire personnelle avec le monde naval" “C'est un ingénieur qui a une vraie histoire personnelle avec le monde naval. Son père a construit Île Longue [la base de la Marine nationale pour les sous-marins nucléaires lanceurs d'engins située dans la rade de Brest, Finistère]. Son grand-père était le patron de l'usine d'Indret à la direction des constructions navales [ancêtre de Naval Group]”, fait valoir la source gouvernementale. Pierre Eric Pommellet lui-même n'est pas étranger au secteur naval. Diplômé de l'Ecole Polytechnique, de Sup Aero et du MIT aux Etats-Unis, il est aussi passé à la direction des constructions navales comme ingénieur de l'armement au début de sa carrière. A 52 ans, l'industriel est plus connu comme le directeur général opérations et performance de Thales. Il assume cette fonction depuis 2017 après avoir occupé divers postes de direction : président de Thales Underwater Systems, président de Thales Systèmes Aéroportés, directeur général de la division des systèmes de mission de défense... Autrement dit, Pierre Eric Pommellet est loin d'être un inconnu dans le monde de la défense et il avait l'avantage de cocher plusieurs cases : profil industriel, connaisseur du grand export et du milieu de défense. Malgré cette notoriété, il semble prêt à accepter un salaire un peu plus bas, plafonné par la loi à 450 000 euros par année. Un gage de motivation pour le gouvernement. Des syndicats hostiles à l'arrivée de Pierre Eric Pommellet ? L'arrivée chez Naval Group du directeur général de Thales ne va pas se faire sans complication. Le patron de Thales, Patrice Caine, va devoir trouver un nouveau numéro deux. Surtout, les critiques se sont faites entendre chez les représentants des salariés de Naval Group. Pressentant sans doute cette nomination, les syndicats Unsa et CFE-CGC ont publié un communiqué mardi 21 janvier pour dénoncer le poids de Thales dans la gouvernance de l'entreprise. Le groupe d'électronique est actionnaire à 35 % de Naval Group aux côtés de l'Etat qui détient plus de 62 % du capital. Selon les organisations syndicales, Thales “dispose de droits bien supérieurs à son poids actionnarial” et “se place régulièrement en concurrence de sa filiale Naval Group sur les offres export". "Les personnels de l'entreprise ne comprendraient pas que la succession du PDG actuel, Hervé Guillou, soit l'opportunité pour Thales de positionner un outil industriel de souveraineté comme Naval Group en situation de dépendance vis-à-vis d'un équipementier", ajoutaient-ils avant la nomination de Pierre Eric Pommellet. Vendredi 24 janvier, la source gouvernementale répond aux critiques. “Il n'y a pas d'agenda caché associé à la nomination de Pierre Eric Pommellet. La stratégie de Naval Group reste la même : être un leader mondial de conception et de construction de bateaux militaires fortement armés. Il n'y a pas d'infléchissement stratégique. Naval Group restera une entreprise indépendante, autonome et qui doit créer de la croissance avec une liberté d'entreprendre et d'innover”, assure-t-elle. L'actionnariat de Naval Group ne devrait ainsi pas évoluer. Une feuille de route conséquente Plusieurs grands projets attendent en tout cas le nouveau PDG de Naval Group. Parmi eux : la construction du sous-marin nucléaire lanceur d'engin de troisième génération à partir de 2023, la livraison à la Marine Nationale cette année du sous-marin d'attaque Suffren, mis à l'eau l'été dernier et l'important projet d'un nouveau porte-avions attendu pour 2038. “La feuille de route de Pierre Eric Pommellet, avant toute autre chose, est de livrer les programmes nationaux", affirme le cabinet de Florence Parly. https://www.usinenouvelle.com/article/qui-est-pierre-eric-pommellet-numero-deux-de-thales-futur-patron-de-naval-group.N922724