Back to news

November 8, 2018 | Local, Aerospace

Why do some planes in Canada lack potentially life-saving emergency beacons?

David Burke · CBC News

More than half of the 27,000 civil aircraft in Canada aren't equipped with a modern device that could save lives by allowing search and rescue crews to more easily find potential crash survivors, according to the Transportation Safety Board of Canada.

Modern emergency locator transmitters, or ELTs, emit radio distress calls that can be picked up by satellites, but many small, private and recreational aircraft use older technology that's of little use to rescuers if a plane goes down, because the signal is unlikely to be picked up.

"There's no way to tell where it's coming from, no way to tell the identity of the source," said Steve Lett, head of the Cospas-Sarsat Secretariat, the international organization that runs the satellite-based search and rescue system.

"It relies on the luck of having another aircraft possibly flying nearby and that aircraft having its receiver tuned to 121.5 MHz, and also that aircraft not assuming that it's some sort of a test."

Search and rescue satellites no longer pick up the 121.5 MHz distress signal, which isn't a problem for large commercial airplanes most Canadians use to travel because they use up-to-date ELTs.

Those systems are designed to go off when a plane crashes, sending a signal to orbiting satellites that is relayed to a mission control centre. Local search and rescue crews are then advised where they can find the crash site.

"Private aircraft, general aviation aircraft, they are not as closely supervised. They tend to crash much more frequently and yet governments ... the Canadian and U.S. governments included, continue to allow them to fly with only a 121.5 MHz ELT," said Lett, whose organization stopped monitoring the 121.5 MHz frequency in 2009.

The older distress signals weren't accurate, so Cospas-Sarsat began monitoring ELTs that emit a 406 MHz radio signal instead. Those signals are digital and capable of providing more accurate location information and even the identity of the aircraft.

But in Canada, it is not mandatory for planes to have a 406 MHz ELT.

The Transportation Safety Board of Canada determined in 2016 there were approximately 27,000 aircraft registered in Canada that required an ELT, but only 10,086 equipped with a 406 MHz ELT.

Full article: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/emergency-locator-transmitters-search-and-rescue-aircraft-planes-1.4895600

On the same subject

  • NATO at 70: leaders meet in London today

    December 4, 2019 | Local, Aerospace, Naval, Land, C4ISR

    NATO at 70: leaders meet in London today

    By Marc Montgomery Most alliances historically don't last more than a couple of decades, but the North Atlantic Treaty Alliance is 70 this year, and has grown over that time to its now 29 members. Originally formed as a protection against the Soviets, new and much different types of threats lurk, and there are divisions in the organisation. Colin Robertson, a former Canadian diplomat and a Vice President of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute. discusses the issues. U.S. President Donald Trump has been forcefully scolding many members of the Alliance for not living up to defence spending. In 2018, the Alliance widened the rules as to what counts as defence spending. Canada is among several members, including France and Germany, not living up to the commitment to spend at least two per cent of GDP on defence. This now includes for example, pensions paid to former soldiers. The Liberal government has been meticulously searching for any expense that might be counted as defence spending including RCMP expenses for members involved in peacekeeping, costs for Canada's spy agency-the Communications Security Establishment (CSE) and even death benefits for veteran's survivors. Canada now spends about 1.27 per cent of its Gross Domestic Product on defence. Robertson notes that the Alliance is burdened with disagreements, but that this is not unusual in NATO's history. It now faces new and much different threats from the more simpler Cold War period, such as new state actor threats, social but somewhat fluid and unorganised threats like piracy and mass migration, and non-state actors like Al Queda and DAESH, and a move by Russia and China to militarise space. While it has its hurdles to overcome, Robertson feels the Alliance will remain strong coming out of this week's meetings. https://www.rcinet.ca/en/2019/12/03/nato-at-70-leaders-meet-in-london-today/

  • Solaxis pourra augmenter sa cadence de production gr'ce à l’appui du gouvernement du Canada

    October 23, 2020 | Local, Aerospace

    Solaxis pourra augmenter sa cadence de production gr'ce à l’appui du gouvernement du Canada

    Développement économique Canada pour les régions du Québec accorde 650 000 dollars à l'entreprise de Bromont pour l'acquisition de matériel à la fine pointe de la technologie. Bromont, Québec, 23 octobre 2020 – Développement économique Canada pour les régions du Québec (DEC) Fondée en 2010, Solaxis Ingéniosité Manufacturière inc. se spécialise dans la fabrication additive (impression 3D) de pièces thermoplastiques d'ingénierie avancée. Ses principaux clients, situés au Canada et aux États-Unis, œuvrent dans les secteurs du transport terrestre, de l'aéronautique, de la défense et de la sécurité. Depuis peu, l'entreprise fabrique aussi des pièces médicales en lien avec la présente crise sanitaire. Solaxis s'est vu accorder une contribution remboursable de 650 000 dollars par DEC, tel qu'annoncé aujourd'hui par Élisabeth Brière, secrétaire parlementaire de la ministre du Développement économique et des Langues officielles (Agence de développement économique du Canada pour les régions du Québec) et Lyne Bessette, députée de Brome—Missisquoi. Gr'ce à ce financement, Solaxis pourra accroître sa capacité de production par l'acquisition d'équipement et de matériel informatique à la fine pointe de la technologie. En misant sur la numérisation et l'automatisation de ses procédés, qui passent notamment par l'impression 3D, Solaxis se positionne comme un joueur clé dans son domaine. L'entreprise vise à combler le vide qui existe dans l'industrie entre le prototypage de très bas volume et les procédés de formage avec outillage de grandes séries à haut volume. L'acquisition de technologies d'impression 3D ouvertes et innovantes lui permettra d'augmenter jusqu'à 25 fois sa cadence de production mensuelle. Les procédés avancés et les technologies de fabrication additive de pointe, tels que l'impression 3D, sont de plus en plus adoptés par les industries. L'utilisation de ces technologies contribue à l'implantation d'une fabrication centrée sur l'utilisateur. La crise de la COVID-19 a d'ailleurs encouragé bon nombre d'entreprises manufacturières à adopter ces procédés dans leurs activités de fabrication, contribuant à améliorer leur efficacité de production et ainsi mieux répondre aux besoins des marchés. Véritable moteur économique, l'innovation est la clé du succès puisqu'elle génère la croissance dont profitent les entreprises et les collectivités. Le gouvernement du Canada tient à appuyer les entreprises innovantes afin qu'elles puissent compter sur des ressources adéquates pour créer de nouveaux produits et les commercialiser, et ainsi contribuer à la création de bons emplois dans les régions du Québec. Citations « En soutenant Solaxis, le gouvernement du Canada permet à l'entreprise de se doter de l'équipement nécessaire au développement de technologies et de procédés novateurs. Les entreprises comme Solaxis, qui misent sur l'innovation, contribuent à améliorer et à relancer l'économie canadienne en cette période marquée par la rupture et le changement. » Élisabeth Brière, secrétaire parlementaire de la ministre du Développement économique et des Langues officielles (Agence de développement économique du Canada pour les régions du Québec) « Solaxis fait partie des entreprises qui misent sur l'implantation de technologies avant-gardistes pour créer davantage de richesse et maintenir des emplois de qualité à Bromont. C'est gr'ce au succès d'entreprises audacieuses et innovantes comme celle‑ci que nous pouvons assurer la prospérité économique de la région et de tout le Québec. » Lyne Bessette, députée de Brome—Missisquoi « En ces temps de crise sans précédent, nous sommes là pour appuyer les PME canadiennes et les travailleurs à s'adapter au contexte changeant. Développement économique Canada pour les régions du Québec soutient les entreprises qui misent sur l'innovation, moteurs de la relance économique. En appuyant Solaxis, notre objectif est de collaborer avec une entreprise qui crée de bons emplois en région et qui contribue à la compétitivité de notre économie canadienne. » L'honorable Mélanie Joly, députée d'Ahuntsic‑Cartierville, ministre du Développement économique et des Langues officielles et ministre responsable de DEC https://www.canada.ca/fr/developpement-economique-regions-quebec/nouvelles/2020/10/solaxis-pourra-augmenter-sa-cadence-de-production-grace-a-lappui-du-gouvernement-du-canada.html

  • Russia’s Arctic Agenda and the Role of Canada

    April 16, 2020 | Local, Naval

    Russia’s Arctic Agenda and the Role of Canada

    Publication: Eurasia Daily Monitor Volume: 17 Issue: 51 By: Sergey Sukhankin April 15, 2020 05:24 PM Age: 14 mins New research (which includes two articles written by Russian experts) published by the prominent think tank the Canadian Global Affairs Institute has spurred interest and hopes in Russia's expert community about the possibility of normalizing ties between Russia and Canada through cooperation in the Arctic region (Russiancouncil.ru, April 3; Cgai.ca, accessed April 12). This cooperation could potentially be premised on two main pillars. First would be the mutual rejection of “internationalization” of the Arctic. Both Canada and Russia—for whom the Arctic region is an issue of foreign policy (Russiancouncil.ru, July 1, 2019) —feel ill at ease with the increasing involvement of non-Arctic states in the region, particularly, China. Russian information outlets noted the level of distress when the Chinese icebreaker Snow Dragon completed its first-ever voyage through the Arctic Ocean off the coast of Canada, accumulating “a wealth of experience for Chinese ships going through the Northwest Passage in the future” (Regnum, September 17, 2017; see EDM, October 3, 2017). Second, Moscow seeks to exploit regional frictions and disagreements between Canada and the United States (Pentagonus.ru, accessed April 10) to boost its own position/influence in the region. Russian sources recall the year 2010, when then–Secretary of State Hillary Clinton publicly challenged Canada's stance on the status of the Northwest Passage, which Ottawa considers part of Canadian territory (Foreignpolicy.ru, February 20, 2015). In the past, both the Russian tone and general assessment of Canada's role in the Arctic were denigrating, claiming Ottawa lacked agency. Perhaps the clearest expression of this sentiment came from the director of the Institute of Strategic Planning and Forecasting, Professor Alexander Gusev, who, in 2015, declared that “they [Canada] are only performing the role assigned by the US” (Odnako.org, March 30, 2015). After 2016, however, Russia dramatically changed its coverage of the US-Canadian dispute in the Arctic region, with Moscow increasingly employing reconciliatory rhetoric toward Ottawa and employing ever more assertive public diplomacy tools. One notable example of this new approach is Moscow's reliance on pro-Russian experts based in Canada. In 2016, speaking in Sochi, on the margins of that year's Valdai Club session, Professor Piotr Dutkiewicz (a former director of the Institute of European and Russian Studies at Carleton University, in Ottawa) stated, “[T]his area [the Arctic region] will be the first one where we will feel real changes in our relations... Arctic cooperation will become the focal point thanks to which our two sides [Canada and Russia] will be extending their areas of collaboration” (Izvestia, October 28, 2016). Moreover, as repeatedly stated by Federation Council member Igor Chernyshenko (a senator from Murmansk Oblast), the Arctic region could become a “bridge,” helping Canada and Russia overcome the existing difficulties in their bilateral ties. Last May, he announced, “[W]e invited them [the Canadian side] to return to a dialogue. We proposed holding a conference between Russian and Canadian universities in northwest Russia, maybe in Murmansk Oblast. They supported this idea” (TASS, May 25, 2019). Notably, the last such event was held in November 2014, in Canada, hosted by the aforementioned Carleton University. In addition to trying to foster bilateral academic ties, Russia's outreach to Canada on Arctic issues involves sustained information campaigns via RT and similar multi-language information outlets with international reach. In particular, Russian propaganda narratives routinely overemphasize the extent of current US-Canadian disagreements in the Arctic. At the same time, foreign-audience-facing Kremlin-linked media outlets underscore the allegedly negative role of President Donald Trump (and his policies toward Canada) in aggravating the existing disputes. RT widely claimed that “after Trump's inauguration, he began pressing Ottawa on economic issues and extended claims on Canadian possessions in the Arctic region.” It also highlighted US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo's remarks suggesting that “Russia is not the only country with illegitimate claims [in the Arctic] ...the US has a lasting dispute with Canada over its claims on sovereignty over the Northwest Passage. Finally, RT's propaganda reporting also relied on a statement by Pavel Feldman, the deputy director of the Institute for Strategic Studies and Forecasts at the Moscow-based Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN). Feldman is quoted as saying, “[T]he US and Canada carry on a heated competition over the Arctic region; yet, publicly, these countries are trying to position themselves as partners” (RT, October 16, 2019). In recent months, this increasing Russian attention to Canada as an Arctic power and a key element of regional stability and order has started to be expressed at the highest levels in Moscow. Poignantly, President Vladimir Putin declared in a public address at the start of this year that Russia “is open to cooperation with Canada on the basis of mutual respect and consideration of each other's interest.” Putin added, “[O]ur countries are neighbors in the Arctic region and bear joint responsibility for the development of this vast region, for preservation of the traditional lifestyle of its native populations and the careful treatment of its brittle ecosystem” (Vzglyad, February 5, 2020). Such reconciliatory rhetoric should, however, be taken with a heavy dose of caution in Ottawa: from the earliest days of the Soviet Union, Moscow's stance on the Arctic region has been deliberately flexible and tightly premised on being able to demonstrate its military potential in the High North and to intimidate other regional players. The Russian Federation has increasingly undertaken the same policy course since 2014 (see EDM, April 9). Incidentally, on January 31, 2020, two Russian Tu-160 heavy strategic bombers approached Canadian airspace—maneuvers that the Russian Ministry of Defense explained away as “planned exercises” (Vpk.name, February 3). It is worth pointing out that the US North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) is unable to identify and track Russian bombers of this type until they are close enough to launch missiles at targets on the continent. Furthermore, it is worth keeping in mind that, in fact, Russia (not the US) is Canada's direct competitor when it comes to territorial claims in the Arctic (the Lomonosov Ridge)—a point explicitly corroborated by Russia's Arktika 2007 expedition, which explored this disputed undersea area and famously planted a Russian flag at the North Pole, on the bottom of the Arctic Ocean (Izvestia, August 3, 2007). Lastly, it may be worth keeping an eye on one of the proposed amendments (soon to be officially adopted) to the Russian Constitution on the “prohibition of actions related to the alienation of Russian territory, or the propaganda thereof” (TASS, February 25). This amendment—reportedly drafted with predominantly Kaliningrad and Vladivostok in mind—is likely to also be applied to some Arctic territories that are of equally strategic interest to Canada. https://jamestown.org/program/russias-arctic-agenda-and-the-role-of-canada/

All news