August 18, 2024 | International, Land
Soldiers work with Marines as the Corps ramps up its air defenses
Marines and soldiers are trading notes on how to defend their airspace in an increasingly complex and threatening battlespace.
March 24, 2020 | International, Naval
Qui est Pierre Eric Pommellet, numéro deux de Thales, futur patron de Naval Group
Le successeur d'Hervé Guillou à la tête de Naval Group est désormais connu. L'Etat a désigné Pierre Eric Pommellet, actuel directeur général du groupe Thales, a-t-on appris le 24 janvier de sources gouvernementales.
Le nouveau PDG de Naval Group a été désigné. Atteint par la limite d''ge, Hervé Guillou doit quitter le groupe français en mars. C'est Pierre Eric Pommellet, "directeur général opérations et performance" de Thales, qui a été choisi par l'Etat pour prendre la tête du constructeur naval, a-t-on appris vendredi 24 janvier de sources gouvernementales.
“PEP”, favori pour la succession d'Hervé Guillou
“Nous confirmons que le choix de l'Etat est Pierre Eric Pommellet, a déclaré une source du ministère des Armées. Il prendra la tête de Naval Group au départ d'Hervé Guillou, c'est-à-dire à la fin du mois de mars.” Vendredi 24 janvier, le comité des nominations de Naval Group s'est réuni pour valider ce choix. La candidature de Pierre Eric Pommellet doit encore passer devant le conseil d'administration de Naval Group en février. Si les administrateurs approuvent ce choix, une assemblée générale devrait avoir lieu en mars. Le nouveau patron devra ensuite être nommé officiellement par un décret du président de la République.
Depuis plusieurs jours, des informations de presse présentaient “PEP” comme le favori pour la succession d'Hervé Guillou. Le nom de Benoît Ribadeau-Dumas, directeur de cabinet du Premier ministre Édouard Philippe, circulait également avec ceux de plusieurs profils internes.
"Une vraie histoire personnelle avec le monde naval"
“C'est un ingénieur qui a une vraie histoire personnelle avec le monde naval. Son père a construit Île Longue [la base de la Marine nationale pour les sous-marins nucléaires lanceurs d'engins située dans la rade de Brest, Finistère]. Son grand-père était le patron de l'usine d'Indret à la direction des constructions navales [ancêtre de Naval Group]”, fait valoir la source gouvernementale.
Pierre Eric Pommellet lui-même n'est pas étranger au secteur naval. Diplômé de l'Ecole Polytechnique, de Sup Aero et du MIT aux Etats-Unis, il est aussi passé à la direction des constructions navales comme ingénieur de l'armement au début de sa carrière.
A 52 ans, l'industriel est plus connu comme le directeur général opérations et performance de Thales. Il assume cette fonction depuis 2017 après avoir occupé divers postes de direction : président de Thales Underwater Systems, président de Thales Systèmes Aéroportés, directeur général de la division des systèmes de mission de défense...
Autrement dit, Pierre Eric Pommellet est loin d'être un inconnu dans le monde de la défense et il avait l'avantage de cocher plusieurs cases : profil industriel, connaisseur du grand export et du milieu de défense. Malgré cette notoriété, il semble prêt à accepter un salaire un peu plus bas, plafonné par la loi à 450 000 euros par année. Un gage de motivation pour le gouvernement.
Des syndicats hostiles à l'arrivée de Pierre Eric Pommellet ?
L'arrivée chez Naval Group du directeur général de Thales ne va pas se faire sans complication. Le patron de Thales, Patrice Caine, va devoir trouver un nouveau numéro deux. Surtout, les critiques se sont faites entendre chez les représentants des salariés de Naval Group. Pressentant sans doute cette nomination, les syndicats Unsa et CFE-CGC ont publié un communiqué mardi 21 janvier pour dénoncer le poids de Thales dans la gouvernance de l'entreprise. Le groupe d'électronique est actionnaire à 35 % de Naval Group aux côtés de l'Etat qui détient plus de 62 % du capital.
Selon les organisations syndicales, Thales “dispose de droits bien supérieurs à son poids actionnarial” et “se place régulièrement en concurrence de sa filiale Naval Group sur les offres export". "Les personnels de l'entreprise ne comprendraient pas que la succession du PDG actuel, Hervé Guillou, soit l'opportunité pour Thales de positionner un outil industriel de souveraineté comme Naval Group en situation de dépendance vis-à-vis d'un équipementier", ajoutaient-ils avant la nomination de Pierre Eric Pommellet.
Vendredi 24 janvier, la source gouvernementale répond aux critiques. “Il n'y a pas d'agenda caché associé à la nomination de Pierre Eric Pommellet. La stratégie de Naval Group reste la même : être un leader mondial de conception et de construction de bateaux militaires fortement armés. Il n'y a pas d'infléchissement stratégique. Naval Group restera une entreprise indépendante, autonome et qui doit créer de la croissance avec une liberté d'entreprendre et d'innover”, assure-t-elle. L'actionnariat de Naval Group ne devrait ainsi pas évoluer.
Une feuille de route conséquente
Plusieurs grands projets attendent en tout cas le nouveau PDG de Naval Group. Parmi eux : la construction du sous-marin nucléaire lanceur d'engin de troisième génération à partir de 2023, la livraison à la Marine Nationale cette année du sous-marin d'attaque Suffren, mis à l'eau l'été dernier et l'important projet d'un nouveau porte-avions attendu pour 2038. “La feuille de route de Pierre Eric Pommellet, avant toute autre chose, est de livrer les programmes nationaux", affirme le cabinet de Florence Parly.
On the same subject
-
-
June 23, 2020 | International, Aerospace, Naval, Land, C4ISR, Security
New European Defence Agency boss warns against ‘rash’ budget cuts by EU members
By: Martin Banks BRUSSELS — The new head of the European Defence Agency, Jiří Šedivý, has thrown down the gauntlet to European Union member states, telling them: “It is up to you to deliver.” In an interview with Defense News, he said the onus is on EU countries “to use the EDA to its full extent.” Šedivý has extensive experience in the defense domain, having served as defense minister and deputy defense minister of the Czech Republic, NATO assistant secretary general for defense policy and planning, and permanent representative of the Czech Republic to NATO. His term comes amid a fast-changing European defense landscape and new EU defense initiatives that are under increasing pressure to deliver results. How will the COVID-19 health crisis affect European defense spending in the near, mid and long term? Let's be realistic: We are still in the middle of the pandemic and, at this stage, nobody can foresee what its exact repercussions will be. But being realistic also means that we have to anticipate, already now, that national and European defense budgets might come under pressure as a result of the massive economic and financial costs of COVID-19, whether we like it or not. Here our answer should be straightforward: Rather than cutting national defense expenditure rashly, let's coordinate, pool and share our resources and invest more in collaborative capability development because a collective approach is much more cost-effective than national solo efforts. The same goes for defense research where national ministries of defense might face problems to receive the same funding than in the past to finance their individual national programs. The best response to shrinking national budgets for defense research is to join forces and resources and to engage in more cost-effective collaborations at EU level. We therefore should maintain our European defense ambitions, keep course and pursue the implementation of the new EU defense instruments — the Coordinated Annual Review on Defence (CARD), the Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) and the European Defence Fund (EDF) — which are all in place, fit for purpose and ready to be used. The COVID-19 crisis could offer us an unexpected and unique opportunity to reinvigorate defense cooperation in Europe. The defense portion of the proposed EU budget has come under pressure. If the European Defence Fund is indeed curtailed, how do you expect EDA to adjust its objectives? It is too early to speculate about the Fund's future budget allocation as negotiations are still ongoing. Therefore, we have to wait and see. This being said, the EDF will be an essential part of the EU's defense-cooperation toolbox, together with CARD and PESCO. Therefore, it is crucial that the Fund receives the financial means it needs to play its role properly. I thus hope for adequate funding for this important collaborative tool because for the reasons I just explained, we need more defense cooperation in the future, not less. And the Fund will serve not only as an incentive to that end, but also as a point of leverage for economic recovery. In any case, EDA's activities are not directly linked or dependent of the Fund's budget as we are an intergovernmental agency entirely and directly funded by our member states, not through the EU budget. U.S. defense companies want to be allowed to compete for EDF money and PESCO participation. How do you believe it is possible to strengthen intra-EU defense cooperation without shutting out trans-Atlantic ties at the same time? Third-party participation in the EDF is among the topics currently discussed between member states, the Commission and the European Parliament as part of the legislative process on setting up of Fund. So the jury is still out on the outcome of these talks. EDA is not involved in that process and therefore I cannot comment. However, I want to recall a basic underlying principle of European defense cooperation, namely that the European Union is fully committed to working with the U.S. as a core partner in security and defense matters. The EU defense initiatives must be understood in this context: They are not directed against our trans-Atlantic partnership but aim to enhance Europe's contribution to our common trans-Atlantic security by sharing a greater part of the burden. PESCO and EDF will help enhance EU member states' investment in the joint development of defense capabilities and deepen cooperation to make more efficient use of defense spending in the EU. The resulting defense capabilities will not be owned by the EU but by its member states. Which means they will also be available to NATO, at least for those EU member states that are NATO allies. As a result, EU cooperation ultimately also strengthens NATO as well as our trans-Atlantic partners. What is in store for the dozens of PESCO projects currently underway? For example, do you expect new ones to join the roster at some point, or some to be canceled if they fail to deliver? As you know, PESCO is a member states driven initiative. It's therefore up to the 25 participating countries to decide whether they want to launch new collaborative projects in the future. If you ask me, I expect indeed more projects to be added in the future but not this year as it was decided to skip 2020 after three consecutive waves of new projects launched — 47 in total to date — since December 2017, when PESCO was established. Focusing on the project implementation and delivering tangible outputs is thus the priority now. Equally, it is up to the member states involved in a given project to decide about possible changes or adjustments to be made or, to answer your question, even to cancel a project that would fail to deliver. It's the member states who own the projects, so it is up to them to implement them in the way they want. This being said, EDA is available and keen to support them, if they wish, in the implementation. As the European hub for collaborative capability development, we have the expertise and experience needed to do that. We therefore encourage member states to make full use of the Agency and to seek our know-how and support for bringing their PESCO projects forward. And we see that they start to rely more and more on our help. The number of PESCO projects which have been or currently are supported by the agency has constantly increased and now stands at six; two of them (in the areas of CBRN surveillance and deployable underwater capabilities) as EDA projects. Judging from informal expressions of interest received, we have reasons to expect those numbers to further grow in the future. https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2020/06/22/new-european-defence-agency-boss-warns-against-rash-budget-cuts-by-eu-members/
-
March 16, 2024 | International, Naval
France’s Naval Group wins $6 billion Dutch submarine project
The Dutch are slated to get a conventionally powered version of the French Barracuda submarine, offering shallow-water maneuvering and long reach.