For US Air Force pilots, the toughest training flights are going virtual

On the same subject

• 

  August 28, 2020 | International, Aerospace

  Japan requests foreign help with F-X as programme moves into next phase: reports

  By Garrett Reim Japan's ministry of defence is inviting foreign suppliers to help develop the country's next-generation fighter aircraft, known as the Future Fighter programme, or F-X. The solicitation was made via a public notice and a press briefing by Japanese defence minister Taro Kono on 25 August, according to reports. The Japanese ministry of defence wants components that are at high-technology readiness levels, in areas such as stealth unmanned air vehicles, airborne missile systems, radar, sensors, electronic warfare and communications equipment, according to media outlet Janes. The notice reportedly adds that this next phase will continue discussions related to development of F-X with the USA and UK. “We are inviting companies to [support] the integration of the fighter aircraft,” Kono says. “We are currently exchanging information with the US and UK to deepen our consideration of international co-operation in this development project.” In July, the ministry of defence said it would choose a single Japanese company to serve as prime contractor and lead systems integrator for the jet, according to Janes. That company is thought likely be Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, which builds the Mitsubishi F-15J and runs a final assembly and check-out facility for the F-35 Lightning II in Nagoya, Japan. The Future Fighter is to replace Tokyo's Mitsubishi F-2 fleet in the 2030s. The F-2 is a fighter derived from Lockheed Martin's F-16. Mass production of the F-X is reportedly planned to start in 2031. The next-generation aircraft would be deployed in 2035. https://www.flightglobal.com/fixed-wing/japan-requests-foreign-help-with-f-x-as-programme-moves-into-next-phase-reports/139927.article?referrer=RSS

• 

  April 23, 2018 | International, Security

  The unlikely tool that’s improving physical security at military bases

  By: Adam Stone From their perch in the operations center at the Navy Yard in Washington, D.C., security analysts peer down like hawks over the Naval Research Lab, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling and a half-dozen other major military installations scattered around the national capital region. It takes just 10 people to maintain constant surveillance over all those disparate sites, “but you need machines to help you,” said Robert Baker, command information officer for the Naval Facilities Engineering Command. Those machines include a complex network of cameras and sensors, supported by analytics software. When the software spots a suspect event – traffic headed in the wrong direction, for example – that video feed gets pushed to the foreground for human analysis. This is just one example of how the military looks to technology to improve physical security. The real-world influence of technology is evident across the military: Everything from targeting systems to logistics to intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance has been enhanced in some way by IT. Physical security represents an emerging frontier, where artificial intelligence, machine learning, autonomous technologies and other advances could give the military an edge. Force multiplier At Edwards Air Force Base in California last summer, a security team installed a ground-based radar system to monitor a wide landscape using electro-optical and infrared sensors. The team turned to technology to give them insight across a massive 308,000-acre facility. “The driving need for this system is to proactively defend Edwards AFB. Given the mission of Edwards, and how much terrain we have, we need a system that can overcome the difficulties of patrolling the vast amount of land Edwards presents to our patrols,” Staff Sgt. Alexander Deguzman, an installation security technician with the 412th security forces squadron said in a news release. As at the Navy Yard, the effort at Edwards is all about using some combination of remote sensing, networked surveillance and machine intelligence to create a force multiplier in physical security. Analysts say such initiatives could make bases and installations markedly safer at a lower cost and with less labor required. The rise of artificial intelligence is a critical technology moving forward. Security often involves the constant observation of multiple video and data feeds for prolonged periods of time. Human analysts get tired. They look away for a moment. In short, they miss stuff. “A human can look at things once or twice, but after 100 times they start to lose their edge,” said retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Bob Elder, chair of the cyber and emerging technologies division at the National Defense Industrial Association. “AI goes beyond what a human can do, because it doesn't get tired.” Elder envisions a future in the near-term in which routine surveillance can be carried out by software-supported machines, with computers scanning for anomalies and alerting human analysts to potential threats. That saves on labor. In addition, such as approach also would allow the military to use less highly-skilled operators, relying instead on the machine's expertise and accuracy. Eyes in the sky Industry's interest in this subject has helped bring AI and autonomy to the fore as potential security assets. With the rise of the drones and the imminent arrival of driverless cars, some experts are looking to autonomy as the next logical step in military security. Drones alone don't offer a security fix: Their batteries run down too fast. The military might however consider the use of tethered drones, autonomous ISR assets that can hover in place and remain attached to a power source for ongoing operations. Put one at each corner of a base camp and leaders can put together a big-picture view of any approaching hazard. “This kind of solution is really smart, because you can constantly feed it power, you don't have to worry about it flying away, and if someone tries to damage it or take control of it, you know about it right away,” said Steve Surfaro, chairman of the Security Industry Association public safety working group. Another key industry trend, biometrics, may also point the way forward on physical security. “Investing in facial recognition software ... can improve perimeter security by automating aspects of it to speed up entry to bases for those authorized and focus screening attention on those that represent a risk,” according to a Deloitte report on smart military bases titled “Byting the Bullet.” The networking needs To make the most of the technological imperative around security, experts say, the military will have to give serious thought to issues of infrastructure. Security is becoming a data function: Sensor streams, video feeds, drone surveillance and other methodologies all will require robust network support and substantial compute resources. The data will need to flow freely, even in great quantities, with ample processing available to put it to use. Much of the processing will be done in the cloud, “but you still need to have a reliable connection to that cloud, which means you want diversity and redundancy. At a minimum you want two connections and ideally you want three ways of doing it – wires, line of sight wireless, and satellite,” Elder said. “You need a reliable way to get to your cloud services.” Such an implementation will require, at the least, a significant amount of bandwidth. At the Navy Yard, Baker said he is able to overcome that hurdle through thoughtful network design. In other words: Rather than pushing all the information back to the operations center for processing, new video and sensor analytics takes place on the edge, shrinking the overall networking demand. “The more processing you can do at the edge of the network, the less robust your network needs to be,” he said. Efficient network design weeds out routine activity “and then the really interesting information is being sent for human analysis.” While emerging technologies can enhance the military's security operations, some argue that IT capabilities are not, in themselves, a rationale for upgrading systems that may already be meeting mission. Budgetary constraints apply. “You could make processing faster, but what is the threat that we are trying to counter? If we are seeing zero incidents, why we would gold-plate that area? We want to be good stewards of the taxpayer dollars,” Baker said. “At the same time, if there was some high-risk area where we needed to do that better, we would absolutely want to put resources against that.” https://www.c4isrnet.com/it-networks/2018/04/12/the-unlikely-tool-thats-improving-physical-security-at-military-bases/

• 

  October 1, 2018 | International, Aerospace

  RAF, l’Eurofighter en successeur du Tornado !

  La Royal Air Force prépare activement la mise à jour de sa flotte d'avions de combat Eurofighter « Typhoon II » en vue du remplacement du Panavia Tornado GR4. En effet, les dernières unités de « Tornado » devraient être retirées au début de l'année 2019. Project Centurion : Le programme « Poject Centurion » doit permettre à l'avion européen d'égaler la capacité d'attaque au sol du « Tornado » et de la dépasser à terme. Pour remplacer complètement le « Tornado » au sein de la RAF, les « Typhoon II » devront porter les mêmes armes, avec la phase 2 et phase 3 d'amélioration (P2EA et P3EA) qui, à leur tour, constituent la première phase et la deuxième phase du programme « Centurion ». Ils ont été précédés d'un Phase Zero (P1EB ou Phase 1 Enhancement Further Work). La phase zéro a été livrée en décembre 2017, officiellement entrée en service en janvier 2018 et est désormais opérationnelle dans le cadre de l'opération «Shader». La configuration du projet « Centurion » est destinée à combiner la bombe guidée de précision Raytheon Paveway IV déjà livrée avec les missiles « Storm Shadow », « Meteor » et « Brimstone » sur le Typhoon FGR4. L'avion devra prochainement venir remplacer le Panavia Tornado GR4 au début de l'année 2019. Les avions de première phase qui sont livrés ont été équipés de la mise à niveau « Typhoon » Phase 2 Enhancement (P2E) qui comprend le « Meteor » et le « Storm Shadow ». La phase 2 du projet Centurion couvre la mise à niveau de la phase 3 du Typhoon Enhancement (P3E) avec l'arrivée du « Brimstone ». Les essais sont maintenant en cours, la configuration finale du projet « Centurion » devrait être prête pour la fin de 2018. Les appareils concernés font partie de la Tranche 1 (51), la Tranche 2 (67) et environ 10 appareils de la Tranche 3. A noter que 24 Eurofighter de la tranche 1 qui doivent être retenus serviront uniquement à la défense aérienne et ne recevront pas la mise à niveau du projet Centurion. Environ 65 à 75 sorties devraient être enregistrées avant qu'une phase d'évaluation opérationnelle ne commence à au sein de la base aérienne de la RAF de Coningsby dans le Lincolnshire le 10 août prochain. Cela comprendra également des essais de tir complets avec l'arme de précision. D'autres améliorations incluent des mises à jour de l'interface homme / machine du "Typhoon", avec notamment le système de visée monté sur un casque Striker fourni par BAE. Le Storm Shadow : Le SCALP (acronyme de « Système de croisière conventionnel autonome à longue portée »), anciennement « Arme de précision tirée à grande distance », est un missile développé fin 1994 MBDA. La version britannique est baptisée «Storm Shadow». Cette arme est conçue pour frapper l'ennemi dans son territoire profond, quelle que soit la défense aérienne gr'ce à sa furtivité qui le rend indétectable, y compris par les avions radars. Le MBDA Brimstone : Le missile Brimstone air-sol britannique fabriqué par MBDA sur commande de la Royal Air Force. Il est équipé d'un guidage laser et d'un radar millimétrique, ceci afin de le rendre plus efficace contre des cibles mobiles. Le missile Meteor : Le Meteor est prioritairement réservé aux missions d'interception à grande distance, au-delà de la portée optique (BVR) de tout type d'aéronefs. Son utilisation est privilégiée pour les cibles de haute valeur telles que l'attaque à plus de 100 km d'avions radar ou de ravitailleurs. Ce missile va permettre d'assurer une efficacité de destruction à des distances aujourd'hui encore importantes, de l'ordre de 50 Nm (entre la cible et l'avion tireur au moment de l'impact). A cette fin, le système d'arme comporte : Un radar de bord qui fournit des informations précises sur la cible avant le départ du missile, et une liaison de données de type Link16 assurant les mêmes fonctions en retransmettant vers l'avion tireur les informations d'un capteur porté par un autre aéronef. Des systèmes d'identification des cibles à des distances compatibles avec la portée du missile. Une manœuvrabilité suffisante du missile dans toutes les phases de vol, pour toutes les distances de tir, qui doit lui assurer une grande probabilité de destruction des cibles. La propulsion de ce missile est également un défi technologique du fait du concept retenu : celui d'un statoréacteur. Ce statoréacteur à propergol solide et à poussée régulée (Throttleable Ducted Rocket ou TDR) dans sa phase de croisière comporte un accélérateur à poudre intégré dans la chambre de combustion, ce qui permet de donner une impulsion initiale suffisante pour atteindre une vitesse compatible avec le fonctionnement du statoréacteur. http://psk.blog.24heures.ch/archive/2018/09/30/raf-l-eurofighter-en-successeur-du-tornado-866306.html