Back to news

February 11, 2020 | International, Naval

Esper backs a bigger Navy fleet, but moves to cut shipbuilding by 20 percent

By:

WASHINGTON — U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper is calling for a 355-ship fleet by 2030, but for fiscal 2021, shipbuilding took a big hit in the Defense Department's budget request.

The Navy's FY21 budget request asked for $19.9 billion for shipbuilding; that's $4.1 billion less than enacted levels for 2020. The ask also seeks in total four fewer ships than the service requested in its 2020 budget.

The hefty slice out of shipbuilding comes in the first year the Navy requested full funding for the first Columbia-class submarine, which Navy leaders have warned for years would take up an enormous portion of the shipbuilding account.

The Department of the Navy's total budget request (including both base funding and overseas contingency operations funding) is $207.1 billion, approximately split $161 billion for the Navy and $46 billion for the Marine Corps.

News of the cuts come a day after Defense News held an exclusive interview with Esper during which he backed a larger, 355-ship fleet, but said the Navy must refocus around smaller, lighter ships to fit within budget constraints.

In total, the Navy requested two Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, one Columbia-class submarine, one Virginia-class submarine, one FFG(X) future frigate, one LPD-17 amphibious transport dock, and two towing and salvage ships.

The budget reflected a cut to the Virginia-class sub and FFG(X) programs, each of which were supposed to be two ships in 2021, according to last year's 30-year shipbuilding plan. Both cuts were forecast in a memo from the White House's Office of Management and Budget obtained by Defense News in December. The memo also called for cutting an Arleigh Burke destroyer, but it appears to have been restored in trade-offs.

Another controversial move in the budget is the decommissioning of the first four littoral combat ships, likewise a move forecast in the OMB memo, as well as the early decommissioning of a dock landing ship.

The budget also requests a $2.5 billion cut to aircraft procurement over 2020's enacted levels, requesting $17.2 billion. The budget calls for 24 F/A-18E/F Super Hornets fighter jets, 21 F-35C jets (between the Navy and Marine Corps), and four E-2D Hawkeye aircraft.

The budget also funds $160 million in shipyard upgrades, as well as research into the Common Hull Auxiliary Multi-Mission Platform to the tune of $17 million.

There is also $208 million in research and development for the DDG-1000 class, as well as $216 million for the Ford class. It also funds the procurement of two new large unmanned surface vessels.

Columbia cuts?

For years the Navy has warned that once the service starts buying the Columbia class, it's going to have a significant impact on everything else the Navy wants to buy.

In a 2013 hearing before the House Armed Service Committee's sea power subpanel, then-Navy Director of Undersea Warfare Rear Adm. Richard Breckenridge testified that failure to realign the Department of Defense's budget by even 1 percent would have a devastating impact on the Navy's shipbuilding program.

"The Navy recognizes that without a supplement this is going to have a devastating impact on our other general-purpose ships and is working with the [Office of the Secretary of Defense] and with Congress to identify the funds necessary, which I mentioned earlier represent less than 1 percent of the DoD budget for a 15-year period, to provide relief and fund this separately above and beyond our traditional norms for our shipbuilding budget,” Breckenridge said.

But with the rubber meeting the road, the Navy's budget instead went down by almost 20 percent.

In an interview with Defense News, Esper rejected the idea of moving Columbia out of the Navy's shipbuilding account, even as he called for a much larger fleet in the future.

The Navy must tighten its belt to reduce the impact on the budget, Esper said, adding that the Air Force is in a similar financial bind.

“Clearly the Columbia is a big bill, but it's a big bill we have to pay,” Esper said. “That's the Navy's bill. The Air Force has a bill called bombers and ground-based strategic deterrent, so that's a bill they have to pay.

“We all recognize that. Acting Secretary [of the Navy Thomas] Modly and I have spoken about this. He believes, and I think he's absolutely correct, that there are more and more efficiencies to be found within the department, the Navy and the Marine Corps, that they can free up money to invest into ships, into platforms.”

It is unclear, however, where the Navy will be able to find that money. Despite years of record defense budgets under the Trump administration, the Navy — at its current size of 294 ships — is struggling to field sufficient manpower. It has also struggled with the capacity of its private shipyards and is scouring the country for new places to fix its ships.

Furthermore, there are questions about whether the Navy is adequately funding its surge forces, given that the Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group was stranded on a Middle East deployment for more than 10 months because the carrier relieving it had a casualty.

The Navy declined to use its surge forces and instead extended Abraham Lincoln's deployment, according to Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Michael Gilday.

Esper said the Navy must look to smaller ships to grow, even though the current budget also defunds a second FFG(X) planned for this year. The FFG(X) was developed to field significant capabilities for about half the price of an Arleigh Burke so they could be bought in greater number.

“We need to move away from large platforms,” Esper said. “We need to move to smaller and more ships. We need to move to optionally manned.”

The idea of moving to a more lightly manned fleet with an unmanned option is currently en vogue with the Navy, and it's partly driven by the fact that 35-40 percent of the shipbuilding budget is eaten up by the Columbia class for the foreseeable future. That's something that all parties are coming around to, Esper said.

“[Acting Secretary Modly] agrees, so there's no doubt he's on board," Epser said. “I know the chairman and I have had the same conversations. I've heard from members of Congress. If you go look at the think tank literature that's out there, they will tell you generally the same thing. We need to move forward in that direction.”

Optionally manned vs. optionally unmanned

Experts disagree over the degree to which the Navy should pursue a more lightly manned construct, and the difference appears to be philosophical: The Navy is developing an “optionally manned” ship; a recent Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments study led by analyst Bryan Clark is proposing an “optionally unmanned” ship.

It may seem like a small difference, but building a ship designed from the ground up to support humans is a major difference from a boat that can accommodate a few humans if the operators want to.

The Navy is currently pursuing a large unmanned surface vessel, or LUSV, which is based on a commercial offshore support vessel, as part of an effort that started in the aegis of the Office of the Secretary of Defense's Special Capabilities Office and is now run by the Navy.

The service describes its planned LUSV as an external missile magazine that can significantly boost the number of missile tubes fielded for significantly less money than buying Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, which cost nearly $2 billion per hull.

The Navy has discussed equipping the LUSV with the ability to house sailors, but the vessel would be largely designed as an unmanned platform, which would save money because there likely won't be a need for structure that supports human habitation. Sailors supporting an LUSV might use a port-a-potty and eat MREs rather than building an at-sea septic system and galley, for example.

But therein lies the problem with the LUSV, according to the study by CSBA: What would the Navy do with those vessels, which it intends to buy in mass, when it's not trading missiles with China?

Before the Navy gets too far down the road of fielding an optionally manned LUSV, the Navy should pony up for a more expensive but more useful corvette that, in the event of war, could be unmanned and used as the envisioned external missile magazine, the study said.

“The Navy's planned LUSV would also be an approximately 2,000-ton ship based on an [offshore support vessel] design,” the study read. “In contrast to the optionally manned LUSV, the DDC [corvette] would be an optionally unmanned vessel that would normally operate with a crew. By having small crews, DDCs could contribute to peacetime training, engagement, maritime security, and deterrence.”

In other words, for every scenario short of war, there would be a small warship that can execute normal naval missions — missions that ideally deter conflict from occurring in the first place.

The study described a vessel that would be crewed with as many as 24 sailors, but would retain the ability to be unmanned in a crisis.

“Instead of procuring an optionally manned LUSV that may be difficult to employ throughout the spectrum of competition and conflict, CSBA's plan introduces a similarly designed DDC that is designed to be, conversely, optionally unmanned and would normally operate with small crews of around 15–24 personnel,” the report read. “DDCs primarily armed with offensive weapons would serve as offboard magazines for force packages.”

https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2020/02/10/355-as-secdef-backs-a-bigger-fleet-dod-moves-to-cut-shipbuilding-by-20-percent/

On the same subject

  • Les Armées face au défi des drones

    July 9, 2021 | International, Aerospace

    Les Armées face au défi des drones

    Faisant suite aux deux rapports parlementaires à l'Assemblée nationale et au Sénat, Le Figaro consacre une double page aux drones militaires. Pour la ministre des Armées, la menace des drones « s'accroît et s'accélère », a-t-elle déclaré en assistant, à Biscarrosse, à un premier tir antidrone par laser. « C'est un véritable enjeu technologique, car il s'agit de faire face à une menace qui ne peut pas toujours être prise en compte par notre défense aérienne classique : elle est trop petite, trop lente, trop basse et avec une signature radar trop faible » poursuit la ministre. Pour y répondre, les systèmes Milad ou Bassalt conçus avec le groupe ADP ont déjà été utilisés à l'occasion de la fête nationale ou du sommet du G7 à Biarritz. En outre, le système Arlad est capable de détecter un objet volant entre 700 mètres et 1 kilomètre et d'orienter un tir de destruction automatique. Toutefois, la « chaîne détection-identification-neutralisation n'est pas encore consolidée » reconnaissent les armées. Les régiments vont donc aussi s'équiper de fusils brouilleurs Nerod. Dans le domaine offensif, la France cherche à rattraper son retard. « Nous allons multiplier le nombre d'aéronefs au sein de l'armée de terre par plus de 10 pour passer de 250 en 2017 à 3 000 en 2023 », explique le lieutenant-colonel Pierre-Yves. Par ailleurs, s'agissant des munitions rôdeuses, le général François Lecointre, chef d'état-major des armées, s'est montré clair : « l'emploi de munitions rôdeuses n'est pas acceptable d'un point de vue éthique. Les drones que nous utilisons permettent de contrôler la munition tirée sur la cible qui est identifiée précisément jusqu'au moment du déclenchement du tir ».

  • U.S. Army selects GE’s T901 engine for Improved Turbine Engine Program

    February 6, 2019 | International, Aerospace

    U.S. Army selects GE’s T901 engine for Improved Turbine Engine Program

    The U.S. Army has selected GE Aviation's T901-GE-900 engine for the Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) phase of the Improved Turbine Engine Program (ITEP), the U.S. Army's endeavor to re-engine its Boeing AH-64 Apaches and Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawks. “We are honored to be chosen by the Army to continue powering their Black Hawks and Apaches for decades to come,” said Tony Mathis, president and CEO of GE Aviation's military business. “We've invested in the resources and infrastructure to execute immediately, and our team is ready to get to work on delivering the improved capabilities of the T901 to the warfighter.” GE has powered Black Hawks and Apaches for the past four decades with its T700 engine, racking up more than 100 million flight hours of combat-proven experience. Through continuous upgrades and technology advancements, GE has doubled the power of derivative engines in the T700 family over its lifetime and reduced its cost to the government by 50 percent. GE carried over the benefits of the T700 engine's single-spool core architecture, ensuring that the T901 engine is ready to continue delivering combat readiness to the warfighter over the next four decades. The T901's single-spool core design is the key to its low cost, growth, reliability, maintainability and reduced life-cycle costs. The full modularity of the T901's single-spool core provides the Army with superior fix-forward maintainability. Combat units can swap out modular parts of the engine in the field and travel with fewer full-sized spare engines, simplifying logistical footprints and supply lines. The fully modular design also offers superior growth potential at a lower cost through incremental improvements to engine modules, a significant advantage to meet the Army's FVL requirements. The U.S. Army is also expecting the ITEP engine to meet Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft requirements for Future Vertical Lift (FVL). GE has invested $9 billion in maturing technologies applicable to the T901 and more than $300 million to develop and test turboshaft-specific technologies. Additionally, GE has invested more than $10 billion in their supply chain over the past decade, including eight new facilities, ten plant expansions and one-and-a-half million square feet of new, advanced manufacturing space in the U.S. This robust, first-in-class supply chain stands ready to deliver T901 engines to the Army. https://www.verticalmag.com/press-releases/u-s-army-selects-ges-t901-engine-for-itep/

  • Coronavirus Impact Editon of cPDM in AeroSpace and Defence Market 2020 Future Development, Top Manufacturers, Technological Advancement, Share, Size and Forecast SAP AG, CIMdata, IBM Corp, Oracle Corp, HP

    July 6, 2020 | International, Aerospace, Naval, Land, C4ISR, Security

    Coronavirus Impact Editon of cPDM in AeroSpace and Defence Market 2020 Future Development, Top Manufacturers, Technological Advancement, Share, Size and Forecast SAP AG, CIMdata, IBM Corp, Oracle Corp, HP

    Report is a detailed study of the cPDM in AeroSpace and Defence market, which covers all the essential information required by a new market entrant as well as the existing players to gain a deeper understanding of the market.The primary objective of this research report named cPDM in AeroSpace and Defence market is to help making reliable strategic decisions regarding the opportunities in cPDM in AeroSpace and Defence market. It offers business accounts, industry investors, and industry segments with consequential insights enhancing decision making ability.nicolas.shaw@cognitivemarketresearch.com or call us on +1-312-376-8303. Request Report from CMR Website:https://cognitivemarketresearch.com/service–software/cpdm-in-aerospace-and-defence-market-report Global and Regional cPDM in AeroSpace and Defence Market Segmentation by Type: SAP AG, CIMdata, IBM Corp, Oracle Corp, HP, Dassault Systemes SA, Siemens PLM Software Inc, Autodesk Inc, Parametric Technology Corp, Synopsys Inc, Capgemini, Deloitte, Accenture Plc, Market segment by Regions/Countries this report covers, North America, Europe, China, Rest of Asia Pacific, Central & South America, Middle East & Africa, Market segment by Type the product can be split into, Software, Service Global cPDM in AeroSpace and Defence Market Segmentation by Applications: Military, Civilian Major Market Players with an in-depth analysis: SAP AG, CIMdata, IBM Corp, Oracle Corp, HP, Dassault Systemes SA, Siemens PLM Software Inc, Autodesk Inc, Parametric Technology Corp, Synopsys Inc, Capgemini, Deloitte, Accenture Plc Request Free Sample Copy of cPDM in AeroSpace and Defence Market Research Report@ https://cognitivemarketresearch.com/service–software/cpdm-in-aerospace-and-defence-market-report#download_report The cPDM in AeroSpace and Defence market report offers the current state of the market around the world. The report starts with the market outline and key components of the cPDM in AeroSpace and Defence market which assumes a significant job for clients to settle on the business choice. It additionally offers the key focuses to upgrade the development in the cPDM in AeroSpace and Defence market. Some fundamental ideas are likewise secured by reports, for example, item definition, its application, industry esteem chain structure and division which help the client to break down the market without any problem. Also, the report covers different factors, for example, arrangements, efficient and innovative which are affecting the cPDM in AeroSpace and Defence business and market elements. Any query? Enquire Here For Discount (COVID-19 Impact Analysis Updated Sample): Click Here—> Download Sample Report of cPDM in AeroSpace and Defence Market Report 2020 (Coronavirus Impact Analysis on cPDM in AeroSpace and Defence Market) The research comprises primary information about the products. Similarly, it includes supply-demand statistics, and segments that constrain the growth of an industry. It also includes raw materials used and manufacturing process of cPDM in AeroSpace and Defence market. Additionally, report provides market drivers and challenges & opportunities for overall market in the particular provincial sections. Competitive Analysis has been done to understand overall market which will be helpful to take decisions. Major players involved in the manufacture of cPDM in AeroSpace and Defence product has been completely profiled along with their SWOT. Some of the key players include SAP AG, CIMdata, IBM Corp, Oracle Corp, HP, Dassault Systemes SA, Siemens PLM Software Inc, Autodesk Inc, Parametric Technology Corp, Synopsys Inc, Capgemini, Deloitte, Accenture Plc. It helps in understanding their strategy and activities. Business strategy described for every company helps to get idea about the current trends of company. The industry intelligence study of the cPDM in AeroSpace and Defence market covers the estimation size of the market each in phrases of value (Mn/Bn USD) and volume (tons). Report involves detailed chapter on COVID 19 and its impact on this market. Additionally, it involves changing consumer behavior due to outbreak of COVID 19. Further, report consists of Porter's Five Forces and BCG matrix as well as product life cycle to help you in taking wise decisions. Additionally, this report covers the inside and out factual examination and the market elements and requests which give an entire situation of the business. Regional Analysis for cPDM in AeroSpace and Defence • North America (United States, Canada) • Europe (Germany, Spain, France, UK, Russia, and Italy) • Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, India, Australia, and South Korea) • Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, etc.) • The Middle East and Africa (GCC and South Africa) DOWNLOAD FREE SAMPLE REPORT@: https://cognitivemarketresearch.com/service–software/cpdm-in-aerospace-and-defence-market-report#download_report Chapters Define in TOC (Table of Content) of the Report: Chapter 1: Market Overview, Drivers, Restraints and Opportunities, Segmentation Overview Chapter 2: COVID Impact Chapter 3: Market Competition by Manufacturers Chapter 4: Production by Regions Chapter 5: Consumption by Regions Chapter 6: Production, By Types, Revenue and Market share by Types Chapter 7: Consumption, By Applications, Market share (%) and Growth Rate by Applications Chapter 8: Complete profiling and analysis of Manufacturers Chapter 9: Manufacturing cost analysis, Raw materials analysis, Region-wise Manufacturing expenses Chapter 10: Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers Chapter 11: Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders Chapter 12: Market Effect Factors Analysis Chapter 13: Market Forecast Chapter 14: cPDM in AeroSpace and Defence Research Findings and Conclusion, Appendix, methodology and data source To check the complete Table of Content click here: @ https://cognitivemarketresearch.com/service–software/cpdm-in-aerospace-and-defence-market-report#table_of_contents The qualitative contents for geographical analysis will cover market trends in each region and country which includes highlights of the key players operating in the respective region/country, PEST analysis of each region which includes political, economic, social and technological factors influencing the growth of the market. The research report includes specific segments by Type and by Application. This study provides information about the sales and revenue during the historic and forecasted period of 2015 to 2027. About Us: Cognitive Market Research is one of the finest and most efficient Market Research and Consulting firm. The company strives to provide research studies which include syndicate research, customized research, round the clock assistance service, monthly subscription services, and consulting services to our clients. Contact Us: +1-312-376-8303 Email: nicolas.shaw@cognitivemarketresearch.com Web: https://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/ **********Download the Entire Report************************************************* https://cognitivemarketresearch.com/service–software/cpdm-in-aerospace-and-defence-market-report

All news