June 26, 2018 | International, Aerospace

B-21 Bomber Critical Design Review by End of Year

JOHN A. TIRPAK

The secret B-21 bomber will progress to a major milestone—critical design review—by the end of this year, Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office director Randall Walden said Monday. Walden also revealed that the B-21 is merely one of 28 programs being managed by the RCO, which he noted is funded at about $30 billion over the five-year future year defense plan.

Walden, speaking at an AFA Mitchell Institute event in Arlington, Va., said the B-21 has already passed its preliminary design review, and noted that the release of drawings for the bomber is progressing well. As for critical design review, "we haven't done it, but we're on our way," and he predicted it would happen by the end of December. Major design work on the bomber is taking place at Northrop Grumman's Melbourne, Fla., facility. He acknowledged that subscale models of the aircraft have been tested in wind tunnels, but said no full-size version has yet been fabricated. "Component testing" is moving along at an "appropriate" speed, he said.

"We're looking forward to ... an 'on-time' start of production," Walden said.

Walden has spoken publicly about the RCO in a number of venues, but was more forthcoming than usual about the organization and its products at the Mitchell event. Of the 28 projects in the RCO's portfolio, 13 are "ACAT 1," he noted, meaning they are major defense acquisition programs, which usually means a major platform, like an aircraft, missile, or command and control system. While Walden would only identify the B-21 and X-37 orbital vehicle among those that the RCO is working on, he said the majority of the rest could best be characterized as "family of systems" projects.

Interestingly, Walden said the RCO has not been called on to undertake any hypersonics programs. The Air Force is pursuing hypersonics projects with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the other services are conducting independent research in the field.

Walden said the RCO has about 220 people, who are headquartered at JB Anacostia-Bolling, in Washington, D.C. Among them are experts from the line Air Force who are "embedded" with programs to offer operator advice on design and development. Four bomber pilots are attached to the RCO to advise on the B-21's development, he noted. The B-21 program manager—who Walden did not name—has had experience with management of the F-22 and F-35 programs, he said.

The B-21 program has long been scheduled to produce a "usable asset" in the 2024 timeframe, according to comments offered by Air Force officials for the last three years.

Rep. Rob Wittman (R-Va.), chair of the House Armed Services Seapower and Projection Forces panel, revealed in March that problems had arisen with airflow to the B-21's engines, and Walden said Monday that these had been resolved.

"Complex weapon systems, especially engine integrations, ... you've got to get throat sizes done right, prior to anything being built" he said, referring to the serpentine tunnels by which air reaches the B-21's engines, which are buried in the fuselage. The RCO obtained "insight from actual lab testing" and found the optimal solution, he said.

The RCO has been asked to help with the set-up of a dedicated "Space RCO" at the Space and Missile Systems Center at Los Angeles AFB, Calif., and Walden said he has recommended veterans of his own shop to run it, especially those who have worked on space systems, and they have been hired, he said. Walden resisted allowing his own people to be hired away for the new organization, he said.

Walden was asked whether the RCO is working on a successor platform to the X-37, and although he did not reply directly, he did say that it is "no different from any other system, ... it starts to get old," and there begin to emerge problems with vanishing vendors and parts obsolescence. However, he forecast no "big change" in that program in the near future. The X-37 tends to fly two-year missions, and various agencies that use the data collected from it are very happy with its activities, he said.

Walden told Air Force Magazine he is not experiencing trouble obtaining the workforce he requires, but he said he's aware that major vendors are experiencing difficulties hiring all the engineering and especially software talent needed to execute the Air Force's array of high-tech projects. He also reported that the RCO's experience with protests—wherein a contractor not selected for a program complains that the judging was not fair—is no worse, and probably somewhat better, than that experienced by the Air Force in its "white world," or non-secret programs.

Commenting on the "culture" of the RCO, Walden said it is largely based on the Lockheed "Skunk Works" model of small teams with tightly defined objectives and a vastly shortened reporting chain. Where the RCO saves time and money is usually in the area of "deciding to do" something and not going into endless coordination efforts. The RCO can save two to three years on a project simply by having the authority to make decisions, Walden said, avoiding "the tyranny of consensus." It reports to an executive committee comprised of the Secretary and Chief of Staff of the Air Force, the service's acquisition executive, and the Pentagon's acquisition chief. It's not possible to rush the development of, say, an aircraft, he said, noting that basic design must be gotten right or problems are inevitable later on. It takes about three years at a minimum to develop a design, he said.

Asked whether the RCO can provide a model to the overall acquisition system, Walden said it can be applied to a degree, but there is the risk that the organization could get too big. "There is a knee in the curve. I can't tell you" what it is, he said, but at a certain size, an RCO-like acquisition agency would no longer be able to do things rapidly.

The value of something of constrained size, like the RCO, is to "make a decision, get on contract," Walden said. The mainstream acquisition system takes "an inordinate amount of time" on those two steps. An analysis of alternatives can take up to three years and "sometimes no one makes a decision," Walden said.

Walden insisted the RCO is fully observant of the 5000-series of acquisition regulations, but makes a careful review of them on all its efforts and works to "avoid" the ones that don't really affect its programs. He also said the organization turns away many people who want to be involved in overseeing or getting briefed on RCO activities unless they are required under regulations. Even so, he said the RCO has a good relationship with Congress because it tries to be transparent with members, and even when it runs into problems, people on Capitol Hill "want to help."

He added that the Pentagon's "risk-averse" acquisition process took many years to get that way and reversing that mindset to one of risk-taking and experimentation will not happen quickly.

http://www.airforcemag.com/Features/Pages/2018/June%202018/B-21-Bomber-Critical-Design-Review-by-End-of-Year.aspx

On the same subject

October 25, 2018 | International, Aerospace

AIR2030: A la rencontre du consortium Eurofighter et du Typhoon (3/5)
Alexis Pfefferlé Que produire en Suisse ? Mercredi 17 octobre 2018, 0800, Lausanne. Troisième journée BtoB et troisième introduction du Président du Groupe romand pour le matériel de Défense et de Sécurité (GRPM). « On ne vient pas en Suisse pour produire des choses simples et pas chères, on vient produire en Suisse des biens complexes ou pour dépasser des challenges techniques » C'est direct mais le ton est donné. Pour détendre l'atmosphère, l'introduction est ponctuée par une petite plaisanterie bienvenue car, on le sait bien à Berne, le rire, c'est bon pour la santé. D'European Fighter Aircraft à Typhoon Troisième journée BtoB et dernier avion européen en lice pour le programme AIR2030, l'Eurofighter-Typhoon. Produit d'une coopération unique en Europe et dans le monde, l'Eurofighter –Typhoon est un biréacteur de 4ème génération + né du souhait, au début des années 80, de plusieurs pays de fabriquer en coopération un avion multi-rôles européen dans un contexte de guerre froide. Partenaire au début, la France quitte rapidement le programme en 1985 pour développer son propre chasseur, le Rafale, lequel a fait l'objet de la journée BtoB du 16 octobre dont le compte rendu est disponible ici. Les « Eurofighters » ont tour à tour pris différents noms, d'abord EFA (European Fighter Aircraft) puis Eurofighter, puis Eurofighter 2000 pour enfin prendre le nom d'Eurofighter Typhoon. L'exemple de la coopération européenne et industrielle La présentation du jour se veut ambitieuse. En effet, l'Eurofighter Typhoon est aujourd'hui produit par un consortium industriel composé de quatre entreprises principales rattachées au quatre pays piliers du programme, AIRBUS pour l'Allemagne, BAE SYSTEMS pour le Royaume-Uni, LEONARDO pour l'Italie et EUROJET pour l'Espagne. Les différents pays / industries se partagent la production selon les investissements de leur pays dans le programme. Nous avons donc 33 % pour l'Allemagne, 33 % pour le Royaume-Uni, 21 % pour l'Italie et 13 % pour l'Espagne. Les quatre sociétés vont se succéder sur scène en l'espace d'une petite heure. Nous démarrons avec une introduction par le représentant d'AIRBUS. La force du programme Eurofighter c'est l'expérience industrielle et la coopération maitrisée. Les chiffres sont impressionnants : 623 avions commandés dont près de 500 actuellement en utilisation dans 5 forces aériennes européennes, 9 pays utilisateurs au total, 100'000 places de travail et plus de 400 sociétés impliquées dans 180 lieux de production différents. Toutefois, comme pour le Rafale, l'Eurofighter Typhoon est un programme mature avec peu ou pas de place pour une compensation directe dans le cadre du programme lui-même. Cependant, le consortium a fait ses devoirs avant de venir en Suisse et les exemples de coopération possibles ne vont pas manquer. Les quatre piliers On enchaine donc avec LEONARDO. Le groupe italien a décidé de mettre l'accent sur son expérience en matière d'affaires compensatoires. En chiffres, LEONARDO c'est 40 ans d'expérience dans les affaires compensatoires dans près de 30 pays, 100 projets en cours dans 12 pays différents et près de EUR 3mia à compenser dans les 15 prochaines années. Pour LEONARDO, l'EUROFIGHTER en Suisse c'est prendre part à un grand projet européen et pouvoir s'offrir un accès privilégié au marché international au travers des entreprises qui composent le consortium. C'est au tour du représentant de BAE SYSTEMS d'intervenir. Il insiste sur la taille du groupe, 3ème mondial, plus de 80'000 employés dans 40 pays et 80 pays clients. Pour son représentant, le groupe peut ouvrir à la Suisse les portes de marchés très intéressants comme les Etats-Unis ou le Golfe. BAE SYSTEMS met en avant les domaines du groupe à forte croissance et dans lesquels la Suisse pourra jouer un rôle de premier plan : Le cyber, l'électronique, surtout dans le domaine civil/commercial avec AIRBUS, et l'espace. Avec « la nouvelle philosophie suisse en matière de satellites » (petits satellites utilisés en réseaux) ils viennent chercher chez nous la technologie du futur. Touché, l'assemblée est flattée. Nous passons sans transition à l'espagnole EUROJET. Pour son représentant, la force d'EUROJET c'est sa capacité à travailler en équipe. EUROJET travaille sur l'EUROFIGHTER, l'A400 ou encore l'hélicoptère tigre, ces projets ont apporté au groupe l'expérience de la coopération internationale et de la coordination. Intégrer la Suisse ne sera pas un problème nous dit-on. S'en suit une présentation technique du moteur de l'Eurofighter. Comme mes voisins, je ne comprends pas tout mais je crois comprendre que pour son créateur, c'est un excellent moteur. Après cet interlude technico-ibérique, c'est au tour du représentant d'AIRBUS de conclure. En premier lieu quelques chiffres sur le groupe : EUR 59mia de chiffre d'affaire en 2017, 12'000 sous-traitants qui se partagent EUR 50 mia de commandes et 129'442 employés. Précis, allemand, efficace. Il précise qu'AIRBUS a 7'265 avions en commande dont 1'019 commandés en 2017. Vous cherchez un partenaire solide et pérenne ? Vous l'avez trouvé. En second lieu, comme pour BAE SYSTEMS, le représentant d'AIRBUS confirme que les secteurs qui montent et dans lesquels ils cherchent des partenaires sont le cyber, l'espace, l'urban mobility ou encore les drones. Autant de secteurs qui, très justement, aiguisent depuis quelques années l'appétit de l'industrie suisse et des EPF. Enfin, et c'est le premier constructeur à le soulever, AIRBUS souligne que remplir CHF 6mia en offset c'est une t'che difficile. Les partenaires d'EUROFIGHTER ne veulent pas acheter pour acheter ou simplement faire leur marché. La présentation se conclut en ces termes : Le consortium souhaite une vraie collaboration bilatérale avec la Suisse (!). L'Europe n'aura de cesse de nous surprendre. https://blogs.letemps.ch/alexis-pfefferle/2018/10/22/air2030-a-la-rencontre-du-consortium-eurofighter-et-du-typhoon-3-5/
March 26, 2019 | International, Aerospace

Leonardo eyes enhanced firefighting configuration for its C-27J aircraft
The 16th Aerial Firefighting Europe event is returning to Nimes, France, March 19 to 20 with a new entry, Leonardo's C-27J aircraft in firefighting configuration. The C-27J firefighter with roll-on/roll-off Fire Attack System (FAS) made by Simplex Aerospace–a leader of advanced aerial application systems–represents an effective solution in airborne firefighting technology and capability. This enhanced firefighter configuration is a flexible solution, ideal for enhancing the capabilities of the C-27J multi-mission aircraft with significantly lower acquisition and operating costs than a dedicated firefighting platform. The Simplex Fire Attack System can be easily installed or removed by a small team in approximately 60 to 90 minutes via the aircraft's rear loading ramp. No major structural modifications are required to the airframe. The main tank has a maximum capacity of 10,600 l (2,800 US gallons); 568 litres (150 US gallons) of foam retardant can also be added. The firefighting system is one of the options that C-27J customers can add to the C-27J Spartan new baseline configuration, which incorporates a brand new avionics system designed to comply with Next Generation Air Traffic Control requirements, new cockpit control panels and LED aircraft lights. Operators will enjoy improved operational cost and performance within the aircraft flyaway price. The firefighting capability and the new baseline configuration are also being offered as a retrofit to current operators that want to upgrade their C-27J fleet. While offering the C-27J firefighter with the Simplex Aerospace roll-on/roll-off Fire Attack System, Leonardo, in collaboration with the European SCODEV Consortium, is also studying and testing a further innovative solution to enhance the C-27J's firefighting potential. The SCODEV scooping device will provide increased operational flexibility by allowing the water tank to be filled from a stretch of water, without the need to return to base. The system will provide a scooping device for the safe loading of water (sea, lakes, rivers) from around 30 metres above the surface, with a roll-on / roll-off approach to allow the aircraft different roles between firefighting, emergency support (medevac) and transport. Eighty-five C-27J Spartans have already been ordered by the air forces of Italy, Greece, Bulgaria, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, United States, Mexico, Australia, Peru, Kenya, Morocco, Chad and Zambia. https://www.skiesmag.com/press-releases/leonardo-eyes-enhanced-firefighting-configuration-for-its-c-27j-aircraft
June 26, 2020 | International, Aerospace

The F-35 Will Give Poland A More Advanced Air Force Than Some Major NATO Allies
June 24, 2020 - This past January, the Polish government took the bold step to acquire thirty-two F-35A Joint Strike Fighters (JSF). Poland is becoming a major player in NATO. It is working to modernize its air, sea and land forces. It is also forging closer relations with the United States, hosting U.S. forces, allowing the prepositioning of military equipment, and working to improve interoperability. By making the decision to buy the F-35, Poland will leap ahead of a number of its European allies, most notably France and Germany, and enter the elite group of countries operating fifth- generation aircraft. The F-35 will not only be America's premier fifth generation fighter, but the world's. From its inception, the JSF was going to be an international fighter. The F-35 Consortium, consisting of the United Kingdom, Italy, the Netherlands, Canada, Australia, Norway, Denmark, and until recently Turkey, contributed more than $4 billion towards the program's development costs. The aerospace industries in each of these countries also contributed critical technologies. Current estimates for international purchases are between 600 and 700 JSFs. If all the NATO members currently planning to acquire the JSF fulfill their commitments, the F-35 will constitute NATO's single biggest fighter fleet, ahead of the Franco-German-British Eurofighter. This will provide a major boost to air power interoperability for the Alliance. The move from the current fourth-generation platforms to fifth-generation is both inevitable and urgent. There is a general consensus that fourth-generation aircraft have decreasing survivability in the face of advanced, integrated air-defense networks. Efforts to sustain the ability of older aircraft to penetrate increasing lethal defenses will require larger force packages and the extensive use of scarce support assets, such as airborne jammers. Given that NATO air forces will also be fighting outnumbered, with their infrastructure under continuous attack from long-range-fire systems, this is a losing proposition. The F-35 will inevitably become the centerpiece of NATO's air capability. Fifth-generation aircraft with low-observable features, commonly referred to as “stealthiness,” and an array of advanced sensors are able not only to counter advanced air defenses, thereby restoring the West's erstwhile advantage in the air, but improve the performance and survivability of fourth-generation aerial platforms. Employing its sophisticated suite of sensors, the JSF can pass high-quality, near-real-time targeting information to fourth-generation platforms operating at a distance from high-threat air defenses. In addition, with its revolutionary array of sensors and computers, the F-35 can serve as both a penetrating ISR and stand-in electronic warfare platform. Read more from the National Interest. View source version on F-35.com: https://www.f35.com/news/detail/the-f-35-will-give-poland-a-more-advanced-air-force-than-some-major-nato-al

All news