March 25, 2020 | International, C4ISR

Amazon Denounces DoD JEDI ‘Do-Over’

The Pentagon's request to reconsider narrow technical aspects of the award to Microsoft, Amazon argues, ignores a wide range of fundamental flaws.
By SYDNEY J. FREEDBERG JR.

WASHINGTON: Amazon Web Services has publicly denounced the Defense Department's latest legal maneuver in the months-long public battle over the JEDI cloud computing contract, awarded to Microsoft last year. No, Amazon said in a statement this morning, the Pentagon should not get to redo a particular piece of the award process the judge found flawed, because that was just one flaw among many and fixing it is a distraction from the larger issues.

“We're pleased to see the DoD recognize the need to take corrective action,” the Amazon statement began, “but we're concerned that the proposed approach is not designed to provide a complete, fair, and effective re-evaluation.”

“Both earlier in the adjudication process when we submitted 265 questions to the DoD that they refused to answer, and in our protest where we outlined numerous significant flaws in the evaluation, it's been clear that there were many problems with the DoD's initial decision,” the statement continues. “Instead of addressing the breadth of problems in its proposed corrective action, the DoD's proposal focuses only on providing Microsoft a ‘do-over' on its fatally flawed bid while preventing AWS from adjusting its own pricing in response to the DoD's new storage criteria.”

“This attempt to gerrymander the corrective action without fixing all of the serious flaws pointed out in our complaint raises significant questions,” the statement concludes.

DoD graphic

The Pentagon's plan to consolidate many — but not all — of its 500-plus cloud contracts into a single Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure (JEDI). Note the suggestion that the single “pathfinder” contract for JEDI might evolve into multiple JEDI contracts.

An email circulated by Amazon went further: “DoD's proposed corrective action seeks to resurrect Microsoft's award eligibility and directly and unreasonably benefits Microsoft's deficient approach. DoD's proposed corrective action does not meaningfully address the numerous errors identified in AWS's protest. These errors were pervasive, impacting all six of the technical evaluation factors” — that is, not just the one the Pentagon is asking to redo.

“From the President's order to ‘screw' Amazon out of the contract, to the Secretary halting the award for an 85-day ‘examination,' to the Secretary's bizarre recusal after an award decision had been made, to the numerous inexplicable evaluation errors, to the refusal to substantively address AWS's 265 post-award debriefing questions, to the blatant political interference which impacted the award decision – the history of this procurement casts serious doubt on the rationality and fairness of DoD's proposed correction action,” the email said bluntly.

Some backstory might help in parsing all this. (Click here for more detail). On Feb. 13, the court had granted Amazon a preliminary injunction, saying the company would “likely” be able to prove the Department of Defense had erred in one particular portion of its process – an evaluation of the two companies called Price Scenario 6 – when it awarded the potentially $10 billion contract to Microsoft Azure. On March 12th, DoD responded by asking the judge to “remand” the case back to DoD so it could correct and redo Price Scenario 6, giving Microsoft and Amazon the opportunity to submit updated bids – albeit with very strict limits on those updates.

“During the proposed remand,” DoD's motion said, “the agency potentially could make decisions that would moot this action, in whole or in part, and may obviate the need for further litigation in this Court.”

In other words, the Pentagon is asking the judge: let us fix this one thing, and then there might be nothing left for Amazon to object to, and you can dismiss the case. Today, Amazon replied: We have plenty more to object to – and we think the judge will side with us.

https://breakingdefense.com/2020/03/amazon-denounces-dod-jedi-do-over

On the same subject

October 5, 2020 | International, Aerospace

Avions de combat: Boeing passe à l’attaque
Eric Felley La votation à peine digérée, le lobbyiste Thomas Borer invite déjà des parlementaires à une rencontre la semaine prochaine avec les Américains du Super Hornet. Malaise dans la commission. Les urnes sont encore tièdes d'une mince victoire pour l'acquisition des avions de combat que déjà s'active à Berne le lobbyisme pour influencer les élus sur le choix de l'avion: le Rafale de Dassault, l'Eurofighter d'Airbus, le F-35 de Lockheed Martin ou le Super Hornet de Boeing. Et les défenseurs de ce dernier ont semble-t-il tiré les premiers. En début de semaine déjà, certains conseillers nationaux, membres de la Commission de la politique de sécurité, avaient reçu une invitation pour venir se renseigner à propos de leur engin. Cette invitation leur est parvenue par quelqu'un de bien connu à Berne, l'ancien ambassadeur devenu lobbyiste de haut vol, Thomas Borer. Dans un courrier envoyé par mail, il invite certains parlementaires à rencontrer le directeur des ventes et du marketing des avions de combat à l'international chez Boeing, qui est responsable du processus d'achat en Suisse. Il semble que des élus de tous les partis l'ont reçu, même chez les socialistes et les Verts, opposés à l'achat. «Ils n'ont aucune pudeur, s'agace l'un d'entre eux. J'ai renvoyé aussitôt pour dire que je ne viendrai pas». Ancien pilote de F/A-18, le directeur des ventes de Boeing, Alain Garcia, «aimerait prendre le temps de parler avec vous sur l'offre de Boeing et de répondre directement à vos questions», écrit Thomas Borer. Les parlementaires pouvaient choisir entre mardi 6 octobre ou mercredi 7 octobre pour le rencontrer. D'après nos sources, la grande majorité d'entre eux ont refusé. S'abstenir de tout contact avec les avionneurs La Commission de la politique de sécurité, dans sa composition d'avant les élections de 2019, avait convenu que ses membres devaient s'abstenir de tout contact avec des avionneurs. Certains socialistes avaient été remis à l'ordre parce qu'ils étaient allés visiter un constructeur en Italie, pour chercher une alternative aux quatre concurrents qui sont en lice. La nouvelle commission, sous la présidence d'Ida Glanzmann-Hunkeler (PDC/LU), n'a pas encore pris de décision à ce sujet. Sa prochaine réunion a lieu les 26 et 27 octobre prochains. En interpellant les parlementaires seulement quelques jours après la votation, Thomas Borer est fidèle à sa réputation de fonceur. Mais au Parlement, ce n'est pas peut-être pas la meilleure façon d'agir. L'ancien ambassadeur a déjà troublé la quiétude des Chambres fédérales dans le cadre de ses activités de lobbyiste pour le Kazakhstan. Une enquête avait été ouverte contre lui par le Ministère public de la Confédération (MPC) et le conseiller national Christian Miesch (UDC/BL) suite à des soupçons de corruption passive et d'acceptation d'avantages. Mais l'affaire a été classée sans suite en juillet 2019. https://www.lematin.ch/story/avions-de-combat-boeing-passe-a-lattaque-426165817866
February 28, 2020 | International, Aerospace, Land

Robots Autonomously Navigate Underground in DARPA Challenge
Whether robots are exploring caves on other planets or disaster areas here on Earth, autonomy enables them to navigate extreme environments without human guidance or access to GPS. The Subterranean Challenge, or SubT, is testing this kind of cutting-edge technology. Sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the contest concluded its second circuit on Wednesday, Feb. 27. Taking first in the competition was CoSTAR, a 12-robot, 60-person team led by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (there were also winners declared for a separate, virtual competition). SubT is divided into four circuits spread over three years. With each, teams program their robots to navigate a complex underground course. The first contest, held last August, took place in a mine. For the most recent, called the Urban Circuit, teams raced against one another in an unfinished power plant in Elma, Washington. Each team's robots searched for a set of 20 predetermined objects, earning a point for each find. For the Urban Circuit, CoSTAR earned 16 points; the No. 2 team, with 11 points, was Explorer, led by Carnegie Mellon University. "The goal is to develop software for our robots that lets them decide how to proceed as they face new surprises," said CoSTAR's team lead Ali Agha of JPL. "These robots are highly autonomous and for the most part make decisions without human intervention." CoSTAR, which stands for Collaborative SubTerranean Autonomous Robots, brought machines that can roll, walk or fly, depending on what they encounter. Along the way, the bots have to map the environment and find objects like a warm mannequin that simulates a disaster survivor or a lost cellphone with a Wi-Fi signal. This particular course, which aims to simulate an urban environment, also included a carbon dioxide leak and a warm air vent. Joining the team for the Urban Circuit was a four-legged robot called Spot, which was provided by Boston Dynamics. "One of the two courses we had to run had multiple levels, so it was great that the Boston Dynamics robots were fantastic on stairs," says Joel Burdick, a Caltech professor and JPL research scientist. He is the leader of the Caltech campus section of the CoSTAR team. As the bots explore, they send back video and digital maps to a single human supervisor, who they remained in radio contact with for the first 100 feet (30 meters) or so of the course. They can extend that range by dropping communications nodes, a kind of wireless repeater. Once out of contact, it's up to each robot to decide whether to proceed or backtrack in order to update the team. Each must also rely on fellow robots to access different levels of the course. For example, a wheeled robot might request a quadrupedal one to climb or descend a flight of stairs. "These courses are very, very challenging, and most of the difficulty lies in communicating with the robots after they've gone out of range," Agha said. "That's critical for NASA: We want to send robots into caves on the Moon or Mars, where they have to explore on their own." Mapping caves on the Moon or Mars could identify good shelters for future astronauts. Moreover, if it exists at all, microbial life has a better chance of survival under the surface of Mars or within the icy seas of planetary moons, like Europa, Enceladus and Titan. NASA wants to search for life in these regions, where robots would be frequently out of contact. The next circuit in the Subterranean Challenge will be set in an undisclosed natural cave network this August. A final circuit that blends tunnels, urban environments and natural caves will take place in August of 2021. Teams competing in that final event have the opportunity to win up to $2 million in funding from DARPA. CoSTAR, includes JPL; Caltech, which manages JPL for NASA; MIT; KAIST (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology); Sweden's Lulea University of Technology; and industry partners. News Media Contact Andrew Good Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. 818-393-2433 andrew.c.good@jpl.nasa.gov 2020-041 https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2020-041&rn=news.xml&rst=7607
March 6, 2024 | International, Security

Kratos Awarded a $499 Million Multiple Award, Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity Contract for the Design, Build, Test, and Delivery of Functioning Anti-Tamper Solutions
San Diego, March 4, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (Nasdaq: KTOS), a Technology Company in Defense, National Security and Global Markets, announced today that it...

All news