30 novembre 2018 | Local, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR, Sécurité

Why can't Ottawa get military procurement right?

Murray Brewster · CBC News

The last couple of weeks may go down in the Trudeau government's public record as the point when the desires of deliverology met the drawbacks of defence procurement.

Remember 'deliverology'?

That lofty concept — measuring a government's progress in delivering on its promises — was the vogue in policy circles at the beginning of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's administration.

While it's sometimes derided as an empty concept, deliverology must have seemed tailor-made for a new government inheriting a troubled defence procurement system.

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal's decision Tuesday to step into the brawl over which multinational consortium will design and support the construction of the navy's new frigates is another lesson in how (apologies to Robert Burns) the best laid plans of mice and men go awry.

The tribunal's decision to order Ottawa to put the frigate project on hold pending the completion of their probe into a complaint by a failed bidder comes at a politically awkward time for the Liberals.

One week ago, Auditor General Michael Ferguson delivered an ugly report on the Liberals' handling of fighter jet procurement — specifically, the plan to buy interim warplanes to cover the gap until the current CF-18 fleet can be replaced with new aircraft.

Self-inflicted wounds

A cynic's reflex (given the checkered history of defence purchasing over the last decade) might be to consider these two events as just another day at the office for the troubled government procurement system.

That might not be entirely fair. Still, experts were saying Wednesday that the government is suffering from numerous self-inflicted political and administrative wounds on this file.

With a federal election on the horizon, and in a climate of growing geopolitical instability, the question of what the government has actually managed to deliver on military procurement is an important one to ask, said Rob Huebert, an analyst in strategic studies at the University of Calgary.

While the system, as the Trudeau Liberals and previous governments have constructed it, seems to be the perfect model of the "evidence based" policy making promised by the champions of deliverology, it's also not built for speed.

Some would suggest the deliverology model was followed to the letter in the design competition now tied up before the trade tribunal and in Federal Court.

What seemed like endless consultations with the bidders took two years. The government made up to 88 amendments to the tender. And in the end, the preferred bid was challenged by a competitor that claims not all of the navy's criteria were met.

Alion Science and Technology Corp. and its subsidiary, Alion Canada, argue the warship Lockheed Martin Canada and BAE System Inc. want to sell to Ottawa cannot meet the speed requirements set by the tender without a substantial overhaul.

It does not, the company claims, meet the government's demand for a proven, largely off-the-shelf design.

Michael Armstrong, who teaches at Brock University and holds a doctorate in management science, said the government could have avoided the challenges and accompanying slowdowns had it been more precise in its language.

"They could have been more clear and firm when they use the words 'proven design'," he said. "Did they literally mean we won't buy ships unless they're floating in the water? Or did they mean that British one that doesn't quite exist yet is close enough?

"If they would have been more firm and said, 'We want a ship that actually exists,' that might have simplified things at this stage."

Huebert described the auditor general's report on the purchase of interim fighters as an all-out assault on evidence-based policy making.

"It is just so damning," he said.

A break with reality

The Conservatives have accused the Liberals of avoiding the purchase of the F-35 stealth jet through manufacturing a crisis by claiming the air force doesn't have enough fighters to meet its international commitments. The auditor found that the military could not meet the government's new policy commitment and even ignored advice that one of its proposed solutions — buying brand-new Super Hornets to fill the capability gap —would actually make their problems worse, not better.

That statement, said Huebert, suggested a jaw-dropping break with reality on the government's part.

"They [the Liberals] were just making things up," he said.

It might have been too optimistic to expect the Liberals to fix the system, said Armstrong, given the short four years between elections.

But Huebert said Ottawa can't carry on with business as usual — that the government now must deliver on procurement, instead of doubling down on rhetoric.

The problem, he said, is that governments haven't really paid a price in the past for botched military procurement projects. There was "no political pain for the agony of the Sea King replacement, as an example," he said, referring to the two-decade long process to retire the air force's maritime helicopters.

"The thing that makes me so concerned, even outraged, is that we are heading into a so much more dangerous international environment," said Huebert, citing last weekend's clash between Russia and Ukraine over the Kerch Strait and ongoing tension with Beijing in the South China Sea.

"When things get nasty, we have to be ready."

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/why-can-t-ottawa-get-military-procurement-right-1.4924800

Sur le même sujet

  • Airbus aggressively sourcing more Canadian content

    28 août 2018 | Local, Aérospatial

    Airbus aggressively sourcing more Canadian content

    by Chris Thatcher When Tom Enders, then the chief executive officer of Airbus, announced in October 2017 that Canada would become the company's fifth home country and first outside of Europe, following a deal with Bombardier to acquire a majority stake in the C Series passenger jet, small- and medium-sized Canadian aerospace companies had reason to be optimistic. Canada has typically ranked eighth or ninth among Airbus suppliers. But with the C Series now firmly under the Airbus tent (it was renamed the A220 in July), a contract award in 2016 to provide the Royal Canadian Air Force with 16 C295W fixed-wing search and rescue (FWSAR) aircraft, and looming competitions for a future fighter jet and strategic tanker and transport aircraft, Airbus is aggressively sourcing more Canadian content. Before you make your pitch, however, Ruben Tauste Caro, responsible for Airbus's strategic procurement in North America, has a few words of advice: no bashing the competition, no me-too products, and go easy on the wonders of your new shop floor machinery. “I want you to tell me that you work in a very, very dedicated frequency. And in that frequency, I want you to tell me that you are the expert in a very specific niche. Then you've got me,” he told the Abbotsford Aerospace, Defence and Security Expo in August. Airbus routinely conducts in-person assessments of its prospective suppliers and, while cost, quality, and on-time production are obvious baseline requirements, what interests Tauste Caro are signs of continuous improvement and true innovation. He said companies that claim to build a better mouse trap or be a one-stop shop for all his supply needs are quickly dismissed. “Tell me what you are really, really good at, and if I have an opportunity in the future, that will be yours,” he said. Continuous improvement need not involve large investments. A dashboard with measurable targets will suffice if it clearly shows progress, said Tauste Caro. “Show me your KPIs [key performance indicators]. If you don't [meet] a target that month, do you have an action behind it?” A clear ability to set and reach targets is important, he emphasized, because if there is ever an issue with product quality, “The question is, will you overcome that issue? Do you have the right procedures, the right way of working? Is your workforce engaged?” That's why he also asks questions about innovation. Most companies have a tendency to highlight their shop floor. While new machines and robotics are important, he always looks beyond to the people operating them. “Innovation is people,” he said. “{They] are the key parameters in the innovation equation...[D]on't waste time on machines, tell me your way of working.” In particular, how do ideas move from the shop floor to the C-suite? For suppliers eyeing opportunities with Airbus's commercial aircraft production, an ability to ramp up production and deliver at high rates is critical. “This is extremely important,” he stressed. “We cannot afford to have one aircraft system stopped in the warehouse.” Tauste Caro heads a small four-person team responsible for supplier identification and development throughout North America, so he encouraged companies to call or “knock on the door,” to keep him apprised of product changes, expansion plans, new strategies, and contract awards. “Feed me with that information. That is the daily bread and butter of my job within strategic procurement,” he said, explaining that if he's asked to recommend a supplier, “I have to be able to answer right away.” While ramp-up of A220 production this year and delivery of the first FWSAR aircraft in 2019 might mean more opportunities for Canadian suppliers, Airbus is particularly focused on the value proposition it can offer in a future fighter jet and air-to-air refuelling aircraft competition. “We need to work with you right now,” he told executives at the Abbotsford trade show, to identify industrial and technological benefits (ITBs) proposals for both programs and meet FWSAR obligations. There is a “huge requirement” for ITBs within the fighter jet program, he noted. “We need to be creative, we need the suppliers.” https://www.skiesmag.com/news/airbus-aggressively-sourcing-more-canadian-content

  • Soutenir l’emploi et l’acquisition de compétences gr'ce aux acquisitions en matière de défense

    31 mai 2019 | Local, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR, Sécurité, Autre défense

    Soutenir l’emploi et l’acquisition de compétences gr'ce aux acquisitions en matière de défense

    Les projets d'approvisionnement liés à la défense favorisent le perfectionnement des compétences des Canadiens Le 29 mai 2019 – Ottawa (Ontario) Tous les ans, les achats de la Défense et les grands achats de la Garde côtière canadienne effectués par le gouvernement du Canada génèrent des milliards de dollars de travaux pour les entreprises canadiennes et appuient des milliers d'emplois au pays. Dans l'avenir, ils favoriseront également le développement d'une main-d'œuvre hautement qualifiée et diversifiée. C'est le point de vue qu'a fait valoir aujourd'hui le ministre de l'Innovation, des Sciences et du Développement économique, l'honorable Navdeep Bains, lors de son passage à CANSEC, le plus important salon commercial des industries de la défense et de la sécurité au Canada. À cette occasion, le ministre Bains a participé au lancement du Prix pour le leadership dans l'industrie canadienne, mis sur pied conjointement par trois entreprises : L3 Technologies, Thales Canada et CAE Inc. Dix étudiantes ayant fait preuve de leadership et d'un bon rendement scolaire obtiendront ainsi un stage de travail ou stage coopératif rémunéré. Ces étudiantes collaboreront à des projets innovateurs qui consolideront leur apprentissage, tout en profitant de mentorat dans les disciplines des sciences, de la technologie, de l'ingénierie et des mathématiques. Les entreprises ont établi ce programme dans le cadre de la Politique des retombées industrielles et technologiques (RIT), selon laquelle les entreprises qui remportent des contrats d'approvisionnement de la défense doivent investir un montant équivalent à la valeur du contrat dans l'économie canadienne. Le ministre Bains a annoncé des changements à la Politique des RIT qui favoriseront l'acquisition de compétences par les travailleurs. En effet, les entrepreneurs principaux obtiendront des points supplémentaires lors de l'évaluation de leur soumission si cette dernière prévoit des investissements dans le développement des compétences et la formation des Autochtones au Canada. Un nouvel élément de cybercertification sera aussi mis en place afin d'offrir aux petites et moyennes entreprises canadiennes un meilleur accès aux possibilités d'affaires associées aux projets d'approvisionnement liés à la défense. Il s'agit là d'une façon pour le gouvernement de concrétiser son engagement à établir et à promouvoir une norme nationale de cyberprotection pour les entreprises canadiennes. Cette nouvelle mesure fait écho à la nouvelle Charte canadienne du numérique, dont l'un des 10 principes énonce que les Canadiens devraient pouvoir se fier à l'intégrité, à l'authenticité et à la sécurité des services qu'ils utilisent, et se sentir en sécurité en ligne. Citations « L'économie mondiale est hautement concurrentielle, et le Canada doit mettre tous ses talents à contribution pour tirer son épingle du jeu. Gr'ce à la Politique des RIT, le gouvernement soutient le développement d'une main-d'œuvre qualifiée et inclusive. Le Prix pour le leadership dans l'industrie canadienne est un excellent exemple de la façon dont nos politiques peuvent favoriser des investissements qui aident les femmes à se tailler une place en sciences, en technologie, en ingénierie ou en mathématiques. Les améliorations à la politique annoncées aujourd'hui faciliteront également de nouveaux investissements dans le perfectionnement des compétences et la formation pour les Autochtones. De leur côté, les petites et moyennes entreprises auront plus facilement accès à un programme de cybercertification qui leur donnera un avantage concurrentiel de plus dans une industrie axée sur l'innovation. » – Le ministre de l'Innovation, des Sciences et du Développement économique, l'honorable Navdeep Bains Faits en bref La Politique des RIT incite les entreprises à établir ou à accroître leur présence au Canada, à renforcer les chaînes d'approvisionnement canadiennes, ainsi qu'à développer des capacités industrielles canadiennes dans des sphères comme l'innovation, la recherche-développement, le développement des sources d'approvisionnement et les exportations. L'un des éléments de la Politique des RIT est la proposition de valeur, en vertu de laquelle les soumissionnaires qui souhaitent obtenir des contrats liés à la défense mettent de l'avant des engagements qui leur permettront de satisfaire aux obligations de RIT. En janvier 2019, l'ensemble du portefeuille des obligations de RIT comptait 161 projets d'une valeur de près de 47 milliards de dollars, dont 36,1 milliards de dollars pour des activités commerciales déjà terminées, 7,1 milliards de dollars pour des activités en cours, et 3,7 milliards de dollars en occasions de travaux futurs non encore déterminés. L'industrie canadienne de la défense compte plus de 660 entreprises, dont les ventes dépassent les 10 milliards de dollars et qui soutiennent près de 60 000 emplois au pays. Cette industrie offre des emplois de calibre supérieur à des travailleurs hautement qualifiés. https://www.canada.ca/fr/innovation-sciences-developpement-economique/nouvelles/2019/05/soutenir-lemploi-et-lacquisition-de-competences-grace-aux-acquisitions-en-matiere-de-defense.html

  • Canada Selects Boeings P-8A Poseidon as its Multi-Mission Aircraft

    3 décembre 2023 | Local, Aérospatial

    Canada Selects Boeings P-8A Poseidon as its Multi-Mission Aircraft

    The P-8 is the only proven, in-service and in-production solution that meets all CMMA requirements, including range, speed, endurance and payload capacity

Toutes les nouvelles