1 octobre 2020 | Local, Naval, C4ISR, Autre défense

Terrestrial Energy and L3Harris Technologies to Develop IMSR Generation IV Nuclear Power Plant Simulator

GlobeNewswire

OAKVILLE, Ontario and MONTREAL, Sept. 30, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Terrestrial Energy has awarded L3Harris Technologies a contract to develop an engineering and operator training simulator for the Integral Molten Salt Reactor (IMSR®), a Generation IV nuclear power plant.

The IMSR power plant simulator is being built at L3Harris' operation in Montreal, Quebec and will be delivered to Terrestrial Energy's Oakville, Ontario facility in 2021. It will provide Terrestrial Energy with a high-fidelity platform to simulate and visualize all major IMSR reactor and power plant functions. The simulator will support Terrestrial Energy's engineering activities and, subsequently, operator training as development moves to licensing and construction prior to plant commissioning.

“We are applying our high-performance computing and reactor simulation capabilities to IMSR power plant development,” said Rangesh Kasturi, President, Maritime International, L3Harris. “This effort will result in Terrestrial Energy obtaining its first simulator for the IMSR power plant equipping its engineers with a dynamic, integrated and real-world tool to support IMSR deployment.”

“L3Harris' simulator provides an extraordinary real-world experience of the IMSR power plant operation and performance. It supports our engineering activities, operator training programs and future IMSR deployments,” said Simon Irish, CEO of Terrestrial Energy. “This digital technology illustrates how high-performance computing enables Generation IV innovation capable of providing cost-competitive, reliable, resilient and clean electric power and industrial heat.”

In addition to modeling and testing the integrated engineering simulator, L3Harris will provide its state-of-the-art Orchid® simulation environment and training to Terrestrial Energy for further simulator development. This aspect of the contract is a result of L3Harris' Industrial and Technological Benefits (ITB) commitments to Canada through its participation in the National Shipbuilding Strategy (NSS) on the Arctic and Offshore Patrol Ships program with Irving Shipbuilding.

“This investment in Terrestrial Energy is another example of the National Shipbuilding Strategy at work creating investment in people and businesses across the country to ensure Canadians are benefitting from coast to coast to coast,” said Kevin McCoy, President of Irving Shipbuilding. “Through the Arctic and Offshore Patrol Ship construction program and the Canadian Surface Combatant program, spending commitments to date have generated positive economic impacts for hundreds of businesses and organizations that are creating world-class innovation and research across the country.”

The ITB commitment requires identifying new opportunities that benefit Canadian industry when any work is performed outside of Canada on the NSS. The ITB program ensures that 100 percent of the value of a significant defence contract is spent in Canada, and this creates a strong link between our naval programs and the creation of innovation in our energy sector.

About Terrestrial Energy

Terrestrial Energy is a developer of Generation IV advanced nuclear power plants that use its proprietary Integral Molten Salt Reactor (IMSR®) technology. IMSR technology represents true innovation in cost reduction, versatility, and functionality of nuclear power plants. IMSR power plants will provide zero-carbon, reliable, dispatchable, cost-competitive electric power and high-grade industrial heat for use in many industrial applications, such as chemical synthesis and desalination, and in so doing extend the application of nuclear energy far beyond electric power markets. They have the potential to make important contributions to industrial competitiveness, energy security, and economic growth. Their deployment will support rapid global decarbonization of the primary energy system by displacing fossil fuel combustion across a broad spectrum. Using an innovative design, and proven and demonstrated molten salt reactor technology, Terrestrial Energy is engaged with regulators and industrial partners to complete IMSR engineering and to commission first IMSR power plants in the late 2020s. terrestrialenergy.com

About L3Harris Technologies

L3Harris Technologies is an agile global aerospace and defense technology innovator, delivering end-to-end solutions that meet customers' mission-critical needs. The company provides advanced defense and commercial technologies across air, land, sea, space and cyber domains. L3Harris has approximately $18 billion in annual revenue and 48,000 employees, with customers in more than 100 countries.
https://financialpost.com/pmn/press-releases-pmn/globe-newswire-releases/terrestrial-energy-and-l3harris-technologies-to-develop-imsr-generation-iv-nuclear-power-plant-simulator

Sur le même sujet

  • Canada’s defence industry positioning for life beyond COVID

    19 mai 2020 | Local, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR, Sécurité

    Canada’s defence industry positioning for life beyond COVID

    Posted on May 15, 2020 by Chris Thatcher In an appearance before the Commons finance committee on May 12, Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux suggested the federal deficit could vastly exceed the $252 billion he projected in mid-April as the government continues to unveil relief measures to help Canadians and businesses withstand the economic impact of the coronavirus pandemic. Most admit it is to too early to tell what that will mean for future military procurement and the government's 2017 defence policy, Strong, Secure, Engaged (SSE), but think tanks and defence analysts are nonetheless forecasting turbulence ahead. “Over the past generation, recessions and the fiscal consolidation that has followed them have had a seriously negative impact on DND's (Department of National Defence) budget,” wrote Eugene Lang, an adjunct professor with the School of Policy Studies at Queen's University and Fellow with the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, in a recent policy paper for CGAI. “The future for SSE and its associated funding does not look bright. National defence probably has a year or two before the crunch hits.” Christyn Cianfarani is more cautious, but the president and chief executive officer of the Canadian Association of Defence and Security Industries (CADSI) admits the “rumblings are there that we are naturally concerned. Anybody who knows their history will tell you that when federal governments have been in these deficit spending situations — and this is the largest since the Second World War — they typically will be looking for strategies to reduce that deficit in the long term and DND unfortunately is a target.” But pulling government funding from a sector that has weathered the COVID-19 storm reasonably well might be “counterintuitive,” she suggested. The sector “right now is one of the few that is able to contribute to the economy under this persistent pandemic environment ... If there are multiple waves of [the virus], defence will be one sector that actually can shoulder the ups and downs and return to remote operations if we get to that stage again.” “Pure play” defence companies with few or no ties to commercial aerospace and the travel industry have managed the risks well, she said. Most have so far avoided the workforce layoffs and temporary downsizing experienced in other sectors, though manufacturing has slowed to meet provincial health regulations. Some, in fact, have been hiring. “Aside from some localized instances of companies facing real challenges, I would say the overall health [of the sector] is not too bad,” she said. Following what she called a “choppy” roll out of COVID-19 related policies that cut across federal and provincial jurisdictions, defence companies have adapted. Some have retooled shop floors and supply chains to manufacture critically needed personal protective equipment (PPE). Others with government contracts have continued operations where possible, albeit at reduced levels to match restrictions at government facilities. Maintenance on some platforms such as submarines has halted. The federal government has been “very conscious of trying to keep the contracts moving and executing,” said Cianfarani. “For example, if you are in the Canadian shipbuilding program, you are still pushing forward. If you are part of that supply chain, that hasn't seen any tangible change in the expectations.” Furthermore, many smaller defence firms specialize in software development and cyber security, both of which remain in demand as governments and companies try to protect expanded networks that now include thousands of employees working from home. The greatest concern for members has been liquidity, she said. CADSI encouraged the Business Development Bank of Canada and Export Development Canada to set aside their traditional risk aversion to the defence sector as they work with private sector lenders to support access to capital. The Business Credit Availability Program includes loans of up to $60 million and guarantees of up to $80 million. “We are quite proud of making a big intervention on that,” she said. “It was supposed to be open for all businesses and, irrespective of ... whether you characterize certain businesses as higher risk than others, it is an incentive program at the federal level.” An essential service At the outset of the COVID-19 economic slowdown, CADSI was a vocal advocate for defence as an essential service and greater harmonization of federal and provincial policies, including the rules that allow embedded contractors to access Canadian Armed Forces facilities. As provincial governments now begin easing restrictions and take the first tentative steps to open their economies, the association is calling for guidance and common standards, especially for the use of protective masks, gloves and other clothing. Of particular concern are the rules for employees of companies that embed on Wings and Bases to provide training, platform maintenance, healthcare and other services. “Who has to wear protective health equipment in a DND facility and is it the same [federal standard] across different provincial jurisdictions?” said Cianfarani. “If Ontario decides you have to stand two metres apart and Nova Scotia doesn't have the same policy,” it will create confusion. “If you need a particular face mask to go onto a DND base to perform maintenance on their aircraft, what does that look like? If it is so specialized, can you help us procure it? Or, if it is not so specialized, can you give us a specification so we can ensure that we do have it when we get spooled up to work?” Likewise, what PPE do companies need to provide when DND and other government employees visit their facilities? DND has released some information on “what they are starting to classify as health equipment versus PPE,” she said. “If companies have that information, they won't get to a DND facility and be surprised by a piece of PPE they need or a standard of working they need to accommodate.” Made in Canada The economic repercussions of the pandemic likely won't be felt in the defence sector for some time. Cianfarani noted that some companies have found opportunity in the crisis and will increase investments in automation, big data and other elements of Industry 4.0 as they position for the future. “This is probably an acceleration of something that has been going on slowly in the background for quite sometime,” she observed. But the pandemic has opened the door to a renewed discussion about a national defence industrial strategy, an issue CADSI has been flagging for over a decade. Buying made-in-Canada defence and security platforms and systems is more expensive, but the past months have demonstrated that protectionism is “alive and well.” President Donald Trump in early April asked U.S.-based 3M to stop supply N95 masks to Canada. “The crisis has certainly given us and the government, and Canadians in general, a renewed interest in the concept of having sovereign capability,” she said. Shifting to a procurement culture that accepts the risks and costs of Canadian-built equipment won't happen quickly or easily — it took about seven years to study and adopt recommendations for Canadian key industrial capabilities, she noted — “but I really do think if there is any opportunity, it is probably now, because the shock is still very prevalent in everyone's mind.” https://www.skiesmag.com/news/canada-defence-industry-covid

  • Le ministère de la Défense nationale et les Forces armées canadiennes tiennent des consultations publiques ouvertes auprès de tous les Canadiens concernant la mise à jour de la politique de défense du Canada

    9 mars 2023 | Local, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR, Sécurité, Autre défense

    Le ministère de la Défense nationale et les Forces armées canadiennes tiennent des consultations publiques ouvertes auprès de tous les Canadiens concernant la mise à jour de la politique de défense du Canada

    Le 9 mars 2023 – Ottawa (Ontario) – Défense nationale/Forces armées canadiennes Aujourd’hui, le ministère de la Défense nationale (MDN) et les Forces armées canadiennes (FAC) ont annoncé le lancement de consultations publiques auprès de tous les Canadiens concernant la mise à jour de la politique de défense, annoncée dans le budget de 2022. Cette mise à jour s’appuiera sur la politique de défense actuelle du Canada, Protection, Sécurité, Engagement (PSE), et permettra aux FAC d’intervenir en cas de menaces dans le nouveau contexte de sécurité mondiale. La politique de défense du Canada PSE, lancée en 2017, est notre plan sur 20 ans visant à fournir aux FAC les capacités, l’équipement et la culture nécessaires pour anticiper les menaces, y répondre et protéger la population canadienne. Bien que la politique PSE ait correctement cerné les tendances qui façonnent le contexte de sécurité mondiale, le paysage géopolitique a considérablement changé depuis 2017 et une mise à jour est de toute évidence nécessaire. L’invasion de l’Ukraine par la Russie a changé le contexte de menace, tout comme les cybermenaces plus fréquentes, la modernisation militaire de la Russie et de la Chine, la présence croissante d’acteurs non traditionnels dans les conflits, l’accélération et l’intensification du changement climatique et le rôle accru des Forces armées canadiennes dans les interventions lors de crises nationales. Pour assurer l’efficacité des FAC face à ces menaces, nous devons continuer de mettre l’accent sur la mise en place d’un changement culturel durable et positif au sein de nos forces armées. Pour ces raisons, le ministère de la Défense nationale et les Forces armées canadiennes procèdent à un examen de la politique PSE pour veiller à ce que nous puissions continuer à être prêts, résilients et compétents pour réagir à toute menace dans ce nouveau contexte de sécurité mondiale. Compte tenu des défis auxquels nous sommes confrontés en matière de sécurité, nous cherchons à recruter et à maintenir en poste un plus grand nombre de membres des FAC, et à faire en sorte qu’ils se sentent protégés et respectés lorsqu’ils portent l’uniforme. Nous continuerons d’aller de l’avant avec la Directive pour la reconstitution des FAC, la Stratégie de maintien des effectifs et les autres nouvelles initiatives de recrutement annoncées au cours de la dernière année, ainsi qu’avec les recommandations novatrices de l’ancienne juge de la Cour suprême, madame Louise Arbour, que la ministre Anand a demandé au MDN et aux FAC de mettre en œuvre. Cet examen de la politique de défense du Canada est effectué alors que nous continuons à progresser vers les priorités de défense déjà annoncées et à nous en inspirer. Protéger les Canadiens sera toujours la plus importante mission des Forces armées canadiennes. En 2022, nous avons annoncé un investissement de 38,6 milliards de dollars au cours des vingt prochaines années pour moderniser le NORAD. Nous renforçons notre sécurité dans l’Arctique grâce à des exercices interarmées, à six nouveaux navires de patrouille extracôtiers et de l’Arctique, et à des capacités de surveillance et de renseignement améliorées que nous continuons d’acquérir dans le cadre de la politique PSE. Les Forces armées canadiennes participent aussi plus fréquemment à des missions nationales en réponse à la pandémie de COVID‑19, à des feux de forêt et à des inondations – soutenant les collectivités partout au pays lorsqu’elles sont appelées à le faire. Alors que les changements climatiques continuent de menacer le Canada et le monde entier, cette mise à jour permet d’examiner les capacités nécessaires pour protéger les Canadiens au cours des années à venir – et cela pendant que le MDN et les FAC prennent aussi des mesures pour réduire leur propre impact sur l’environnement. La mise à jour de la politique de défense s’appuiera également sur les importantes contributions du Canada en matière de défense à ses alliés et partenaires européens, notamment en offrant de la formation à plus de 35 000 membres des forces de sécurité de l’Ukraine dans le cadre de l’opération UNIFIER depuis 2015, en faisant des dons d’aide militaire à l’Ukraine évalués à plus d’un milliard de dollars, et en assurant des vols réguliers pour acheminer cette aide en Europe. Dans le cadre de l’opération REASSURANCE, le Canada a été actif sur terre, dans les airs et en mer pour renforcer la sécurité sur le flanc oriental de l’OTAN. Ce travail se poursuivra avec tout le sérieux qu’il mérite, notamment grâce au soutien des 8 milliards de dollars sur cinq ans en nouvelles dépenses en défense allouées dans le budget de 2022. La mise à jour de la politique de défense est également réalisée alors que le Canada accroît sa présence dans la région indopacifique en adoptant sa Stratégie pour l’Indo-Pacifique récemment annoncée, qui vise à renforcer la présence des FAC dans la région en organisant davantage de formations et d’exercices et en déployant une frégate supplémentaire. Les FAC continuent aussi de contribuer aux opérations de paix des Nations Unies partout dans le monde et se tiennent prêtes à intervenir lors d’urgences internationales avec des capacités comme l’Équipe d’intervention en cas de catastrophe (EICC). Au cours des derniers mois, les représentants du ministère de la Défense nationale, membres des FAC et la ministre de la Défense nationale ont collaboré avec leurs partenaires pour cerner les défis que la mise à jour de la politique de défense doit permettre de relever, ainsi que les moyens pour y parvenir. Nous sommes maintenant impatients d’accueillir les commentaires du public et des intervenants canadiens concernant nos prochaines étapes. Ces consultations comprennent : une nouvelle plateforme Web au moyen de laquelle tous les Canadiens peuvent fournir leurs commentaires et suggestions en réponse aux domaines d’intérêt de la mise à jour de la politique de défense; des tables rondes avec des dirigeants de l’industrie canadienne et des entreprises canadiennes de défense et de sécurité; des tables rondes avec des experts canadiens en défense et en sécurité, y compris des universitaires; des opinions de députés et de sénateurs; des discussions avec les collectivités et les dirigeants autochtones, ainsi qu’avec d’autres ordres de gouvernement; et la poursuite des discussions de haut niveau avec les Alliés de l’OTAN, les responsables du NORAD, les représentants du Groupe des cinq, et les partenaires internationaux, dont bon nombre d’entre eux procèdent également à des processus d’examen semblables. Les représentants de l’industrie, les experts, les gouvernements, les partenaires autochtones, les organisations civiles, les parlementaires et tous les Canadiens sont invités à faire part de leurs commentaires, notamment sur les cinq thèmes suivants : appuyer nos effectifs; bâtir la capacité organisationnelle; maintenir et adapter les capacités essentielles des FAC; mettre à niveau les défenses continentales et de l’Arctique; et acquérir les capacités pour les conflits modernes. Ces commentaires seront essentiels pour mettre à jour la politique de défense du Canada et veiller à ce que notre pays soit prêt à réagir à toute menace nouvelle et émergente dans le paysage géopolitique actuel, tout en créant des possibilités économiques et des emplois pour les Canadiens. Ces engagements viendront compléter les discussions en cours menées par la ministre de la Défense nationale et les hauts fonctionnaires du MDN et des FAC avec les partenaires de l’industrie, les experts en défense et en sécurité, les parlementaires, les communautés autochtones et les alliés et partenaires internationaux au sujet de la mise sur pied de forces armées modernes du 21e siècles capables de relever les défis actuels et futurs en matière de sécurité. Ils s’appuieront également sur les vastes consultations pluriannuelles que le MDN et les FAC ont menées pour élaborer la politique Protection, Sécurité, Engagement, sur les consultations d’un large éventail de partenaires qui ont précédé la publication du plan canadien de modernisation du NORAD, et sur les récents engagements ciblés avec les partenaires concernant la mise à jour de la politique de défense. Nos prochains engagements se tiendront avec les partenaires de l’industrie, les experts, les gouvernements, les alliés, les parlementaires, les partenaires autochtones et le public canadien dans le cadre de divers forums pour nous assurer de bien faire les choses.  Faits en bref En 2017, le Canada a publié sa politique de défense, Protection, Sécurité, Engagement (PSE) – un plan sur 20 ans visant à fournir aux Forces armées canadiennes (FAC) les capacités, l’équipement et la culture nécessaires pour anticiper les menaces et y répondre. La politique prévoit une augmentation des dépenses de défense de plus de 70 % au cours de la période de 2017 à 2026. En plus des augmentations prévues dans la politique PSE, le budget de 2022 a annoncé un investissement total de 8 milliards de dollars en nouveau financement de défense sur cinq ans. Au printemps 2022, la ministre Anand a annoncé le plan canadien de modernisation du NORAD. Ce plan prévoit un investissement de 38,6 milliards sur vingt ans afin de moderniser les capacités canadiennes du NORAD qui permettent de protéger les Canadiens. Au printemps 2022, la ministre Anand a accepté le rapport final de l’examen externe indépendant et complet. En décembre 2022, la ministre Anand a présenté son rapport au Parlement précisant les mesures prévues pour répondre à chacune des 48 recommandations formulées dans le rapport afin d’instaurer un changement culturel durable et significatif au sein du ministère de la Défense nationale et des Forces armées canadiennes. Le soutien à l’Ukraine est une priorité absolue pour le ministère de la Défense nationale et les Forces armées canadiennes. Depuis février 2022, le Canada s’est engagé à accorder à l’Ukraine une aide militaire d’une valeur de plus d’un milliard de dollars, en plus de ses efforts en cours déployés pour former les membres des forces armées de l’Ukraine et transporter l’aide militaire à destination de l’Ukraine à bord d’aéronefs de l’Aviation royale canadienne (ARC) en Europe. En novembre 2022, le Canada a publié sa Stratégie pour l’Indo-Pacifique, qui prévoit une présence militaire canadienne accrue dans cette région. Le budget de 2022 annonçait un examen de la politique Protection, Sécurité, Engagement pour permettre au Canada de mettre à jour sa politique de défense actuelle. Nous invitons tous les Canadiens et les intervenants de la Défense à visiter notre plateforme Web pour obtenir les plus récentes informations concernant le processus de mise à jour de la politique de défense et fournir des commentaires en ligne sur nos prochaines étapes. Les soumissions seront examinées et prises en considération du 9 mars au 30 avril 2023 afin d’orienter les prochaines étapes.   https://www.canada.ca/fr/ministere-defense-nationale/nouvelles/2023/03/le-ministere-de-la-defense-nationale-et-les-forces-armees-canadiennes-tiennent-des-consultations-publiques-ouvertes-aupres-de-tous-les-canadiens-co.html

  • Incoming AIAC chair discusses aerospace vision

    5 décembre 2019 | Local, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR, Sécurité

    Incoming AIAC chair discusses aerospace vision

    by Chris Thatcher As Members of Parliament return to the House of Commons this week, aerospace eyes will be on the cabinet ministers and MPs most likely to support a new vision for the industry. With the return of Marc Garneau to Transport Canada, Navdeep Bains to Innovation, Science and Industry, Harjit Sajjan to National Defence and Mary Ng to Small Business and Export Promotion, and the introduction of Anita Anand to Public Services and Procurement and Carla Qualtrough to Employment, Workforce Development and Disability Inclusion, the government's front benches include ministers well acquainted with key issues that need to be addressed if Canada is to retain its position as a leading global aerospace nation. Last fall, the Aerospace Industries Association of Canada (AIAC) asked Jean Charest, a former premier of Quebec and deputy prime minister of Canada, to lead a cross-country discussion on the sector's future and a possible course forward. His ensuing report, “Vision 2025,” delivered at the Paris Air Show in June, offered recommendations centred on six core themes: expanding the skilled workforce; growing small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs); promoting innovation; investing in Transport Canada's aircraft certification and regulation capacity; sustaining Canadian leadership in space; and better leveraging defence procurement to drive industry growth. The recommendations were drawn from five months of meetings with industry executives, provincial premiers and their economic development ministers, federal ministers, opposition parties, academia and the general public. “Our goal was to re-start the discussion between the industry and its partners in government, education, research and the business community,” Patrick Mann, president of Patlon Aircraft & Industries and the former chair of AIAC, reminded the sector during the recent Canadian Aerospace Summit in Ottawa. “It has been a truly pan-Canadian event that has reached all through the industry . . . [and] into every level of government.” If Charest's report provides a guide for how to address some of the challenges generated by a multitude of countries and technology companies now seeking to gain a larger footprint in aerospace, the task of implementing it rests in part with Keith Donaldson. Donaldson assumed the chair of AIAC during the summit and acknowledged the report will drive much of the association's activities over the next 12 months. “I'm all in on Vision 2025,” he told Skies. “This is the time to re-engage as an industry, to recognize that [aerospace] is a jewel we have in Canada. It's R-and-D intensive, it's pan-Canadian, it has the highest input for STEM (science, technology, math and engineering)-type jobs, men and women – let's grow this. We need the support and partnership of the federal government. That is how we combat [other entrants].” A chartered accountant by training who previously worked with KPMG, Donaldson is vice-president of APEX Industries, a machining, components, subassembly and structures manufacturer in Moncton, N.B. Over his 15 years with the company, he served as president of the New Brunswick Aerospace and Defense Association and co-founded the Atlantic Canada Aerospace and Defence Association. He's also been a fixture on AIAC's technical committees, from audit and finance, to small business, defence procurement and supply chain access. That experience could be crucial, as much of the heavy lifting to make the report's recommendations reality will come from the technical committees. Under Mann's leadership, AIAC spent part of the past year restructuring the committees to align with the direction of Vision 2025. “We spent a lot of time . . . making sure their mandates were going to match the recommendations,” said Donaldson. “We wanted to make sure the chairs were well aligned. [They] are some of the heavy hitters in the industry, from Bombardier, UTC, Cascade, Collins Aerospace . . . [They have] industry interest, company interest and personal interest for the success of these recommendations.” Winning the skills battle Because of ministerial familiarity with the report's recommendations, AIAC will be hoping it can move quickly to implement some of them. The appointment of Qualtrough, who has spoken at previous AIAC conferences, to a portfolio that will focus on the sector's top priority of skills development is seen as “an early win,” Donaldson noted. “When AIAC did the industry engagement, it was very evident that to maintain and grow, we have to win the skills battle,” he said. “A lot of the other recommendations are going to move forward, but we have to solve the skills one. Failure is not an option here.” Other sectors are going to be competing for the same STEM talent, but the Vision 2025 blueprint might give aerospace a leg up with government, he suggested. That means offering ideas not only to retain and retrain the current workforce where necessary, but also to recruit and support more women in the sector, attract First Nations, and collaborate with immigration initiatives. “It is not going to be a one size fits all. We are going to have to work on each one of those areas,” said Donaldson. For APEX, a medium-sized business of about 250 people, 70 of whom work specifically in aerospace, finding and retaining talent is the issue that keeps most senior managers awake at night, he added. The association will also be looking for quick progress on some of the recommendations aimed at strengthening the capacity of Transport Canada. “They are already a world class organization. We are not starting from zero on that one,” noted Donaldson. However, much of the early effort will go to growing SMEs, which account for over 95 per cent of the aerospace sector. It's terrain Donaldson knows well and believes can be improved through initiatives to build on government programs that are already in place. “We are going to be taking what's already working and say, we want to expand some of these programs. That is going to give us some early wins,” he said. One possible tool could be the expansion of Quebec's MACH program, which has provided mentorship from OEMs and Tier 1s to SMEs to help improve business processes and make the transition to digital systems. “From an SME perspective, that program is one of the ways to go because it involves a larger company, the SME, the province, and support nationally,” observed Donaldson. Support and mentoring from larger businesses for digitization and best cyber practices are a critical need for smaller companies, he added, noting that many capture “thousands of pieces of data every day” and don't make as much use of the information as they should. “The new protocol for Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification in the U.S. is going to be applied to every single company in aerospace and defence, no matter where you are,” he said. “[These are areas] where a MACH-type program could hugely benefit SMEs across the country.” He cautioned, though, that while the emphasis must be on growing SMEs, those small companies often rely on strong OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) and Tier 1 suppliers for their export opportunities. In APEX's case, that's about 50 per cent of the business. “We need to keep the OEMs and large Tier 1s healthy in Canada,” he said. “The MACH [programs] of the world are only going to work well if Pratt & Whitney, Bombardier, Bell, IMP, Magellan, if they grow and invest in Canada. That goes back to a part of the overall Vision 2025.” During separate addresses to the aerospace summit, both Donaldson and Mann appealed to fellow executives to get involved in the process. Committees are the “place where our company can impact and shape the issues that are important to our business,” observed Mann. “There is a lot to making Vision 2025 a reality . . . and we need everyone's help to do that, to make sure aerospace is a key part of our new government's new strategy.” AIAC will continue to lobby the federal and provincial governments on the Vision 2025 recommendations, especially the 48 MPs whose ridings including substantial aerospace activity, and will serve as secretariat to a newly re-created all-party aerospace caucus in Ottawa. Speed is of the essence said Donaldson, noting the pace with which other jurisdictions are growing their aerospace capabilities. “We do not have the luxury [of time],” he said. “It's not like we have Vision 2025 and then there's a whole other plan. Vision 2025 is going to drive the industry. Period.” https://www.skiesmag.com/news/incoming-aiac-chair-discusses-aerospace-vision

Toutes les nouvelles