Parliamentary budget officer to examine Liberal government decision to buy F-35

Sur le même sujet

• 

  10 juillet 2020 | Local, Aérospatial

  Les Alpha-Jet de la Défense vendus à la société canadienne Top Aces

  Les Alpha-Jet de la Défense vendus à la société canadienne Top Aces. La Défense belge a revendu 25 de ses anciens avions d'entraînement Alpha-Jet à une société canadienne, Top Aces, spécialisée dans l'entraînement au combat aérien au profit de différentes forces aériennes. Depuis la fermeture de l'école franco-belge de pilotes de chasse de Cazaux en France le 11 octobre 2018, les Alpha-Jet ont été retirés du service. Ils sont encore restés un an en France à disposition de l'Armée de l'Air française le temps de solder les comptes de l'AJeTS. Depuis leur retour en Belgique, ils sont stockés sur la base de Beauchevain. La société canadienne Top Aces serait responsable du démontage et du transport des appareils selon l'agence Belga. Le dossier de la vente des Alpha-Jet a été lancé en 2018. Neuf candidats avaient été retenus par la Défense en décembre 2019 et devaient soumettre une nouvelle offre. La société canadienne Top Aces possède déjà une vingtaine d'Alpha-Jet utilisée par la Luftwaffe, l'armée de l'air allemande, plus 7 A-4 Skyhawk et les 3 Learjet 35 (sans compter d'autres appareils civils en plus petites quantités). Des F-16 devraient bientôt les rejoindre pour compléter l'offre. Selon le blog français Lignes de Défense, cet achat n'est pas surprenant car Top Aces fait partie des sociétés choisies par l'USAF, l'armée de l'air américaine, pour le gros contrat d'externalisation des services ADAIR (adversary air). Top Aces se doit donc d'augmenter sa flotte d'Alpha-Jet. D'autres armées de l'air font appel à ses services pour l'entrainement de leurs pilotes (la Luftwaffe, la Royal Canadian Air Force et la Royal Australian Air Force). Ces programmes comprennent tant le combat air-air qu'air-sol (formation de JTAC), la défense anti-aérienne à partir de navire ou encore la réalisation de mission ISR. L'entreprise emploie une quarantaine de pilotes issu des armées de l'air américaine, canadienne, allemande et australienne (dont une grande partie est diplômée de l'école Top Gun). L'Alpha-Jet est un appareil de conception franco-allemande qui a effectué son premier vol en 1973 et qui est entré en service dans différentes armées de l'air en 1979. Il a été un réel succès de l'aéronautique avec plus de 500 appareils construits et une carrière loin d'être terminée. Conçu en deux versions (entrainement et attaque au sol), 12 armées de l'air à travers le monde y ont ou y ont eu recours. La Belgique a commandé 33 appareils, assemblés par la SABCA, et livrés entre 1978 et 1980. Quatre d'entre eux ont été perdus durant leur carrière. Durant presque quinze ans et jusqu'en 2018, 165 pilotes de chasse de la Composante Air ont été formés à Cazaux en France au sein de l'école franco-belge de pilotes de chasse sur l'Alpha-Jet. Avec la décision de ne pas remplacer les Alpha-Jet, la Défense s'est tournée vers l'Euro-NATO Joint Jet Pilot Training (ENJJPT), une école installée sur la base aérienne Sheppard, dans le nord du Texas, pour former ses pilotes de chasse. La formation est moins coûteuse pour la Défense belge. En 2017, le ministre de la Défense Steven Vandeput estimait à environ 1,3 millions de dollars la formation de 18 mois aux USA. « L'économie pour la Défense est difficile à chiffrer mais, étant donné qu'il n'y aura pas d'investissement dans un nouvel avion d'instruction (le life cycle cost étalé sur 20 ans pour une flotte d'environ 15 avions est estimé à +/- 750 millions d'euros) et qu'on pourra aussi épargner sur les coûts d'infrastructure et de personnel, on peut présumer que celle-ci sera importante », expliquait-il dans une réponse écrite à la député Karolien Grosemans (N-VA). Le personnel détaché est aussi moins important passant de 40 personnes (pilotes, personnel administratif et techniciens) à 10 personnes. En plus d'économies de coût et personnel, le ministre Steven Vandeput défendait ce choix par l'absence de solution alternative au niveau européen, l'Armée de l'Air française n'ayant à cette époque pas encore de solution pour son Fast Jet Training. Actuellement, les élèves pilotes suivent un tronc commun de formation sur les Marchetti à Beauchevain avant de se séparer dans leur filière spécifique. Mais le ministère de la Défense envisage aussi de recourir à l'outsourcing au lieu de remplacer les Marchetti, qui arrivent en fin de vie. Les pilotes d'avions de transport ou d'hélicoptères sont toujours formés en France. Article co-écrit avec Pierre Brassart https://defencebelgium.com/2020/07/09/les-alpha-jet-de-la-defense-vendus-a-la-societe-canadienne-top-aces/

• 

  4 février 2019 | Local, Terrestre

  Too soon to think about INF withdrawal ripple effects on Canada: Defence Minister

  By Charlie Pinkerton The United States will no longer abide by its nuclear arms agreement with Russia and will be removing itself from the treaty in six months if Russia doesn't come back into its compliance, but Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan said it's too early to think about what the ripple effects could be for Canada. In a written statement, U.S. President Donald Trump said his country will be removing itself from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. Russia and the United States agreed to the treaty in 1987. It eliminated all nuclear and conventional missiles and launchers that had ranges of 500 to 5,500 kilometres. Trump said the U.S. will no longer abide by the treaty as of Saturday and will formally withdrawal in six months. “The United States has complied with the INF Treaty for more than 30 years, but we will not be held back while Russia cheats,” says the White House statement, which repeatedly blames Russia for not conforming to the requirements of the arms treaty. “We agree with our allies' assessment that Russia has been in a breach of the INF Treaty,” Sajjan said. Sajjan said that he and new acting Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan didn't discuss the INF “directly” today in Washington, where Sajjan had his first meeting with Shanahan since he's been acting as the U.S. defence chief. Shanahan was previously the deputy secretary of defence but was appointed to the more senior role in an acting capacity after Jim Mattis resigned following U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement of his intention to remove American troops from Syria. “For non-proliferation and (nuclear) disarmament to occur, everyone needs to make sure they're in compliance with the treaty,” Sajjan said. According to the statement from the White House, only Russia's destruction of its INF-violating missiles and launches will keep the U.S. in compliance and stop them from withdrawing completely in August. The defence minister acknowledged that a treaty-free Russia could cause uneasiness for Canadian and U.S. allies in Europe, but that it's too early to say what the impacts could be domestically. “It's important for us to send a unified message to Russia to come back to the rules based order so that we can maintain the stability that we have known for some time,” Sajjan said. “This decision solely rests on the actions of Russia. There is opportunity still for Russia to come and be verifiably compliant and ... we can always hope that they can come into compliance,” said the defence minister. https://ipolitics.ca/2019/02/01/too-soon-to-think-about-inf-withdrawal-ripple-effects-on-canada-defence-minister/

• 

  11 juin 2020 | Local, Aérospatial, Naval, Terrestre, C4ISR, Sécurité

  Military spending needed more now than ever, top defence official says

  Lee Berthiaume The Canadian PressStaff Contact Published Thursday, June 11, 2020 4:20AM EDT OTTAWA -- The Defence Department's top civilian official is touting the importance of continued investments in the Canadian Armed Forces, and says she has received no indications the Liberal government is planning to cut spending because of the COVID-19 crisis. The comments by Defence Department deputy minister Jody Thomas come amid questions about how the Liberal government plans to find the tens of billions of dollars doled out in recent months to support Canadians during the pandemic. The emergency support, estimated at $153 billion at last count, has far surpassed expected government spending and significant belt-tightening is likely after the crisis as Ottawa will start searching for ways to keep the country from drowning in red ink. Military spending was previously slashed in the 1990s as Jean Chretien's Liberal government wrestled with massive deficits while Stephen Harper's Conservative government followed a similar course after the 2008-09 financial crash. That has prompted concerns within defence circles that the pattern will repeat itself after COVID-19, with fears the Liberals will lean heavily on the country's $29-billion defence budget to help get government spending back under control. In an interview with The Canadian Press, Thomas said she had not received any order or direction to slow or cut defence spending and that officials are continuing to work on the planned purchase of new warships, fighter jets and other equipment. "We are not experiencing any slowdowns," she said. "We are continuing very aggressively and ambitiously to continue our plan." That plan is the Liberals' defence strategy, which it released in 2017. Known as Strong, Secure, Engaged (SSE), the strategy promised $553 billion in military spending over 20 years. Much of that is to buy new equipment such as jets and warships. "There has been zero indication from anyone that there would be a cut to the budget," Thomas said, adding Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan "has been very clear of his expectations of us to execute on SSE." She went on to suggest the planned defence spending is actually needed as much now as before the pandemic as the crisis amplifies the already significant global uncertainty that existed before COVID-19. A scan of recent headlines underscores that uncertainty, from U.S. President Donald Trump's administration suggesting it may pull troops from Germany to China imposing its will on Hong Kong and flexing its muscles in the South China Sea. There are also ongoing concerns about Russia and the situation in the Middle East. "Canada has to be equipped," Thomas said. "In a post-COVID world, there is, I would say as the deputy minister of defence, a need for SSE to in fact be done more quickly rather than slow it down or cut the budget." The government last week tabled its latest request for money in Parliament, which included $585 million for the continued construction of two new naval support ships in Vancouver. The first of those ships is due in 2023. Defence analyst David Perry of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute said the Liberals have significantly ramped up military spending, but no one knows how fast the economy will recover or how deep Ottawa will be in the hole when the pandemic ends. "Without knowing more about these things, it's way too early to know what the impact will be to defence," he said. "But it's a basic fact of Canadian federal budgeting that if a government is looking to reduce all federal spending, DND plays a part in that because it spends the most money." And while trimming military spending was the route taken by previous governments, there are implications, as evidenced by the age of Canada's CF-18s and other old equipment and its lack of naval support vessels until the new ones are finished. "Part of the reason we're having issues with procurement today is because of the decisions that were taken before," Perry said. "The reasons they were taken -- rightly or wrongly, I would say largely rightly -- in the 1990s to reduce spending then, we're still dealing with the after-effects of it now because we didn't buy stuff then and we're trying to make up for lost time now." This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 11, 2020. https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/military-spending-needed-more-now-than-ever-top-defence-official-says-1.4979395