21 septembre 2018 | International, Aérospatial

‘I’ll be their angel investor’: Air Force vice chief wants to crowdsource airmen’s ideas

By:

As the U.S. military turns its attention to the threats posed by near-peer adversaries, Air Force leadership is shifting its focus to great power approaches to combat, like multi-domain operations and expeditionary warfare.

A culture of innovation among airmen will be pivotal in preparing for such a conflict, and the effort to foster that independence and creativity is already underway.

In the coming weeks, the Air Force will be rolling out a new initiative to crowdsource solutions from airmen around the service.

Across all specialty codes, the service is calling on airmen to design apps, develop algorithms and create new approaches to the problems that plague their career fields or help the Air Force carry out its missions.

The program — dubbed the Vice Chief's Challenge — will be spearheaded by Air Force Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Stephen Wilson.

“We want to take the ideas our airmen have to see around corners, anticipate what's next and solve these really complex national security challenges,” Wilson told Air Force Times.

Those challenges range from fusing open-source social media information into actionable intelligence with new software, to upgrading legacy aircraft with gadgets to help airmen stay in the fight longer.

“Navigation apps like Waze change the way we travel across town by giving us an intuitive display that integrates traffic, hazards, and route recommendations in real time. Companies like Uber and Amazon have transformed our view of logistics," according to a copy of the Vice Chief's Challenge provided to Air Force Times. "They are not the only ones leaning forward. I am sure each of you have seen opportunities to enhance [multi-domain operations]. I want to hear your best ideas.”

The initiative is designed to deliver capabilities to the Air Force in months, rather than the usual years, Wilson said. And it's going to become routine, always running against the backdrop of the service's other acquisition initiatives.

“It's this cultural change and this shift that happens ... and today, I think it's clear in this great power competition, we need this urgently," Wilson said. “I need to remove barriers to innovation."

The Vice Chief's Challenge will consist of three phases. First, ideas will be solicited from across the service in a broad announcement. Then, workshops will be set up in which subject matter experts help refine the most promising proposals and draft development plans for the budding ideas. The final phase will involve developing and demonstrating prototypes for the chosen concepts.

“We'll start small by gathering ideas from individual airmen, rapidly evolve concepts with national thought leaders, and scale fast by working with industry to build and demonstrate prototypes in the next year,” Wilson said.

Each phase will be led by a different organization, but the Air Force Research Lab and the Office of the Vice Chief of Staff will serve as executive agents to ensure smooth transition between phases.

The initiative is similar to last year's first-ever Spark Tank innovation proposals.

“Each of the [major commands] went out to their different wings and solicited ideas, picked their best ones and came to us," Wilson said. "There were a dozen ideas, of which we picked six of them and presented them at the [Warfighter's Edge] conference.”

The idea chosen for development ended up being that of a boom operator on the KC-135 Stratotanker. He proposed a plan to re-engineer the boom operator platform instructor position for the entire KC-135 fleet at a projected cost of $1.5 million. The proposed innovation aims to both reduce back and neck injuries and save the Air Force $132 million each year in this critical aircrew specialty, according to Air Mobility Command.

“It was across the fleet, easy to implement, and that's what we're using now,” Wilson said.

Other innovative ideas that Wilson has already seen, and clearly wants more of, involve software development that connects sensors, platforms and nodes to share information across the force.

“We had an airman and second lieutenant who briefed me on software development they had done that was unbelievable — the capability they were bringing me and the speed at which they were doing it,” Wilson said.

The duo took SIPRNet information and found a way to fuse it together using complex computer coding for targeting purposes. The result was a tool dreamed up in-house that directly solved a pressing issue.

Much of that is simply owed to the fact that those airmen knew what they needed to do, how to do it and already worked in a position to provide the service.

“The CEO of Pivotal [Software Inc.] pulled me aside and said ‘I work with all the Fortune 500 companies across the world, and I would put these two people against any company, anywhere,'” Wilson said.

That's the sort of innovation the Vice Chief's Challenge is looking to tap into.

Wilson doesn't know yet how many ideas will be taken to completion, but by this time next year, he's hoping that the Vice Chief's Challenge will be handing out some awards.

“I can't compensate them like industry can, but I can offer them purpose," he said.

https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2018/09/20/ill-be-their-angel-investor-air-force-vice-chief-wants-to-crowdsource-airmens-ideas

Sur le même sujet

  • Updating software in flight? The Air Force may be close.

    17 septembre 2020 | International, Aérospatial

    Updating software in flight? The Air Force may be close.

    Andrew Eversden WASHINGTON — The U.S. Air Force will soon announce that the service can update an aircraft's software while in flight, the Air Force's chief software officer said Tuesday. Nicolas Chaillan, the service's software czar, hinted at the announcement during a wide-ranging interview on a webcast hosted by C4ISRNET, but he declined to share which aircraft could handle the upgrade before the formal announcement is made. The update is part of a larger push by the Air Force to modernize its software practices. However, Chaillan described the news as a “gamechanger” and offered insight into the challenges associated with updating software during flights. “We need to decouple the flight controls, the [open mission systems], all the air worthiness piece of the software from the rest of the mission [and] capability of [that] software so we can update those more frequently without disrupting or putting lives at risk when it comes to the flying piece of the jet or the system,” Chaillan said. A formal announcement could follow in coming days. The Air Force is embracing agile development and DevSecOps in several of its programs to accelerate development time and deploy tools faster. Critical to this effort has been two Air Force environments — Cloud One and Platform One. Platform One, which was recently deemed an enterprise solution by the Department of Defense, is a software development platform that hosts a broad range of DoD components, including the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center. The JAIC moved to the Air Force platform as it awaits the results of an ongoing court battle between Amazon Web Services and Microsoft over the Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure, or JEDI cloud. Chaillan said the F-35 program is also planning to move to Platform One soon. He added that he wants the platform to serve as a “software factory as a service.” In the next 12 to 18 months, Chaillan said that he sees the service continuing to add artificial intelligence and machine learning into its systems at scale. Both Cloud One and Platform One will be critical to the development of those systems. Cloud One, a multi-cloud environment with Microsoft and AWS, will also be looking to add new vendors “down the road,” Chaillan said. The Air Force's decision to go the multi-award route over the single award structure like JEDI made sense because of the advancement of cloud technology taken by the Air Force, Chaillan said. “When JEDI started, it did make sense to have a single award because cloud is very hard and very complex and it did makes sense to start there. Would I do that now? Probably not. I think technology changed,” Chaillan said. https://www.c4isrnet.com/battlefield-tech/it-networks/2020/09/15/updating-software-in-flight-the-air-force-may-be-close/

  • House Appropriators Add 12 F-35s, Boost Weapons Spending, But…

    8 juillet 2020 | International, Aérospatial, Naval

    House Appropriators Add 12 F-35s, Boost Weapons Spending, But…

    "To us, it means that there is going to be much more tension and debate over future modernization programs as flat investment will not enable DoD to recapitalize in a timely and militarily relevant pace," says defense analyst Byron Callan. By COLIN CLARKon July 07, 2020 at 7:38 PM WASHINGTON: House appropriators made their first cut at the annual defense spending bill today, approving spending $3.5 billion below the Trump Administration's request — although lawmakers added a substantial $4.1 billion for several weapons systems, including 12 additional F-35s. Overall, the House Appropriations Committee trimmed $3.5 billion from the Trump Administration's 2021 budget request while still fully paying for a 3% pay raise and force structure increases to all but the Marines, who will lose 2,100 people. The appropriators approval of an increase in F-35 buys makes it unlikely the House Armed Services Committee's skepticism of the Joint Strike Fighter program will prevail. The HASC added no more planes above the administration request for 79 aircraft of all three models and docked at least a score of supporting line items by a total of $561 million. By contrast the SASC added $1.36 billion to buy more Air Force F-35As, Marine F-35Bs, and Navy F-35Cs, plus spare parts. In other bump ups, the HAC funds 11 V-22 aircraft, adding $1.1 billion to buy two more than the request. It also adds three P-8A Poseidon aircraft for the Navy Reserve, three more than the request for an additional $510 million. And echoing the House authorizing committee's support, the HAC added 16 MQ-9 Reaper unmanned aerial vehicles to the Pentagon request, for a cost of $344 million. But making sense of the HAC-D bill is difficult because it's not yet clear what and where they've cut, as veteran defense stock analyst Byron Callan notes. It all gets complicated by the CARES Act and adjustments to contracts that have been made. Overall, Callan says, it looks as if fiscal 2020 — last year — may have been the peak of whatever Trump defense boost there has been. But it's all uncertain. “Absent the pandemic budget impacts, however, the markups so far suggest that FY20 was a peak for DoD investment. This does not mean investment is at the peak and headed fast downhill in FY21 and beyond,” Callan writes. “To us, it means that there is going to be much more tension and debate over future modernization programs as flat investment will not enable DoD to recapitalize in a timely and militarily relevant pace.” https://breakingdefense.com/2020/07/house-appropriators-add-12-f-35s-boost-weapons-spending-but/

  • L'achat d'un nouvel avion de combat, un choix militaire et diplomatique

    10 décembre 2019 | International, Aérospatial

    L'achat d'un nouvel avion de combat, un choix militaire et diplomatique

    Le Rafale, l'Eurofighter, le F-35A ou le F/A-18 Super Hornet: quel nouvel avion de combat la Suisse choisira-t-elle? La décision sera politique. Mais ce choix n'est pas qu'une question de technologie. L'enjeu est aussi diplomatique. Les 26 vieux Tiger et les 30 F/A-18 de l'armée suisse arriveront à la fin de leur durée d'utilisation au plus tard vers 2030. Après le retrait du suédois Saab, constructeur du Gripen, il ne reste plus que quatre constructeurs en lice pour les remplacer: le français Dassault (Rafale), l'européen Airbus (Eurofighter) et les américains Boeing (F/A-18 Super Hornet) et Lockheed-Martin (F-35A). Les quatre jets ont été évalués entre avril et juin sur la base aérienne de Payerne (VD). Objectif: tester leurs capacités en conditions réelles. Au terme de l'appel d'offres, le Département fédéral de la défense effectuera une recommandation fondée sur l'efficacité opérationnelle, mais aussi sur d'autres critères comme les coûts d'achat et d'exploitation. La décision finale reviendra au Conseil fédéral. Quel avion pour quel partenaire? La compétition entre les quatre candidats se jouera sur les capacités de l'appareil mais aussi sur les contreparties industrielles - les affaires compensatoires - exigées par la Suisse. Moins visible, il existe aussi un autre enjeu, plus diplomatique. Pour le comprendre, la RTS s'est rendue dans la capitale française. Le ministère français des Armées, qui chapeaute l'offre pour le Rafale, lui a exceptionnellement ouvert ses portes. La France, cinquième puissance militaire mondiale, n'exporte pas ses armes comme elle exporte ses voitures, explique Thierry Carlier, chargé du dossier côté français. "Qu'un pays ami acquiert un système qui est le même que celui de la France permet de développer des partenariats très importants. C'est pour ça que notre offre dépasse largement la question du Rafale", affirme-t-il. Pour le directeur du développement international de la Direction générale de l'armement (DGA), cette notion de partenariat est importante. Acheter un avion français permettrait de créer des opportunités au niveau technologique, avec des échanges, mais également sur un plan plus opérationnel: réalisation d'exercices communs, utilisation par la Suisse de terrains d'entraînement français, développement des missions de police du ciel existantes, partage d'expériences, etc. "Europe de la défense" La France n'est pas la seule à vouloir séduire la Suisse avec un partenariat. C'est aussi le cas de l'Allemagne, qui vend l'Eurofighter, fabriqué par Airbus. Acheter cet avion, c'est s'allier davantage à l'Allemagne, comme le relevait ce printemps le lieutenant-colonel de l'armée de l'air allemande Ingo Stüer lors de la présentation de l'Eurofighter à Payerne. "Je pense que les défis pour les armées de l'air en Europe sont tous les mêmes, affirmait-il. Pour l'armée de l'air allemande, c'est important d'être interopérable avec nos alliés, afin d'être capable d'agir ensemble s'il le faut. C'est pourquoi nous cherchons une coopération très étroite avec l'armée de l'air suisse." La France et l'Allemagne, avec leurs offres, proposent aussi à la Suisse "l'Europe de la défense", une certaine vision d'une Europe géographique souveraine défendue par Emmanuel Macron. "Je pense qu'il y a une cohérence des Européens à s'équiper en européen. Je défends beaucoup cette idée", expliquait en juin dernier le président français à la RTS. L'argument économique Si cette "Europe de la défense" n'intéresse pas la Suisse, il reste les deux chasseurs américains. Lors des essais du F/A-18 Super Hornet et du F-35A à Payerne, l'ambassadeur des Etats-Unis en Suisse Edward McMullen adoptait d'ailleurs des arguments différents de ses concurrents européens. Un style diplomatique davantage porté sur les enjeux économiques. "Lorsqu'on parle de développement économique et d'opportunités de marchés, il s'agit d'un partenariat. Nous sommes conscients que la Suisse est neutre et il n'y a aucune alliance avec elle", explique-t-il. Un vote sur le principe, pas sur l'avion L'Europe ou les Etats-Unis? Pour quel partenariat? Le Conseil fédéral se réserve ce choix. Sur ce point, le peuple n'aura pas son mot à dire. Il ne votera que sur l'enveloppe de six milliards de francs destinée à l'acquisition des nouveaux avions de combat sans connaître le nom de son futur partenaire. La votation devrait intervenir à l'automne 2020. https://www.rts.ch/info/suisse/10922471-l-achat-d-un-nouvel-avion-de-combat-un-choix-militaire-et-diplomatique.html

Toutes les nouvelles