Retour aux nouvelles

10 juin 2019 | International, Autre défense

How industry can build better AI for the military

By:

As AI becomes more prominent in the national security community, officials are grappling with where to use it most effectively.

During a panel discussion at the C4ISRNET conference June 6, leaders discussed the role of industry building AI that will be used by the military.

After studying small and big companies creating AI technology, Col. Stoney Trent, the chief of operations at the Pentagon's Joint Artificial Intelligence Center, said he found commercial groups do not have the same motivations that exist in the government.

“Commercial groups are poorly incentivized for rigorous testing. For them that represents a business risk,” Trent said. Because of this, he the government needs to work with the commercial sector to create these technologies.

“What the Defense Department has to offer in this space is encouragement, an incentive structure for better testing tools and methods that allows us to understand how a product is going to perform when we are under conditions of national consequence because I can't wait,” Trent said. “Hopefully, the nation will be at peace long enough to not have a high bandwidth of experiences with weapons implementations, but when that happens, we need them to absolutely work. That's a quality of commercial technology development.”

For this to take place, the Department of Defense needs to help create the right environment.

“All of this is predicated on the Pentagon doing things as well,” said Kara Frederick, associate fellow for the technology and national security program at the Center for a New American Security. “Making an environment conducive to the behaviors that you are seeking to encourage. That environment can be the IT environment, common standards for data processing, common standards for interactions with industry, I think would help.”

Panelists said national security leaders also need to weigh the risks of relying more on AI technology, one of which is non-state actors using AI for nefarious purposes.

Trent said he sees AI as the new arms race but noted that in this arena, destruction may be easier than creation.

“AI is the modern-day armor anti-armor arms race,” Trent said. “The Joint AI Center, one of the important features of it is that it does offer convergence for best practices, data sources, data standards, etc. The flip side is we fully understand there are a variety of ways you can undermine artificial intelligence and most of those are actually easier than developing good resilient AI.”

Frederick said part of this problem stems from the structure of the AI community.

“I think what's so singular about the AI community, especially the AI research community, is that its so open,” Frederick said. “Even at Facebook, we open source some of these algorithms and we put it our there for people to manipulate. [There is this] idea that non-state actors, especially those without strategic intent or ones that we can't pin strategic intent to, could get a hold of some of these ways to code in certain malicious inputs [and] we need to start being serious about it.”

However, before tackling any of these problems, leaders need to first decide when it is appropriate to use AI

Rob Monto, lead of the Army's Advanced Concepts and Experimentation office, described this process as an evolution that takes place between AI and its users.

“AI is like electricity,” he said. “It can be anywhere and everywhere. You can either get electrocuted by it or you target specific applications for it. You need to know what you want the AI to do, and then you spend months and years building out. If you don't have your data set available, you do that upfront architecture and collection of information. Then you train your algorithms and build that specifically to support that specific use case...AI is for targeted applications to aid decisions, at least in the military space, to aid the user.”

Once the decision is made how and where to use AI, there are other technologies that must make advances to meet AI. One the biggest challenges, said Chad Hutchinson, director of engineering at the Crystal Group., is the question of hardware and characteristics such as thermal performance.

“AI itself is pushing the boundaries of what the hardware can do,” Hutchinson said.

Hardware technology is not the only obstacle in AI's path. These issues could stem from policy or human resource shortfalls.

“What we find is the non-technology barriers are far more significant than the technology barriers,” Trent said.

https://www.c4isrnet.com/show-reporter/c4isrnet-conference/2019/06/09/how-industry-can-build-better-ai-for-the-military/

Sur le même sujet

  • Vente d'armes : Airbus envisage de porter plainte contre Berlin

    6 mai 2019 | International, Aérospatial

    Vente d'armes : Airbus envisage de porter plainte contre Berlin

    Par Bruno TREVIDIC La décision du gouvernement allemand de suspendre les exportations d'armes à l'Arabie saoudite a déjà coûté à Airbus plus de 190 millions d'euros. L'embargo allemand sur les ventes d'armes à l'Arabie saoudite a coûté très cher à Airbus et le groupe d'aéronautique et défense envisage désormais de présenter la facture à Berlin. Selon un article du « Spiegel » publié vendredi, Airbus envisagerait de porter plainte devant les tribunaux allemands, contre la décision du gouvernement fédéral. « Nous nous réservons la possibilité d'engager un recours », a confirmé un porte-parole du groupe. Un impact de 190 millions d'euros Lors de la présentation des résultats du premier trimestre , le 30 avril, les dirigeants d'Airbus avaient chiffré à 190 millions d'euros, l'impact financier de la suspension des licences d'exportation de matériel militaire à l'Arabie saoudite. Une somme à laquelle s'ajouterait une partie des 83 millions d'euros « liés à l'écart de comptabilisation des paiements avant livraisons et aux réévaluations bilancielles ». De quoi expliquer partiellement la forte baisse du résultat net d'Airbus au premier trimestre. Un contrat de 2,5 milliards d'euros Pour le groupe européen, la potion est d'autant plus amère que le principal contrat avec l'Arabie saoudite visé par cet embargo allemand ne porte pas véritablement sur des ventes d'armes. Il s'agit d'un contrat signé dès 2009 pour un système complet de sécurisation des 9.000 km de frontières du royaume, associant tous les moyens de détection et de surveillance, d'une valeur totale d'environ 2,5 milliards d'euros, et qui devait être partiellement fabriqué sur le site Airbus de Donauwörth, près de Munich. D'où l'envie d'aller en contester la légalité devant les tribunaux allemands. Exportations impopulaires Toutefois d'autres programmes militaires auxquels le groupe Airbus participe sont également concernés par le gel des exportations d'armes à Ryad, parmi lesquelles les avions de combat Eurofighter Typhoon, l'avion de ravitaillement en vol A330 MRTT, des hélicoptères, des missiles MBDA... A tel point que plusieurs des partenaires européens de l'Allemagne, au premier rang desquels la France , se sont émus de cette situation. Sans effet jusqu'à présent sur le gouvernement d'Angela Merkel, qui sait l'impopularité des ventes d'armes au sein de son opinion publique. La décision de Berlin de stopper les ventes d'armes à l'Arabie saoudite avait été annoncée en octobre dernier, suite à l'émotion suscitée par l'assassinat du journaliste Jamal Khashoggi au consulat d'Arabie saoudite à Istanbul. A l'époque, Berlin avait toutefois évoqué une mesure provisoire. Mais depuis, ce moratoire a déjà été prolongé à trois reprises, rendant de plus en plus improbable la réalisation des contrats. Bruno Trévidic https://www.lesechos.fr/industrie-services/air-defense/vente-darmes-airbus-envisage-de-porter-plainte-contre-berlin-1016128

  • Soldiers to get a say in light tank competition

    15 octobre 2019 | International, Terrestre

    Soldiers to get a say in light tank competition

    By: Jen Judson WASHINGTON — Two companies are competing to build the Army's new light tank for Infantry Brigade Combat Teams and, in order to win, their prototypes will be judged by the users themselves. Those tests will be part of an extensive evaluation beginning roughly a year from now, Maj. Gen. Brian Cummings, Army program executive officer for ground combat systems, told Defense News. BAE Systems and General Dynamics Land Systems were chosen in December 2018 to build 12 prototypes each of the Army's future Mobile Protected Firepower vehicle identified in the Army's ground combat vehicle strategy, released in 2015, as much needed capability the service lacked. GDLS will build a vehicle that takes the United Kingdom's AJAX chassis and combines it with an Abrams turret. BAE Systems will bring an M8 Buford Armored Gun System with new capabilities and components. The MPF is going to be critical for the infantry, according to Brig. Gen. Ross Coffman, who is in charge of combat vehicle modernization. “Looking in every war movie ever watched, the infantry has been pinned down and they have a machine gun nest or another enemy vehicle that's preventing them to get their objective,” Coffman said. “It takes an Audie Murphy-like character to go up and sneak around and take it out from the rear.” MPF is going to take care of those impediments to forward progression, he said, and is a “vital piece of equipment for our Army. Right now we are doing that with Humvees and Javelin.” The soldier vehicle assessment will take place at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, and Fort Stewart, Georgia, and will include live-fire tests and operating in IBCT formations, Cummings said. The assessment will not just cover how the vehicles perform operationally, but how they hold up when assessed against warfighting doctrine, organization, training, maintenance in the field, logistics and sustainment. “This will be different, even though we've done it in history,” Cummings said. A team will look at doctrine in terms of having a light tank in the formation as well as having mechanics, fuel and the ability to recover vehicles as part of the operational assessment. “It's important we learn that early on,” in the prototyping process rather than after choosing a winning vehicle, Cummings noted. The Army is now reviewing design maturity of the vehicles and is making sure that everything stays on track to meet the soldier vehicle assessment requirements. These prototypes have to be ready for prime time when they get into an operational environment toward the end of next year, according to Cummings. Cummings also has two groups working with each vendor that are firewalled from one another. Those groups will be working with vendors through the SVA and to eventual down-select to one vehicle around the second or third quarter of fiscal year 2022 to go into production. The prototypes are expected in the third quarter of fiscal 2021. The first units will get MPF by FY25. The Army plans build 26 vehicles initially with an option to build 28 more and retrofit eight prototypes. https://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/ausa/2019/10/15/soldiers-to-get-a-say-in-light-tank-competition

  • Sweden selects Embraer cargo plane, Brazil plans to buy more Saab fighters

    10 novembre 2024 | International, C4ISR, Sécurité

    Sweden selects Embraer cargo plane, Brazil plans to buy more Saab fighters

Toutes les nouvelles