Back to news

December 14, 2018 | International, Land

Need to upgrade Army vehicle software? Got 10 minutes?

By:

The Army is rolling out a new streamlined tool for updating critical software on thousands of vehicles that use the Joint Battle Command-Platform (JBC-P) system.

Vehicles depend on the Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and Below system to deliver communications, friendly and hostile-force tracking, maps and other key intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance functionality. But FBCB2 is out of date, and upgrades have required the pricey and time-consuming replacement of both hardware and software.

“We wanted to give war fighters the option of doing a software-only upgrade,” said Dan Ghio, JBC-P deputy product manager. “We will still hit them with the full hardware upgrade eventually. This just gets us to a more common software baseline in the meantime. It's a stopgap for those who can get at least some of the upgrades done.”

The upgrades started rolling out in the spring and so far over 800 vehicles have completed the process. Of the 103,000 fielded platforms, roughly 20,000 to 30,000 can be updated using the new approach, which applies to platforms such as Humvees and Mine-Resistant Ambushed-Protected vehicles. All upgrades should be completed by fiscal 2023, said Lt. Col. Shane Sims, JBC-P product manager.

“We started with a unit at the National Training Center at Fort Irwin, California, just to see if we were on track,” Sims said. “The process is pretty easy. You call our help center and our folks will send out a new hard drive with the new software loaded on it. Once you attach it to the system it's a 10-minute process to load it up.”

While it would have been technically possible to upload the software via the internet, connectivity constraints made the hard drive a better option. “These are users with very limited bandwidth. It would take a very long time to fully download a new operating system,” Sims said.

By sending out new hard drives, the engineers also help to position the system for future enhancements, while reducing the overall burden of system support.

“We want to keep pushing more and more capabilities out into the field, but right now our support teams in the field have to support 18 different hard drives. There is a huge sustainment cost to supporting all of that,” Sims said. “We're a huge Army and the more we standardize, the better it is.”

The latest software version includes a few significant functional enhancements. The user interface has been modernized and made more intuitive; engineers have hardened the security on the back end and made the system more reliable, Ghio said.

By creating a “standardized, repeatable and intuitive process” for upgrades, he said, Army aims to empower war fighters to take control over their most critical technologies.

“We believe solders and commanders can take on some of the [technology] mission themselves if given the right tools and the right instructions,” Sims said. “As we move to the future, we are going to have to rely on our units to modernize things on their own. That will allow us to inject new capabilities at a much faster pace.”

Looking ahead, Army engineers are still looking to overcome the bandwidth limitations that presently prohibit them from pushing out upgrades online.

“We are definitely looking at ways to do an over-the-air update,” Sims said. “It would be a lot of easier, just the same way you do an update to an iPhone or an Android. We could send a message to the entire force and have everyone updated at once. That would improve our security posture and would serve to keep everyone current.”

At the same time, safety and security concerns factor heavily, as the Army looks to enhance systems on vehicles that are equipped for live fire. “A software malfunction on a firing system would be a catastrophic event, so we have to make sure that our software doesn't interfere with any of the safety mechanisms on these platforms,” Sims said.

https://www.c4isrnet.com/it-networks/2018/12/13/need-to-upgrade-army-vehicle-software-got-10-minutes

On the same subject

  • Here’s how many foreign military sales the US State Department OK’d in FY19

    October 7, 2019 | International, Aerospace, Naval, Land, C4ISR, Security

    Here’s how many foreign military sales the US State Department OK’d in FY19

    By: Aaron Mehta WASHINGTON — The U.S. State Department cleared $67.9 billion in weapons in fiscal 2019, in an indication that America's position in the global arms trade remains strong. The number, spread across 64 individual procurement requests from 28 different countries and a NATO consortium, represents the second year in a row that the overall value of foreign military sales requests have slightly declined. But the total still represents almost double the total cleared by the State Department in fiscal year 2016. These numbers represent potential arms sales that the State Department cleared internally, then passed on to Congress through the Defense Security Cooperation Agency. The notifications do not represent final sales; if Congress does not reject the potential sale, it then goes into negotiations, during which dollar figures and quantities of equipment can change. In some cases, as highlighted by the large FMS request notification for Turkey to buy Patriot batteries, those sales will never happen. However, while not solid dollars, notifications are a notable way of tracking interest in procuring American arms from foreign partners, and can be a leading indicator of final sales to come. Geographically, the Pacific region led the way with 21 requests, totaling $24.8 billion in potential sales – notable given the emphasis put forth by the Trump administration that the Pacific represents a priority theater for the future. Following that was the Middle East, with 18 requests totaling $15.2 billion. Europe had 18 requests for $19.8 billion; the only nation from Africa, Morocco, put in six requests totaling $7.26 billion; and Canada put in three requests, for $731 million. The biggest potential customer, at a time of a whole-of-government effort against China is underway, is Taiwan. Over four different requests, Taiwan requested $10.7 billion in sales, driven primarily by $8 billion for long-sought F-16 aircraft, as well as $2 billion for Abrams tanks. In second place was Japan, with $7.54 billion in requested sales, spread over six requests. That was driven by three different tranches of SM-3 missiles and an Aegis Ashore missile defense system. Morocco, which was cleared for six separate requests totaling $7.26 billion on U.S. arms, came in third. Their procurement was driven mainly by its purchase of new F-16 fighter jets and the associated equipment, as well as a request for Abrams tanks. As always with FMS notifications, a few large sales can drive the overall total. Sixteen of the 63 sales requests topped $1 billion, led by Taiwan's F-16 request ($8 billion), Poland's F-35 request ($6.5 billion), Morocco's F-16s ($3.79 billion), the U.K's procurement of Chinook helicopters ($3.5 billion), Turkey's Patriot request ($3.5 billion) and Japan's largest SM-3 request ($3.3 billion). The F-16 was a significant driver of FMS requests this year, showing the Lockheed Martin legacy plane remains popular around the world. Eight requests, with a potential total of $15.8 billion in sales, involved the F-16, raging from the request for tranches of fighters from Taiwan, Morocco and Bulgaria to $125 million for Pakistan security support related to their F-16 fighters. While the numbers are strong, Roman Schweizer, an analyst with Cowen, notes that political realities could upend an unusual number of these potential deals in the coming year. “Notably, for FY19, there are a number of large sales that may be unlikely for political or other reasons: these include a $3.5B sale to Turkey of Raytheon's Patriot missile system, a $2B sale to Taiwan of General Dynamics' M1 Abrams tanks, and an $8B sale to Taiwan of Lockheed Martin F-16s,” he wrote in a note to investors. “We don't think a Turkish Patriot purchase is possible as they continue to own/operate Russian-made S-400s. And while Taiwan needs U.S. weapons (fighters, tanks and more), there is a legitimate concern that those sales could be halted if there is a broader strategic agreement with China on trade and economic issues. “If that's the case, about 20% of this year's potential deals aren't viable, meaning this would be a step-down year but not quite as low as FY16's $37B in announcements.” From a corporate level, Schweizer estimates Lockheed Martin is the big winner for the year with $32 billion, followed by Raytheon at $15 billion, Boeing at $9 billion, General Dynamics at $3 billion, Northrop Grumman at $1.2 billion and Textron $600 million. A specific wrinkle for FY19's accounting was the inclusion of $3.9 billion as part of a controversial emergency package pushed through by the Trump administration for Saudi Arabia and the UAE. For the better part of a year, those weapons were tied up in Congress over concerns of how they will be used as part of the Saudi-led actions against Iranian-backed fighters in Yemen, an operation that has contributed to a humanitarian crisis in that country. The issue escalated following the death of columnist Jamal Khashoggi, which has been tied to the Saudi royal family. In May, the State Department announced that an emergency exemption would be used to push those arm sales through; while the administration cited a broad threat from Iran in the region as the reason, the move received bipartisan rebuke from both the Senate and the House, with some members expressing concern this was a precedent-setting move to take away arms sale veto powers from Congress. That $3.9 billion was divided among seven FMS notifications, four for the UAE and three for Saudi Arabia. https://www.defensenews.com/global/2019/10/04/heres-how-many-foreign-military-sales-the-state-department-okd-in-fy19/

  • Augmentation du budget Défense de l’Allemagne : un challenge pour la France

    March 23, 2022 | International, Aerospace, Naval, Land, C4ISR, Security

    Augmentation du budget Défense de l’Allemagne : un challenge pour la France

    L'augmentation très forte de son budget de Défense par l'Allemagne représente un challenge pour la France, qui devra répondre avec la même ambition pour conserver son « leadership » en matière de Défense en Europe, relève La Tribune. « Pour garder son rang, la France doit répondre avec la même ambition et les mêmes objectifs en disant qu'elle va augmenter son budget et qu'elle souhaite faire des coopérations. La France doit saisir la balle au bond », estime un observateur cité par le quotidien. Le Président de la République, Emmanuel Macron, a confirmé le 17 mars la trajectoire pour 2025 de l'actuelle Loi de programmation militaire, à hauteur de 50 Md€. « Nous avons lancé plusieurs projets qui devront se poursuivre de coopérations capacitaires, et la France portera la défense d'un réinvestissement dans le fonds européen de Défense au niveau européen pour pouvoir justement aller plus loin et consolider cet effort », a-t-il précisé. « Je demanderai au chef d'état-major des Armées de pouvoir réévaluer tous les besoins qui apparaissent, à la lumière de la guerre que nous sommes en train de vivre et de la mise en œuvre de la Loi de programmation militaire depuis 2019 », a-t-il également indiqué. La Tribune du 22 mars

  • Lancement du premier appel à projets dans le cadre du fonds européen de défense

    July 5, 2021 | International, Aerospace, Naval, Land, C4ISR, Security

    Lancement du premier appel à projets dans le cadre du fonds européen de défense

    La Commission européenne a officiellement lancé hier le fonds européen de défense, créé pour cofinancer des projets de coopérations entre entreprises de défense et consolider l'autonomie européenne. Ce fonds est doté de 7,95 milliards d'euros sur huit ans pour un budget européen de 1 074 milliards d'euros (constants 2018) pour la période. Un premier appel à projets d'un montant de 1,2 milliard d'euros a été lancé. 700 millions d'euros sont consacrés à des projets d'ampleur comme le développement du futur avion de combat, la digitalisation des navires ou la défense antimissile. Cent millions sont affectés à des technologies critiques comme le cloud militaire ou l'intelligence artificielle, cent millions pour le cyber et cinquante pour l'espace. Par ailleurs, dans le cadre du programme européen de développement industriel dans le domaine de la défense (EDIDP), 100 millions d'euros sont destinés au projet de drone MALE européen et 37 millions au programme Essor de communications sécurisées. Pour Thierry Breton, « le fonds européen de défense est une contribution absolument essentielle à une plus grande souveraineté européenne », l'Union européenne devant « devenir progressivement un acteur de la sécurité au niveau mondial ». Le Figaro, 1er juillet

All news