Back to news

December 17, 2020 | Local, Aerospace, Naval, Land, C4ISR, Security

Matt Gurney: Supporting local industry shouldn't be the first consideration in military procurement

Rather than worrying about where things are built, a better question is: will Canadian soldiers be properly equipped? That's all that matters

Matt Gurney

Dec 16, 2020 • Last Updated 22 hours ago • 5 minute read

It is almost a truism in Canadian public policy: We are terrible at military procurement.

You hear that often. I've said it often. But it really isn't true. We only think we're terrible at military procurement because we are confused about what we're trying to do. Our military procurements are not about actually procuring equipment for the military. They're about creating jobs and catapulting huge sums of money into key ridings across the country.

Once you shift your perspective and look at it that way, you realize very quickly that our military procurement system is amazing. It bats a thousand. The problem isn't with the system. We've just labelled it badly. If it were called the Domestic Defence Industry Subsidy Program instead of our military procurement system, we'd all be hailing it as a shining example of a Canadian public policy triumph.

This is terrible. It has cost us the lives of our soldiers, and probably will again. But it's undeniable. Canadian politicians, Liberals and Conservatives alike, have long had the luxury of seeing defence as a cash pool, not a solemn obligation. And they sure have enjoyed that pleasure.

Two recent stories by my colleague David Pugliese for the Ottawa Citizen have explored this theme: Our efforts to replace our fleet of frigates with 15 newer, more powerful ships is turning predictably complicated. The 15 new combat ships are part of a major overhaul of the Canadian fleet, which was neglected for many years and now must be modernized all at once. In February of 2019, the government chose American defence giant Lockheed Martin to produce the ships in Canada, using a British design. (How Anglosphere of us.) Companies that weren't selected to be part of the construction or fitting out of the ships are unhappy, Pugliese noted, and aren't bothering to hide it, even though they've abandoned their legal challenges.

The sniping has continued, though, with spurned industry figures talking to the media about problems with the program. Jody Thomas, deputy minister of the Department of National Defence, reportedly told industry leaders to knock it off. “There's too much noise,” she reportedly said, adding that it was making the job of getting the new fleet built “very difficult.”

Some of Thomas's irritation is undoubtedly the automatic hostility to scrutiny, transparency and accountability that's far too common for Canadian officials — our bureaucrats are notoriously prone to trying to keep stuff tucked neatly out of public view. But some of what Thomas said is absolutely bang-on accurate: Defence industry companies know full well that the government mainly views military procurement as a jobs-creation program, so are understandably put out to not get what they think is their fair share.

Some Canadian companies have designed and developed critical communication and sensor gear for modern warships, Pugliese noted. This gear was developed with taxpayer assistance and has proven successful in service with allied fleets, but was not chosen for the new Canadian ships. And this is, the companies believe, a problem. Why aren't Canadian ships using Canadian-made gear?

It's a good question, until you think about it for a moment. Then you realize that the better question is this: will the Canadian ships be properly equipped?

That's it. That's all that matters.

Will the new ships be capable of doing the things we need them to do? If yes, then who cares where we got the gear? And if no, well, again — then who cares where we got the gear? The important thing isn't where the comm equipment and sensors were designed and built. It's that the systems work when our ships are heading into harm's way. Assuming we have many viable options to choose from, then there are plenty of good ways of making the choice — cost, proven reliability, familiarity to Canadian crews, and, sure, even whether it was made in Canada.

But supporting the local industry needs to be the last thing on the list. This stuff is essential. The lives of our sailors may depend on it working when needed. Cost matters, too, of course, because if the gear is too pricey, we won't have enough of it, but effectiveness and reliability are first.

Treating military procurement as just another federal jobs-creation program is engrained in our national thinking

But we talk about them last. Because we value it least. There probably is some value in preserving our ability to produce some essential military equipment here in Canada. The scramble earlier this year to equip our frontline medical workers with personal protective equipment is instructive. In a war, whether against a virus or a human enemy, you can't count on just buying your N-95 masks, or your torpedoes and missiles, from your normal suppliers. Unless Canada somehow gets itself into a shooting war without any of our allies in our corner, any time we are suddenly scrambling to arm up, our much larger allies are probably also scrambling to arm up, and they'll simply outbid us. (See again our current efforts to procure vaccines for an example of this unfolding in real time.)

But we aren't at war now, and we can buy the damn ships from anyone. To the government's credit, it seems to be doing this; the pushback against the program seems mostly rooted in the government's decision to let the U.S.-British consortium chosen to build the new ships equip them as they see fit. The program may well derail at some point — this is always a safe bet with Canadian shipbuilding — but insofar as at least this part of the process goes, we're doing it partially right. Yes, we're insisting on building the ships here, but we aren't getting picky about the equipment that goes into them. That's probably wise.

But that's about as far as the wisdom goes. Treating military procurement as just another federal jobs-creation program is engrained in our national thinking. It would have been good if COVID had knocked a bit of sense into us and forced us to, at long last, grow up a bit. But no dice. Oh well. Maybe next time.

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/matt-gurney-supporting-local-industry-shouldnt-be-the-first-consideration-in-military-procurement

On the same subject

  • Steel costs for sixth patrol vessel could be steeper

    November 12, 2018 | Local, Naval

    Steel costs for sixth patrol vessel could be steeper

    Andrea Gunn (agunn@herald.ca) Ongoing steel and aluminum tariffs between the United States and Canada will not drive up costs for the first five Arctic and Offshore Patrol Ships, but could contribute to the final price tag for the sixth, the Department of National Defence says. There have been tariffs in place on imports of Canadian steel and aluminum to the U.S. of 25 per cent and 10 per cent respectively since the end of May. In response, Canada implemented its own dollar-for-dollar duties on steel and aluminum being imported from the U.S. Both the American tariffs and Canadian countermeasures remain in place, even with a new tentative agreement to replace NAFTA. On Tuesday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau confirmed the signing of the new trilateral trade deal was not contingent on the lifting of those tariffs. In an emailed statement, Department of National Defence spokesperson Ashley Lemire said these tariffs will not have an impact on the cost of the first five Arctic and Offshore Patrol Ships (AOPS) being built by Irving Shipbuilding as part of the National Shipbuilding Strategy. Lemire said most, if not all, of the steel has already been purchased for these vessels and none of it comes from the U.S. “As part of its contract with the Government of Canada, Irving Shipbuilding Inc. is responsible for the procurement of steel used for the construction of the Arctic and Offshore Patrol Ships,” Lemire said in an email. “Irving procured the majority of steel from a foreign supplier who sourced it from Europe and, to a lesser extent, from China. A small amount of steel was procured in Canada.” Lemire said for the sixth AOPS, which the government confirmed plans to build last week, the department has planned and budgeted for the risk of increased steel and aluminum prices. Earlier this week a DND spokesperson said buying a sixth AOPS will increase the cost of the $2.3 billion project by about $810 million. Of that, $250 million is set aside for “adjustments” — things like labour rates, inflation, and exchange rates. Lemire said any additional steel costs will come from that $250 million fund. David Perry, senior analyst with the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, said the materials needed to build a navy vessel are so specialized that it's not uncommon for governments to do advanced purchases “There's a limited supply; you can't just go and call it up at the last minute kind of thing,” he said. Perry said in the case of the AOPS, having a separate fund set aside for potential cost increases — rather than paying the company a higher contract price to assume all the liability for changes in commodity or labour prices — will likely save taxpayers money if costs do go up. Ian Lee, associate professor at Carleton University's Sprott School of Business told The Chronicle Herald the federal government is lucky to have avoided any major increases with the AOPS. But, Lee said, if the tariffs remain in place, they are likely to impact future builds either directly or indirectly. “It's not going to affect the (AOPS) program but it's still a burden on the economy it's going to be passed on through the cost of doing business,” he said. This is perhaps concerning given the most expensive build of the National Shipbuilding Strategy — the Canadian Surface Combatant — is on the horizon. But how much that project would be impacted if tariffs remain in place is anybody's guess, Lee said. “Historically governments have been very, very involved in the shipbuilding industry with subsidies, and offsets and that sort of thing, so it's hard to predict how it might affect future builds,” he said. “It's not a normal competitive market like the stock market or most commodities.” That said, Lee said there will likely be a big push on the federal government's part to get the tariffs sorted ahead of the upcoming election. “Generally speaking when you look at the trade agreements that have been signed in the last 10 or 20 years whether it was the original NAFTA, CETA or the TPP, one of the first things and most important things you do is reduce or eliminate tariffs,” he said, “I think it's going to make it more difficult for Mr. Trudeau and his government to defend this in the fall 2019 election, that's why I think they're going to be working assiduously to try and remove them.” https://www.thechronicleherald.ca/news/local/steel-costs-for-sixth-patrol-vessel-could-be-steeper-257534/

  • Le stratagème du ministre Harjit Sajjan pour dégoter des respirateurs

    April 23, 2020 | Local, Security, Other Defence

    Le stratagème du ministre Harjit Sajjan pour dégoter des respirateurs

    (Ottawa) Le ministre de la Défense Harjit Sajjan a pu déjouer les velléités protectionnistes de l'administration Trump et obtenir 200 respirateurs destinés au Canada qui étaient retenus à Boston gr'ce aux liens qu'il a pu établir avec le Pentagone au cours des cinq dernières années. Publié le 21 avril 2020 à 4h00 Selon des informations obtenues par La Presse, les respirateurs en question sur lesquels les autorités canadiennes voulaient mettre la main ne devaient plus quitter le territoire américain à la suite de la décision du président des États-Unis Donald Trump d'invoquer le Defence Production Act (DPA), une loi qui remonte à la guerre de Corée et qui permet à l'administration d'imposer des conditions aux manufacturiers américains, par exemple le type de produits qu'ils fabriquent en priorité, et d'en limiter les exportations. Le président Trump a récemment invoqué cette loi pour empêcher la société américaine 3M d'exporter des masques N95 vers le Canada et des pays d'Amérique latine. Cette décision, qui a soulevé l'ire des autorités canadiennes, et en particulier du premier ministre de l'Ontario Doug Ford, a toutefois été partiellement infirmée une semaine plus tard, et l'entreprise a pu reprendre ses exportations vers le Canada. En coulisses, le ministre Sajjan et ses conseillers ont pu contourner les obstacles érigés par le président américain afin d'obtenir les 200 respirateurs flambants neufs en demandant aux Forces armées canadiennes de procéder à leur achat. « Le ministre et son équipe ont persuadé le Pentagone de les envoyer au Canada. On leur a dit qu'il fallait que la commande soit faite par les Forces armées canadiennes et le Pentagone, en raison des alliances militaires existantes, avait l'autorisation de procéder à l'envoi des respirateurs », a expliqué une source gouvernementale. La Presse a accordé l'anonymat à cette source parce qu'elle n'avait pas l'autorisation de discuter publiquement de ce dossier. « C'est tout de même remarquable ce qui a été fait dans ce dossier. [...] C'est d'autant plus vrai que les relations canado-américaines représentent tout un défi en raison de la crise et que les choses risquent d'empirer encore au sud de la frontière », a ajouté cette source digne de foi. D'un commun accord, le Canada et les États-Unis ont annoncé en fin de semaine que la frontière entre les deux pays allait demeurer fermée pour les voyages non essentiels pour une autre période de 30 jours, soit jusqu'au 21 mai. Ces 200 respirateurs font partie des quelque 400 appareils obtenus par le gouvernement fédéral qui ont été distribués aux provinces au cours des dernières semaines, selon nos informations. Il a été impossible d'obtenir le nombre de respirateurs qui a été remis à chacune des provinces par Ottawa. Au bureau du ministre Sajjan, un proche collaborateur n'a pas voulu commenter l'intervention en coulisses du ministre, préférant braquer les projecteurs sur l'ensemble du gouvernement fédéral durant la crise de la pandémie de COVID-19. « Le ministre a d'excellentes relations avec son homologue de la Défense aux États-Unis. Il s'agit d'un travail d'Équipe Canada », a notamment affirmé ce proche collaborateur, qui a requis l'anonymat. Récemment, le premier ministre Justin Trudeau a annoncé que le gouvernement fédéral avait conclu des ententes avec des entreprises canadiennes comme Thornhill Medical et CAE, entre autres, afin d'acheter 30 000 respirateurs fabriqués au Canada. À la reprise des travaux de la Chambre des communes, lundi, M. Trudeau a indiqué que l'on s'attend à ce qu'une première commande de respirateurs soit livrée en mai. M. Trudeau a d'ailleurs dû expliquer aux Communes pourquoi une agence fédérale avait jeté aux ordures quelque 2 millions de masques N95 et 440 000 gants qui se trouvaient dans un entrepôt de la Réserve nationale stratégique d'urgence (RNSU), qui a pignon sur rue à Regina, au printemps dernier, comme l'a révélé la semaine dernière une enquête de la CBC. La RNSU, qui relève du gouvernement fédéral, permet aux provinces et aux territoires d'obtenir des équipements médicaux qui s'y trouvent en cas de crise sanitaire comme une pandémie. Le premier ministre a indiqué que ces équipements étaient périmés depuis au moins cinq ans, mais il a affirmé que l'on doit revoir les protocoles d'utilisation afin de remettre ces équipements aux provinces pour les utiliser avant qu'ils atteignent la date limite d'utilisation de cinq ans. Cela devrait permettre à l'agence de renouveler son stock en quantité suffisante pour affronter les crises comme celle que l'on vit en ce moment. https://www.lapresse.ca/covid-19/202004/20/01-5270187-le-stratageme-du-ministre-harjit-sajjan-pour-degoter-des-respirateurs.php

  • Your chance to reach target buyers with clear purchasing mandates: CANSEC Labs 2022

    April 6, 2022 | Local, Aerospace, Naval, Land, C4ISR, Security

    Your chance to reach target buyers with clear purchasing mandates: CANSEC Labs 2022

All news