Back to news

November 28, 2024 | Local, Land

Joint Statement from the Chief of the Defence Staff and Office of the National Defence and Canadian Armed Forces Ombud

General Jennie Carignan, the Chief of the Defence Staff, and Robyn Hynes, Interim Ombud, are pleased to announce an exciting new collaboration between the Office of the DND/CAF Ombudsman and the Canadian Armed Forces.

https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/news/2024/11/joint-statement-from-the-chief-of-the-defence-staff-and-office-of-the-national-defence-and-canadian-armed-forces-ombud.html

On the same subject

  • Le défi de rapiécer nos vieux CF-18 jusqu’en 2028 coûtera 3 milliards et probablement beaucoup plus

    December 7, 2018 | Local, Aerospace

    Le défi de rapiécer nos vieux CF-18 jusqu’en 2028 coûtera 3 milliards et probablement beaucoup plus

    Par Stéphane Parent | francais@rcinet.ca Le gouvernement canadien de Justin Trudeau prévoit investir 3 milliards au cours de la prochaine décennie pour maintenir en service ses avions de chasse CF-18 jusqu'à l'achat de nouveaux chasseurs. La facture ne tient pas compte cependant de la mise à niveau des systèmes électroniques de ces avions qui n'ont pas été modernisés depuis 2008. Nos CF-18 auront 50 ans en 2032, l'année où le gouvernement prévoit les retirer. Leur technologie de combat accusera alors un retard de 15 ans si elle n'est pas modernisée. Croyant qu'elle allait pouvoir les remplacer en 2020, la Défense nationale canadienne n'a pas préparé de plan pour mettre à jour leur capacité de combat. Le vérificateur général du Canada, Michael Ferguson, a critiqué le gouvernement libéral, le mois dernier, en soulignant que les montants prévus pour le maintien opérationnel de la flotte ne comprenaient en fait aucune mise à niveau réelle des systèmes de combat des avions, qui n'ont pas été revus depuis 2008. Des avions capables de voler, mais pourront-ils réellement nous défendre? Des représentants de la Défense ont affirmé à un comité de la Chambre des communes, lundi après-midi, qu'ils s'attendaient à avoir une idée d'ici le mois de mai du type de mises à niveau nécessaires. Des améliorations qui, selon des analystes, coûteront des centaines de millions, voire des milliards de dollars. Selon les données de la défense nationale du printemps dernier, 22 % des postes de techniciens dans les escadrons de CF-18 à Bagotville au Québec et à Cold Lake en Alberta étaient vacants ou occupés par des techniciens peu qualifiés. Un autre défi qui attend l'armée canadienne sera de trouver une façon de remédier à la pénurie de techniciens expérimentés pour réparer et entretenir les vieux avions. Elle cherche à sous-traiter certaines t'ches de maintenance des avions de combat vieillissants CF-18. Des responsables de la Défense estiment qu'ils sauront le printemps prochain quels capteurs, armes et autres mises à niveau seront nécessaires pour que les avions de combat CF-18 vieillissants du pays puissent encore effectuer des missions de combat jusqu'à leur remplacement. De moins en moins d'avions et de plus en plus d'argent Pas moins de 19 chasseurs F-18 se sont écrasés depuis l'acquisition de cette flotte de 138 appareils par l'Aviation royale canadienne au tout début des années 1980 au prix de 5 milliards de dollars. Dix pilotes ont perdu la vie dans ces écrasements. Seuls 76 des 138 CF-18 achetés dans les années 80 sont toujours en service. Craignant de ne plus être en mesure de maintenir le nombre de chasseurs qui doivent être prêts à décoller en tout temps comme l'exige son alliance militaire avec les États-Unis au sein du NORAD, le Canada a décidé l'an dernier d'acheter 18 avions de chasse usagés CF-18 de l'aviation militaire australienne. En septembre, les États-Unis ont finalement donné le feu vert à l'achat par le Canada des CF-18 australiens usagés. L'approbation des Américains était nécessaire parce que ces avions ont été construits aux États-Unis avec la technologie américaine. Si toutes les négociations et approbations se déroulent comme prévu, les avions commenceraient à arriver au Canada en 2019. De nouveaux avions attendus depuis près de 10 ans d'ici 7 ans et plus Les CF-18 mis en service dans les années 1980 devaient être retirés d'ici 2020, mais leur remplacement s'est transformé en une longue saga. Il y a six ans, le gouvernement conservateur de Stephen Harper a abandonné dans la controverse son projet d'acheter des avions de chasse américains F-35 sans appel d'offres pour remplacer cette flotte vieillissante. Le gouvernement Trudeau, qui avait par la suite décidé d'acheter 18 avions Super Hornet à Boeing également sans appel d'offres, a annulé cet achat en 2017 dans la foulée du conflit commercial entre Boeing et Bombardier. Il a donc fini par se tourner vers l'Australie pour acheter des avions de chasse provisoires et a lancé un appel d'offres pour acheter 88 avions de chasse permanents. On s'attend maintenant à ce qu'il faille de cinq à sept ans pour réunir un nombre suffisant de pilotes et de techniciens à temps pour commencer à faire la transition des CF-18 vers de nouveaux avions ultramodernes. La livraison du premier avion est prévue en 2025, et celle du dernier en 2031. http://www.rcinet.ca/fr/2018/12/04/modernisation-vieux-cf-18-canada-verificateurs-avion-chasse-australien/

  • Bold move backfires as Canada declines Naval Group-Fincantieri frigate offering

    December 8, 2017 | Local, Naval

    Bold move backfires as Canada declines Naval Group-Fincantieri frigate offering

    PARIS, ROME, and VICTORIA, British Columbia — Naval Group and Fincantieri are out of the running to compete in Canada's program to acquire a fleet of new surface combatants after they failed to submit a bid through the formal process and instead sent a proposal directly to the Canadian government. The companies had offered Canada a proposal to construct 15 ships at Irving Shipbuilding in Nova Scotia for a fixed cost. But the proposal circumvented the government's procurement procedure, which required formal bids to be submitted to Irving by Nov. 30. Naval Group and Fincantieri did not follow that requirement. The Canadian government announced Tuesday it had rejected the proposal from the two firms. “The submission of an unsolicited proposal at the final hour undermines the fair and competitive nature of this procurement suggesting a sole source contracting arrangement,” Public Services and Procurement Canada, or PSPC, which is overseeing the procurement, said in a statement. “Acceptance of such a proposal would break faith with the bidders who invested time and effort to participate in the competitive process, put at risk the Government's ability to properly equip the Royal Canadian Navy and would establish a harmful precedent for future competitive procurements.” Canada's decision effectively removes Naval Group and Fincantieri from taking part in the program since the companies never submitted a formal bid, government officials noted. Public Services and Procurement Canada declined to say how many bids were received for the Canadian Surface Combatant project. Besides a bid from the BAE-Lockheed Martin Canada consortium for the Type 26 frigate, only two other companies have acknowledged bidding. A team led by Alion Canada is offering the Dutch De Zeven Provinciën-class air-defense and command frigate. The Spanish shipyard, Navantia, has submitted a bid based on its F-105 frigate design. Canada expects to make a decision on the winning bid sometime in 2018. The program to build 15 new warships is estimated to be worth CAN$62 billion (U.S. $49 billion). The program was originally estimated to cost CAN$26 billion, but that figure has been revised a number of times and has been climbing steadily over the last several years. Fincantieri and Naval Group had hoped the proposal of a fixed price tag of about CAN$30 billion for a new fleet might sway the Liberal government, as it would eliminate much of the risk and would offer a proven warship design. The proposal had the backing of the French and Italian governments and was made directly to Canadian Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan. Naval Group and Fincantieri took note Canada had rejected their joint bid that filed outside the competition for a frigate fleet, but they were still ready to offer the design of their warship for local assembly, the companies said Wednesday. “We acknowledge the position expressed by the Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) not to take into consideration the offers submitted outside the process of the Canadian Surface Combatant program (CSC) Request For Proposal (RFP),” Naval Group and Fincantieri said. “Nevertheless, Naval Group and Fincantieri remain at the disposal of Canada to contribute to the modernization of Canadian forces with a sea-proven warship, currently in service with the French and Italian Navies, that would minimize the scheduling gaps for design and construction of all the ships in Canada and maximize value for money,” the companies said. Asked on Wednesday how Fincantieri and Naval Group will react to Canada's rejection, Fincantieri CEO Giuseppe Bono declined to give a direct response but did suggest there might be room for compromise. “We don't want to take risks,” he said, adding: “we need to see what makes sense” and “the customer is always right.” In addition, he said the design of the ship offered to Canada would be more similar to the Italian version than the French. “We have made a joint offer of a FREMM, which is close to the Italian version if only because Italy has an anti-submarine warfare version,” he said. The terms of the Canadian competition posed a problem as the tender required bidders to hand over intellectual property and there was danger it might end up in the wrong hands, an analyst said. “The problem from the outset is how the Liberals have set the competition,” said Robbin Laird, of consultancy International Communications and Strategic Assessments, based in Paris and the Washington, D.C., area. “One would think that with ... the U.S. and Australia launching new frigates as well as the French and Italians working on a new frigate program, the approach would be to leverage the allied global recapitalization effort,” he added. “Yet what the Canadian government has focused upon is simply forcing competitors to provide intellectual property to their own Canadian shipyard without any real protection against leakage of that technology to China or to other competitors.” In their direct bid to the Canadian government, the European partners offered a speedy start of shipbuilding in 2019, which they said would help sustain local jobs. A frigate generally takes about four years to build. The Franco-Italian frigate was offered with the Thales Sea Fire radar, a multifunction digital system, an industry executive said. Naval Group offered its Senit combat management system, with Fincantieri delivering the ship design. Thales developed the flat-paneled Sea Fire for the FTI, an intermediate frigate ordered for the French Navy and aimed mainly for export markets. Anti-submarine systems included Thales Captas hull-mounted and towed array sonars, specialist website Mer et Marine reported. The weapons could include a 127mm gun and two vertical launchers for surface-to-air missiles, which would likely be Aster but would also be available for American weapons. https://www.defensenews.com/industry/2017/12/06/bold-move-backfires-as-canada-declines-naval-group-fincantieri-frigate-offering/

  • Subject:  New challenges launched from the NATO Innovation Hub to fight COVID-19

    April 3, 2020 | Local, Aerospace, Naval, Land, C4ISR, Security

    Subject: New challenges launched from the NATO Innovation Hub to fight COVID-19

    As part of a coordinated effort to fight COVID-19, IDEaS is informing innovators about COVID-19 related challenges being issued by the NATO Innovation Hub. The NATO Innovation Hub is a community where experts from around the world collaborate to tackle NATO challenges and design solutions. In response to the pandemic, the Innovation Hub has issued two challenges. 1. Identifying false information and mitigate its effects; and 2. Delivering supply to isolated individuals and teams. These challenges are open to all. If interested, you can submit your solutions here: https://www.innovationhub-act.org/challenge-intro If you have questions, you can contact them directly by email: sactinnovationhub@act.nato.int

All news