Back to news

September 18, 2019 | International, Aerospace, Naval, Land, C4ISR, Security

Defence Secretary keynote speech at DSEi 2019

Defence Secretary outlines global influence of UK defence in keynote speech at the 2019 Defence and Security Equipment International.

I don't intend to speak for too long. The kit, not the speeches, are the real reason you're here today.

But if you're going to take home one message from the UK, it is this - we are global. We are alive to the global threats. And we have the world class industrial base and the game-changing capability to deal with the danger.

To prove the point I want to briefly dwell on the success of our Defence and security sector. It is a story seldom told.

This is a sector that brings in sales worth more than £19bn to our economy. A sector that is the second largest in the world – accounting for 19 per cent of global export value over the past decade.

A sector that according to reports supports around 260,000 jobs directly and indirectly in the UK.

What's more our Defence is the spine of our nation, spreading wealth across our entire union from the South of England to the North of Scotland. Our average expenditure with UK industry equated to £290 spent on the security of every person living in the UK.

There is always the challenge of selling to wider Government what we in Defence do. It is true that what our Armed Forces do is often over a distant horizon, or below the deep ocean.

But the reality is, what we do, makes an enormous global difference. Defence is often upstream focusing on keeping danger away from these shores.

On this day, 18 years ago, terrorists hijacked American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175, and flew them into the twin towers in New York.

For many it was the first awakening of the full horror of global terrorism. But it was because of our investment in Defence, because of the strength of our capability, that the UK was able to fight alongside our allies. And because of key procurement decisions we were able to operate side-by-side across the globe.

Look at how we've been taking the fight to Daesh in the past few years with our Typhoons, attacking the terrorists both day and night with power and precision, while our cyber capability eroded their communication channels and exposed the so-called caliphate for the sham it always was.

Our expertise was on display last year too when Russia deployed nerve agent on British streets to murder British civilians. We immediately called on our internationally renowned medical and scientific community at DSTL in Porton Down.

Their chemical and biological know-how identified the deadly use of novichok. But you do not grow the corporate knowledge of the UK's defence capability overnight. Which is why when that knowledge is channelled into the British forces' next generation needs, we provide world leading products to go alongside.

In more recent times, when the arteries of worldwide trade have been threatened by hostile Iranian state action in the Strait of Hormuz, we've enlisted the global capacity of our Type 23s and Type 45s, built on shipyards on the Clyde, to defence the red ensign.

And, with Hurricane Dorian ravaging the Caribbean, we were the first nation to send support, dispatching RFA Mounts Bay, equipped with amphibious vehicles and helicopters to work alongside international aid colleagues, providing residents in the Bahamas with much needed humanitarian help.

A stark demonstration of Britain's ability to match global capability with global presence to deal with any eventuality. But that what's so remarkable about the British defence industry, is that we have strength and depth.

We don't just make the big platforms. We machine engineer the parts. We shape the electronic systems behind them. We devise the niche capability and we innovate with the very best. For example, here today we have remarkable companies like Wiltshire-based companies Avon Protection, a world leader in Respiratory Protective Equipment (RPE).

Not only does it supply the UK and its NATO allies with kit, it is also the primary supplier of Chemical Biological, Radiological and Nuclear respiratory equipment to the United States Department of Defense Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force and Special Operations.

Then we have dynamic firms like Reaction Engines in Oxfordshire currently building a hypersonic engine capable of reaching orbit. And my Lancashire constituents would never forgive me if I didn't mention their contribution, building the aft fuselage, horizontal and vertical tails of every F-35 built as well as on the tried and test Typhoon.

We're surrounded by brilliant examples of British expertise in the hall today. As the UK's new Defence Secretary we do however need to break the traditional cycle where our appetite didn't match our stomachs which led to the annual hollowing out of capability and plans, which ultimately lets down the men and women of our Armed Forces.

We have to invest in our global defence force if we want to make a global difference and last week's Spending Round announcements signalled our intent.

For those who didn't catch the headlines it's worth summarising. UK Defence secured an extra £2.2 billion. An increase of 2.6 per cent above inflation between 2019/20 and 2020/21.

Well above government's commitment to grow the defence budget by 0.5% above inflation every year of this Parliament. It means that by 2020/2021 this year's £39 billion defence budget will rise to over £41 billion by 2020/21, the first time it's topped the £40bn mark.

It means that we'll continue to exceed our NATO commitment to spend 2 per cent of GDP on Defence. It means that the UK remains the largest NATO defence spender in Europe by far.

Above all, it means more money to keep investing in key capabilities such as offensive cyber, nuclear deterrent and shipbuilding. Defence will always continue to require sustained investment for the long-term.

But we're already making sure we put our money where our mouth is. Look at what's happening across the domains.

Let's start with shipping. Today 11 major warships are in build or on contract not to mention our next-generation of nuclear deterrent submarines.

We're looking to build Type 31 frigates and we're building Type 26 global combat ships, whose designs have won plaudits and contracts in Australia and Canada.

And with HMS Queen Elizabeth off to Westlant, our carrier strike is back after an absence of a decade, giving us the unparalleled ability to project power and influence across the seven seas.

We're also investing in cutting-edge Artificial Intelligence. Yesterday on board the HMS Argyll I witnessed the first exercise involving our Maritime Autonomy Surface Testbed (MAST).

Effectively this is the next generation underwater drone swarm, operating autonomously but collectively, to scout ahead of a ship and spot trouble in advance.

Switching from sea to land, our Army is upgrading not only our Challenger 2 and Warrior vehicles but bringing in multi-role armoured vehicles to operate alongside AJAX, with a main gate decision due at the end of October.

Together these vehicles will deliver the Army's new transformational Strike Force, contributing to NATO Readiness and creating as well as sustaining more than a thousand jobs.

Companies like Qioptiq, less than 100 miles from my own constituency are involved in the sighting systems. They are here exhibiting today.

As a former infantryman, I'm delighted we're doing more to lighten the load of our soldiers in the field.

MOD has been working with BAE Systems to develop lighter ammunition, replacing the brass in the cartridge cases with stainless steel or titanium, reducing the load our troops have to carry by up to 26 percent along with the costs of transporting rounds to the front line.

We're applying the same blue-skies thinking to the air domain as well. Last year at Gatwick and Heathrow we saw the peril drone technology poses to our airspace.

Today I can announce that, from early next year, the RAF will be working with Leonardo on a three-year programme, looking at how to detect, track, identify and defeat rogue drones as this technology continues to evolve.

And I'm pleased that we've signed a statement of intent with Italy who, alongside Sweden, will support joint working on the Tempest and our Future Combat Air Strategy.

I'm looking forward to working with Italian and Swedish counterparts, as well as others, to put the Tempest programme into hyper-drive and take Global Britain into the stratosphere.

Fifty years ago Britain put its first satellite, Skynet1, in space. Today we're having to deal with increasing threats to satellite-based navigation. So the need for robust communications has never been more vital.

That's why we're developing Skynet6 which will give our forces unparalleled capacity to talk to each other in any hostile environment.

And I can announce the launch of a new competition for an industry partner to operate and manage the Ground Stations, infrastructure and technology involved in this programme.

And just as we upgrade our capability in space we're also bolstering our strength in cyber too.

The nature of warfare is changing. In an Information Age the challenge is not just to prepare for contingency but to operate and engage constantly.

That means we need to be able not just to repel threats from our online frontline but the ability to strike out. We need to gather, co-ordinate and exploit the information we receive across all the domains much more effectively.

That's why we're initiating a major programme of change, managing our people differently, adjusting the way we run our operations and maintaining our long-standing association of working with GCHQ in this area so we can be more agile in tackling dangers and grasping opportunities.

But we know that you only produce great kit if you have great partnerships between policy makers and product makers. That's why I want to see a step-change in our partnership with industry.

We're determined to go out of our way to help you giving you the certainty and confidence you need to create great capability. So as well as investing we're planning for the future.

A few days ago we published our Defence Technology Framework. It will help concentrate our collective minds by assessing the technologies needed to drive our defence modernisation and deliver battle-winning technologies.

Now you need to help us. So we're helping you. But we expect something in return We need industry to show willing. Willingness to strengthen your competitiveness, willingness to benefit our own procurements, willingness to seize those export opportunities.

The Army's newly announced industrial engagement framework marks the start of that journey. But the end point will see a fundamental shift in mindset from the regional to the global.

Britain has long been a nation of makers, from the steam engine to the turbo jet, from Watt to Whittle.

We remain a world leading exporter and as DSEI shows, the potential of our Defence sector is limitless.

But seizing our opportunities, realising our potential, demands we think big. It demands we all have a vision.

My vision for Defence is one that returns pride to the places in which things are made.

A vision where our kit is wanted not simply because it carries a stamp saying made in Britain. But because it carries a stamp that proudly proclaims made in Barrow or made in Birkenhead.

It's a vision where every part of the country is famed for its particular brand of expertise from air to autonomy. So we might be living through challenging times but if you're looking for solutions you've come to the right place.

Tomorrow is here today.

I hope you leave with the message that UK Defence is on the up, that our Defence industrial base remains the spine of our nation, allowing our forces to be the tip of our spear for Global Britain.

https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/defence-secretary-keynote-speech-at-dsei-2019

On the same subject

  • Army Futures Command drafting next operating concept

    July 31, 2023 | International, C4ISR, Security, Other Defence

    Army Futures Command drafting next operating concept

    What's after Multidomain Operations? Army Futures Command is beginning to work on an operational concept for 2040 and beyond.

  • US State Dept OKs potential sale of Abrams main battle tanks to Romania for estimated $2.53 billion  - Pentagon | Reuters

    November 9, 2023 | International, Land

    US State Dept OKs potential sale of Abrams main battle tanks to Romania for estimated $2.53 billion - Pentagon | Reuters

    The U.S. State Department has approved a potential sale of Abrams main battle tanks to Romania for an estimated $2.53 billion, the Pentagon said on Thursday.

  • ‘Lightning in her veins’: How Katie Arrington is convincing defense contractors to love cybersecurity

    June 26, 2020 | International, C4ISR, Security

    ‘Lightning in her veins’: How Katie Arrington is convincing defense contractors to love cybersecurity

    Andrew Eversden Katie Arrington's job is to win the room. She's at San Francisco's Moscone Center on Feb. 26 at the RSA Conference, one of the largest cybersecurity events. In the last year, she's spoken at more than 100 events, which may explain why today, she's sick. Her voice, typically loud and energetic, is raspy and shaky. Arrington's title is clunky: chief information security officer for acquisition in the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. Translated, she's leading the Pentagon's effort to add new cybersecurity requirements for the 300,000 companies that do business with the Pentagon. Her challenge, almost every day, is to convince industry it should embrace the Defense Department's new auditing standards, which are aimed at improving cybersecurity. In this room, she sits next to a top American executive from the Chinese technology company Huawei to discuss — rather, argue about — supply chain security, alongside a Harvard lecturer and think tank fellow. In the months leading up to the panel, the U.S. government and Huawei fought in court over a provision in the fiscal 2019 defense policy bill that bans federal agencies from buying the company's equipment. The audience is shoulder to shoulder, no seat spared. “This session promises to be one of the most interesting, colorful and perhaps debate[d] topic,” the moderator begins. Arrington, however, doesn't understand what all the “hoopla” is about. “Really, honestly, it's not that big of a deal,” she told C4ISRNET hours before the session. The Department of Defense has made the RSA Conference a greater priority in recent years as it tries to heal a strained relationship with Silicon Valley. Outside the Capital Beltway, the cybersecurity community often views the department's mission with skepticism or that of an overly strict parent. In contrast, defense leaders see themselves as offering lucrative contracts with reasonable sets of security requirements for winning the work, which can range from the acquisition of military weapons systems and basic IT tools to mowing grass at military bases. But after years of suppliers with weak cybersecurity tormenting the department, it's now Arrington's job to find a solution. The conventional wisdom among defense officials is that cybersecurity problems can't be solved — they can only be mitigated. “Supply chain security is an insurmountably hard problem,” said fellow panelist Bruce Schneier, the Harvard lecturer and well-known technology guru. So Arrington flies all over the country, speaking to room after room of defense contractors and trying to convince them, somehow, that they must impose tighter cybersecurity controls. And if they don't? The Pentagon could lose out on state-of-the-art technology to protect national security secrets. And if industry doesn't care about that? Then businesses will lose out on profitable DoD contracts. The underdog Arrington has spent much of the last two and a half years shuffling in and out of rooms, working to persuade audiences she can solve pressing community problems. In 2018, it was a different cause: politics. Her problem then was Rep. Mark Sanford. Sanford, she said, spent too much time on cable news fighting with President Donald Trump and not enough time on local issues. So Arrington challenged him in a Republican primary. Sanford, the former South Carolina governor of “hiking the Appalachian Trail” fame, had never lost an election. But Arrington, endorsed by the president, pulled off the unexpected, knocking off the political powerhouse by about 2,500 votes and adding her name to South Carolina political folklore. “If somebody tells her she can't do something, she ignores that,” said Andrew Boucher, a consultant for Arrington's congressional campaign. “She ignores the naysayers. Now, Arrington, 49, is leading a robust overhaul of the Pentagon's cybersecurity requirements for contractors, known as the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification, or CMMC. The department is pushing the reform at a breakneck pace, at least as far as Defense Department reforms go. Her team has issued several drafts and the final standards in the past year. “She's got lightning in her veins,” said retired Adm. James Stavridis, the former supreme allied commander of NATO and a member of the board of directors for PreVeil, an email encryption company. “She's smart, and she's smart enough to know she doesn't know everything.” That lightning kept CMMC on pace for its final standards rollout in January, an aggressive timeline that one trade association representative characterized as a “herculean effort.” This summer, CMMC is scheduled to be included in requests for information for upcoming Pentagon contracts. If all goes according to plan, CMMC would mitigate several cybersecurity issues that plague the DoD supply chain, and the government would have a mechanism to verify contractors' cybersecurity claims. The guidance recognizes that security differs from business to business while allowing the government insight into companies' cyber posture before awarding contracts. The problem now is a system where companies can self-assess their cyber defenses. Arrington describes it this way: “Everybody thinks when they walk out of the room in the morning, when they walk away from the mirror, they look great, [but] when you put the mirror up and you say, ‘Yeah, nope' — you didn't draw your eyebrows on right today.” Through these changes, the department has to retain a fair and competitive acquisition process. It's a massive overhaul that needs a charismatic and competent leader to succeed, said David Berteau, president and CEO of the Professional Services Council, a trade organization that represents more than 400 government contractors. “Very little important change gets done without a vocal, capable champion present all the way through,” he said. That's Arrington. Experts estimate that China steals hundreds of billions of dollars worth of American intellectual property annually, including military technology. The federal government's concern with Huawei is that its presence could allow the Chinese government to access the feds' data. Chinese actors have continuously breached Navy contractors, as the Wall Street Journal reported in 2018. In addition, China accounts for 90 percent of the U.S. Justice Department's economic espionage cases as well as two-thirds of its trade secrets cases, according to a 2019 Congressional Research Service report. Pentagon officials see the success of CMMC as critical “because of the ongoing and escalating threat of cybersecurity challenges,” said Berteau, who also worked for six defense secretaries. “It has real consequences for America, above and beyond the consequences for a particular contract or a particular program.” But leaders in the defense industry still have questions. Company executives wonder what level of certification they will need, a centerpiece of CMMC that will affect competitiveness. Business leaders also don't know when they need to get the certifications. Others still have questions about reimbursement for “allowable costs” for compliance, or don't understand how subcontractors can recover compliance costs, if at all. Though some industry members have criticized the Pentagon for the rapid speed at which CMMC has proceeded, others acknowledge it is years overdue. For each day CMMC isn't part of solicitations, the Defense Department is losing out on implementing tighter cybersecurity controls until contracts expire, the argument goes. And Arrington is quick to mention the standards need to be in RFPs this fall. “Our adversaries ... their whole job is to have us not exist. The easiest way to do that has been through our supply chain,” she said on a January podcast. “It's the easiest way to get access to us.” ‘Everybody has a superpower' Tensions rise on the RSA Conference panel after Arrington explains why the Defense Department must stay away from risky technology that may allow access into DoD networks through backdoors. Why, she questions, would the federal government use hardware made by a company with close ties to the Chinese government — the same government that's plotting economic domination, trampling over human rights and looking to spread communism? But isn't it true there are several other countries that can install backdoors and launch virtual attacks, responds Huawei's Andy Purdy, implying the United States has that capability as well? “That's ridiculous!” Arrington says, with her arms outstretched to her sides. “The bottom line is we're a democracy, we're different!” In the last 18 months, Arrington's earned a reputation for her candor with the defense-industrial base, a community of vendors accustomed to dry presentations on programs from other senior DoD officials. She responds to criticism on LinkedIn. She's direct with contractors, once telling them to chant: “We all are going to get breached.” Then there's the origin story of the acronym that became shorthand for her program. “It was a glass of wine on a Friday night, and that's how you got ‘C-M-M-C,' ” Arrington jokingly said Jan. 28 at the law firm Holland and Knight. “Really, unique, huh? Yeah, I went cray-cray on the acronym.” But joking aside, Arrington knows the government contracting process can be cumbersome. She reminds audiences that she came up in industry and understands. “Ladies and gentlemen, we're a ‘we,' ” Arrington said in June last year, as if it were an applause line on the campaign trail. Her approach, she said, is part of a paradigm shift that defense contractors must adopt. Accepting there's a risk of a breach will lead to stronger cyber defenses. To get this done will require a web of industry relationships. Arrington knows this. “Everybody has a superpower,” she said in an interview, and hers is collaboration. Sources in industry agreed, telling C4ISRNET that Arrington and her team's success thus far is due to their engagement with small businesses, prime contractors and trade associations. “It's collaboration! That's what the human condition is about. What we can do together is far more impactful than what we'll ever do on our own,” Arrington said. Driven to serve Twenty-eight minutes into the RSA session, the prickly nature of the panel prompts the moderator to quip: “I'm glad we're at least expressing how we feel here.” Huawei's Purdy is passionately arguing that all bad technology should be removed from the supply chain, when Arrington cuts him off. He shuts his eyes momentarily and takes a deep breath. She continues until Harvard's Schneier says that “5G's lost, and our only hope now is to try to secure 6G.” He then adds: “I'm rooting for you, but I'm not optimistic.” Arrington — again finding herself on the defensive — interrupts the moderator to pointedly ask Schneier who he's really rooting for. He responds by saying he hopes Arrington can build a Huawei-free 5G network. “Why would I have to build a 5G network? When did the Department of Defense ever build a network?” Arrington asks, snapping her head back to look at the packed audience, her eyebrow furrowed on a face of sarcastic confusion. The quip earns laughter from the crowd, a sign her humor and wit are working to her advantage. Arrington “fell in love” with cybersecurity when she worked at the defense giant Booz Allen Hamilton. She's fascinated by the power and interconnectedness of technology. Cyber, she said, is like fire: It can provide benefits such as warmth or help with cooking. But handled improperly, it will burn you. Similarly, poor cyber hygiene can destroy everything a victim is connected to, including national security secrets. Or, as she said on a January podcast, “When Al Gore created the internet, he did not realize what he was doing.” She's also long been attracted to solving problems in public life; even President Jimmy Carter encouraged her at five years old to find solutions to problems. And there are plenty of problems to solve in local politics. So in 2016 she turned politician, winning a seat in the South Carolina House of Representatives. That was a “great training ground” that prepared her to wrestle with contractors' concerns. “Your job is to listen to all the disparate pieces and work on the best solution set for all,” she said. Her foray into the South Carolina political scene was brief — just two years — before she launched her bid for Congress. Ten days after she beat Sanford in the Republican primary, however, Arrington and a friend were hit head on by a drunk driver. They were taken to the hospital with life-threatening injuries. She was bleeding to death. Her back was fractured. Several ribs were broken. A main artery in her legs partially collapsed. Doctors had to remove part of her colon and small intestine. She spent two weeks in the hospital. When Boucher visited, she wrote a note — unable to speak due to the tubes down her throat — telling him: “Two weeks and I will be right back at it.” He joked to her that finally he could tell her what to do without her talking back. With the hand that wasn't strapped down, she flipped him off. After a few weeks of recovery, she was in “tremendous” pain that limited how much time she could spend campaigning, Boucher said. Arrington spent weeks in a wheelchair, then used a cane. But toward the end of that summer, she helped pack and deliver sandbags as the area prepared for a hurricane. For Arrington, the wreck gave her a new perspective. “Even when you think you are at your worst, the sun will rise and you can make it better the following day,” Arrington said in an interview. “I mean, you don't go through what I went through with my car accident and getting that awareness of ‘tomorrow will be OK, like, I'm alive.' ” She went on to lose the election. But the week after the congressional race concluded, both candidates left for Washington, D.C., on the same day, with Arrington cryptically telling the Post and Courier she was “going to see some groups of people.” Later, she joined the Defense Department. “I teared up walking into the Pentagon the first day like, ‘OK, I'm really going to make a change now. I'm really going to be part of the solution,' ” she said. Unfinished business On stage at RSA, Chinese IP theft is a primary point of discussion. Arrington's CMMC effort is designed to defend against that, but the panelists continue to poke at the government's decision to ban Huawei. At one point the moderator asks Arrington: What if Huawei were to go through the CMMC process and earn certification? Then could its hardware be used in DoD networks? “It's against the law. Why are you asking a silly question?” Arrington quips, staring unflinchingly back at the laughing moderator, the crowd cheering in the background. “This is a moot point. The law is done.” But now Schneier wants to deal in hypotheticals: If it was legal, would it be reasonable to allow Huawei into the process? Before answering no, she says: “Even Huawei can admit [that] their programmers are where Microsoft was 25 years ago, right?” Purdy looks forward, tongue literally in cheek, tugging awkwardly at his black dress shirt. As CMMC becomes part of every acquisition, Arrington wants to move ahead with tools that highlight cybersecurity gaps in the supply chain, and she expects international allies to adopt some standards. Her goal for CMMC isn't for it to serve as checklist, but rather as a living document that can evolve to address new threats. Eighteen months into the job, Arrington is struggling with at least two other problems. The first is there aren't sinks to rinse out coffee mugs in the Pentagon. “We have to wash our coffee cups in the bathroom, it's not a big deal,” she said. “But if I could figure something out like a little kitchenette, that would be nice.” The second is her work-life balance, she said. When she says she'll meet with industry, she means it. For more than a year Arrington's been the public face of CMMC. That leaves a third problem lingering as a presidential election approaches: What happens to Arrington, and CMMC, if there's a new administration next year? For now, her trip to San Francisco is just another packed bag, another flight and another opportunity to evangelize to an audience of cybersecurity professionals. By now, the panelists have targeted her on several occasions, and at the end, the moderator says: “Katie, looks like they're, like, beating up on you here.” “We don't mean to, though,” Schneier interjects. “You're, like, on the good side.” “I am on the good side,” Arrington replies. The audience applauds. She wants to add another comment, but the clapping cuts her off. She waits. Even Purdy gives her a few claps. “I came here today because sometimes you just gotta say the truth and you just gotta hold the line.” She's won over this room, and she did it while making the case for more stringent requirements that put additional burdens on companies. Her voice was nearly gone, but another room, another meeting of industry leaders awaits. For Arrington, another set of problems is always waiting. https://www.c4isrnet.com/cyber/2020/06/25/lightning-in-her-veins-how-katie-arrington-is-convincing-defense-contractors-to-love-cybersecurity/

All news