October 16, 2020 | International, Aerospace

A&D Industry And The Chinese Conundrum: Get In Or Out?

Western airlines are begging for more government aid, the International Air Transport Association does not expect the industry to see positive cash flow before 2022, and credit agency analysts forecast depressed aerospace and defense business activity for up to another 1.5 years.

Meanwhile, data continues to portray China as the lone bright spot in the aviation world. By August, Chinese domestic flights had recovered to about 90% of 2019 levels. “China has been effectively controlling the spread of COVID-19, limiting cases to less than 100 a day. Combined with a large domestic market, the recovery in commercial aviation is expected to outpace the rest of the world,” Jefferies analysts Sheila Kahyaoglu and Greg Konrad noted in late September.

“Right now, really, the two areas of traffic that are close to normal are domestic China and the roughly 2,000 all-cargo aircraft out there today,” echoes AeroDynamic Advisory Managing Director Kevin Michaels. Otherwise, “it's a bloodbath, and we're all aware of that,” he told an Aviation Week SpeedNews conference in September.

For aerospace and defense (A&D) suppliers, the dichotomy sets up a critical decision: Should suppliers and servicers run toward China—or run away?

It is easy to understand why they are debating the question. Long before COVID-19 gutted commercial air traffic and kick-started what is expected to be the greatest makeover of aircraft manufacturing and the maintenance, repair and overhaul industries since the dawn of the jet age, there were already good reasons to debate being in China. Topping the list was the Trump administration's trade war with the world's second-largest economy. Ongoing questions lingered about intellectual property rights and the specter of inadvertently creating future competitors in Avic, Comac and other Chinese companies.

Proponents of reshoring industry to the U.S.—or “nearshoring” to Canada or Mexico—are certainly touting potential opportunity. “The logical thing is to fill longer-term and COVID-revealed supply chain gaps,” Reshoring Initiative President Harry Moser told an Aerospace and Defense Forum audience on Oct. 6.

Others agree that conditions are ripe for reshoring, not least because automation and advanced technologies that replace humans can offset North American costs. Also, A&D has been deemed a critical part of U.S. infrastructure. And Chinese unit labor costs have risen fivefold in recent decades. This summer, site-selection consultant Duff & Phelps identified A&D as a top candidate for moving to America (see chart).

But siting decisions are complex, and supply chain moves are even more so. Not only is commercial aviation looking strongest in China now and in the near future, but it could accelerate a long-expected toppling of the U.S. as the world's leading aviation market, possibly as soon as 2025. Increasingly, Beijing officials talk about relying on domestic supply instead of imports. Indeed, the “Sleeping Giant” could boast a future estimated aviation market value of more than $1 trillion, according to Yi Zhang, general manager of OCO Global China.

That catches suppliers' attention. Zhang spoke in June to a well-attended webinar hosted by Washington state economic development officials about aerospace opportunities in China, and that was a month before Boeing revealed it was even thinking about scrapping 787 production in Puget Sound, Washington.

Now China's opportunities beckon brighter with no snapback in Western air traffic.

Still, in his Sept. 24 report titled “Caveat Venditor,” or “seller beware,” Vertical Research Partners analyst Rob Stallard cautions Western A&D companies against rushing toward China. “We see the Chinese government leveraging its position of relative post-COVID strength in coming years, and no doubt aerospace will see some of the fallout,” Stallard says. “As the biggest show in town, we would expect to see more quid pro quo in China's relationship with what is still very much a Western aerospace industry. Price, supply chain and technology transfer could be on the table, as could politics.

“Aviation could conceivably suffer collateral damage as part of a broader trade war,” Stallard writes. “So while investors will probably see good news in a Chinese-led aero recovery, we would be looking for any strings attached.”

https://aviationweek.com/aerospace/manufacturing-supply-chain/ad-industry-chinese-conundrum-get-or-out

On the same subject

April 16, 2020 | International, Aerospace

Le Boeing F-15 QA réalise son premier vol
Boeing a effectué avec succès le premier vol du chasseur F-15QA, version la plus avancée du F-15 développée pour l'armée de l'air qatarie (QEAF). L'avion a démontré ses capacités au cours d'un vol de 90 minutes. L'appareil a décollé et a atterri de l'aéroport international Lambert à Saint-Louis. Cure de jouvence pour le F-15 Enfin une bonne nouvelle pour Boeing, même si le F-15 n'est plus vraiment ce que l'on peut appeler un appareil de première fraîcheur. L'avionneur de Saint Louis (ex division McDonnell Douglas en conséquence) a effectué avec succès le premier vol du chasseur F-15QA, version la plus avancée du F-15 développée pour l'armée de l'air qatarie (QEAF). L'avion a démontré ses capacités au cours d'un vol de 90 minutes. L'appareil a décollé et a atterri de l'aéroport international Lambert à Saint-Louis. « Nous sommes très fiers de cet accomplissement et nous nous réjouissons avec beaucoup d'enthousiasme des succès continus de ce programme », a déclaré le colonel Ahmed Al Mansoori, commandant de l'escadre F-15 de la QEAF. « Ce premier vol réussi est une étape importante qui rapproche nos escadrons d'un pas vers le pilotage de cet avion au-dessus du ciel du Qatar. » 9G L'équipe d'essais en vol de Boeing, dirigée par le pilote d'essai en chef Matt Giese, a mis en place une liste de vérification précise de la mission pour tester les capacités de l'avion multirôle. L'avion a démontré sa maniabilité lors de son décollage vertical en tirant neuf G, soit neuf fois la force de la gravité terrestre, au cours de ses manœuvres subséquentes dans l'espace aérien d'essai. Les vérifications des systèmes tels que l'avionique et le radar ont également été couronnées de succès. Une équipe d'essai qui surveillait les données en temps réel a confirmé que l'avion s'était comporté comme prévu. 6,2 MD$ pour 36 avions Le département américain de la Défense a attribué à Boeing un contrat de 6,2 milliards de dollars en 2017 pour la fabrication de 36 avions de chasse F-15 pour la QEAF. Boeing commencera à livrer des avions au client en 2021. De plus, Boeing a obtenu un contrat de vente militaire à l'étranger de l'US Air Force en 2019 pour les équipages F-15QA et la formation à la maintenance pour la QEAF. Le F-15QA apporte à ses exploitants des technologies modernes telles que les commandes de vol CDVE (commandes de vol électriques), cockpit numérique, capteurs modernisés, radars et des capacités de guerre électronique. L'augmentation de la fiabilité, de la durabilité et de la maintenance permet aux opérateurs de défense de rester en avance sur les menaces actuelles et en évolution. Vers le F-15EX pour l'USAF Gr'ce à des investissements dans la plate-forme F-15QA et un partenariat avec l'US Air Force, Boeing se prépare maintenant à construire une variante nationale du chasseur avancé, le F-15EX. Huit appareils devraient être assemblés pour commencer, les plans futurs prévoient jusqu'à 144 appareils. https://www.air-cosmos.com/article/le-boeing-f-15-qa-ralise-son-premier-vol-22929
January 14, 2021 | International, Aerospace, Naval, Land, C4ISR, Security

Did your state receive the most defense dollars? We’ve got the numbers.
By: Aaron Mehta WASHINGTON — California topped the list of states receiving defense dollars in 2019, a period in which overall Pentagon contracts and payroll spending in the 50 states and Washington, D.C., totaled $550.9 billion, the Department of Defense revealed Wednesday. Of that total, $403.9 billion (73 percent) were from contracts, with the remaining $146.9 billion (27 percent) tied up in DoD personnel salaries. Overall, defense spending represented 2.5 percent of the country's gross domestic product, according to a department statement accompanying the data. The numbers, released annually, are generally included in the case made by pro-defense lawmakers and Pentagon supporters for the benefits of a large defense budget. They come as defense spending is expected to be flat, with some progressives in Congress pushing President-elect Joe Biden to cut defense funding to support social programs instead. “The report compiled by the Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation can be a great tool to state and local officials,” Ellen Lord, undersecretary for acquisition and sustainment, said in a statement. “All of our work is aimed at supporting the National Defense Strategy and this report is key as we look to continue defense reform and modernization efforts.” The top 10 states are: California: $66.2 billion Virginia: $60.3 billion Texas: $54.8 billion Florida: $29.8 billion Maryland: $26.1 billion Connecticut: $19.7 billion Pennsylvania: $18.1 billion Washington: $17.8 billion Alabama: $16.0 billion Massachusetts: $15.8 billion California, Virginia and Texas historically rank among the top states in defense dollars. California is home to a significant aerospace presence, with all the major players in that sector bringing in large chunks of cash for their in-state work. Virginia's top firm was the major shipbuilder Huntington Ingalls Industries, but the state largely brought in funding for being the corporate home for many major defense firms — and for their lobbying efforts. And 41 percent of Texas' total comes from Lockheed Martin contracts; the company's Fort Worth facilities produce the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, among other materiel. The top 10 overall contractors for the year were: Lockheed Martin: $45.6 billion Boeing: $25.7 billion Northrop Grumman: $19.5 billion General Dynamics: $18.6 billion Raytheon: $15.7 billion United Technologies: $10.3 billion BAE Systems: $7.3 billion Huntington Ingalls Industries: $6.7 billion Humana: $6.7 billion L3 Technologies: $4.9 billion https://www.defensenews.com/industry/2021/01/13/california-top-state-recipient-of-defense-dollars
September 9, 2020 | International, Aerospace

UK Defense Chief Hints Review May OK Future Combat Air System
Tony Osborne September 08, 2020 LONDON—British Defense Secretary Ben Wallace has hinted that the UK's future combat air system initiative, Tempest, could be one of the winners in the government's Integrated Review of defense and foreign policy. Writing in the Times newspaper on Sept. 6, Wallace said the UK needed products that could be exported to help the country afford the equipment the UK requires for its armed forces. He also cited the UK's aerospace industry as being at the forefront of those efforts. “Our aerospace industry isn't just a domestic concern,” Wallace wrote, noting that aerospace exports amount to £34 billion ($50.1 billion). The UK's Tempest has already secured Italy and Sweden as partners, with Saab expected to make investments in an FCAS technology center worth £50 million. “The defense and security sector is a breeding ground for science, invention and world-beating technology, as the bedrock of hundreds of thousands of jobs in the UK,” Wallace wrote. While the review will re-examine the UK's foreign policy and defense operations, Wallace says it will also “recognize the importance of research, skills and the aerospace industry. Without them, our forces could risk losing the battle-winning advantage we will need in this evermore insecure and anxious world.” Wallace said he recognized a need to reform and modernize the country's armed forces to meet new threats. He said the UK had a “sentimental attachment” to a static armored-centric force that was anchored in Europe, possibly hinting at reports that the UK may do away with its fleet of Main Battle Tanks and instead focus on light armored and airborne capabilities. Reports have also suggested that the UK may not buy its full complement of 138 Lockheed Martin F-35s, and potentially buy as few as 70 airframes over the program's life. “If we are to truly play our role as ‘Global Britain,' we must be more capable in new domains, enabling us to be active in more theaters,” Wallace wrote. Wallace also confirmed that the government would publish a Defense Industrial Strategy alongside the Integrated Review, which is expected in November. https://aviationweek.com/special-topics/air-dominance/uk-defense-chief-hints-review-may-ok-future-combat-air-system

All news